Claremont School Board, May 15, 2024

A regular meeting at which the board adopts Eureka Squared and Into Math for K–8 ($85,729.28 within an existing $120,000 allocation), votes $50,000 of unbudgeted money for pre-bond architectural planning at the technical center (recorded in the minutes as $54,000), authorizes the chair to sign the teachers' union 403(b) sidebar, accepts the retiree list, and hears the interim superintendent announce an SREB program-of-studies project and a District Management Group strategic plan, with the business administrator projecting about $1 million left in the FY2024 budget. Built from the Cablecast recording's attributed dialogue, the agenda, the packet and the approved minutes. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (seven members)
Date
Wednesday, May 15, 2024
Start time
Agenda: 6:30 p.m. The chair calls the meeting to order at the start of the recording (0:00:02). The minutes record no start or adjournment time; adjournment is by consent at 2:02:43, against an agenda time of 8:30 p.m.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, Claremont (agenda masthead; no room named)
Board composition
Seven members, all present (minutes: "Present: all present"; roll at 0:00:38): Heather Whitney (chair), Frank Sprague (vice chair), Bonnie Miles, Whitney Skillen, Arlene Hawkins, Candace Crawford, Michael Petrin. The clerk was absent at the start and Candace Crawford called the roll (0:00:29).
Recording
Cablecast: School Board Meeting 5/15/24 (observed extent 2:02:48 from the last row of the dialogue file; the Cablecast API refuses requests from this environment, so the catalogue run time was not read)
Minutes
10. approved CSB meeting minutes 5.15.24 (created on Drive June 10, 2024); 5.15.24 draft CSB meeting minutes (1).pdf (created May 29, 2024, in the 10. CSB 6.5.24 packet). Submitted by clerk Noelle Kronberg.
Gaps before this meeting
The May 1, 2024 meeting announced on April 17 is not in the record (no notice, agenda, minutes or recording located). A board retreat was held May 11; its draft minutes sit in the June 5 packet. Neither is part of this page.

