Claremont School Board, Deliberative Session, February 3, 2024

First session of the 2024 Claremont School District annual meeting under SB 2, at which voters discussed the five warrant articles (a $39,582,407 operating budget and three support-staff contracts), corrected one article and sent all five to the March 12 ballot. The body here is the voters, not the board. Built from the dialogue transcript, the agenda, the Rules of Procedure, the default-budget worksheet and the minutes. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School District annual meeting, first (deliberative) session; the school board presents the warrant
Date
Saturday, February 3, 2024 (snow date February 10)
Start time
9:00 a.m. scheduled (agenda). Called to order at 9:05 a.m. (minutes; 0:00:20 on the recording). The minutes give no adjournment time; the recording runs 1:32:42 and ends on the adjournment vote.
Location
Stevens High School Auditorium (agenda and minutes)
Recording
Cablecast: Claremont School Deliberative Session 2/3/24 (runs 1:32:42 by the last transcript row; the Cablecast API refused this environment)
Minutes
Approved CSB Delibrative Session Minutes 2.3.24.pdf (the misspelling is the district's); drafts: draft CSB Delibrative Session Minutes 2.3.24.pdf, 4. draft CSB Deliberative Session Minutes 2.3.24.pdf
Presiding
Charlene Lovett, styled interim moderator; the elected moderator does not appear in the record (see flag 1)
Board composition
Seven board members; six present, Bonnie Miles absent (minutes)

Participants

Everyone in the record. Names, wards and positions follow the approved minutes, which list floor speakers by position (for, against, neither) and in speaking order within each group. Where a floor speaker is named here from that order rather than from the recording, the Participation cell says so.
NameRoleParticipation
Charlene LovettPresiding officer, styled interim moderatorSelf-identifies: “My name is Charlene Lovett, and I am the interim moderator today” (0:00:20). Reads the Rules of Procedure and each article; conducts every vote.
Heather WhitneyBoard chairIntroduces the board (0:02:48); opens and closes the board's presentation (0:09:46, 0:28:19). Minutes: moved the 2/8/23 minutes, Article II, and the Article V correction.
Frank SpragueVice chair; Finance Committee chairFinance-committee goals (0:11:23); staff retention and the teachers' contract (0:25:23); speaks for Article IV as a Ward 2 voter (1:15:50). Minutes: moved to restrict reconsideration of Article II and moved Article IV.
Candace CrawfordMemberCurriculum and instruction (0:15:30); CTE expansion (0:22:51). Minutes: moved Article V as amended.
Jennifer GallagherMemberDisruptive behaviors and the added social worker (0:19:01). Minutes: seconded several motions and spoke for Article V as a Ward 1 voter; her floor turn is not separable in the transcript.
Whitney SkillenMember; policy committee chairMinutes: moved Article I, seconded Article II, first speaker for Article II (Ward 2). By that order she is the board member who says “Even though I am a member of the board. I support this budget” (0:54:05); the recording does not carry her name.
Arlene HawkinsMember; SAU 6 board chairCorrects her ward in the 2023 minutes (Ward 3; voice unlabeled at 0:08:32). Minutes: second speaker for Article II, moved and spoke for Article III. By that order she is the voice at 0:56:31 (it refers back to “as Whitney said”, which fits Skillen speaking first) and at 1:12:15.
Bonnie MilesMemberAbsent (introduced as unable to attend, 0:03:43; minutes).
Chris PrattInterim SuperintendentIntroduces staff (0:02:18); answers the budget's opponent (1:01:15); supports the support-staff articles “as interim superintendent” (1:29:56).
Mary HenryBusiness AdministratorBudget and warrant presentation (0:32:30 to 0:49:16).
Michael Koski; Jeff Small; Ben NesterAssistant Superintendent; Director of Technology; Director of Special EducationIntroduced (0:02:18); not heard otherwise.
Angela VivianDirector of Human ResourcesAbsent (introduced as not present).
Shawn TanguaySchool district attorneyIntroduced (minutes spelling; the transcript has only “Sean of the school district attorneys”).
Noelle KronbergSchool board clerkSigns the minutes. Not identifiable on the recording.
Brandon PerryVoter, Ward 3 (minutes)Third speaker for Article II in the minutes; by that order, the district technology employee whose family has been in Claremont “for over a century” (1:06:32).
Gary MerchantVoter, Ward 2Speaks for Article II (1:08:28; the transcript renders his name “Gary Martin for two”).
Wayne HemingwayVoter, Ward 1 (minutes)The only speaker against Article II in the minutes; by that order, the parent at 0:59:25 who says “I have a child in school and they're getting taught by videos off of YouTube”.
Tom LutherVoter, Ward 1 (minutes)Minutes: spoke on process, neither for nor against Article II. His remarks are not in the transcript, which has no rows from 1:02:57 to 1:04:41 and from there to 1:06:32.
Matt BeanVoter, Ward 1; paraprofessionals' association presidentSelf-identifies by first name and ward (1:22:04); surname from the minutes.
Kelly Fontaine; Jean AllenVoters, Ward 1 (minutes)Minutes list them, after Gallagher, speaking for Article V. The transcript between 1:24:30 and 1:29:21 carries parts of three turns and about two minutes without words, so turns are not assigned to names.
Pam LaBountyVoter, Ward 3 (minutes); paraprofessionalLast speaker for Article V in the minutes; the recording's last speaker, a Ward 3 “30 year veteran as a paraprofessional” (1:30:22).

