Claremont School Board — January 13, 2021

Remote budget hearing and board meeting summary generated from the Claremont Community Television recording and its speaker-attributed transcript; no agenda, notice or minutes for this meeting are posted in the district's online shares. The board held its public hearing on a $37,785,406 budget for 2021–22 (a proposed tax rate of $24.53 against $23.93) with no public speakers and without a default budget, which the business administrator had not finished calculating; sent the budget unanimously to the annual meeting; voted 6–1 to replace the in-person deliberative session with the virtual procedure of HB 1129; and, facing the district's first in-school COVID cluster and 27 staff out, set a re-evaluation of remote learning for January 27. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (SAU 6): public hearing on the fiscal 2021–22 budget, followed by a board meeting
Date
Wednesday, January 13, 2021
Start time
Not stated in any available record. The chair opens the public hearing at 0:01:01 and closes it at 0:21:26, then opens the board meeting with the pledge. The adjournment roll call begins at 2:10:00; the recording runs 2:10:51.
Location
Remote (video conference). The chair speaks from a home connection ("when the phone rings. I lose my internet", 0:00:00); the clerk "got knocked out of zoom" (2:00:34); telephone callers are told to press star six (0:20:27). No meeting room is named.
Recording
Cablecast: School Board Budget Meeting of 1/13/21 (2:10:51, from just before the hearing opens to the adjournment roll call)
Minutes
None located in the district's public shares: neither Drive share reaches back before July 2022 (MAP.md, checked 9/26/26). At the next meeting, on January 27, the chair said "So we had no minutes the previous meeting" (show 11216; see the January 27 page).
Board composition
All seven members answer the opening roll (0:22:47): Heather Whitney, Rebecca Zullo, Jason Benware, Rob Lovett Jr., Michael Petrin, Carolyn Towle and chair Frank Sprague. The clerk says the terms of Zullo, Benware and Whitney expire in March (2:08:04).

Participants

Everyone in the record, as named in the dialogue CSV. No agenda or minutes are available to confirm spellings; spellings follow the project roster, and the transcript's renderings are given where they differ. Hover over (or Tab to) a clipped entry for the full text.
NameRoleParticipation
Frank SpragueChairOpened and closed the budget hearing; moved the adoption of the HB 1129 procedure (1:01:47) and seconded Whitney's re-evaluation motion; switched to roll calls when he began a voice vote (0:24:20); returned to citizens' comments after the decision (2:02:08). Rendered Frank. Greg. in the roll.
Heather WhitneyBoard memberAsked how the cluster was determined (1:15:46) and pressed for a firm return-to-school metric: "I'm not comfortable voting on a date." (1:20:20). Moved to re-evaluate the COVID impact matrix, which passed (1:59:07). Rendered Hello, Whitney, As a Whitney.
Jason BenwareBoard memberMoved the $37,785,406 budget to the deliberative session (0:26:41). Spoke and voted against the virtual procedure ("I'm definitely not the support of a mobile deliberative session.", 0:45:12). Asked about keeping elementary schools open (1:37:42) and moved to adjourn. Rendered Jason Benwell, Jason. Ben!.
Michael PetrinBoard memberMoved the amended agenda (0:24:05) and seconded the HB 1129 motion; had audio trouble on a school Chromebook (1:37:16); moved to follow the superintendent's recommendation, then withdrew in favor of Whitney's motion (1:55:28, 1:56:50). Rendered Mike patron, Mike Peterson.
Carolyn TowleBoard memberSeconded the budget motion (0:26:53); asked what would happen if an in-person session filled up (0:45:47); offered help with the logistics (0:57:20). Rendered Carolyn Tall, Carolyn. Cole.
Rebecca ZulloBoard memberUrged the board to keep following the approved matrix and pressed on inequity for remote cohort C students (1:42:42 to 1:49:22). Her remarks are split word by word across many rows in the dialogue file.
Rob Lovett Jr.Board memberSeconded the agenda (0:24:11); pointed out that Sullivan County had "the highest infection rate and the highest positive test rate currently" (1:27:02). His earlier question about the Covid Act Now metric at 1:24:46 is merged into a row labeled for the chair.
Richard SeamanAssistant superintendent for finance, SAU 6Presented the budget at the hearing (0:01:32 to 0:18:23); said the default budget was not yet finished (0:17:19); gave the motion figure (0:26:17); asked whether drive-up voting could be split by ward (0:50:57).
Ben NesterSpecial education director, SAU 6Explained the Brave program and the elementary autism program run with the New England Center for Children (0:05:06).
Michael TempestaSuperintendent, SAU 6Presented COVID data and the first official in-school cluster, and asked "the board to continue remote for another two weeks" (1:11:48).
Donna MagoonAssistant Superintendent, SAU 6Reported contact-tracing numbers: "I have put out on quarantine or isolation, 80 people." (1:14:22), including 27 staff; explained how a cluster is determined; argued for following the approved matrix (1:30:37). Her cluster in the dialogue file is mixed; one roll-call Yes after Whitney's name is labeled for her (see footer).
Matt UptonSchool district attorneyExplained the HB 1129 procedure: "I was the the person who came up with the process that ultimately became House Bill 1129." (0:29:54, 0:29:59). Answered questions on amendments, drive-up voting and board members attending remotely.
Tracy PopeSchool district moderatorAttended for the HB 1129 item; asked how amendments would work (0:40:16); favored virtual sessions and drive-through voting, citing county case numbers and her own health, and said she would not attend an in-person session (0:49:04, 0:54:25). Left after the vote (1:06:50).
Mary WoodmanSchool district clerk and recording secretaryCalled every roll; announced the January 20 to 28 filing period for the three expiring seats (2:08:04).
Jeff SmallDirector of Technology, SAU 6Ran the slides and watched the queue for public comment during the hearing (0:19:37).
Melissa LewisPrincipal, Disnard ElementaryDescribed moving remote students at her school to more synchronous learning (1:50:31). Title from the project roster.
Prescott HerzogStudent representativeDescribed his experience of remote high school classes (1:52:53). First name on the recording; surname from the project roster.
Ray (surname not stated)Citizens' comments (ward not stated)Spoke at 2:02:31, after the vote, on other schools playing winter sports; refers to "my team".
Lisa (surname not stated)Citizens' comments; third-grade teacher in the districtSpoke at 2:04:41, after the vote: elementary children "need to be in school".
UnidentifiedVarious5 rows (0.7%): the pledge chorus, a merged row at 0:52:10, two spotter lines and a closing thanks.

