Participants
Everyone heard or addressed on the recording. Spellings follow the agenda and approved minutes; where a name is unresolved, the role is given instead. Students other than the two student board members are not named on this page.
| Name | Role | Participation |
| Heather Whitney | Chair, presiding | Questions the students on police presence (0:11:38). Reorders the agenda to hear the auditor first (0:25:04). Raises salary, accountability and qualifications concerns about the safety specialist and proposes deferring it to April 2 (2:09:11, 2:16:35, 2:30:34). Proposes signs for the meeting room (2:37:47). Opposes the Acuity letter and votes no (2:42:25, 2:42:49). Thanks the retiring members (2:48:54). |
| Frank Sprague | Vice chair; Finance subcommittee chair | Asks whether FY2020 issues were fixed in FY2021 (0:33:32); raises the IRS and ACA matter in the audit (0:50:46). Asks the superintendent to follow the English-language executive order (1:53:20) and HR to show start dates on job postings (1:55:53). Says the safety salary is "way too much money." (2:28:03). Moves the calendar (2:36:21) and the Acuity letter (2:41:58); moves to adjourn (2:51:39). Finance subcommittee to meet April 4 (2:43:08). |
| Candace Crawford | Member; Capital Improvement subcommittee chair | Questions the auditor on policy, timing and follow-through (0:34:48, 0:35:43, 0:37:13). Moves the $4,000 donation (1:45:58); seconds the safety-specialist motion (2:06:04); asks for a four-year degree requirement (2:32:58). Presents and reads the Acuity letter (2:39:35, 2:40:08). Named audit liaison (0:49:15). |
| Arlene Hawkins | Member; curriculum committee representative; Policy subcommittee | Corrects the audit year on the agenda (0:01:20). Nominates Crawford as audit liaison (0:49:15); asks when the SAU audit will be current (0:49:57). Suggests advertising the safety post as grant funded (2:25:46). Reports Policy subcommittee and curriculum committee meetings held that day (2:43:47, 1:58:44). Mentions the mayor's fair-funding petition as an individual matter (2:51:09). |
| Bonnie Miles | Member (final meeting) | Moves to hire a Stevens safety specialist (2:05:48), then withdraws the motion (2:32:51). Seconds the Acuity letter (2:42:04). Thanks the superintendent for his statement on immigration enforcement at schools (2:45:30); offers a piano to the music program (2:46:15); supports a longer band block (2:47:03). |
| Whitney Skillen | Member (final meeting); Policy subcommittee chair | Asks about the safety specialist's uniform and suggests plain clothes (2:06:52, 2:08:05); asks about grant risk and pay equity and suggests a one-year contract with a safety-plan deliverable (2:22:45, 2:23:14). Suggests a student help the Policy subcommittee (2:44:47). Farewell remarks (2:50:20). |
| Michael Petrin | Member | Absent per the approved minutes. |
| Miles Sheehan | Student board member, Stevens High School | Music and arts report; asks for band to return to a double block after losing "roughly 96 hours of rehearsal time." (0:05:12). Reads his own account of the February 11 lockdown (0:08:12 to 0:10:59). |
| Lily Clark | Student board member, Stevens High School (agenda: Lilly) | Sports report (0:02:26); describes classmates' social-media replies and her experience of the lockdown (0:07:20, 0:12:15); suggests reviewing the phone policy (0:21:24). |
| Christopher Pratt | Superintendent, SAU 6 | Asks the students what would make Stevens safer (0:20:25). Presents the $4,000 donation (1:44:54) and his report, including the March 17 safety forum and the new truancy officer, Scott Maple (1:49:18, 1:50:43). Proposes the safety specialist (2:01:01). Presents the calendar (2:34:12). |
| Mary Henry | Business Administrator, SAU 6 | On policies versus procedures (0:43:36); on the IRS matter (0:51:43); "This is driving me crazy because I don't have numbers" (0:54:30). |
| Patrick O'Hearn | Human Resources Director, SAU 6 | Agrees to add start dates to job postings (1:56:46); says the safety post would not come from Title I (2:26:48). |