Agenda

The posted agenda, the time each item was taken up, and its disposition per the recording and the approved minutes. Votes at a deliberative session are voice votes of the voters present; no counts were announced.
Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:20I. Call to orderCalled to order 9:05 a.m. by Charlene Lovett.
0:01:39I.A Pledge of AllegianceMinutes: led by Chair Whitney.
0:02:00I.B IntroductionsAdministration (Pratt) and board (Whitney).
0:04:13I.C Rules of Procedure (agenda: “Charlene Lovett, Interim Moderator”)The full Rules of Procedure sheet read aloud, including the remedy for a doubted vote (see flag 2).
0:07:57II. Approval of minutes, February 8, 2023 deliberative sessionMoved (minutes: Whitney) and seconded (Sprague). Corrections: Hawkins is Ward 3 (0:08:32); Sprague's 2023 motion was to restrict reconsideration (0:08:45). Approved as amended by voice vote (0:09:07).
0:09:07III. Board and business administrator presentationsNot a separate agenda item; the minutes record it under Discussion & Action. Board presentation 0:09:46 to 0:31:29; Henry 0:32:30 to 0:49:16.
0:50:57Article I: School board and officersModerator, clerk and treasurer (one-year terms) and three board seats (three-year terms). Moved and seconded (minutes: Skillen, Gallagher); no discussion; to the ballot as written (0:51:49).
0:51:49Article II: Main budgetRead as totaling $39,582,407, default $39,371,774 (0:52:30). Moved (minutes: Whitney; second Skillen). Four speakers for, one against, one on process. To the ballot as written (1:09:58). Reconsideration restricted on a voice vote (1:10:37; minutes: moved Sprague, seconded Gallagher, unanimously passes).
1:10:37Article III: Claremont Association of SecretariesCost items $102,860 for FY25, then $27,169 and $28,245 (as read). Moved and seconded; one speaker for; to the ballot as written (1:13:43). The minutes' entry under this heading reads “motions to move Article II as written”, a typo for III.
1:13:43Article IV: Maintenance and custodial employeesRead as the “Claremont Association of Maintenance Workers”; $87,789 for FY25, then $32,502 and $30,408 (as read). Moved (minutes: Sprague; second Whitney); Sprague speaks for; to the ballot as written (1:18:08).
1:18:08Article V: Claremont Association of Paraprofessionals$189,210. The printed article said 2015 for 2025; amended from the floor (minutes: Whitney, second Gallagher) and approved by voice vote (1:20:55); moved as amended (minutes: Crawford, second Hawkins); six speakers for; to the ballot as amended (1:31:21).
1:31:21IV. Closing activitiesReminder to vote March 12. Adjourned by voice vote (1:32:30); minutes: moved Skillen, seconded Whitney.

Discussion timeline

Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/15552 SchoolBoardDeliberative020324.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording. Quotations are the transcript as it stands, including its errors.