Order of business (reconstructed)

No agenda for this meeting is posted in any district share, so this list is reconstructed from the chair's transitions. The chair refers to "an agenda in front of us" and adds two items to it (0:23:22), so a written agenda existed. Hover over (or Tab to) a clipped entry for the full text.

Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:01:01Public hearing: fiscal 2021–22 budgetPresentation by Seaman; the default budget not yet calculated (0:17:19). Public comment invited at 0:18:55 with a three-minute limit; none offered. Hearing closed at 0:21:26.
0:21:26Pledge; roll callAll seven present (0:22:47 to 0:23:22).
0:23:22Agenda amended and approvedSuperintendent's report and the remote-learning decision added. Petrin moves, Lovett seconds; the chair starts a voice vote, stops ("Oh, I can't do it that way. Can you roll call, please?"), and the roll is unanimous (0:24:49).
0:25:18Fiscal 2021–22 budget to the deliberative sessionBenware: "I move that we move the proposed 2021 2022 budget of $37,785,406 to the deliberative session." (0:26:41) Towle seconds. Roll call from 0:28:07: seven Yes.
0:28:47House Bill 1129 (conduct of the annual meeting)Presentation by attorney Upton; discussion. Sprague moves "that we, implement House Bill 1129 for our deliberative session process in the 2122 school year" (1:01:47); Petrin seconds. Roll call from 1:05:38: Benware No, six Yes; "That's only one against it passed." (1:06:45)
1:07:52Superintendent's report (added)COVID data, the first in-school cluster, the recommendation to stay remote two more weeks; contact-tracing report by Magoon.
1:15:40Remote learning decision (added)Petrin's motion to follow the recommendation (second Zullo) withdrawn (1:56:50). Whitney: "I would like to make a motion to reevaluate the Covid impact matrix, determine which schools will be safe to open in person on February 1st." (1:59:07) Sprague seconds; roll call unanimous (2:00:43). See flag 4.
2:02:08Citizens' comments (taken late)"I neglected to do, citizens comments in the beginning of this meeting". Two speakers, Ray and Lisa. See flag 5.
2:07:03AdjournmentBenware moves; the clerk announces the filing period; roll call from 2:10:00.