| Michael Campo | Partner, Plodzik & Sanderson, P.A. (auditor; virtual) | Presents FY2020 findings and audit history (0:25:46 to 0:33:01); proposes monthly check-ins with a board member (0:45:04). |
| Scott Blewitt | YouthCAN Prevention Coordinator, West Central Behavioral Health | Introduces the YRBS presenters (0:59:17); alcohol and marijuana trends (1:01:44, 1:03:43); response rate (1:38:01); youth action clubs and initiatives (1:29:41). |
| Jennifer Gallagher | Prevention Educator, Turning Points Network | Relationship-violence and mental-health data (1:09:41 to 1:15:09); notes the age of consent (1:24:10); Turning Points initiatives (1:32:23). |
| TLC presenter (name unresolved) | SHINE educator, TLC Family Resource Center; also a Turning Points prevention educator | Presents TLC services and sexual-health data (1:16:12 to 1:25:31; 1:35:15). The approved minutes print Kari Hague; her self-introduction is transcribed as "I'm Kerry Rochford," (1:16:12) and Blewitt's introduction as "Kerry Rochford. Hague" (0:59:17). The project has not resolved the name. |
| Hannah Brooks | Greater Sullivan County Public Health Network, Dartmouth-Hitchcock | Survey reliability (1:07:00); the Getting to Y youth data project and LGBTQ+ connection groups (1:26:02 to 1:28:55). |
| Noelle Kronberg | School board clerk | Reads the roll (0:00:35; transcript "Noel Cronenberg"); signs the minutes. |
| Unidentified | Crosstalk | 54 short rows the dialogue file leaves unidentified, mostly acknowledgments and setup chatter during the survey presentation (0:57:46 to 0:59:15). |
Agenda
Items from CSB Agenda 3.5.25 (2).pdf, in the order taken up; agenda wording is quoted from that document. Dispositions from the recording, checked against the approved minutes.
| Taken up | Item | Agenda text / disposition |
| 0:00:04 | I. Call to order, pledge | Agenda: "6:30 PM Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance". |
| 0:00:35 | II. Roll call | Six present; Petrin absent (minutes). |
| 0:00:45 | II.a Consent agenda: agenda; minutes "2.5.25 & 3.5.25" | Hawkins's floor amendment: the audit item becomes FY2020 (0:01:20, 0:01:21). "Consent agenda is approved." (0:01:21). Minutes: "Consent approval" of "2.5.25 & 2.15.25". See flag 4. |
| 0:01:21 | II.b Citizens' comments | Invitation under policy BEDH; no speakers (0:01:54). |
| 0:01:54 | II.c Student board member report | Sports, music, the band schedule, and the February 11 lockdown. |
| 0:25:20 | IV.1 FY2021 audit, FY2022–23 progress (taken as FY2020) | Moved ahead by consent (0:25:04). Discussion only; Crawford nominated as audit liaison (0:49:15), no vote. See flag 1, flag 2. |
| 0:55:16 | IV.2 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (Exhibit A) | Presentation; discussion only. |
| 1:46:24 | III. Superintendent's report | Taken after the donation. Truancy officer introduced (1:50:43); April 2 meeting to cover achievement data (1:58:03). |
| 1:44:54 | IV.4 S.A.L.T. donation, $4,000 (Exhibit C) | Crawford moved (1:45:58), Miles seconded per minutes; voice vote, carried (1:45:59). See flag 10. |
| 2:01:01 | IV.6 SHS Safety Specialist Proposal (Exhibit D) | Miles moved to hire (2:05:48), Crawford seconded (2:06:04); after discussion Miles withdrew the motion (2:32:51); deferred to April 2. The agenda skips item 5. |
| 2:34:12 | IV.3 2025–2026 calendar (Exhibit B) | Sprague moved (2:36:21), Whitney seconded; voice vote, carried (2:36:36). See flag 9. |
| 2:37:47 | IV.7 SRVRTC sign | No vote; Crawford to ask about the carpentry class making it. |
| 2:39:20 | IV.8 Citizens' comments response: Acuity proposal (Exhibit E) | Sprague moved to endorse the letter (2:41:58), Miles seconded (2:42:04); carried with the chair opposed (2:42:49). Minutes: "all present voting in favor". See flag 3. |
| 2:43:05 | IV.9 Subcommittees | Finance to meet April 4 (2:43:08); Policy subcommittee report (2:43:47). See flag 5. |
| 2:47:48 | V. Other business | Committee interest for 2025 appointments; retreat to wait for new members; farewells. |
| 2:51:39 | VII. Adjournment | Minutes: "Consent adjournment at 9:20pm". |
Discussion timeline
Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/16371 SchoolBoard030525.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording.