Chronological topics with what was said. Hover or focus a cell to expand it.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:20Opening; who presides“My name is Charlene Lovett, and I am the interim moderator today. So if I make a mistake, please forgive me.” Pratt thanks her “as being interim moderator” (0:02:18, where the transcript renders her name “challenge for”). Nobody says how she came to preside.HIGH
0:07:38Rules of Procedure: doubted votesRead aloud: “any voter who does the accuracy of any non county vote may require the moderator to determine a vote by counted show of hands or counted standing vote”. The printed sheet reads “doubts the accuracy of any non-counted vote” (quoted from the Rules of Procedure).MED
0:09:46Board goalsWhitney: the budget “was created to support a singular goal. And that goal is to dramatically improve academic growth”. Priorities: implement the district-wide curriculum, attract and retain staff, improve teaching practice and school culture (0:10:32).
0:11:23Finance committee goalsSprague: interventions begun with federal money continue only with “documentation of success”; “we put televised every single meeting, every minute of every meeting” (0:11:51); the budget subcommittee is now a year-round Finance Committee (0:30:44).
0:15:30Curriculum, coaching and professional developmentCrawford: “It will take a minimum of a year to see these scores improve” (0:17:03).
0:19:01Disruptive behaviors and social workersGallagher: “The board did approve an additional social worker for a total of three district wide social workers. Previously, all three elementary schools were sharing a single social worker with Stephens High.” (0:21:20).
0:22:51CTE expansionCrawford: health-science program and a continued career counselor at the tech center.
0:25:23Staff retention and contractsSprague on entry-level pay and the teachers' contract: “we have really made some great strides in becoming competitive” (0:27:33).
0:28:19Costs outside the district's controlWhitney: state aid decisions, “the Esser grant expiring that will expire in 2024” (0:28:36), unfunded mandates, energy and insurance costs.
0:32:30Budget presentation (Henry)Fund structure, expense functions, objects and revenues. Base adequacy for FY25 “is $4,182. For fiscal year 24, the current year is $4,100” (0:38:59), which is the 2 percent statutory adjustment. Retirement “19.64% of all wages on teachers” (0:39:24).POS
0:40:16Proposed versus defaultHenry reads the definition of default budget, stopping at “reduced by one time expenditures contained in the operating budget”, then: “our budget is 210,633 higher than what the proposed or excuse me, than the default” (0:41:05).OBS
0:42:33Tax effect and the $420,000“over last year's general budget were 1.2 million higher, or 3.55% increase, but the total amount to be raised after revenues is 0.34%”. The board “decided to use that fund balance to offset taxation”; the increase to be raised is “$796,718” before that and 376 thousand after (0:43:03, 0:43:32); about “$30.66 per 100,000 of property value” (0:44:20). On January 17 the same figure was given as 852,000.
0:47:34Budget changesPositions moved back from ESSER, two coaches, a technology person, the CTE program, a CMS academic coordinator, math materials “roughly 124,000”, and “all Esser positions were removed unless otherwise noted” (0:48:07). Trust funds: part of the Stevens roof replaced for “$370,765” (0:49:16).
0:51:49Article II read“totaling $39,582,407”; “Should this article be defeated, the default budget shall be $39,371,774”.
0:54:05For Article II: a board member as voter“Even though I am a member of the board. I support this budget because I have no questions about it. The process to develop this budget within the Finance committee was transparent and professional. It was televised on CCTV”.
0:57:27For Article II: second board member“Many hours were spent televised hours, as Whitney said, to provide sufficiency, transparency and accuracy.”
0:59:25Against Article II“What are we doing with this money that is being set aside for these positions?” A child is “getting taught by videos off of YouTube”; disruptive children take time from others; “I do not agree with this budget” (1:00:45).
1:01:15Superintendent's replyPratt: “I can't disagree with the concerns that we're seeing in my short time here. That's what the budget is trying to do.” The curriculum funding aims “to get away from the the YouTubes and stuff like that”.
1:02:57Gap in the transcriptNo transcribed words from here to 1:04:41 (about 104 seconds) and from there to 1:06:32 (about 111 seconds). The minutes place Tom Luther's process remarks in this part of the debate.OBS
1:06:32For Article II: district employee“My family has been in Claremont for over a century”; criticism of teachers “really betrays” understanding; “I work in the it”.
1:08:28For Article II: Gary Merchant“I feel this community is finally coming around.” School spending is “an investment” (1:08:58).
1:10:27Reconsideration restricted“RSA 40 colon 13 comma Roman numeral four. I moved to restrict reconsideration.” “Of article two.” Passed by voice vote (1:10:37). Paragraph IV of RSA 40:13 incorporates RSA 40:10, the section that authorizes the restriction; it lasts only until the session adjourns.
1:10:37Article III: secretariesSpeaker for: secretaries are “the face of the public Claremont Schools” (1:12:57).
1:15:50Article IV: maintenance and custodiansSprague: “our entry level wages were just not competitive”; the cost is “literally pennies on the dollar” (1:17:04).
1:18:41Article V: the year errorThe moderator reads “$189,210 is the estimated a crease this 2015 that correct?”; a voice answers “Been 2025.” (1:19:24). After an attempted vote without a second, the moderator corrects herself: “Oh I'm sorry, you're right, you're right. I should know that.” (1:20:22). Amendment adopted (1:20:55).POS
1:22:04For Article V: paraprofessionalsMatt Bean: “I've been a paraprofessional for the Claremont School District” for seven years; “We are educators. We are de-escalation masters. We are interventionists.” (1:22:41). The moderator holds him to two minutes (1:24:08).
1:26:51For Article V: a teacher and parent“These people don't have a living wage here in town.” “I can't think of any establishment in town that pays less than their starting rate” (1:29:01).
1:29:23Superintendent on the support-staff articles“so, as interim superintendent, I support all these articles.”
1:30:22For Article V: a 30-year paraprofessional“I'm at the top. There's no more steps for me. And I make a whopping 2456 an hour on 32 hours a week, and I have to work a second job.” (The figure is presumably $24.56.)
1:31:48Closing“Our average voting percentage for school board elections is 13 to 17% of our registered voters.”

