SAU 6 Board, December 1, 2022

Regular meeting of the joint Claremont and Unity board of School Administrative Unit 6. The board went line by line through the proposed FY24 SAU budget ($2,046,679.61, up 13.96%), including 6.5% raises, cell phone and mileage stipends, a new Human Resources Director and fully employer-paid health insurance, and sent it back for revision with a list of action items; no budget vote was taken. A citizen who described himself as a former board chair asked the board not to give SAU staff raises in light of the November organizational study. Built from the recording's dialogue transcript, the posted agenda, notice and budget worksheet, and the board's minutes. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
SAU 6 School Board (School Administrative Unit 6: Claremont and Unity school districts)
Date
Thursday, December 1, 2022
Start time
6:30 p.m. scheduled (agenda, public notice and minutes; closing activities scheduled 8:00 p.m.). The recording opens on the Pledge of Allegiance at 0:00:07; the adjournment vote is at 1:53:57 and the recording ends at 1:54:03. The minutes record Heather Whitney arriving at 7:10 p.m. and give no adjournment time.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, Business & Community Room (public notice; the agenda and minutes name the technical center)
Recording
Cablecast: SAU 6 Board Meeting live on 12/1/22 (dialogue transcript runs 1:54:03; the Cablecast API refused requests from this environment, so the extent is taken from the last transcript row)
Minutes
SAU6 12.1.22 Meeting Minutes, filed in the next SAU 6 packet folder, 1. SAU SB 1.3.23 (Drive createdTime December 13, 2022), and approved at the January 3, 2023 meeting. A second copy with the same text, draft SAU6 12.1.22 meeting minutes, sits in 5. SAU SB 3.30.23 (created March 30, 2023). The minutes close "Respectfully submitted by Chelsea Weatherford". No copy in the district's Meeting Minutes share. See flag 1.
Board composition
Twelve members on the agenda masthead: Marjorie Erickson (Chair), Frank Sprague (Vice Chair), Michael Petrin, Shannon Popescu, Garry Bator, Rocco Ruggeri, Atonya Hart, Steven Horsky, Joshua Lambert, Bonnie Miles, Whitney Skillen, Heather Whitney. The minutes record nine present (Whitney from 7:10 p.m.) and three absent: Lambert, Bator and Hart. No roll call is heard on the recording.

