Claremont School Board, April 16, 2025

Regular meeting of the Claremont School Board, built from the CCTV recording's dialogue transcript, the approved minutes and the posted packet. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (Claremont School District, SAU 6)
Date
Wednesday, April 16, 2025
Start time
6:30 p.m. (agenda). The minutes record "Consent adjournment at 8:55pm"; the recording runs 2:25:22, which fits a 6:30 call to order and that adjournment. No nonpublic session.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center (agenda masthead)
Recording
Cablecast: School Board Meeting - 4/16/25 (runs 2:25:22, call to order through adjournment)
Minutes
21. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 4.16.25; the draft (4.16.25 DRAFT CSB Meeting Minutes (2).pdf) is in the May 7 packet, created May 6, 2025 (see flag 1). Approved by consent on May 7.

Participants

Everyone in the record. Attendance and spellings follow the approved minutes ("Present: all members"); the dialogue CSV's renderings are noted where they differ. 14 of 774 CSV rows are Unidentified and 2 Multiple.
NameRoleParticipation
Heather WhitneyChairPresided. Asked for teacher-absence data, a menu of renovation options with budgets, and how coaching will be evaluated; moved the Teacher Appreciation spending and three policy motions; offered to pay for the meeting signs herself. 135 CSV rows.
Michael PetrinVice chairRaised post-grant sustaining costs; seconded the trust withdrawal (the chair: "Mr. Peterson second") and the GBCD revision; his second on the Teacher Appreciation motion was reassigned by the chair to Howard (1:58:30). The CSV renders him "Mr. patron" and "Mr. Peterson".
Arlene HawkinsMember; Policy subcommittee chairSeconded the grant acceptance; questioned coaches' time in meetings and covering classes; questioned spending during a freeze; presented four policies and referred whole policy sections to the finance committee, HR and administration.
Candace CrawfordMember; SRVRTC subcommittee chair; audit liaisonMoved the grant acceptance; defended the renovation process as "iteration number one"; reported on her March 20 Zoom meeting with the auditors; ran Teacher Appreciation planning; reported on student-built meeting signs.
Frank SpragueMember; Finance subcommittee chairAsked about mechanical systems, air conditioning and cost inflation; moved the $50,000 trust withdrawal; reported the April 4 Finance subcommittee meeting and its schedule; moved policy AC and seconded ACA.
William "Bill" MaddenMemberAsked how store revenue would be accounted for, questioned the $200–$450 per square foot range and the construction schedule, asked how parents learn of coaching and benchmark scores, and asked that audit targets be published.
Loren HowardMemberPresent per the minutes, which record him seconding the Teacher Appreciation motion. No CSV row carries his name.
Miles Sheehan, Lilly ClarkStudent board members (agenda masthead)Not heard on tape; no student report was on this agenda.
Noelle KronbergBoard clerkCalled the roll (0:00:28); not separately labelled in the CSV.
Christopher PrattSuperintendent, SAU 6Superintendent's report (0:14:29): Bluff Elementary interim principal, truancy officer, school events. Strategic-plan implementation update (1:43:33).
Mike KoskiAssistant superintendentInstructional coaches update and benchmark data (1:12:46–1:39:28).
Mary HenryBusiness administratorExplained activities accounts; requested the up-to-$50,000 special education trust withdrawal; said the budget is "in a deficit situation"; reported she approved the FY21 audit.
Patrick O'HearnHR directorBrief confirmations during the policy item.
Michelle HerringtonAssistant director, Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center (SRVRTC)Presented the $44,300 IRC grant and the renovation background. The CSV renders her surname "Harrington" in others' speech; the 2024 corpus warns the same rendering is used for a different person, the SHS principal.
Julie SpenceProject architect, Lavallee Brensinger ArchitectsPresented the feasibility study (0:24:27 self-introduction). The minutes give only "Jay and Julie from Lavallee-Brensinger Architects"; surnames are from the self-introductions on tape.
Jay DohertyPrincipal, Lavallee Brensinger ArchitectsSelf-introduced at 0:24:42; firm background and process.
Gary MerchantPublic hearing speaker, Ward 2Supported the grant (0:13:01). Self-introduced as "Gary Marchant, Ward two" in the transcript; the minutes spell Merchant.
Bonnie MilesPublic; former board member, visioning committeeSpoke for the renovation plan (1:08:46); the transcript renders the name "Barney Miles".
John LambertPublic; Charlestown resident, visioning committeeSpoke for the plan and urged early public outreach (1:10:17).
UnidentifiedVarious14 rows, including a staff voice explaining the store's ledgers (0:11:11).

Named but not present or not heard: Courtney Steele (CMS instructional coach, per the packet's Exhibit C); a high school coach named only as Colleen; Stephanie Hurst, former curriculum director; Bluff's interim principal, named only as Dale, and former principal Christine Baker; the truancy officer, Scott (the transcript's Scott Maple is not confirmed by any document); Chelsea (scheduling); Michael Campo and Justin Larch of the audit firm (the second name is the transcript's rendering); Mr. McCosker (student services). Courtney's Closet and "Miss Porter" come up in Madden's question at 0:08:45.