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. A deliberative session is governed by RSA chapter 40 as applied to school districts and by the district's own Rules of Procedure; board rules such as the public-comment period and nonpublic sessions do not apply. Each flag names the rule it rests on, as that rule read on February 3, 2024.

HIGH The session was run by an interim moderator, an office state law does not create, with no record of how she was chosen

The district moderator presides at a school district meeting with the powers of a town moderator (RSA 197:19). If the moderator is absent, the clerk acts as moderator “until a moderator pro tempore shall be chosen” (RSA 197:20, statute text), and if the office is vacant, “the school district clerk shall serve as moderator or shall appoint a moderator pro tempore” (RSA 671:33, III, statute text). The school board may fill vacancies in district offices “except that of moderator” (RSA 197:26, statute text). The agenda, the Rules of Procedure sheet and the minutes all style Charlene Lovett “Interim Moderator” (agenda), she introduces herself that way at 0:00:20, and the elected moderator is not named anywhere in the record. Nothing on the recording or in the minutes shows the clerk presiding first, the meeting choosing a moderator pro tempore, or the clerk appointing one; the title was printed on the agenda before the session opened. The session's actions (sending five articles to the ballot, amending Article V, restricting reconsideration) were all taken under her gavel. Mitigation: no voter objected, every article went to the ballot as RSA 40:13, VI requires regardless of floor action, and the one amendment corrected an evident typographical error. A clerk's appointment made off the record would cure the defect; none has been located.

Sources: RSA 197:19 (district moderator; in force since 1979); RSA 197:20 (clerk acts until a moderator pro tempore is chosen); RSA 671:33, III (vacancy in moderator's office); RSA 197:26 (board may not fill the moderator's office); agenda; Rules of Procedure

MEDIUM The Rules of Procedure read to voters misstate how a vote can be challenged

At 0:07:38 the presiding officer read the district's rule that “any voter who doubts the accuracy of any non-counted vote may require the Moderator to determine a vote by a counted show of hands or counted standing vote” (Rules of Procedure text). State law, which RSA 40:13, IV makes binding at a deliberative session, says otherwise: a declared vote questioned immediately by “7 or more of the voters present” must be retaken by secret yes-no ballot (RSA 40:4-b), and 5 voters may request a secret ballot in writing before a vote (RSA 40:4-a). The sheet sets the threshold at one voter and the remedy at a counted show of hands, and it says nothing of the secret ballot. The sheet also omits RSA 40:13, IV's limits on amendment (no amending articles whose wording is prescribed by law; no amendment eliminating an article's subject matter). Nobody invoked either rule on February 3, so no vote was affected; the defect is in what voters were told about their rights.