Participants

Names and roles follow the agenda masthead and the approved minutes; attendance follows the minutes. Where the dialogue file's speaker label differs from the minutes, the row says so. Students who presented are described by role only.
NameRoleParticipation
Heather WhitneyChairPresides; disposes of the consent agenda without a vote (0:00:51); reports on the meeting with the mayor and city manager (1:54:51); explains why ESSER cannot replace ESSER-bought furniture (1:41:20). The dialogue file's chair clusters also carry several of Bonnie Miles's remarks and seconds (see Miles).
Frank SpragueVice Chair; Finance subcommittee chairQuestions on math pacing (0:47:14), Easter Seals contract costs (1:15:17), unspent technology and instructional salary lines (1:33:11, 1:36:20); moves acceptance of the retiree list (1:45:41); Finance report (1:48:36).
Bonnie MilesMember; Capital Improvement subcommittee chairRoll answer Yes (0:00:42). Per the approved minutes she seconded the architect funding and the 403(b) sidebar motions and thanked Crawford for the teacher appreciation brunch; on the recording those seconds sit in the chair's rows (0:58:28, 1:28:33) and the thanks in a row labelled Hawkins (2:02:16). The capital-improvement report "today I sent an email to Mr. Sprague and Miss Crawford" (1:47:37) is labelled for the chair; it reads as the committee chair, Miles.
Whitney SkillenMember; Policy subcommittee chairAsks that every school function be represented in the strategic plan (0:10:15); seconds the retiree list (1:45:46); asks about honoring retirees (1:46:06); policy report (1:51:45). The chair calls her Wendy and Miss Gillan.
Arlene HawkinsMember; Curriculum committee representativeAsks the strategic plan timeline (0:11:42); moves adoption of the math programs (minutes; the motion is garbled on tape, 0:51:24); questions Nester on programs and evaluators (1:03:59, 1:12:34); asks about furniture (1:40:14) and retiring bonds (1:58:16); announces the May 29 SAU retreat (1:59:33). Per the minutes she also asked the Youth and Government presenters what the board could do (0:25:59, labelled for the chair).
Candace CrawfordMemberCalls the roll (0:00:38); asks the cost of SREB phase two (0:13:04); seconds the math motion (minutes); moves the architect funding (0:58:17) and the 403(b) sidebar (1:28:19); reads the special-education identification rates aloud (1:04:50).
Michael PetrinMemberAsks whether the strategic plan will consider moving grade 8 to the high school (0:13:29), about math program transitions (0:44:44), state renovation aid (0:57:03) and 403(b) costs (1:25:47).
Nicole Bouchard; Kylee PlummerStudent board members (masthead)Not heard on the recording; the minutes do not record their attendance.
Noelle KronbergSchool Board ClerkAbsent at the start (chair, 0:00:29); submitted the minutes.
Chris PrattInterim Superintendent (masthead)Superintendent's report on SREB phase two and the District Management Group (0:01:37 to 0:10:09); calls himself "your former principal and now the superintendent" (0:32:21); presents the retiree list (1:45:14).
Michael KoskiAssistant SuperintendentIntroduces the math item (0:33:58); reports a corrected calendar typo (1:54:25).
McLaughlin (agenda: Catlin McLaughlin)Director of Curriculum and InstructionPresents the K–8 math recommendation (0:34:18 to 0:44:33). The agenda and minutes print Catlin; the dialogue file and other district documents use Kat or Cat; the first name is unresolved.
Dr. Alex HerzogDirector, Sugar River Valley Regional Technical CenterPre-bond planning proposal (0:53:34 to 1:00:28).
Ben NesterDirector of Special Education (agenda: Director of Student Services)Special-education report (1:00:51 to 1:22:50).
Mary HenryBusiness Administrator403(b) sidebar (1:23:07); financial update (1:29:30 to 1:45:06).
Jeff SmallDirector of TechnologyExplains unspent technology lines (1:33:39).
Jill ChastenayStevens social studies teacher; Youth and Government advisor (agenda and minutes)Presents the program (0:15:02); the dialogue file labels her Ms. Chastain.
Two Stevens studentsYouth and Government delegates (a junior elected youth governor; a senior)Describe their experience (0:21:19, 0:23:45). Named on the agenda; not named here.
Hope DamonState RepresentativeUpdates the board on the special-education funding bill (1:21:16).

Agenda

Official agenda items in order, with the time each is taken up on the recording and its disposition from the recording and the approved minutes.
Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:02I. Call to Order and Pledge of AllegianceClerk absent; Crawford calls the roll (0:00:38).
0:00:51II. Consent Agenda (agenda: "vote required"): 1. agenda; 2. Minutes Approval, April 17, 2024The chair: "Seeing none, we will consider the amendments and that there are no amendments to the board agenda and that the minutes from April 17th, 2024 have been approved." No vote. Minutes: "Consent Approval". See flag 3.
0:01:19II. Citizens CommentsNone.
0:01:37III. Superintendent's ReportSREB phase two and the District Management Group (0:02:24, 0:06:06). See flag 4.
0:14:22IV.1 Youth in Government ExperiencePresentation by the advisor and two students.
0:33:48IV.2 2024-2025 K-8 Purchase of Instructional Math Materials (Vote) (Exhibits A–D)Eureka Squared (K–5) and Into Math (6–8), total $85,729.28 (0:43:37). Minutes: Hawkins moved "to approve the Eureka2 and Into Math programs for the 2024-2025 school year", Crawford seconded; unanimous voice vote (0:53:12).
0:53:24IV.3 SRVRTC Pre-Bond Planning Service Funding (agenda: "Contract estimate $54,000, unbudgeted") (Exhibit H)Crawford moves "the expenditure of the $50,000" (0:58:17); second in the chair's row (0:58:28; minutes: Bonnie Miles); the chair puts "approving $50,000" (0:58:35); passes. Minutes record "$54,000 as presented". See flag 1.
1:00:42IV.4 Presentation from Director of Student Services (Exhibit E)Discussion only.
1:22:52IV.5 SREA 403(b) Sidebar (Exhibit F)Crawford moves that the chair sign (1:28:19); second in the chair's row (1:28:33; minutes: Bonnie Miles); unanimous (1:29:09).
1:29:22IV.6 Financial Update (Exhibit G)Discussion only.
1:45:06IV.7 2024-2025 Claremont Retirees List (Exhibit I)Sprague moves (1:45:41), Skillen seconds (1:45:46); voice vote (1:45:59). Exhibit I is not among the ten documents MAP.md records for the packet folder.
1:47:25IV.8 School Board Sub-CommitteesCapital Improvement, Finance, Policy, Curriculum, SRVRTC Visioning. See flag 5.
1:54:13V. Other BusinessCalendar correction; city–school meeting; bonds; SAU retreat; June meeting dates.
1:57:23VI. Future Dates/Future Agenda ItemsJune 5 meeting; June 20 cell phone policy and bell schedule; public forum (agenda).
2:02:43VII. Adjournment"Is there any opposition to attorney [adjourn]? No." Minutes: "Consent adjournment".

