Claremont School Board, February 2, 2022

Regular board meeting held at the Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center one week before the district's deliberative session. The board and a larger than usual audience discussed the proposed fiscal 2023 reductions at the tech center, the proposed reduction of the preschool to three classrooms, a school board candidate forum and the district's COVID protocols, then voted to enter a nonpublic session, where the recording ends. The page is built from the CCTV recording's dialogue transcript; no agenda, packet or minutes for this meeting were located, although later minutes show the board approved this meeting's minutes on June 15, 2022. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (Claremont School District, SAU 6)
Date
Wednesday, February 2, 2022 (the chair calls "the school board meeting of two, two, two, two to order", 0:00:17)
Start time
Scheduled time not confirmed. A member remarks that the agenda "does say the start time seven" while another says the normal time is 630 (0:01:46, 0:01:54); the posted agenda was not located. The call to order is at 0:00:17 of the recording. The board votes to enter nonpublic session at 2:04:06; the recording ends at 2:04:36, as the roll call closes, so no return to public session or adjournment is on tape.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, Claremont. Not stated in a document for this meeting; inferred from the record: speakers refer to "this building" next to the middle school (0:29:20, 0:30:25) and to the pre-K program housed in the building (1:07:48), and the April 6 and June 15, 2022 minutes give the same venue for the board's regular meetings.
Recording
Cablecast: Claremont School Board of 2/2/22 (dialogue transcript runs 2:04:36; it ends at the nonpublic roll call)
Minutes
Not located. The June 15, 2022 minutes record that the board approved "Feb. 2, 2022" minutes that night (see appendix), so minutes were written, but no copy was found in the district's public Drive shares as of 2026-10-03.
Board composition
Seven members, all answering the attendance roll (0:01:20): Frank Sprague (chair), Heather Whitney (vice chair), Steven Horsky, Joshua Lambert, Rob Lovett Jr., Michael Petrin and Nicholas Stone. Officers per the February 9, 2022 deliberative-session minutes.