Participants

Everyone named in the minutes or heard on the recording. Spellings follow the agenda and minutes, then the project's 2015-2023 roster. Where the minutes and the dialogue file disagree on who spoke, both are given.
NameRoleParticipation
Marjorie EricksonUnity member; SAU 6 chair; presidesLeads the pledge (0:00:07) and opens with "Shows you how many meetings I've missed." (0:00:22); runs the agenda and minutes votes (0:00:52, 0:01:26); recognizes the citizen David Putnam three times (0:01:37, 1:14:21, 1:51:41). Starts the line-by-line review (0:06:24), raises stipends versus reimbursement (0:09:00) and the HR director and coordinator salaries (0:17:44, 1:05:37); reads the action items back (1:38:47); says she will miss the next meeting for her daughter's wedding (1:44:48); reports for the superintendent evaluation subcommittee and proposes a January 12 retreat (1:45:09, 1:48:53).
Frank SpragueClaremont member; SAU 6 vice chairDisputes whether stipends carry retirement costs (0:10:15, 0:10:46); questions the $1,000 cell phone line (0:11:19) and $8,500 in superintendent travel and mileage (0:15:22); asks what an HR employee does on a day like this one and calls for a process before hiring (0:19:31, 0:21:16); asks Seaman his own HR role (0:38:37) and about the data specialist raise (0:39:56); asks for raises at 3% (1:17:12), business office contracted services cut from $15,000 to $5,000 (1:22:04) and mileage as reimbursement (1:27:38). The dialogue file gives him the motion to approve the 11/16 minutes (0:01:21); the minutes give it to Michael Petrin (flag 4). The minutes record him seconding the adjournment.
Steven HorskyClaremont memberMoves the agenda (0:00:49); abstains on the 11/16 minutes, which he missed (0:01:35). Opposes cell phone stipends (0:12:43, 1:23:35); asks why health lines rise far more than 12% (0:27:32); calls the utility estimates light (0:32:33); asks about the receptionist increase (0:47:58) and whether Unity has been billed for shared Claremont staff (0:51:35); "I definitely can't justify it being a $100,000 a year position" (1:01:42); proposes a policy requiring a job description before any new position (1:13:39); cautions that an employee premium share would make positions harder to fill (1:33:33).
Michael PetrinClaremont member (Claremont board chair)Asks how firm the roughly $90,000 health increase is (0:26:24); raises two Claremont-paid special education positions that serve both districts (0:49:49); "HR is not just hiring" (1:04:45); ties HR to turnover (1:12:58); asks for a breakdown of contracted services (1:36:43) and a mix of the raise and premium-share ideas (1:37:09). The minutes credit him with the motion to approve the 11/16 minutes (see Frank Sprague).
Whitney SkillenClaremont memberQuestions the $500 custodial supplies line (0:30:56); asks whether one person is both data specialist and food service manager (0:42:42); defends HR as a profession that earns six figures (1:03:20) and argues the director should rank as an administrator (1:18:45); proposes paying half of a typical cell phone bill (1:24:21); moves to adjourn (1:53:50). The minutes record her seconding the agenda and the 11/16 minutes.
Heather WhitneyClaremont memberArrived at 7:10 p.m. (minutes). Recognized by the chair at 0:46:13; warns against "generating jobs to fit people" and "creeping job descriptions" (0:46:22, 0:46:29). The chair turns to her again at 1:42:15; the replies that follow (1:42:36 to 1:43:14) sit in the chair's diarization cluster and are left unidentified in the dialogue file.
Rocco RuggeriUnity memberAsks whether health benefits are contractual (1:28:47); proposes a 10% employee share of health premiums, about $33,000, in place of cutting raises (1:30:03, 1:30:35). Petrin refers to "what Marco expressed" [Rocco] (1:37:09). The minutes record the proposal.
Bonnie MilesClaremont memberPresent per the minutes. The chair names her once: "And then Bonnie, you also wanted." (1:01:35); no dialogue row is attributed to her.
Shannon PopescuUnity memberPresent per the minutes; no dialogue row is attributed to her. A member of the superintendent evaluation subcommittee (its November 7 notes); the chair lists her as free for a January 12 retreat (1:48:53).
Unidentified Unity memberSAU 6 board member speaking for UnitySays back-billing for the Medicaid and out-of-district positions began in 2019-20 and that "we unity does receive bills" (0:52:13). Not named on the recording.
Joshua Lambert, Garry Bator, Atonya HartMembers (Lambert, Claremont; Bator and Hart, Unity)Absent per the minutes. "Garry Bator" is the agenda and minutes spelling; the chair says "if Gary Bader hasn't shown up at the last few meetings, I think we got to get him going again" (1:51:31).
Unidentified board membersVoices the dialogue file does not nameA summing-up of the HR debate that says the SAU needs a budget "by the end of December" (1:10:07); "I'd say put it off for a year." (1:11:27); remarks on the data specialist salary (1:42:36 to 1:43:14); the second to the adjournment (1:53:53), which the minutes give to Frank Sprague.
Michael TempestaSuperintendent, SAU 6Says his mileage and phone terms rolled over from his previous contract (0:14:43); thinks the HR director salary is low (0:19:08); describes HR duties and "one of the highest, turnover rates" (0:23:39, 0:24:08); defends the data specialist (0:41:28, 0:43:11); gives 400 to 450 district employees (0:54:36); says the other bargaining units' employer share runs 93% to 97% (1:34:05) and asks for insurance scenarios (1:35:02); says the NHSBA's Will [Phillips] offered to help (1:52:31).
Richard SeamanAssistant Superintendent for Finance, Operations & HR (agenda and minutes masthead; the minutes' text calls him "Finance Director")Presents the budget with raises "set at 6.5% as a starting point for discussion" (0:05:56); answers line questions throughout; says SAU employees pay Zero. toward health premiums (0:30:07); explains utilities (0:33:54), contracted services (0:35:28) and the data specialist raise (0:40:14); says Unity has not been billed for the shared positions (0:51:49); "Each percent is about 12,000." (1:17:39); compares the 6.5% to a teacher's step and base increase (1:37:28); adds his own action items (1:40:02).
Michael KoskiAssistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment and Innovation (minutes masthead)Says HR work is falling on other SAU staff, himself included (0:25:42, 0:26:04); describes the data specialist as data management (0:45:48) and says "we're not a big enough district to have a data analyst" (0:47:19). The minutes and the budget's staffing sheet spell the name Koski; David Putnam's reference is transcribed "Mr. coffee" (1:14:44).
David PutnamCitizen, Ward 2 (minutes); former board chair by his own accountCitizens' comments (0:01:51 to 0:03:16): budget increases should rest on a superintendent evaluation, and raises for SAU staff are "not warranted because of the deficiencies which are outlined in this report". Recognized again on the HR debate (1:14:44 to 1:15:51) and on the evaluation process, suggesting a New Hampshire School Boards Association consultant (1:51:50, 1:52:15). The transcription renders his introduction "When David. Pollen board two."; the minutes name him "David Putnam (Ward 2)". The dialogue file labels him David only.
Audience member addressed as CandyNot establishedAfter David Putnam's comments the chair asks "David, did you have anything? Candy?" (0:03:38); no reply is transcribed. The minutes report Putnam saying people had approached him "and Ms. Crawford" (the transcript reads "Mr. Crawford"); this page does not name the person from that alone.
Unidentified administratorSAU staff voiceNotes that "we added the recommendation from the report that Marjorie just articulated" (0:05:06), the HR position. Diarized with Horsky's cluster; voice not identified.
Chelsea WeatherfordRecording secretary (named in the minutes)Signs the minutes. Not heard on the recording.