Discussion timeline

Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/15722 SchoolBoard051524.mp4.CSV). Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:29Roll and consent"Our clerk is unable to be here at the start of this meeting. So Miss Crawford has agreed to call." Then: "All items on the consent agenda will be accepted or approved without discussion. Unless a motion is made to move a specific item to the regular agenda." No vote follows.OBSERVATION
0:01:19Citizens' comments"We'll now open the floor to non-agenda item citizens comments for policy BEDH. Is there anyone present who would like to speak to citizens? Comments? Seeing none, we will close citizens comments."
0:02:24SREB phase two"So we through Esser grants, we added a phase two." SREB will provide training on programs of study, "Because currently what we have right now is not necessarily a program of studies, but it's just a course catalog." Cost, asked by Crawford (0:13:04): "Because around 28,000." "A little over 28, I believe."OBSERVATION
0:06:06Strategic plan"When I was a superintendent in Vermont, we used a company out of Boston called the District Management Group". "We currently don't have a strategic plan for SO6." "Assistant Superintendent Kosky myself will have our first meeting virtually with them on Monday." Preliminary analysis "typically it's up to two months", then "3 to 4 months" for the plan (0:12:11). No cost or contract is mentioned.OBSERVATION
0:13:29Grade 8 at the high schoolPetrin: "there was discussion, of possibly moving eighth grade to the high school." Pratt: "that will be part of the discussion".
0:14:22Youth and GovernmentThe advisor: "We had around ten kids this year." "We had our kids submit 14 bills with only ten students" and "of the 14 bills, we had six make it through committee and then make it to the floor of the House." A student delegate was elected youth governor. On cost: "220 right now. For a student to participate in the program" (0:26:31); "it certainly wouldn't hurt if we had a slush fund for students".
0:32:21Superintendent's titlePratt: "I just want to say, as your former principal and now the superintendent." The agenda and the approved minutes for this meeting still print "Christopher Pratt, Interim Superintendent".OBSERVATION
0:34:18K–8 math materials"The current situation is that math and focus is not aligned to the standards." "So that means that the district has never been aligned to the standards." No teachers had capacity to pilot because of the new ELA program; Koski: "That lack of teacher participation was was really a signal of capacity." Eureka Squared has "140 lessons all aligned to the standards"; middle-school teachers chose Into Math (0:41:54).POSITIVE
0:42:09Measures and cost"Grade three, I think, is going to be a really key year to start looking at". "The grand total for purchasing both programs would be $85,729.28, but, we have $120,000 allocated right now". After first-year costs "the cost should be roughly what we're currently spending on math and focus, if not slightly less." The chair: "So we don't need to attach the dollar number to our motion. No, because you had already budgeted" (0:51:00).POSITIVE
0:51:00Math voteThe motion is garbled on tape ("Representative. Good, good. I so more."); the chair asks for a second "approval of the Eureka two and into math program for the 2425 school year". Vote: "All in favor of the motion as articulated by Miss Hawkins? Say, I. I opposed. Motion passes."
0:53:56Pre-bond architectural planningHerzog: "this is the LaValley resident architects" [Lavallee Brensinger Architects]; "The actual amount is for $50,000." Safety: "we have some real safety concerns from 30 years ago". On funding: "it's not in this year's budget on it. So I wasn't aware if there was any, any year monies available. It can't be in the Esser because that's kind of that window has passed." (0:55:50). Crawford: "I understand that there may be some monies at the end of the year".MEDIUM
0:57:03State sharePetrin: "Renovation is 75 state funding and 25% local." Herzog: "But legislative law says 50%, 50%. But in the past, every renovation was 75%." The chair: "So this 50,000 would be part would be our part of our 20. 5%." (Speaker's characterization; no statute was cited.)
0:58:17Architect voteCrawford: "I make a motion that we approve of the expenditure of the $50,000 to go forward with the assessment by the architectural firm." Chair: "All in favor of approving $50,000 for the retirement of architectural services for potential renovation." Passes.MEDIUM
1:00:56Roll-call asideNester: "I noticed I wasn't asked to call roll today". The chair: "the last time you did roll call was the last time you were going to be roll call."