Participants

Everyone heard or addressed on the recording. Member names follow the February 9, 2022 deliberative-session minutes, which list the same seven members; other spellings follow the project's 2015 to 2023 roster. No minutes of this meeting were available to check speakers against.
NameRoleParticipation
Frank SpragueChairCalls the meeting to order (0:00:17), moves and passes the agenda himself (0:02:00), opens each discussion item to the audience, and on COVID says "I think we hold the course" (1:51:35) while asking the superintendent to tell state officials the board wants "a transition to endemic planning" (1:52:27). Offers to contact Vital Communities about a candidate forum (1:39:27). Transcribed "Greg. Spread" in the roll call and "Mr. Sprog" by a commenter.
Heather WhitneyVice chairQuestions the tech-center reductions on the public's behalf (0:20:29), reads from the center's Perkins grant application (0:54:42), explains the board's tax reasoning (1:21:00) and presses for data on learning days lost to quarantine: "if 22 students are out for ten days, that's 220 days of learning lost" (1:47:18).
Steven HorskyMemberProposes a controlled-access connector from the middle school to the tech center (0:29:20), reads prepared remarks on the center's decline (0:40:47), defends a half-time director (0:58:24), and explains why he avoids answering all-board emails (1:36:17). Asks about a drop of 39 registered high school students (1:44:39). Answers to Steven in the roll call.
Michael PetrinMemberAsks what prevents an eighth-grade feeder program next year (0:32:29); questions preschool class capacity (1:13:06) and states that the district is not required to run a pre-K program (1:18:03). Moves the nonpublic session (2:03:36). Transcribed "Michael. Patron" in both roll calls.
Nicholas StoneMemberSpeaks as a 2018 Stevens graduate who took tech-center courses (0:53:43); on COVID data, "if not us, who?" (1:55:32). Identification of the 2018-graduate passage rests on the attribution report's cluster evidence (medium confidence).
Joshua LambertMemberRecognized because he "hasn't spoken tonight" (1:30:42); asks that the preschool's half-typical, half-special-education model be explained to the public (1:30:45). His answer on the nonpublic roll call is not separately audible (see flag 4).
Rob Lovett Jr.MemberAnswers the attendance roll (0:01:25); thanked by a speaker at the podium (1:26:41). No attributed speech. His answer on the nonpublic roll call is not separately audible (see flag 4).
Michael TempestaSuperintendent, SAU 6Gives his report as the frame for the discussion items: the tech-center plan (0:05:33), the summary of reductions (0:13:04), the preschool recommendation (1:05:28) and COVID data (1:40:38). The dialogue file's row at 0:03:35 begins with the chair closing citizens' comments before the superintendent speaks.
Ben NesterDirector of Special EducationJoins late and presents the preschool history from 2014-15 and the administration's recommendation to "revert back to the 1819 model, which removes one teacher and one classroom" (1:10:48). Transcribed "Mr. Nestor".
Paige (surname not stated)Pre-K coordinatorAnswers questions on sessions, related services and the Head Start arrangement (1:16:29); says the waitlist exists because "I currently have six open positions for paraprofessionals" (1:31:34) and that removing a classroom takes away "24, potentially 24 spots" (1:32:45). Transcribed Page.
Richard SeamanAssistant Superintendent for Finance, Operations and Human ResourcesOne answer, on the agency that ran an earlier candidate forum (1:37:28). Title per the February 9, 2022 minutes.
Mary WoodmanSchool board clerkCalls the roll for the nonpublic vote (2:04:06). The attendance roll at 0:01:20 is labeled Unidentified in the dialogue file.
Josh (surname not stated)Audience, Ward 3Introduced by the chair as "Joshua. Race one three" (0:49:13). Asks what student outcomes are expected "by eliminating a nurse position" and the guidance counselor (0:49:29, 0:49:52), and later about the preschool waitlist (1:31:15).
UnidentifiedAudience, Ward 2Asks for the slides to be emailed and why the director is "being cut back" if the program is growing (0:57:20, 0:58:00); asks whether the consultants are in the budget (1:03:31) and for the podium to be moved (1:03:57). Possibly more than one voice.
UnidentifiedAudience (realtor)Thanks the board and describes buyers who see school ratings online (1:25:08).
Jen GallagherAudience, Ward 2Self-identified; first says ward one, then corrects to two (1:26:36, 1:26:41). Asks "why are we cutting a classroom from the little guys?" (1:27:06), describes her own family's use of the program, and asks about high school volunteers (1:31:59).
UnidentifiedAudience, Ward 3 (mask commenter)Reads a prepared statement asking the board to revisit masks in schools (1:57:44) and closes: "masking our kids forever is not supported by most parents" (2:00:23).
Whitney SkillenAudience, Ward 2Self-identified ("Whitney Skilling", 2:00:54). Agrees with the chair on planning for the endemic phase, focusing on long-term health and learning effects (2:01:34). She won a board seat at the March 2022 election (roster).

Order of business (reconstructed)

No agenda for this meeting was located. The list below follows the chair's transitions on the recording. The chair names the four discussion items at 0:02:43: a preschool update, the Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center (SRVRTC), a school board candidate forum and COVID protocols. The superintendent presented his report item by item alongside them.