Agenda

Items from the posted agenda (SAU6 12.1.22 Agenda), with the time each was taken up and its disposition from the recording and the minutes. The chair refers to a "revised agenda" (0:00:22); the posted copy reached Drive at 11:16 a.m. on the meeting day, and whether it is the revised version is not stated.
Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:07I. Call to order, pledgeScheduled 6:30 p.m. The recording opens on the pledge.
6:35 p.m.II. Roll callNot heard on the recording, which runs from the pledge straight to the agenda at 0:00:22. Attendance is taken from the minutes: nine present, three absent.
0:00:22II.a Agenda"I make a motion to approve the agenda as presented." (Horsky, 0:00:49); a second is heard in the chair's row and the voice vote carries (0:00:52). Minutes: Horsky moved, Whitney Skillen seconded.
0:00:52II.b Minutes of November 16, 2022"I'll make a motion to approve the minutes from the 16th, 2022." (0:01:21; the voice sits in a diarization cluster that also carries Sprague and the citizen, and the dialogue file follows the minutes); voice vote (0:01:26) with one abstention, Horsky (0:01:35). Minutes: "Michael Petrin makes a motion to approve meeting minutes from 11.16.22 as presented; seconded by Whitney Skillen" (flag 4).
0:01:37II.c Citizens' commentsDavid Putnam, Ward 2 (0:01:51 to 0:03:16). No other speaker is transcribed.
0:03:50III.a "FY23 SAU 6 Budget"The agenda's label (scheduled 6:45 p.m.); the document under review is the SAU FY24 Proposed Budget. Line-by-line review from 0:06:24 to the action-item read-back at 1:38:47. No motion or vote: the chair wants to be "looking at this again, hopefully a revised copy" by the 15th (0:04:52), and the minutes record "Next SAU meeting is scheduled for 12.15.22".
1:45:09III.b Superintendent GoalsStatus report from the superintendent evaluation subcommittee; a SAU board retreat proposed for Thursday, January 12, with January 26 as the alternative (1:48:53, 1:50:46). No vote. The packet item is the subcommittee's notes of its November 7, 2022 meeting.
1:44:12IV. Future agenda itemsScheduled 7:45 p.m. The next meeting on the 15th (1:44:12). The minutes list "FY23 Budget".
1:53:31V. Other businessScheduled 7:55 p.m. The chair asks for other discussion; only retreat logistics follow.
1:53:50VI. ClosingScheduled 8:00 p.m. Whitney Skillen moves to adjourn (1:53:50); an unidentified voice seconds (1:53:53); voice vote (1:53:57). Minutes: Skillen moved, Frank Sprague seconded. The recording runs 1:54:03 from the pledge, so the meeting closed at about 8:25 p.m. if it began at 6:30, against 8:00 p.m. on the agenda.

Discussion timeline

Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/14765 SAU 6 Board Meeting live on 12-1-22.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording. Budget figures in brackets come from the posted worksheet, SAU FY24 Proposed Budget.