Topics in the order discussed. Quotations are the transcript as it stands. Survey figures are as presenters stated them; the presentation is Exhibit A- Stevens Board YRBS Presentation 2025 (1).pdf.
| Time | Topic | What was said | Flags |
| 0:00:04 | Call to order; consent agenda | Roll (0:00:35). Hawkins: the packet holds the FY2020 audit, not FY2021 (0:01:20); the chair accepts the change. No citizens' comments (0:01:54). | MEDIUM |
| 0:02:20 | Student report: sports and music | Sports results; senior play and band festival. "Band was already a year long course." and lost "roughly 96 hours of rehearsal time." (0:05:12); request for a double block (0:06:05). | |
| 0:07:10 | Student report: the February 11 lockdown | Sheehan reads his account: "I heard the stomping in the radios, and I had my classmates crying." (0:08:58); "many of us were comforted by how fast the police response was" (0:09:21). Clark: "Because it's never like you're never prepared to be told to put your hands in the air with guns pointed at you." (0:12:49). The chair apologizes for adults' social-media comments (0:11:10). | |
| 0:19:26 | What would make Stevens safer | Pratt asks the students (0:20:25). Clark: hall-wandering now means being sent home; review the phone policy (0:21:00, 0:21:24). Sheehan: "it's at a spot where all we can do is tweak." (0:23:41). | |
| 0:25:41 | Auditor: history of the engagement | Campo: the firm audits "Claremont, Unity and Sussex." [SAU 6] and most audits "don't take multiple years to complete." (0:25:46). Past management "unreceptive, unavailable"; sealed boxes of completed audits (0:26:37). | OBSERVATION |
| 0:28:16 | Auditor: FY2020 findings | Unreconciled general ledger (0:28:37); misstated budget-to-actual reports as a result (0:29:23); unapproved, undocumented journal entries (0:29:43); stale-dated checks (0:30:16); no credit card policy (0:30:34); unauthorized reimbursements (0:31:21); review financial policies every three years (0:32:13). | OBSERVATION |
| 0:33:23 | Board questions on the audit | Sprague: were FY2020 issues fixed in FY2021? "Some have been addressed, but some have not." (0:33:41). Crawford: report dated July 21, 2023 (0:35:43); who enforces findings: the Department of Education receives the reports (0:38:14); lenders may look at them (0:38:55). | HIGH |
| 0:39:55 | Policies and procedures | Hawkins and the chair ask who should write financial policies; Campo: "Don't build it for that person. Build it for the seat." (0:42:38). Henry distinguishes procedures from policies (0:43:36). | |
| 0:45:04 | Monthly audit check-ins; liaison | Campo proposes a monthly meeting with a board delegate (0:45:04); Hawkins nominates Crawford (0:49:15); first meeting March 18 (0:49:23). SAU audit: "I want all three caught up and ready to go." (0:50:12). | POSITIVE OBSERVATION |
| 0:50:46 | IRS and ACA matter | Sprague received the full audit by email and raises the IRS matter (0:50:46, 0:51:13); Henry: attorneys and HR are on it (0:51:43). Campo: current management "very cooperative" (0:53:21). | MEDIUM OBSERVATION |
| 0:59:17 | YRBS: substance use | 2023 survey, Stevens grades 9–12. Alcohol in the last 30 days: "15.8% of Stevens ninth through 12th graders", down from 32.9% in 2013 (1:01:44, 1:02:50); marijuana 17.6%, up 2.2 points from 2021 (1:03:43); recall of prevention messaging 47.8% against 73% in 2015 (1:07:21). | |
| 1:09:41 | YRBS: relationships and mental health | Gallagher (Turning Points): 13% of students report being forced to have intercourse, higher than region and state (1:12:13); "56.6% of Stephens students felt that they never or rarely got the help that they needed" (1:14:38). Response rate 66% (1:15:53), 338 of 515 students (1:38:01). | |