Items in the order taken up. No item was voted on except the agenda and the motion to enter nonpublic session.
Taken upItemWhat happened
0:00:17Call to order, pledge, attendance rollCalled to order "of two, two, two, two"; pledge at 0:00:39; all seven members answer the attendance roll (0:01:20).
0:01:36AgendaA member notes the agenda's printed start time (0:01:46). The chair: "Looking for a motion. I'll make a motion that we accept the agenda as presented for the discussion. All those in favor? I closed." (0:02:00). No second or tally is audible.
0:02:23Previous minutes"Previous approval. We didn't have any minutes." The chair adds "We've got several." and "Several meetings to to approve." (0:02:38, 0:02:43). No minutes approved.
0:02:43Citizens' commentsThe chair explains that under a recently passed policy citizens' comments "cannot involve one of the anything on the agenda that's a discussion or action item", with comment invited during those items instead (0:03:10). None offered; closed at 0:03:35.
0:03:35Superintendent's reportPresented as an overview tied to each discussion item; no student report (0:04:37).
0:05:33SRVRTC (tech center)Superintendent's plan for schedule alignment and an eighth-grade feeder; board questions; public comment from 0:49:13. Discussion only.
1:04:24Preschool updateHistory and the recommendation to go from four classrooms to three; public comment. Discussion only.
1:36:59School board candidate forumConsensus that the chair contact Vital Communities and NH Listens (1:39:27, 1:40:03). No vote.
1:40:03COVID protocolsData presentation, board discussion and two public comments. No change voted.
2:03:08AnnouncementDeliberative session: "Next Wednesday, 630. Snow days the 10th." at the Stevens High School auditorium (2:03:16).
2:03:36Nonpublic sessionPetrin moves "to go to nonpublic for RSA 91-A colon. Three the dismissal, promotion or" "compensation of any public employee"; an unidentified Second. (2:03:50); roll call, every audible answer Yes. (2:04:06 to 2:04:23). The recording ends here.

Discussion timeline

Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/12180 SchoolBoard020222.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording.