Topics in chronological order.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:01:51Citizen: no raises for SAU staffDavid Putnam, citing his years as "board chair of both the board and the school board", says budget increases should follow a superintendent evaluation that includes the superintendent's evaluation of his staff (0:02:32), and that in the community's view "raises for SC staff is not warranted because of the deficiencies which are outlined in this report" (0:03:16), meaning the consultants' organizational study presented on November 16.POSITIVE
0:03:50Budget review opensChair: "You all received a budget. I still can't open it a day or so ago and we should go through it." She is "having trouble opening Excel at the moment". The public copy reached the packet folder at 12:57 p.m. that day. The chair reminds members that "the budget I had asked for last meeting included the HR position, and that's what we were sent" (0:04:30). [Total $2,046,679.61 against $1,795,945.22 budgeted for FY23, up $250,734.39 or 13.96%; Claremont's share 90.20% ($1,846,089), Unity's 9.80% ($200,591).]OBSERVATION
0:05:28Seaman's overview"The only major change on staffing number of staff is that position" [the HR director]; replacement staff came in at different salaries; the cost-of-living increase "has been set at 6.5% as a starting point for discussion" (0:05:56).
0:06:24Line 1: information management salariesChair: "it shows an 11.7 or 11.8% increase over the fi 23 budget". Seaman: part cost of living, "part of it is a replacement employee" hired at a higher salary (0:07:04). [$128,338.00 to $143,442.46.] The minutes record this as "the eleven percent increase".OBSERVATION
0:09:00Stipends or reimbursementChair: "the reimbursement would be a tax deductible to the say, you, whereas the stipend is taxable because it's income to the individuals". Sprague says stipends carry retirement costs; Seaman: "These are considered stipends and therefore not a part of the retirement reporting." (0:10:38); Sprague: "they are part of the income of the person, the total income" (0:10:46). Sprague: "I can get a brand new Apple iPhone 14" at "about $50 a month with service" (0:11:19). Horsky: "I'm honestly completely against it" (0:12:43). [Cell phone stipend lines total $5,500 and mileage stipend lines $10,500 in FY24; each shows $0 in the FY23 budget column and the same amount in the FY22 actual column.]
0:14:00Mileage basisChair asks how the mileage figures were set and who is covered. Tempesta: "all I did was roll over the existing contract that I had" (0:14:43). Sprague: superintendent mileage plus travel: "That's $8,500 for travel mileage." (0:15:22). Tempesta offers a breakdown (0:16:02).
0:16:38SAU telephoneSeaman: the SAU landline cost has been "picked up in the Stevens High School invoice" and should be allocated out (0:17:11). [$2,500 budgeted; $0 actual in FY22.]
0:17:44HR director and HR coordinatorChair: the staffing page shows "the director and the coordinator salaries are very similar". Tempesta: the director pay is low; two earlier industry candidates were "well into six figures" (0:19:08). Sprague: "let's just hire another person and pay them 120,000 a year" is not a process (0:21:16); "this needs to be a thoughtful process" (0:21:56). Chair: the study recommended job descriptions for every SAU position (0:22:33). [Human Resources department new in FY24: $200,890.07 with benefits; salaries $130,332.25.]OBSERVATION
0:23:39Why HR, per the administrationTempesta: leaves, certifications and qualifications are "standard HR functions"; "we also have one of the highest, turnover rates" (0:24:08); "exit interviews have been hit or miss" (0:24:37). Koski: "other people are picking up pieces that we can't run out of one office right now" (0:25:42).
0:26:24Health insurancePetrin: "It looks like an increase of about 90,000 in that ballpark." Seaman: the projected rate increase "was close to 12%." (0:27:05). Horsky: "it's almost 60% increase from line to line" (0:27:32). Seaman: plan changes from single to family coverage drive the lines and he will lay them out by person (0:29:16, 0:38:00). Sprague: "What percentage of health insurance employees pay?" Seaman: Zero. (0:30:01, 0:30:07); "Is it typical in industry. No." (0:30:19).
0:30:56Custodial suppliesSkillen on the $500 line: "I personally spend more than $500 in a year on toilet paper" (0:31:29). The line covers only the SAU building, the Dow (0:31:19); cleaning supplies come from the supply line (0:31:47).