Discussion timeline

Chronological, from the dialogue CSV. Times are the start of the cited row, taken from the CSV's own second count. Hover over (or Tab to) a clipped cell for the full entry.

TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:40Who runs the meetingThe chair: "Tracy, do you run this meeting or do I run this meeting?" The moderator: "This is your meeting". The chair: "So we have a quorum." and opens the hearing (0:01:01).
0:02:13Budget totals"the grand total for the budget last year was 38,000,202 651 before warrant articles. We're recommending a budget now of 37785 400 oh 6 or 417,000 reduction." With last year's $1.13 million of warrant articles, "a reduction of 1.55 million, which was expected because of the utilization of one time money that we received from the state last year." (0:02:40)
0:03:13Special education programsElementary out-of-district costs down as "we're able to keep our kiddos in our school district" (0:03:44); Bluff up "$342,000" for two programs (0:04:12). Nester: the Brave program and the elementary autism program with the New England Center for Children; "Our intention is to end our contract with them at the end of this year and continue to operate that program in-house, at a reduced rate." (0:05:39)
0:06:50Placements and the Pride program"we did have two students that moved into our district over this past summer and had to be out placed, to to specific programs, which cost the districts about $500,000 for those two students." A new autism program at Sugar River to bring back "three students that are currently out placing at about 60 to 60 to 70 to $80,000 per student" (0:07:40).
0:08:51One-time money and position reductions"we had a one time, $1.5 million capital improvements in for last year." The budget committee "asked that we tried to target a increase in the in the tax rate, keep it below $1." Retirements will not be refilled (0:09:24); "We have not identified exactly how those position reductions will be allocated across the buildings, which is why it's showing here is a lump number" (0:09:49).
0:11:12RevenuesDistrict assessment up "$541,000"; fund balance to reduce taxes "estimated at $400,000"; "$400,000 from the Special Ed Expendable Trust" (0:12:11); adequacy grants down "$3.3 million", of which about $2.9 million was one-time (0:12:50); catastrophic aid estimated at "600 zero" (0:14:10); Medicaid estimate back to 500,000 (0:14:35).
0:16:01Tax rate"a local tax rate of $22.71", the statewide education property tax "at that $1.83" (0:16:28); "We come out with $24.53 as compared to last year's at 2393." (0:16:58)
0:17:19The default budget is not ready"Now, I know we have on the agenda to also speak to the to the default budget. I haven't quite concluded the calculation of the default budget, but given that we have no real increases from last year to this year, we're not doing big investments in people or other areas. I anticipate that the default budget will be comparable to the recommended and proposed budget". "I should have that finalized over the course of tomorrow or the day after." (0:18:23)HIGH
0:18:55Public comment at the hearing"we'll be taking questions from anyone in the community who has questions" with "comments would be limited to three minutes". Small: "I'm currently not seeing anything from." (0:19:37); "Anybody with the phone just star six to unmute." (0:20:27) The hearing is closed at 0:21:26.
0:24:20From voice vote to roll call"All those in favor? Oh, I can't do it that way. Can you roll call, please? I can't wait till this is over."POSITIVE
0:26:41Budget sent to the annual meetingMotion as above; the chair: "that number is all includes all of the revenue, not just the money to be raised by taxpayers." Seaman: "The actual general fund only number is 343 20." (0:27:28) Benware: "So that includes what we call pass through money." Roll call: seven Yes (0:28:07).HIGH
0:29:59How HB 1129 worksUpton: "the concept behind this is to replace the. Deliberative session with two virtual sessions conducted by the board." After the information session, the public sends "concerns, requested amendments, comments" (0:30:56); at the second virtual meeting "the board members actually act on behalf of the voters in amending the budget". "The first question that will be asked, of the voters is if they approve the process" (0:33:35). "There is a requirement that seven days prior to the informational session that you do provide, a written mailing to all registered voters." (0:35:58) "you have no ability to remove something from the warrant once it's posted." but an article can be zeroed (0:39:05, 0:39:29).OBSERVATION
0:40:16Who amendsThe moderator: "Now, how would amendments work?" Upton: "All they can do is request an amendment." The moderator: "the school board is the governing board. So it's ultimately the school board's decision on how to act on all of the comments that they get from the public." (0:41:20) Upton: "the school board is doing is acting as agents for the voters" (0:41:52).OBSERVATION
0:43:47Benware objects"I don't I don't like the idea of, of a virtual deliberative session for a couple of reasons. The first being the organic nature of a deliberative session. People show up to deliberate." "Once they these these ideas are all sent in, there is no deliberation any longer." (0:44:18) "That auditorium has plenty of room for people to distance."OBSERVATION
0:47:01An in-person session with overflow?The chair proposes the gym as overflow and warns "there will be people there who, if we don't have a traditional deliberative session, are going to disapprove of the process just because of that's who they are" (0:47:51). Whitney: "I personally would prefer the in-person deliberative session" (0:48:39).