| 1:16:12 | YRBS: sexual health; TLC programs | TLC presenter: 43% of Stevens students report ever having intercourse against 38% regionally and 34% statewide (1:21:38); 88% asked for consent at last sexual contact (1:24:46). Gallagher, on the legal age: "Age of consent in New Hampshire is 16, not 13." (1:24:09), a statement reported as hers. | |
| 1:26:02 | Youth programs and closing | Getting to Y data project and LGBTQ+ groups (Brooks, 1:26:42); sticker shock and compliance checks (Blewitt, 1:30:06); opt-out survey consent (1:38:01). Pratt credits the partners for improving trends (1:39:08). | |
| 1:43:54 | Dense agenda; S.A.L.T. donation | The chair: the agenda is dense because items were bumped (1:43:54). $4,000 from the Jack and Dorothy Byrne Foundation for the Student Athlete Leadership Team (1:44:54); carried (1:45:59). | OBSERVATION |
| 1:46:31 | Superintendent's report | Highlights; the March 17 school safety forum "in a direct response to the lockdown gun incident we had that occurred at Stevens High School on February 11th" (1:49:18); new truancy officer Scott Maple (1:50:43). | |
| 1:52:26 | Questions on the report | Crawford urges residents to read the monthly report online (1:52:26). Sprague on the English-language executive order and services for non-English speakers (1:53:20); Pratt: "if they're here, we're going to support them and we're going to provide them their education." (1:54:29). Job postings to show start dates (1:55:53). Achievement data set for April 2 (1:58:03, 2:00:41). | |
| 2:01:01 | Safety specialist proposed | Pratt reads his letter; funded from Title grants (2:04:28); the students involved "were in the hallway for over 40 minutes" (2:04:56). Exhibit D: $65,000–$70,000 salary, about $80,000 with benefits, high school diploma required. Miles moves to hire; Crawford seconds (2:05:48, 2:06:04). | |
| 2:09:11 | Concerns: salary, role, accountability | The chair compares the salary with teachers and police (2:09:37) and asks who is accountable (2:16:35); Pratt wants "at least a bachelor's degree." (2:12:36). Sprague describes the discipline monitor he created at Stevens (2:17:59); no one now monitors hallway cameras live (2:21:25). Sprague and Skillen worry about federal grant uncertainty (2:22:17, 2:22:45). | OBSERVATION |
| 2:28:13 | Deferred to April 2 | The chair wants a nonpublic discussion of positions and resources and the community's view after March 17 (2:28:18, 2:30:34). Miles withdraws her motion (2:32:51); Crawford asks for a four-year degree (2:32:58). | OBSERVATION |
| 2:34:12 | 2025–26 calendar | Within the CBA, "We have no moose." [MOUs] (2:34:12); hours arithmetic (2:34:31); approved (2:36:36). June board meeting moved to Tuesday (2:36:36). | OBSERVATION |
| 2:37:47 | Signs for the meeting room | The chair asks for signs so people stop arriving at a locked front door; Crawford to ask the carpentry program (2:38:40). | |
| 2:39:20 | Acuity letter | Crawford reads the letter: "the school board stands in opposition to a proposal to bring a very large toxic waste sorting facility to Claremont, New Hampshire." (2:40:08); "I know we don't take political positions." (2:41:44). Moved, seconded, carried over the chair's no (2:42:49); Crawford to read it at the state meeting (2:42:14). | MEDIUM POSITIVE |
| 2:43:05 | Subcommittees | Finance on April 4 (2:43:08); Policy subcommittee met that day, three policies coming March 19 (2:43:47). | MEDIUM |