Chronological topics. Quotations are as transcribed; bracketed words are corrections.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:01:46Agenda start timeA member: "It does say the start time seven." Another: "There are normal type of 630." The chair: "I'm so used to I never look at the times." (0:02:00).OBS
0:02:23No minutes to approve"We didn't have any minutes." The chair notes several meetings' minutes are outstanding (0:02:43). The June 15, 2022 minutes later record approval of the January 5, January 18, February 2 and February 16, 2022 minutes in one sitting.MED
0:03:10Citizens' comment policy"So we've recently passed a policy that citizens comments cannot involve one of the anything on the agenda that's a discussion or action item." The chair says the public will have an opportunity during those items.POS
0:05:33Tech center planThe superintendent ties the plan to the strategic plan's "time on learning" goals, points to Newport's single campus and shared staff (0:07:04), and proposes aligning middle and high school schedules with the center. He says "1,520% of our students who graduate from Stevens graduate with some type of college credit" (0:12:01) [likely 15 to 20 percent; the transcript fuses the figures], and that in 2020 "we had 11 qualifying scores, but we had 125 students get actual college credit" (0:16:09).
0:13:04The reductionsSummary of what was agreed with the budget subcommittee: "the director position to part time", "to cut the vacant nurse position", the 0.6 guidance position and the vacant accounting position, aiming near a 12% overhead figure (0:13:55).MED
0:20:29Board questions on the cutsWhitney asks for the overhead chart to be explained "for the public" and says vacant budgeted positions are being removed (0:21:24). The superintendent: the nurse and guidance positions were vacant; the accounting courses "did not run" for lack of enrollment (0:23:12). Asked whether the new schedule costs more, "We might need a couple" more sections (0:26:54). Sprague: teachers would teach five sections a year instead of six (0:27:06).
0:29:20Connector ideaHorsky: "Would there be a way to create a controlled access point from the middle school to this building with that money?" The superintendent: "It's a tough sell because it's not a direct Covid loss type of thing." (0:30:37).
0:32:29Feeder programPetrin asks what prevents an eighth-grade feeder program next year: "I'm kind of looking for some action." (0:33:45). The superintendent says the full schedule will be budgeted for the following year, with parts for the fall if possible (0:36:32).
0:37:03Region 10 agreementSeat allocations: "We get six, Newport get six" (0:37:48). Sprague: "So it isn't the region ten that prevents us from having competing programing. It's the state." (0:39:22). No statute was cited for either point.
0:40:47Horsky's prepared remarksThe center fell from eight programs to four, which he attributes to enrollment and scheduling rather than cuts; "It's hard to justify, as a board member, a program that has half as many courses as Newport at a full time position" (0:43:58).
0:45:38Pre-K space in the tech centerWhitney asks whether the pre-K program encroaches on space meant for career and technical education: "I've got it in writing that it's an issue." (0:46:58). The superintendent recounts the building's history (0:46:14, 0:47:03).
0:49:13Public: nurse and guidanceJosh (Ward 3) asks "what are the improved student outcomes that students should expect by eliminating a nurse position." The superintendent cites a long-standing stipend arrangement for nurse coverage and few significant injuries (0:51:03, 0:51:34). Stone: "I graduated in 2018" and found the guidance counselors supportive (0:53:43).
0:54:42Perkins applicationWhitney reads the plan to hire consultants: "We will contract with a consultant to help develop and implement a program". Josh: "That would be in the future and hasn't been done." Sprague: "It's it's dated May of 2020." (0:55:53, 0:55:58). Whitney later: "It's being funded by the Perkins grant." (1:03:42).
0:57:20Public: half-time directorA Ward 2 resident asks why the director is "being cut back" if enrollment is rising (0:58:00). Horsky: "we don't have the ability to utilize a full time position." (0:58:52). Whitney favors pairing the director role with adult education (1:01:52). A request to move the podium so the audience can see and hear (1:03:57).
1:04:42Preschool recommendationThe superintendent reports 63 students and recommends keeping the typical-peer model with three teachers: "There's too much risk programmatically and financially" in a separate special-education model (1:05:28). Nester's history: a state-partnered improvement plan for 2014 to 2019 after state review of outcome data (1:07:48); "revert back to the 1819 model, which removes one teacher and one classroom" (1:10:48); "we don't want to invite New Hampshire oversight again or risk another audit" (1:11:46).OBS
1:13:06Capacity and legal dutyNester: "that's the New Hampshire rules. One teacher, one pair of 12 kids, something like that." Petrin: "your max would be 72." (1:13:32). Petrin: "We we as a district do not have to run a pre-K program." Paige: "So, from a legal standpoint, yes. But from a professional standpoint" it is a hard no (1:18:03, 1:18:24). Horsky: "we're cutting a program. Really, we're right sizing it." (1:19:28).OBS
1:21:00Taxes and wagesWhitney: property-tax increases fall hardest on "a 78 year old widow on a fixed income"; "we've had a reduction of $200,000 a year that was taken away by the state" (1:23:56). Figures are the speaker's; no source was presented.
1:26:34Public: preschoolJen Gallagher: "why are we cutting a classroom from the little guys?" (1:27:06). Paige: the waitlist exists because "I currently have six open positions for paraprofessionals" (1:31:34); losing a classroom takes away "24, potentially 24 spots" (1:32:45). Petrin: "the waitlist is for the neurotypical kids." (1:33:06).
1:34:12Social media and emailHorsky: "we can't all come out onto Facebook altogether and tell you what our thought is, because the moment we do, it's considered a meeting." He does not answer emails addressed to the whole board "because I creates a discussion which creates a quorum" (1:36:17).POS
1:36:59Candidate forumThe chair recalls an earlier forum; Horsky and others identify Vital Communities (1:37:40). The chair will reach out to "find out what's going on and see what's possible" (1:39:27); the superintendent adds that NH Listens may have run it (1:39:43).
1:40:38COVID dataCases "dipping back down" from the Omicron peak; elementary attendance down about six points from the usual 93 to 94 percent (1:42:30). Horsky notes "the number of registered students is also declined by 39" at the high school (1:44:39); an audience voice calls his comparison "a fallacy" (1:45:32). The superintendent will follow up (1:46:09).
1:47:18Learning lostWhitney: "if 22 students are out for ten days, that's 220 days of learning lost." Sprague: "personally, I'm not ready to declare the pandemic over in Claremont." (1:49:12) and "I think we hold the course." (1:51:35); he asks the superintendent to tell Dr. Chan "my board is very concerned and really want to see a transition to endemic planning." (1:52:27). Whitney: "I don't personally have any problem like straying from the herd." (1:54:54). Stone: "if not us, who?" (1:55:32). Horsky: protocols have "cost me 15 days worth of work in the last three months" (1:55:51).
1:57:41Public: masksA Ward 3 resident reads studies on cloth and surgical masks and asks the board to revisit "the masks in schools question"; "masking our kids forever is not supported by most parents." (2:00:23). The study citations are the speaker's.
2:00:54Public: long-term effectsWhitney Skillen agrees with planning for the endemic phase but asks about "the long term mental health impacts the long term physical impacts" and social delays (2:01:34).
2:03:36Nonpublic sessionMotion by Petrin under "RSA 91-A colon. Three" for the dismissal, promotion or compensation of a public employee; roll call called by the clerk, including "Joshua. Lambert. Rob. Lovett jr." in one breath followed by a single Yes. (2:04:11, 2:04:15). Recording ends at 2:04:36.OBS