1:01:50Special-education ratesNester: "our identification rate currently is right around 25%, a little bit under". Speech and language: state 11.4%, Claremont "a little lower"; the most cognitively impaired: state 2.7%, Claremont 5.1; emotional disturbance "with Claremont coming in at 10.2% with the state average being 55.7" (as transcribed; Crawford's reply, "So twice the state average.", implies a state figure near 5%). Crawford reads "the state average is 18%" (1:05:30).
1:07:24Programs and recommendationsRecommendations: "the need for behavioral programing at the middle school and high school", the high-school Academy, and multi-tiered systems of support. "I think the most important thing we can do for our special education students is to address the base curriculum and instruction needs for the whole district." The program table carries "a number of typos in the grade level column" (1:13:41).
1:15:17Contracted staffEaster Seals paraprofessionals "bill out at an hourly rate of maybe around 30 an hour". Nester's figures: "I didn't have Mary review those, so don't completely take that to the bank." Exhibit E projects FY25 contracted related services at $515,000 of $1,092,500 in all.
1:19:02Special-education revenueCatastrophic aid "usually get around, 600 to 700,000 a year"; Medicaid "around 500, 600,000". Crawford: "we're only reimbursed at a 15 to 20% level." Damon: the tiered funding bill "is in trouble. It did not get a favorable committee report from Senate Education" (1:21:19).
1:23:07403(b) sidebarHenry: payments now go to "five, six, seven different avenues"; "This is streamlining that through one place". Existing Fidelity accounts stay; new staff would use the single platform. Cost per account: "I know it's usually like a dollar or two account."
1:29:30Financial updateAn additional catastrophic-aid payment for students aged 21 to 22: "We received $205,210.46." The report's bottom line "said 576,000" (Exhibit G: $576,529.59 on a $34,880,311.92 budget); with a $25,000 purchase-order fix "we would be at 601,000", and with the "$420,000, which I have not gone in and put against this budget", "a little over $1 million right now". "I'm still finding things."
1:33:11Unspent linesSprague on technology: "about 200,000 in unexpected technology money". Crawford on vocational tuition of $42,000 with nothing spent; Henry: "Haven't gotten any bills yet". Sprague: "about 500,000 here. That's unencumbered" in district-wide instructional salaries (1:36:20).
1:38:52A position not chargeable to ESSERHenry on a middle-school social worker: "I can't move the money unless the contract says S [ESSER] on it. The contract does not say Esser on it. So I need to keep that in the general budget, even though it was supposed to be earmarked for Esser."POSITIVE
1:41:20FurnitureThe chair: "because that furniture was bought with Esser funds or funds associated with Covid relief, we cannot use Esser funds to replace that furniture." Henry will get principals' requests "so that we could you guys could decide if you wanted to use some of this money".
1:45:14RetireesPratt: "So we can show in the minutes that the board accepts the list of retirees". Accepted by voice. No district-level retirement recognition exists, members say.
1:48:36Finance subcommitteeSprague: "we met at length today. Candy. Heather and I met with the whole administrative team" on out-of-district placements, and on audit-cited policy deficiencies. The chair, of the subcommittee minutes: "I just shared it with our group to approve them and make sure that my minutes were accurate." Hawkins: "they go on the website under committees." Chair: "They should that will go." Sprague: "we're meeting monthly".OBSERVATION
1:53:03SRVRTC visioningA stakeholders' meeting with SREB "On May 30th", "the Teal Lantern room at 6:00". Crawford wants SREB to present to the full board in June, "Because we're not meeting in July."
1:54:51City and schoolAfter meeting the city manager and mayor, the plan is to "reconvene in June or July to kind of fix an agenda for a meeting in September or October. And the real focus is going to be elected officials talking to elected officials." "We want to have these conversations in public." Upcoming items: the cell phone policy and a proposed bell schedule change, with "more time for community comments" (1:57:23).
1:58:16BondsHenry: "Not not yet. We're not done with our bond payments." The high-school bond's last payment is "20, 27, I think"; "that's the big bond." Exhibit G budgets FY24 bond interest of $380,901.68 and principal of $847,109.69.
1:59:33SAU retreat and June datesHawkins: "A 29th is the say [SAU] retreat 630". The June 5 meeting conflicts with class night; the second June meeting moves to Thursday, June 20, because of the June 19 holiday (2:02:02).