| 2:45:30 | Other business and farewells | Miles thanks the superintendent for his stance on immigration enforcement at schools (2:45:30); piano offer (2:46:15). Committee preferences (2:47:48); retreat after the new members join (2:48:31). Thanks to Miles and Skillen (2:48:54, 2:49:17, 2:50:20). Hawkins on the fair-funding petition: "And it's individual. It's not board." (2:51:34). | |
| 2:51:39 | Adjournment | "Make a motion to adjourn." | |
Items flagged for review
These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each one names the rule it rests on, as that rule read on March 5, 2025 (or, for the audit, in the fiscal year audited), or is labeled an observation where no verified rule applies.
HIGH The FY2020 audit report was issued in July 2023 and presented to the board in March 2025; the FY2021 audit was still in fieldwork
The agenda noticed "Results of FY 2021 Audit"; Arlene Hawkins corrected it on the floor because "Our packet is FY 20." (0:01:20). The auditor, Michael Campo of Plodzik & Sanderson, attending virtually, said of fiscal year 2021: "We are in the 21 audits." (0:33:30). Candace Crawford read the FY2020 report's date: "the report is dated July 21st, 2023. This is March of 25." (0:35:43). Campo explained that the date is when the signed management representation letter arrived, "We don't need two years to ship a report." (0:36:43), and that "from management side we can't control when it's district." (0:37:08). He told the board "as a school district, receive a substantial amount of federal funds" (0:39:25).
Under the Uniform Guidance in force for fiscal 2020, an entity that "expends $750,000 or more during the non-Federal entity's fiscal year in Federal awards must have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year" (2 CFR 200.501(a)), and the reporting package is due "within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period" (2 CFR 200.512(a)(1)). For the year ended June 30, 2020 that was March 31, 2021; OMB's COVID-19 relief (M-20-26) added six months for year ends from March 30 to June 30, 2020, making it September 30, 2021. A report issued July 21, 2023 is about 22 months past even the extended date, and the FY2021 audit, due March 31, 2022, was not finished three years later. HIGH rests on one premise this page cannot close: that federal expenditures reached $750,000 in each year. The auditor's statement makes that likely; the FY2020 report's schedule of federal awards would settle it, and that report is not in the public packet (flag 2). State law (RSA 21-J:19) sets no comparable deadline for a district's own audit.
Sources: 2 CFR 200.501(a), 2020 annual edition ($750,000 single-audit threshold); 2 CFR 200.512(a)(1), 2020 annual edition (reporting package due nine months after year end); OMB M-20-26 (June 18, 2020): six-month extension for fiscal years ending March 30 to June 30, 2020, as summarized by the Washington State Auditor (secondary source); CSB Agenda 3.5.25 (2).pdf; 18. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.5.25
MEDIUM The FY2020 audit the board discussed was emailed to members but is not in the public packet
Frank Sprague: "So I received the very comprehensive audit by email which I kind of scanned through." (0:50:46). Hawkins referred to it as being in "our packet" (0:01:20). The public folder Drive folder: 16. CSB 3.5.25 holds seven documents (agenda, the superintendent's report and Exhibits A to E); no audit report or management letter is among them (checked by file metadata, 2026-10-03). The public therefore watched a presentation of audit findings, including an IRS matter (flag 6), without the document being discussed.