0:49:04The moderator's view"in Sullivan County, in the month from November to December, our numbers rose from 95 to 240 confirmed cases." "I am in favor of doing House Bill 1129 and having the drive through and having the virtual meetings." (0:50:09) "That's just my opinion as the moderator." (0:50:54) She later says she would not attend an in-person session for health reasons (0:54:25).
0:50:57Voting by wardSeaman asks whether drive-up voting could be held at the three ward locations; Upton: "I think I think you you probably could do it." (0:51:43) March 9 is a professional-development day (0:56:31). Upton: turnout in districts using the process "has been about 30% higher" (0:56:35).
0:57:52The board must decideThe moderator: "the governing body, which is the school board, has the vote on whether you want to do this remote following House Bill 1129 or if you want to have it as we normally have it." Upton: "We have actually no warrants on the on no articles other than the actual main budget this year" (0:59:09). On a failed process vote, a speaker labeled Upton in the dialogue file asks whether the fallback would be last year's budget, "highly bloated because of of state money" (0:59:54); the chair: "in this case, it'd be substantially more." (1:01:06)OBSERVATION
1:01:47HB 1129 adopted 6–1"I move that we, implement House Bill 1129 for our deliberative session process in the 2122 school year." Petrin (at 1:04:29): "I think that matters because we're making the decisions." Roll call: Benware No, no. (1:05:59); "That's only one against it passed." (1:06:45) Benware will move the main budget, "that's our only that's our only article" (1:07:21).POSITIVE
1:08:08First in-school cluster"So we had 99 cases in Claremont" (1:08:34); "we had 22 staff who either had Covid or were quarantined" (1:10:28); "We have our first official cluster and again, that is transmission between people from inside the school." (1:10:57) "I would be asking the board to continue remote for another two weeks till we come back." (1:11:48)OBSERVATION
1:13:21Contact tracingMagoon: "I have put out on quarantine or isolation, 80 people." "We're talking 27 staff members in that and that 80 people." (1:14:48) On the cluster: "we have three positive in one location." (1:15:59) Benware relays a community member's question and confirms three in-school transmissions (1:17:12).
1:18:33What metric brings students back?Whitney: "I can't in good faith, you know, vote cart block on a on a February 1st hold date" (1:20:20); "what are we going to accept as a board, as the metric to return to school?" (1:22:50). The superintendent: a single number "it's capricious. So it's, it's the convergence of all those things." (1:29:16) Magoon: "according to the matrix that was approved by, that was brought to us by the school board and approved by the school board, we should be in remote" (1:31:09). Seaman: "Numbers are only as good as they are." (1:34:12)OBSERVATION
1:37:42Elementary schools first?Benware: "has it been any conversation or thought as to trying to keep the elementary school in session or, instead of just all or nothing?" The superintendent: "it's a big consideration." (1:39:08)
1:42:42Cohort C studentsZullo: "So for me personally, I feel comfortable following the matrix." (1:44:06) "It's definitely, learning for cohort C students, I feel has definitely, not been up to par." (1:45:54) "what is happening at the elementary level is not equitable amongst all students at this point." (1:48:24) Principal Lewis: remote families at her school will get "synchronous learning in the areas of reading, writing, math, science, and social studies" (1:52:04).
1:52:53A student's viewPrescott Herzog: "at least at the high school, the synchronous learning has been great." "remote learning so far has been better than expected" (1:53:15).
1:55:28Motions: return date or re-evaluationPetrin moves "to follow, Mr. Tempesta. Recommendations of return to school on February 1st", Zullo seconds. Whitney proposes instead to "revisit, what where we are with our Covid impact matrix on the 27th and individually evaluated individually evaluate which schools could come back February 1st" (1:55:54). Petrin withdraws (1:56:50); after debate over the 22nd or the 27th, Whitney moves "to reevaluate the Covid impact matrix, determine which schools will be safe to open in person on February 1st." (1:59:07) Roll call, all Yes (2:00:43).OBSERVATION
2:01:22Winter sports stay suspendedMagoon: "Sports is still a no." ... "That wasn't in the motion. I just want to make sure". Benware: "If we're not safe enough to be in school with kids, how can you possibly say we're safe enough to have them bumping into each other?" (2:01:42)OBSERVATION
2:02:08Citizens' comments, after the decisionThe chair: "I neglected to do, citizens comments in the beginning of this meeting, and I wanted to, since we've ceased our deliberations on that." Ray: "There's only three, I think schools in the state that are not having sports in the winter completely." (2:03:02) Magoon: "I got one kid that test positive on a basketball team. The whole team is done." (2:03:58) Lisa, a third-grade teacher: "They need to know how to read and and write and do their math." (2:05:30)OBSERVATION
2:08:04Expiring termsThe clerk: the terms of "Rebecca, Jason and Heather" expire, with filing "anytime between January 20th to the 28th". On a newspaper notice listing two seats: "Heather was was appointed for a two year term and that one expires also this year." (2:09:23)