0:32:33Electricity and fuel oilHorsky: going from the FY22 actual to the FY24 figure "seems like it's a little light in my in my judgment" (0:33:24). Seaman: the tanks were filled at last year's prices, and "whatever we're using in November and December will be a better idea" (0:34:14). [Electricity $6,031.79 actual in FY22, $2,200 budgeted for FY23, $6,200 proposed; fuel oil $7,626.87, $1,500 and $7,800.]
0:35:17Business office contracted servicesSeaman: this year's contractor helped with "working our way through some of the audit work and trying to get the audits caught up going forward" (0:35:28); nothing is identified for next year, but "we're not searching for projects, but inevitably we end up with one" (0:36:20). [$15,000 budgeted for FY23 and proposed for FY24.]
0:38:37Seaman's HR roleSprague: "So Richard I'm looking at your title assistant superintendent finance ops and HR. So what is your role in HR." Seaman: "Managing HR overseeing HR." (0:38:46). Tempesta on whether those duties continue once a director is hired: "Yeah I think they wouldn't continue." (0:39:08).
0:39:56Data systems specialist raise"About a $9,300 race" [raise] (0:40:02). Seaman: "we are significantly under paying that position" compared with similar posts (0:40:14). Skillen asks whether one person is both data specialist and food service manager (0:42:42); Tempesta: yes (0:42:56). Heather Whitney: the concern is "a precedent that we were trying to avoid, which was just generating jobs to fit people" (0:46:22) and "creeping job descriptions" (0:46:29). Koski: "we're not a big enough district to have a data analyst" (0:47:19).
0:47:58Receptionist hoursHorsky asks why the receptionist rises from half time. Seaman: "30 hours a week?" (0:48:57) and "0.5 just wasn't quite enough" (0:49:10).
0:49:49Claremont staff serving both districtsPetrin asks about two positions in Claremont's budget that serve the whole SAU. Seaman: the out-of-district coordinator and the Medicaid clerk, the latter in a bargaining unit (0:50:24). Horsky: "Have we been back billing unity for services?" Seaman: "We have not." with no time sheets kept (0:51:49). A Unity member: "We did start back billing for both Medicaid and the out of district coordinator in 1920." [2019-20] (0:52:13). Horsky: "Clear answer on that?" (0:52:41). Seaman: "Those are two separate questions." (0:52:52).OBSERVATION
0:52:56What HR should do, and at what payChair: "I'm thinking that 70,000 is low for a salary." (0:53:53). Tempesta: 400 to 450 district employees (0:54:36). Sprague presses on what the HR office does in hiring (0:57:00). Horsky: "I definitely can't justify it being a $100,000 a year position" (1:01:42). Chair: a clear position description "before any hiring would be done would be incredibly important" (1:02:52). Skillen: "people do make six figures in these professions in the real world" (1:03:20). Petrin: "HR is not just hiring" (1:04:45). Chair: "it doesn't sound like we have a job description that demands a six figure salary" (1:05:37). Horsky on total compensation: "I haven't ever had an employer pay 100% of my medical." (1:09:38).
1:10:07Fund it now or wait a yearAn unidentified member: "We do need to have a budget, Richard, I guess by the end of December for the say yes." [SAU] and job descriptions will not be ready by then. "I'd say put it off for a year." (1:11:27). Chair: "I don't think we can put it off for a year." (1:11:33). Sprague: the need is to avoid "that logjam over the summertime" (1:12:04). Petrin: "We wouldn't have the onboarding problem if we don't have the turnover problem." (1:12:58). Horsky: "there should be a policy before adding any position in this district that we have a properly vetted job description before it ever hits the board" (1:13:39); "it's putting the cart before the horse" (1:14:09).OBSERVATION OBSERVATION
1:14:21Citizen on the HR debateThe chair asks "Does anybody have a concern with that?" before recognizing David Putnam. He cites "your assistant superintendent, Mr. coffee" [Koski] (1:14:44) on HR work landing on administrators' desks: "So learn all your job descriptions" (1:15:51). Chair: the subcommittee's goals are meant to address "many of the issues that have come up tonight" (1:16:23).POSITIVE
1:17:12Raises and the HR lineSprague wants "the raises reduced to 3% instead of 6.5". Seaman: "Each percent is about 12,000." (1:17:39). Sprague: "I would suggest leaving the HR line saying." [same] with a competitive salary for the lead (1:17:57). Skillen: the director "should be making, at least six figures in their annual salary" (1:18:45). Seaman: "we don't have any pure administrators in the, in the school district" (1:19:12). Horsky: with the line near $200,000, "the total dollar amounts are fine" (1:21:29).