The board's by-laws assign the duty to "Post online any and all agenda materials not-exempt from public dissemination by RSA 91-A in conjunction with the posting of any board or committee agendas" (rule 4.03(d)). A completed audit report is a public financial record, and nothing on the record suggests an exemption was claimed.
Sources: Claremont School Board By-Laws, adopted June 5, 2024 (Exhibit E of the June 5, 2024 packet) (rule 4.03(d)); Drive folder: 16. CSB 3.5.25; CSB Agenda 3.5.25 (2).pdf
MEDIUM The minutes record the Acuity letter as endorsed by "all present"; the chair voted no on the recording
Frank Sprague moved "that we as a board, we endorse this letter." (2:41:58); Bonnie Miles seconded (2:42:04). The chair spoke against it: "Just because I feel very strongly about not engaging in municipal matters" and "So for me, it's a no" (2:42:25), adding "I know I'm a minority" (2:42:42). The vote: "All in favor? Aye, aye. Opposed me." (2:42:49). The approved minutes record the chair's opposition in the discussion and then "Voice vote taken, all present voting in favor".
The motion carried either way (six members present, with the chair the only stated no), so the decision RSA 91-A:2, II requires the minutes to describe is right. The tally is not. The board's by-laws require the clerk to "Keep a complete, accurate record of all CSB proceedings" (rule 4.03(a)), and the board approved these minutes with the error in them. A member's recorded dissent on a public position taken in the board's name matters to anyone later reading the letter as the board's unanimous view.
Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2024 codification; minutes contents and five business days); Claremont School Board By-Laws, adopted June 5, 2024 (Exhibit E of the June 5, 2024 packet) (rule 4.03(a)); 18. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.5.25; Exhibit E- ACUITY
MEDIUM The minutes-approval line names the wrong meetings, and the February 19 minutes are never identified for approval
The agenda reads "Minutes Approval- 2.5.25 & 3.5.25": the February 5 minutes had already been approved on February 19, and March 5 is this meeting. The chair asked for approval of "the minutes from 2525. And I think that was 21525." (0:00:45), and the consent agenda was declared approved (0:01:21). The approved minutes print "Minutes Approval- 2.5.25 & 2.15.25"; no meeting was held on February 15. The minutes of February 19 appear on no approval agenda, no draft of them was posted, and the approved version was created on Drive on March 7, two days after this meeting (17. Approved CSB meeting minutes 2.19.25). The likeliest reading is that "2.15.25" means February 19, but no document says so. This is the record of whether the February 19 minutes, which contain a ten-year seal vote, were ever approved.
Sources: CSB Agenda 3.5.25 (2).pdf; 18. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.5.25; 17. Approved CSB meeting minutes 2.19.25; RSA 91-A:2, II (2024 codification; minutes contents and five business days)
MEDIUM The Policy subcommittee met the day of this meeting; no notice or minutes of that session were found
Arlene Hawkins: "Can I just quickly on policy subcommittee because we had a meeting today." (2:43:47); she reported that three policies would come to the March 19 board. She also reported a curriculum committee meeting that day (1:58:01; the words are split across several transcript segments), a committee the agenda lists with a board "representative" and whose status as a board subcommittee is not settled here. The superintendent separately reported a work session that day on the strategic plan (1:50:10).
A subcommittee of a school board is a public body under RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d), which ends "or any committee, subcommittee, or subordinate body thereof, or advisory committee thereto", so it needs 24 hours' posted notice and minutes under RSA 91-A:2, II. No notice or minutes of a March 5 Policy subcommittee session were found in this packet folder, the March 19 folder or by a Drive title search for the date (a search negative alone is not proof). Graded MEDIUM rather than HIGH because the record mitigates it: the subcommittee's output was reported in public session the same evening and appears on the March 19 agenda.