Items flagged for review

Flags are a reviewer's aid generated by comparing the meeting against the state law in force on January 13, 2021, including the Governor's COVID-19 emergency orders then in effect. They are not findings of violation, and nothing here is legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; where no verified rule applies, the flag says so and is recorded as an observation. Six flags follow, ordered by severity.

HIGH The budget hearing was held without the default budget, which the statute requires to be presented at the first hearing

Claremont votes on its budget by official ballot under RSA 40:13. Paragraph XI(a) of that section provides: "The default budget shall be disclosed and presented for questions and discussion at the first budget hearing held pursuant to RSA 32:5 or RSA 197:6." At this hearing the assistant superintendent for finance said at 0:17:19: "I haven't quite concluded the calculation of the default budget", offered only that he anticipated it "will be comparable", and said at 0:18:23 that he would have it "finalized over the course of tomorrow or the day after". The public comment period that followed (0:18:55) therefore had no default figure to ask about, and the board sent the budget to the annual meeting the same night (0:26:41). The figure, $37,762,398, first appears on the record on February 1, when the recording opens with the corrected document being circulated minutes before the session (see the February 1 page, flag 3). Two points narrow the consequence without changing the rule: the default proved only about $23,000 below the proposed budget, and a hearing on January 13 was itself timely under RSA 40:13, II-a(c) ("on or before the third Tuesday in January", January 19 in 2021), which also displaces RSA 32:5's 25-day spacing for official-ballot districts. The flag would fall away only if an earlier budget hearing disclosed the default; nothing in the record suggests one did.

Sources: RSA 40:13, II-a(c) and XI(a) (2019 codification; source note ends 2019, 192:2, so this is the text in force in 2021): hearing deadline; default budget disclosed and presented at the first budget hearing.

POSITIVE Every vote in this remote meeting was taken by roll call, and the chair corrected himself when he began a voice vote

The board met by video conference. When any member participates other than in person, RSA 91-A:2, III(e) as it read in 2021 required that "All votes taken during such a meeting shall be by roll call vote." Emergency Order #12 waived only the physical-quorum requirement of III(b), on public-access conditions. At 0:24:20 the chair began "All those in favor?" and stopped: "Oh, I can't do it that way. Can you roll call, please?" The clerk then called the roll on the agenda, the budget (0:28:07), the HB 1129 procedure (1:05:38), the re-evaluation motion (2:00:43) and the adjournment (2:10:00), so the split vote on HB 1129 is on the record by name. Two weeks later the same board adopted an agenda by voice vote when the clerk was offline (see the January 27 page, flag 1).