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each names the rule it rests on as that rule read on February 2, 2022, or is labeled an observation where no verified rule applies. The COVID-19 state of emergency and Emergency Order #12 had ended on June 11, 2021, so ordinary RSA 91-A rules governed this meeting. RSA 189:74 (the 30-minute public comment period) was not yet law; it took effect September 6, 2022.

MEDIUM No minutes were ready for approval, and this meeting's minutes surface only as approved four months later; no copy is in the public shares

The chair opens the minutes item with "Previous approval. We didn't have any minutes." and says several meetings' minutes are outstanding (0:02:23, 0:02:43). The June 15, 2022 minutes then record approval of the January 5, January 18, February 2 and February 16, 2022 minutes together, with the April 6 minutes still "In process"; the April 6, 2022 minutes record "No minutes" at that meeting's approval item. RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to be "open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting", and draft minutes satisfy that duty, so a late approval is not itself a violation. What the record shows is a backlog: no minutes were approved at this meeting, the February 16 meeting tabled the December 1, 2021 minutes (see the February 16, 2022 page), the April 6 meeting approved none, and January's minutes waited until June. This meeting's minutes cannot now be found. The page applies the MEDIUM limb of the project's severity rule because the record mitigates the absence: minutes were written and approved. The limit of the evidence: the district's 2021-22 packet share (2021 22 CSB Packets (Web)) exists but could not be fully listed through the Drive interface, so the drafts may sit in a folder this search could not open.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II and II-b (2019 codification; source note ends 2018, 244:1; in force to Oct. 2, 2023); June 15, 2022 minutes; April 6, 2022 minutes

MEDIUM The tech-center reductions were settled with the board's budget subcommittee, and no notice or minutes of its sessions were located

The superintendent presents the reductions with figures showing "what the rationale was at the time when we" met with the budget subcommittee (0:13:04): the director to part time, the vacant nurse position, the 0.6 guidance position and the vacant accounting position. A subcommittee of a school board is itself a public body under RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d), which reaches "any committee, subcommittee, or subordinate body thereof", so each session at which it met was a meeting requiring 24-hour notice and minutes under RSA 91-A:2, II. No notice, agenda or minutes of any budget subcommittee session from this budget cycle were located. The page grades this MEDIUM rather than HIGH, and so differs from pages where a subcommittee's sessions are described at length with no record: here the only evidence of the sessions is one passing reference, and the district's 2021-22 packet share could not be fully listed, so the records may exist where this search could not reach.