Sources: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) (subcommittees are public bodies); RSA 91-A:2, II (2024 codification; minutes contents and five business days); 18. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.5.25
OBSERVATION The auditor described unopened audit reports in a former official's cabinet, and the board learned of an IRS and Affordable Care Act matter from the report
Campo: "We had some members of management in the past who were unreceptive, unavailable, or just flat out just weren't that interested in the audit." He found "the boxes of completed audits were still sealed in the this person's, cabinet." (0:26:37) and added "They obviously didn't make it to you because they were still sealed" (0:27:16). He named no one. The FY2020 findings he summarized: the general ledger "wasn't maintained." (0:28:37); journal entries "weren't being approved, they weren't being reviewed." (0:29:43); stale-dated checks (0:30:16); no credit card policy (0:30:34); staff reimbursed for purchases with no evidence of authorization (0:31:21). Sprague then raised "the IRS and the ACA compliance." (0:51:13); the business administrator said attorneys are working on it (0:51:43). Campo praised the current administration as "very cooperative." (0:53:21).
These are the auditor's and members' characterizations; the report itself is not public (flag 2). No rule is cited because the conduct described predates this board's current administration and the record does not say when the sealed reports were found or which years they covered.
Sources: 18. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.5.25
OBSERVATION Three more places where the approved minutes differ from the recording
(1) Education requirement for the safety specialist: the minutes say the superintendent "has discussed increasing the education requirement to a master's degree"; on tape he says "I want at least a bachelor's degree." (2:12:36) and later a teaching license (2:27:29). (2) The audit liaison: Hawkins said "And I nominate Candace Crawford to be on board." (0:49:15) and the chair answered "I second." (0:49:18); the minutes say "Whitney Skillen seconded the motion". (3) Neither the recording nor the minutes shows a vote on that nomination, so the designation of a board member to meet the auditors rests on a nomination and a second. See also flag 3. By-law rule 4.03(a) asks for "a complete, accurate record".
Sources: 18. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.5.25; Claremont School Board By-Laws, adopted June 5, 2024 (Exhibit E of the June 5, 2024 packet) (rule 4.03(a))
OBSERVATION The chair proposed taking the design of the safety position into nonpublic session; the exemptions are about specific people
Explaining why she would not support the safety specialist that night, the chair said the board would be "talking about positions and people within that are currently employees here." and "That's a nonpublic, how we would be using resources, yada yada." (2:28:18); she then said "we'll do a non public for April 2nd." (2:33:47). Bonnie Miles disagreed in part: the resource analysis she wanted "is not for nonpublic" (2:31:36).
RSA 91-A:3, II(a) reaches "the dismissal, promotion, or compensation of any public employee or the disciplining of such employee"; II(b) the hiring of a person; II(c) matters likely to adversely affect a named person's reputation. How the district deploys staff and money for a new position is not among them, though discussion of a particular employee's role could be. Nothing had happened yet, so this is an observation; the April 2 agenda and motion are where it can be checked.
Sources: RSA 91-A:3, II(a)–(c) (nonpublic exemptions)
OBSERVATION The 2025–26 calendar has 172.5 student days and no hour total on the record
The superintendent said the calendar stays within the bargaining agreement and builds in no snow days (2:34:12). Frank Sprague tried the arithmetic aloud ("Six times 170, 179, 172 days.", 2:34:31) and cited the minimum standards as "994 or 9995 school, 1964 elementary." (2:35:36), which the transcript renders unrecoverably; Bonnie Miles confirmed the state measure is hours (2:35:58). The exhibit itself totals "T=179/S=172.5" with June 15–17 as "Extra days if needed (inclement weather)". The calendar was approved on Sprague's motion, the chair seconding (2:36:21, 2:36:36).
Ed 306.15 (effective December 13, 2024) requires 180 days of instruction or the hour equivalents: at least 945 hours for grades 1–6 and 990 hours for grades 7–12. With fewer than 180 days, compliance depends on daily hours, and no hour figure for any school level appears in the exhibit, the discussion or the minutes. The exhibit's file name also says "24-25" though its contents are the 2025–2026 calendar.