1:22:04Contracted services, cell phones, mileageSprague: "Contracted services like to change that from 15,000 down to 5000." On the superintendent's $2,500 phone stipend: "I don't know how you spend that much on a cell phone" (1:22:39); "I feel comfortable cutting this budget by about 50." (1:22:56). Horsky: "I think the cell phone stipend needs to go away" (1:23:35). Skillen: "So let's pay $50 a month per person for the cell phones." (1:24:45). Sprague on mileage: "Everybody else has to do it in the district." Seaman: "Except for a certain number of the senior employees of the essay." [SAU] (1:27:38, 1:27:51). Chair: "I think there should be a policy in place" (1:28:15).
1:28:47Employee share of health premiumsRuggeri: "If we moved everyone to a 10% co-pay" [premium share] "that would equal 33,000 based on the fiscal year 24 proposed budget" and raises could stay (1:30:03), with "10% of that increase is paid with the employees as well as the district" in later years (1:30:35). Horsky: "you can't mess with the contracted value amount" (1:31:00); Seaman: "Everyone is a year to year. No one's in a negotiated entity." (1:31:31); chair: "No, Mike is the only contract we don't see." (1:31:58). Horsky: "it'll be tougher to fill positions" (1:33:33). Tempesta: other bargaining units are at 93% to 97% employer share (1:34:05); Seaman: Vermont schools "are contractually required to be at 80, 20" (1:34:20). Tempesta: "It would be good to see the scenarios of the insurance." (1:35:02).OBSERVATION
1:35:55Line 3 and the 6.5% comparisonChair on "the the like 151% increase" in line 3 [information management health, $23,496.00 to $59,194.80]. Seaman: "The budget for this year is based on last year's actual staff." (1:36:15). Petrin: "We have almost $40,000 in contracted services." (1:36:43); "The increases for teachers or, you know, maintenance or secretaries are not 6.5%." (1:37:09). Seaman: a teacher moving a step "would see a 6.5% increase because there's an increase in the base plus an increase that comes from the step" (1:37:28); SAU posts "are basically market value positions" (1:38:27).
1:38:47Action items read backChair: "We want to see, the budget with a reduction of the raises to 3%. We want to leave the HR line the same, remove business or reduce business office contracted services by ten K from 15 to 5." (1:38:57); cell phone stipend still to be defined (1:39:18); "Looking at mileage done as a reimbursable expense." (1:39:30); insurance share "try 95% and then several different raises" and a contracted-services breakdown (1:39:36). Seaman adds a health breakdown, "A utilities analysis to be sure we have enough in there on utilities" (1:40:02), the data specialist "salary analysis because of the increase recommended for that" (1:40:23), and whether to move the two Claremont positions into the SAU (1:40:59). Job descriptions for the "HR director and data specialist." (1:44:00).POSITIVE
1:41:33Payroll taxes on stipendsSprague asks whether the Social Security lines include stipend withholding. Seaman: they should; "Now the question is whether my model included it that way." (1:42:02).
1:42:15Job descriptions as a budget conditionAn unidentified member: "I'll be reticent to approve a budget that doesn't have that." (1:42:36), and of the data specialist, "how would we justify that almost $50,000 salary?" (1:42:59).
1:44:10Next meetingThe 15th, two weeks out (1:44:12). Chair: "We have clear action items that will go into the minutes hopefully." and "Send out action items." (1:44:16); "I will not be at the next meeting. My daughter is getting married to." (1:44:48).OBSERVATION
1:45:09Superintendent evaluationChair: "we have not had an evaluation process in quite a number of years"; the subcommittee is folding the study's recommendations into "a multi-year superintendent set of goals" (1:45:39); the handout in the packet is not the latest version. Goals include HR procedures for onboarding, evaluations and exit interviews (1:47:23). Retreat proposed "on the 12th, which is a Thursday" (1:48:53), aiming to "complete a successful evaluation process by June" (1:50:06); "another possibility is January 26th" (1:50:46).
1:51:41Citizen: outside facilitatorDavid Putnam suggests "having a consultant from the Hampshire school Boards of help guide you" [New Hampshire School Boards Association] (1:51:50): "Marjorie, I think you should be separate from being the leadership for that type of process and have a consultant leader." (1:52:15). Tempesta: Will [Phillips] has offered; "He's offered to help our policy committee review virtually." (1:52:31). Chair: "We could see if Will's available." (1:52:43).POSITIVE
1:53:50Adjournment"I'd like to make a motion to adjourn the meeting." Voice vote; chair: "I think this was good discussion." (1:53:57).