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each one cites the rule it rests on as that rule read on May 15, 2024; check the recording and the primary source before relying on any of them. Severity: HIGH, a likely breach of a binding rule or a missed statutory deadline; MEDIUM, a probable process gap; OBSERVATION, notable with no confirmed rule; POSITIVE, practice beyond the legal minimum. This page carries no HIGH flag.

MEDIUM The board voted $50,000 for architectural planning; the minutes record $54,000

RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to record "final decisions". The agenda listed the item as "Contract estimate $54,000, unbudgeted". On the recording Crawford moves "the expenditure of the $50,000" (0:58:17) and the chair puts the question as "approving $50,000" (0:58:35). The Lavallee Brensinger proposal in the packet (Exhibit H, dated April 1, 2024) itemizes fees of $15,000, $5,000, $8,000, $8,000, $7,500, $500 and $6,000, which total $50,000 before reimbursable expenses, and Herzog told the board "The actual amount is for $50,000" (0:53:56); at the April 17 meeting (show 15693) he had put the contract at about $54,500. The approved minutes nevertheless record "a motion to approve the spending of the $54,000 as presented for the retainment of architectural services". The board approved the minutes in that form. The motion also named no appropriation: Herzog said the money was "not in this year's budget" and the funding was to come from year-end money (0:55:50); RSA 32:10 lets the board transfer between appropriations within the total voted, but the record does not show which lines the $50,000 came from.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (minutes include final decisions); RSA 32:10 (transfers by the governing body); Exhibit H; approved minutes, item IV.3

MEDIUM Draft minutes reached the public share on the ninth business day

RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to be "open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting" (statute); the deadline was Wednesday, May 22, 2024. The draft minutes were created on Drive on May 29, 2024, in the next packet folder, 10. CSB 6.5.24, the ninth business day counting out Memorial Day; the approved version followed on June 10. Drive dates show when a reader of the share could see a document, not when it was written. Graded MEDIUM under the project's rule: the meeting was noticed and packeted, the minutes exist, and only their timing fails the statute. This is closer to the deadline than the April 17 minutes (fifteenth business day).