Sources: RSA 40:4-b (questioning a vote; 7 voters; secret ballot); RSA 40:4-a (secret ballot on written request of 5 voters); RSA 40:13, IV (first session governed by RSA 40:4, 40:4-a, 40:4-b; amendment limits; text unchanged since 2019); Rules of Procedure.docx (4).pdf

OBSERVATION The default-budget definition given to voters stops short of the eliminated-positions clause

RSA 40:13, IX(b) defines the default budget as the prior year's appropriations adjusted for debt service, contracts and obligations, “reduced by one-time expenditures contained in the operating budget and by salaries and benefits of positions that have been eliminated in the proposed budget” (statute text). Henry's reading at 0:40:16 and the district's worksheet (dated 1/19/2024) both end the definition before the last clause, and the worksheet has no line for eliminated positions. RSA 40:13, XI(a)(4) requires the default budget form to show “Reductions for eliminated positions and benefit expenditures” (statute text). Whether any FY25 position counted as eliminated under the statute is not clear from the record: Henry said on January 17 that the middle school drops from 25 to 24 teaching positions through attrition, and here that “all Esser positions were removed” (0:48:07), but ESSER-paid positions were not in the FY24 operating budget. The worksheet also labels the default figure “Projected FY24 Default Budget” (worksheet text) where FY25 is meant. The default budget form filed with the Department of Revenue Administration would settle the point.

Sources: RSA 40:13, IX(b) and XI(a) (default budget definition and form contents); Claremont Default Budget FY25 (1).pdf

OBSERVATION The recording does not identify most floor speakers, and the transcript has gaps

Speakers were asked to write their names on a sheet and state name and ward at the podium (0:05:37), but the recording captures a name for only two floor speakers (Gary Merchant, and Matt by first name). The minutes are therefore the register of who spoke; their grouping by position, in speaking order within each group, fits every turn that can be checked on the recording, and this page names Article II's speakers from that order. The transcript has stretches with no words: about 104 and 111 seconds around 1:04:41, where the minutes place Tom Luther's process remarks, and about two minutes during the Article V debate, where the minutes list three speakers (Gallagher, Fontaine, Allen) the page cannot assign. These are gaps in the transcript, not necessarily in the video. The approved minutes also contain an error: under Article III they record a motion “to move Article II as written” (minutes text). The minutes themselves were posted promptly (flag 6). RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to name the members who moved and seconded each motion; at a deliberative session movers are voters, and the minutes name them.

Sources: approved minutes 2.3.24; RSA 91-A:2, II (contents of minutes)

POSITIVE A misprinted article was corrected on the floor before the ballot

Article V as printed gave its first-year cost as for 2015 rather than 2025. The error was caught when the article was read (1:18:41), corrected by a moved and seconded amendment, and adopted by the voters (1:20:55); the article went to the ballot as amended (1:31:21). RSA 40:13, IV allows amendment at the first session (“An amendment that changes the dollar amount of an appropriation in a warrant article shall not be deemed to violate this subparagraph”, statute text, and a date correction changes no amount), and RSA 40:13, VIII has the clerk print the ballot in substantially the amended wording. Fixing the error here, on the record, is the process working as designed. The presiding officer also caught and reversed her own attempt to put the amendment to a vote without a second (1:20:22).

Sources: RSA 40:13, IV and VIII (amendment at the first session; ballot wording)

POSITIVE Minutes posted within three business days, with a full register of speakers; accurate state-aid figure

The draft minutes were placed in the session's public packet folder on Wednesday, February 7, 2024 (Drive created 14:00 UTC), the third business day after a Saturday session, inside the five business days RSA 91-A:2, II allows, and they list every floor speaker with ward and position. Separately, Henry's statement that base adequacy rises from $4,100 to $4,182 (0:38:59) is exactly the 2 percent annual adjustment in RSA 198:40-d applied to the $4,100 in RSA 198:40-a, II, both as in force from July 1, 2023.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (minutes within 5 business days); draft minutes (Drive metadata read 2026-10-03); RSA 198:40-a, II ($4,100 base; 2023, 79:150); RSA 198:40-d (2 percent annual adjustment from July 1, 2024)

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page