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, III(b), (e) (2019 codification; source note ends 2018, 244:1): roll-call votes when a member participates remotely; Emergency Order #12 (March 23, 2020, under Executive Order 2020-04).

OBSERVATION The board replaced the voters' deliberative session with a virtual procedure in which only the board could amend, over one member's objection

By 6–1 on a roll call (1:01:47 to 1:06:45) the board adopted the optional annual-meeting procedure of 2020 N.H. Laws ch. 8 (HB 1129). As the district's attorney explained it, voters could send comments and "request an amendment" (0:40:48), but at the second virtual session "the board members actually act on behalf of the voters in amending the budget" (0:30:56). NHMA's guidance on the enacted law confirms that the governing body "shall discuss, debate, and be permitted to amend the posted warrant" and that the first ballot question asks voters to approve the procedure. Under RSA 40:13, IV the first session would otherwise have been the voters' own "explanation, discussion, and debate of each warrant article". Benware's objection is on the record: "Once they these these ideas are all sent in, there is no deliberation any longer." (0:44:18). The case for the change is also on the record: county cases had risen from 95 to 240 in a month (0:49:04), and the moderator said she could not attend in person. The law offered the choice and the board made it openly, so no rule is engaged; the observation is what the choice removed. At the February 4 session no voter submission of any kind was received (see the February 4 page, flag 1). The attorney's statements that drive-up voting is "required by law" and that he originated the process are his own characterizations and were not verified.

Sources: 2020 N.H. Laws ch. 8 (HB 1129), approved July 10, 2020 (bill status; chaptered text not read); NHMA, Guidance on 2021 Annual Meeting (December 4, 2020); RSA 40:13, IV (2019 codification).

OBSERVATION The requested two-week extension of remote learning was never itself voted; the board voted only to re-evaluate, and the sports suspension continued by default

The superintendent asked "the board to continue remote for another two weeks" (1:11:48). The only motion that would have adopted that recommendation, Petrin's, was withdrawn (1:56:50). The motion that passed was to "reevaluate the Covid impact matrix, determine which schools will be safe to open in person on February 1st" (1:59:07); its date, the 27th, was settled in discussion but is not in the motion as finally worded. The assistant superintendent treated remote learning as already required by the matrix the board had approved (1:31:09), and asked afterwards whether sports remained suspended because "That wasn't in the motion." (2:01:29). The board's authority over reopening in 2021 rested on its own earlier decisions and the state's guidance rather than on any statute identified here, so no rule is engaged. For a reader the result is that the continued closure and the sports suspension have no motion of their own on the record; the January 27 meeting then voted by roll call to return (see the January 27 page).

Sources: no statutory rule identified; dialogue rows at 1:11:48, 1:56:50, 1:59:07 and 2:01:29.

OBSERVATION Citizens' comments at the board meeting were forgotten until after the decision they addressed

The hearing took public comment (0:18:55), but none was offered. The board meeting's own comment period was skipped; the chair returned to it at 2:02:08, "since we've ceased our deliberations on that", after the re-evaluation vote. Both speakers then addressed the decision just made: Ray on winter sports elsewhere and Lisa, a third-grade teacher, on young children needing to be in school. No statute required a public comment period at a New Hampshire school board meeting in 2021 (RSA 189:74 was enacted by 2022, 333:1, effective September 6, 2022), and the chair did come back to it unprompted. The observation is the order: comment that could have informed the vote came after it.

Sources: RSA 189:74 (source: 2022, 333:1, eff. Sept. 6, 2022): not in force in 2021.

OBSERVATION No hearing notice, agenda, budget handout or minutes for this meeting are online

MAP.md records that neither district Drive share holds anything before July 2022 (checked 9/26/26), so this page rests on the recording alone. Three things a reader would want cannot be checked: the posted notice of the budget hearing, which RSA 40:13, II-a(a) required by the second Tuesday in January (January 12, 2021); the handout Seaman presented; and the minutes, which RSA 91-A:2, II required to be "open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting". At the January 27 meeting the chair said "So we had no minutes the previous meeting" (show 11216), which shows only that they were not before the board two weeks later. This is the online-availability limb of the project's missing-records rule, not a finding that the documents never existed.

Sources: RSA 40:13, II-a (2019 codification); RSA 91-A:2, II (2019 codification); Input/SupportingDocuments/MAP.md section 137.

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page