Sources: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) (2022 codification; source note ends 2008, 354:1); RSA 91-A:2, I and II (2019 codification; source note ends 2018, 244:1)

OBSERVATION A member says the agenda printed a 7:00 start against the usual 6:30; the actual starting time cannot be checked

"It does say the start time seven." Another voice: "There are normal type of 630." The chair: "I didn't notice that" and "I'm so used to I never look at the times." (0:01:46 to 0:02:00). RSA 91-A:2, II requires notice of the time and place of a meeting at least 24 hours in advance. If the notice also said 7:00 and the board convened at 6:30, a resident relying on the notice would have missed the citizens' comment period, which closed with no speakers at 0:03:35, before a large audience took part in the later items. The notice, the agenda and the call-to-order time are not in the record, so this is an observation: the posted notice would settle it.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2019 codification; notice of the time and place, 24 hours excluding Sundays and legal holidays)

OBSERVATION Nonpublic session: the motion stated the ground in words, one member's answer is not audible, and nothing after the roll call is on record

Petrin's motion names "RSA 91-A colon. Three" and recites the substance of paragraph II(a), "the dismissal, promotion or" "compensation of any public employee" (2:03:36); RSA 91-A:3, I(b) requires the motion to "state on its face the specific exemption under paragraph II" and a roll-call vote, and the words used match II(a) even though the paragraph letter is not spoken. The clerk calls "Joshua. Lambert. Rob. Lovett jr." together and one Yes. follows (2:04:11, 2:04:15), so one of the two answers is not audible on the recording. The recording ends as the roll closes. Whether the board returned to public session, took any decision, or voted to withhold the nonpublic minutes (RSA 91-A:3, III requires disclosure within 72 hours unless two-thirds of members present so vote in public session with a stated finding) cannot be determined, because the minutes of this meeting were not located (flag 1).

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b), II(a) and III (2022 codification; source note ends 2021, 163:1 and 172:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2022)

OBSERVATION The preschool discussion turned on legal duties and a state ratio that no one cited

Petrin says the district does "not have to run a pre-K program" and can deliver services to identified children elsewhere; the coordinator agrees "from a legal standpoint" (1:18:03, 1:18:24). Federal law requires a free appropriate public education for children with disabilities from age 3 and education with nondisabled children "to the maximum extent appropriate"; it does not require a general preschool, so the statement is broadly consistent with the statute, but the least-restrictive-environment duty is the reason the half-typical model matters, which the administration's recommendation reflects (1:05:28). Nester's "New Hampshire rules. One teacher, one pair of 12 kids" (1:13:26) and the state oversight and audit he describes (1:07:48, 1:11:46) were not tied to any rule or document on the record, and this page has not verified them.

Sources: 20 U.S.C. §1412(a)(1)(A) (FAPE from age 3) and (a)(5)(A) (least restrictive environment)

POSITIVE A member explains on the record why he will not deliberate by all-board email or on Facebook

Horsky tells the audience that board members cannot respond together on Facebook "because the moment we do, it's considered a meeting", and that he does not answer emails addressed to the whole board because a reply "creates a discussion which creates a quorum" (1:36:17). That is the concern RSA 91-A:2-a addresses: public bodies deliberate only in meetings, and communications outside a meeting, including "sequential communications among members of a public body", may not be used to circumvent the chapter. Stating the practice publicly helps residents understand why members do not answer them collectively.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2-a, I and II (2022 codification; source 2008, 303:4, unamended)

POSITIVE The chair opened every discussion item to the audience and took questions at length

The board's new policy keeps agenda items out of citizens' comments (0:03:10), but the chair invited the audience to speak on the tech center (0:49:13), the preschool (1:25:05, 1:26:30) and COVID protocols (1:57:32), and residents asked follow-up questions that board members and staff answered. A request to move the podium so the audience could see and hear was accepted (1:03:57, 1:04:16). No statute then required any public comment period at a school board meeting (RSA 189:74 took effect September 6, 2022), so this practice exceeded the legal minimum of the time.

Sources: RSA 189:74 (2022, 333:1, eff. Sept. 6, 2022; not in force on this date)

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page