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2023 codification); 5.15.24 draft minutes

OBSERVATION A consent agenda the agenda says requires a vote was again approved by declaration

The agenda heads the block "Consent Agenda (vote required)". The chair declared the agenda and the April 17 minutes approved when no one asked to pull an item (0:00:51); no motion or vote is heard, and the minutes record "Consent Approval" with no mover or seconder. Unlike April 17, the minutes do record the decision, which is what RSA 91-A:2, II requires, so this is noted as a gap between the posted agenda's own label and the board's practice. The board's by-laws, which would govern consent procedure, were not adopted until June 5, 2024.

Sources: agenda, item II; RSA 91-A:2, II

OBSERVATION Two consultant engagements announced as settled, with no board vote, contract or cost for the strategic plan on the record

Pratt reported that "through Esser grants, we added a phase two" of the SREB work (0:02:24), at "around 28,000" when Crawford asked (0:13:19), and that the District Management Group would develop a strategic plan for SO6, with a first meeting the following Monday (0:06:06, 0:09:15). Neither engagement was on the agenda as an action item, neither was voted by this board, and no cost, contract, engagement letter or purchase order for the District Management Group appears in this meeting's packet or minutes. The minutes record only that "the District Management Group (a third party organization) will come in to help develop a strategic plan". The SREB phase two is described as ESSER-funded, which carries federal documentation and procurement duties; whether those were met cannot be judged from this record. Herzog said the same night that the ESSER "window has passed" for his project (0:55:50).

Sources: approved minutes, item III

OBSERVATION The Finance subcommittee met that day with minutes circulated privately for approval and not located in any public share

Sprague reported "we met at length today" with "the whole administrative team" (1:48:36), and Nester and the chair referred to the same session (1:01:26, 1:47:59). The chair said she had "shared it with our group to approve them", and that the minutes will go on the website (1:50:33, 1:50:45); the approved minutes say they "will be added to the website under committees". RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) makes "any committee, subcommittee, or subordinate body" of the board a public body, and RSA 91-A:2, II requires its minutes to be open to inspection within five business days. No notice, agenda or minutes of this May 15 session has been located; the subcommittee folders now linked from the district website contain nothing from 2024. Graded as an observation because the site as it stood in 2024 cannot be inspected and notice may have been posted in a place not searched.

Sources: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d); RSA 91-A:2, II

OBSERVATION Where the recording, the dialogue file and the minutes differ

The diarizer merges Bonnie Miles with the chair and with Arlene Hawkins: the seconds the minutes give to Miles on the architect and 403(b) motions sit in the chair's rows (0:58:28, 1:28:33), the capital-improvement report sits in a chair row (1:47:37), and Miles's thanks to Crawford sit in a Hawkins row (2:02:16). The question to the Youth and Government presenters (0:25:59) is the chair's in the dialogue file and Hawkins's in the minutes. The minutes do not record that the clerk was absent at the start or that Crawford called the roll (0:00:29). Pratt describes himself as "now the superintendent" (0:32:21) while this meeting's agenda and minutes print "Interim Superintendent". The teacher is Ms. Chastain in the dialogue file and Jill Chastenay on the agenda and in the minutes; this page follows the documents.

Sources: approved minutes; RSA 91-A:2, II (movers and seconders recorded)

POSITIVE A curriculum purchase explained in full before the vote, and a federal charge refused for want of documentation

Before voting on the K–8 math materials the board heard the problem (materials "not aligned to the standards"), the selection process, the measures of success, the total cost of $85,729.28 against a $120,000 allocation, and the expected later-year cost (0:34:18 to 0:44:33), with questions from four members. Separately, Henry declined to move a social worker's salary to ESSER because the contract did not identify the position as ESSER-funded (1:38:52), noting the need for that backup "when we get audited". Federal cost principles require costs charged to an award to "Be adequately documented"; keeping an undocumented charge off the grant is the practice that rule expects.

Sources: 2 CFR 200.403(g) (2023 edition)

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page