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each one names the rule it rests on, as that rule read on December 1, 2022, or is labeled an observation where no verified rule applies. The RSA 91-A:2, II requirement that minutes name each motion's mover and seconder (2018, 244:1, eff. January 1, 2019) applies to this meeting; the minutes meet it in form.

MEDIUM The minutes first appear in Drive on the eighth business day

RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to be "open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting", which for a Thursday, December 1 meeting is Thursday, December 8. The earliest copy found, SAU6 12.1.22 Meeting Minutes, has a Drive createdTime of December 13, 2022, 12:57 p.m. Eastern, the eighth business day (no legal holiday falls in the window). It sits in the next packet folder, 1. SAU SB 1.3.23, which was created December 15, so the file existed in Drive two days before the public folder that now holds it. A second copy was added to 5. SAU SB 3.30.23 on March 30, 2023. Drive dates show when a file reached the share, not when the minutes were written or first available at the SAU office, which the record does not show. Severity follows this project's rule for missing or late records: MEDIUM, because the meeting was noticed and packeted and minutes exist; only their timing is in question. This matches the grading of the same pattern on the November 16 and January 3 pages.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II, 2022 codification (minutes open to inspection within 5 business days; mover and seconder recorded); Drive folder 1. SAU SB 1.3.23

OBSERVATION Adoption was left to a December 15 meeting, the last one scheduled before the statutory January 1 date

RSA 194-C:9, I reads: "At a meeting held before January 1, the school administrative unit board shall adopt a budget". Nothing was due at this meeting and no vote was taken; thirty days remained. The chair planned to see a revised budget "by the 15th" (0:04:52), an unidentified member said "We do need to have a budget, Richard, I guess by the end of December" (1:10:07), and the minutes record "Next SAU meeting is scheduled for 12.15.22". The chair said she would not attend that meeting (1:44:48). The board next appears in the record on January 3, 2023, when it adopted a $2,406,073 budget; the January 3 page flags that adoption as after the statutory date and reports that no December 15 folder, agenda or minutes was found. This page did not repeat that search. The point is recorded here because this is the meeting at which the timetable was set.

Sources: RSA 194-C:9, I, 2022 codification (SAU budget adopted at a meeting held before January 1); SAU6 12.1.22 Meeting Minutes

OBSERVATION The draft budget adds a Human Resources Director, and the board weighed moving two Claremont positions into the SAU, without mention of the district votes the statute calls for

RSA 194-C:5, II(c): "Other administrative positions may be established, but only after 50 percent or more of the school districts in the school administrative unit representing 60 percent of the total pupils in the school administrative unit has voted favorably upon the establishment of the position." RSA 194-C:9, I adds that the SAU board "shall not add any new service to the school administrative unit budget unless a majority of the school districts" representing at least 60 percent of pupils have voted for it. The worksheet carries a new Human Resources department of $200,890.07, with a director the staffing sheet lists as to be hired; the chair says she asked for it (0:04:30), and the board discussed transferring an out-of-district coordinator and a Medicaid clerk from Claremont's budget (0:49:49, 1:40:59). Nobody mentions a district vote this evening. On January 3 a member raised the statute himself (January 3 page, flag 4). Whether a director who takes over duties of an existing coordinator post counts as a new position, and whether the vote belongs to each school board or to each district's voters, is not settled on this record. Recorded votes of the Claremont and Unity districts on the position would settle it.