Sources: N.H. Admin. Rules, Ed 306.15 (School Year), Doc. #14150, eff. 12-13-24; Exhibit B- draft 24-25 Claremont School Year Calendar (1).pdf
OBSERVATION The donation exhibit is an image of the donor's check with its bank routing and account line
Exhibit C, posted for the $4,000 S.A.L.T. donation (1:44:54), is a scan of the foundation's check that shows its bank, check number and the full magnetic-ink routing and account line, printed twice. This page reproduces none of those numbers. RSA 91-A:5, IV exempts "confidential, commercial, or financial information" from disclosure; it permits withholding and does not require it, so posting is not a violation. The same kind of exposure appears in earlier packets of this board. The file name's "Byrnes" is the district's spelling.
Sources: RSA 91-A:5, IV (exemption permits withholding financial information); Exhibit C- Jack and Dorothy Byrnes Foundation Donation (1).pdf
POSITIVE The board heard the auditor directly and named a member to meet monthly with the auditors and the business administrator
Campo asked the board to "delegate one individual to do a monthly meeting with myself and your business administrator" (0:45:04). Hawkins nominated Crawford (0:49:15); Campo proposed March 18, after fieldwork (0:49:23), and the business administrator undertook to send the invitations (0:49:51). Crawford thanked him for appearing (0:54:38). No statute requires a governing board to take part in audit follow-up; a standing board liaison to the auditors goes beyond the minimum. The designation was not put to a vote (flag 7).
Sources: 18. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.5.25
POSITIVE The packet, including the text of the proposed Acuity letter, was posted two days before the vote
All seven documents in the folder, among them the safety-specialist proposal with its salary range and budget (Exhibit D- School Safety Specialist Proposal (Title IV) (1).pdf) and the letter the board was asked to endorse (Exhibit E- ACUITY), were created on Drive on Monday, March 3, 2025 at about 12:43 p.m. Eastern, with the agenda. A resident could read the exact words of the board's public position before the meeting. Posting materials with the agenda is what by-law 4.03(d) asks; doing it two days ahead for a contested advocacy letter is the practice the by-law aims at. The audit report is the exception (flag 2).
Sources: Drive folder: 16. CSB 3.5.25; Claremont School Board By-Laws, adopted June 5, 2024 (Exhibit E of the June 5, 2024 packet) (rule 4.03(d))
Appendix: source files
Official and public sources
Project files
Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.
Dialogue/16371 SchoolBoard030525.mp4.CSV (1003 attributed rows; the basis of this page)
Input/Videos/16371 SchoolBoard030525.mp4
Input/Transcripts/16371 SchoolBoard030525.mp4.json
Input/SupportingDocuments/MAP.md, section 258
Laws and rules cited on this page
- 2 CFR 200.501(a) and 2 CFR 200.512(a)(1), 2020 annual edition: $750,000 threshold; nine-month due date
- OMB M-20-26 (June 18, 2020): six-month extension for fiscal years ending March 30 to June 30, 2020, as summarized by the Washington State Auditor (secondary source)
- RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d): public bodies include subcommittees
- RSA 91-A:2, II, 2024 codification (source note ends 2023, 188:1): notice; minutes contents; five business days
- RSA 91-A:3, II(a)–(c) (2023, 189:1): nonpublic exemptions
- RSA 91-A:5, IV: exemption for confidential, commercial or financial information (permissive)
- N.H. Admin. Rules, Ed 306.15 (School Year), Doc. #14150, eff. 12-13-24: 180 days or 945 hours (grades 1–6) and 990 hours (grades 7–12)
- Claremont School Board By-Laws, adopted June 5, 2024 (Exhibit E of the June 5, 2024 packet): rule 4.03(a) (accurate record) and 4.03(d) (posting agenda materials)