Sources: RSA 194-C:5, II(c) (new SAU administrative positions need a favorable vote of districts holding 60 percent of pupils; 1996, 298:3, never amended); RSA 194-C:9, I, 2022 codification (no new service without that vote); SAU FY24 Proposed Budget

OBSERVATION The agenda and the minutes label the FY24 budget as FY23, and only the minutes settle a mover and a request the recording leaves unclear

RSA 91-A:2, II requires "The names of the members who made or seconded each motion shall be recorded in the minutes." The minutes do name them: "Michael Petrin makes a motion to approve meeting minutes from 11.16.22 as presented; seconded by Whitney Skillen". On the recording that motion (0:01:21) sits in a diarization cluster that also carries Sprague and the citizen, so the voice alone cannot name the mover. The minutes also record "Frank proposes seeing a budget that shows raises at 6.5% and employees being responsible to pay for 5% of health insurance coverage"; the matching request for insurance-share scenarios (1:35:02) sits in a cluster that carries Sprague early and Superintendent Tempesta later. The dialogue file follows the minutes on both. The chair restates the request as "try 95% and then several different raises" (1:39:36), and Sprague's earlier request is 3% raises (1:17:12). The agenda item reads "FY23 SAU 6 Budget" and the minutes list "FY23 Budget" under future items, though the document is the FY24 proposal and members speak of "the fiscal year 24 proposed budget" (1:30:03). The minutes' "eleven percent increase" is one salary line (0:06:24); neither the minutes nor the recording states the proposal's overall increase, $250,734.39 or 13.96% on the worksheet's total page. None of this changes a decision, since no budget vote was taken.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II, 2022 codification (minutes: names of members, mover and seconder, final decisions); SAU6 12.1.22 Meeting Minutes; SAU6 12.1.22 Agenda

OBSERVATION The proposed budget reached the public packet about five and a half hours before the meeting, as a scanned image

The SAU FY24 Proposed Budget has a Drive createdTime of 12:57 p.m. Eastern on December 1; the agenda arrived at 11:16 a.m. the same day, while the public notice dates from November 21. The chair says members received the budget "a day or so ago" (0:03:50). The packet's own Superintendent Goals document, the subcommittee's November 7 notes, lists under budget transparency: "All documents should be made available to all board members ahead of time (prior to any budget-related public meeting) - at least a week ahead if possible". The posted file is an image scan with no text layer, so a reader cannot search or copy its figures. No rule requiring advance posting of packet documents has been verified for this page; the point is offered for transparency only, measured against the board's own stated goal.

Sources: Superintendent Goals (subcommittee notes, November 7, 2022); Drive folder 4. SAU SB 12.1.22

OBSERVATION Whether Unity has been billed for two Claremont-paid positions that serve both districts was answered both ways

Asked "Have we been back billing unity for services?", Seaman answered "We have not." and said no time sheet had been kept (0:51:49). A Unity member then said "We did start back billing for both Medicaid and the out of district coordinator in 1920." [2019-20] and that Unity receives bills (0:52:13). Horsky asked for a "Clear answer on that?" (0:52:41) and Seaman separated whether invoices were prepared from whether they were paid (0:52:43, 0:52:52). The minutes record the question only as an action item on moving the two positions into the SAU. RSA 194-C:9, I apportions the SAU budget between the districts by formula, but these two positions sit in Claremont's own budget, so no verified rule governs the billing. Invoices to Unity and the receipts against them would settle it.

Sources: SAU6 12.1.22 Meeting Minutes (action item)

POSITIVE The board's requests were read back on the record, minuted as action items, and carried to the next meeting

After nearly two hours of line-by-line review in open session, the chair read the requests back (1:38:47 to 1:39:36), the finance officer added his own (1:40:02 to 1:40:59), and the chair offered to email the list the next day (1:44:16). The minutes list six action items, including "Remove $10,000.00 from business contracted services." and "Job description for the human resource director and the data specialist." At the next meeting the administration answered them item by item and brought both job descriptions (January 3 page, agenda). The worksheet itself shows five years of budget and actual columns for every line. No statute requires this level of public detail for an SAU budget.

Sources: SAU6 12.1.22 Meeting Minutes; SAU FY24 Proposed Budget

POSITIVE A citizen was heard three times, and his suggestion of an outside facilitator was taken up

David Putnam spoke in citizens' comments (0:01:51), was recognized again during the HR debate after the chair asked the board "Does anybody have a concern with that?" (1:14:21), and a third time on the evaluation process (1:51:50). His suggestion of a New Hampshire School Boards Association consultant drew an answer on the spot (1:52:31, 1:52:43), and the minutes record all three remarks with his name and ward. Nothing in the agenda required a second or third opportunity to speak.

Sources: SAU6 12.1.22 Meeting Minutes

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page