Agenda

Official agenda (CSB Agenda 4.16.25) with dispositions from the recording and the approved minutes.
Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:00I. Call to order, PledgeCalled to order by Whitney.
0:00:28II. General business: roll call; consent agenda (agenda and 4.2.25 minutes); citizens' commentsThe agenda labels the consent agenda "(vote required)". On tape the chair asks "Are there any objections to approval of the consent agenda? Seeing none, the consent agenda is approved." No motion or vote. Citizens' comments opened at 0:01:12; none.
0:01:12III. Public hearing, RSA 198:20-b: $44,300 IRC grant, SRVRTC"Per RSA 198:20-b notice and acceptance of unanticipated funds $20,000 or greater" (agenda). Presentation by Herrington; board questions; one public speaker; hearing closed at 0:13:36.
0:13:36IV. Close hearing; vote to accept fundsCrawford moves at 0:13:47, Hawkins seconds; voice vote, none opposed. The chair restates the motion as "$444,300"; the minutes record $44,300 (see flag 2).
0:14:25V. Superintendent's reportReport and questions; no action.
0:22:53VI.1 SRVRTC renovation presentation (Exhibit A)Discussion only; public comment by Miles and Lambert at 1:08:46–1:12:19.
1:08:07VI.2 CMS/SHS instructional coaches update (Exhibits B, C)Discussion only; presentation begins at 1:12:46 after public comment on the renovation.
1:39:33VI.3 Special education trust fund withdrawal"Withdrawal of $50,000 from trust fund for start up costs for alternative program on Maple Avenue" (agenda). Sprague moves "up to" $50,000; Petrin seconds; voice vote at 1:42:34, none opposed.
1:42:46VI.4 Strategic plan updateDiscussion only.
1:56:18VI.5 Teacher Appreciation Week"Approximately $1500 from CSB Line in Budget" (agenda). Whitney moves up to $1,500; Petrin says he will second, the chair gives the second to Howard; carried at 2:03:43, none opposed.
2:04:04VI.6a–b Capital Improvement; Finance subcommitteeReports; Crawford's auditor-meeting notes filed (2:08:45).
2:11:29VI.6c Policy subcommitteeSecond reads: ACAC adopted (2:13:30; Whitney/Sprague per minutes); AC adopted (2:14:46; Sprague/Whitney); AC-R presented without a vote as a regulation; ACA adopted (2:16:21; Whitney/Sprague). First read: GBCD revision accepted the same night (2:18:30; Whitney/Petrin). All voice votes, none opposed. Exhibit J (purpose, goals, cadence) presented.
2:22:02VI.6e SRVRTC committeeStudent-built sandwich-board signs, about $50 each; Whitney donates the cost so "we don't have to make a motion".
2:24:58VII–IX. Other business, future dates, adjournmentFuture dates (agenda): Finance 4.30.25; "Non-Meeting for Legal Advice Google Meet 5.5.25"; board 5.7.25; Finance 5.8.25; board 5.21.25 and Tuesday 6.3.25; Finance 6.23.25. Adjourned by consent ("Is there any opposition to adjournment? Seeing no opposition."), 8:55 p.m. per minutes.

Discussion timeline

Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/16477 SchoolBoard041625.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording.

TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:41Consent agenda by objection"Are there any objections to approval of the consent agenda? Seeing none, the consent agenda is approved." The 4.2.25 minutes are approved this way.OBS
0:02:26$44,300 IRC grantHerrington: "I wrote for $44,300 from the New Hampshire Department of Ed." It funds a six-bay screen-printing system, three days of teacher training in Pennsylvania, and "a $7,000, merchandise" stock for a student-run store; screen printing gives the entrepreneurship program an industry-recognized credential. "I have talked to many seniors this year who don't own one Stevens High School T-shirt sweatshirt."POS
0:06:57Sustaining costsPetrin: "I always have the concern that after the grant runs out, what's the cost going to be?" He sees the store's revenue covering repairs.
0:08:37Where store revenue goesMadden asks how sales money is handled. Henry: "An activities account within the schools that is not. It operates under us, but it's not our account." And: "It has nothing to do with our general fund." Each school has one activities account; Herrington approves expenses and spreadsheets track them.OBS
0:12:56Public hearing comment; voteGary Merchant, Ward 2, supports the grant. Crawford moves acceptance; Hawkins: "I'll second it." The chair: "the motion has been made to accept $444,300 of the Irish Sea grant for sugar River Valley". Carried.OBS POS
0:14:29Superintendent's reportStudent-of-the-month breakfast grew to "over 40 people"; Maple Avenue enrollment "is up to 261"; after administrative changes at Bluff, central office covered the school and "we have an interim principal there until the end of the year", a former Bluff principal; the permanent post is advertised. Truancy officer: "Scott is a alumni of Stevens High School", a former police detective, now logging home visits on a Google form.
0:22:00Teacher absence dataWhitney, noting coaches are pulled to cover classes: "Is there any way we could get data on teacher absences?" Pratt: "Absolutely."
0:25:15SRVRTC renovation: state fundingHerrington: the state "used to be that they would cover 75% of the project and then local would cover the 25%", two projects a biennium; Claremont was eligible in 2023 but not ready. Newport's project: "$17 million project and the state paid, 12.5". The SREB report's career clusters: SRVRTC covers 6 of 16, 12 with Newport, 14 with the plan.
0:35:32The planSpence: goals are expanding CTE offerings, updating current programs, improving security and supervision, and leveraging state funding. Small engine repair in the meeting room with a small addition; visual communications in the preschool space with a studio "could be used for this meeting"; law and safety upstairs beside medical assisting; culinary, machine tool, carpentry and plumbing upgrades; a secured visitor entrance.
0:46:30Cost and the state lineSpence: the state budget still has the CTE line "but it has $1 in it"; the department asked "us to give a number within 24 hours". At $200 to $450 per square foot, "it's not really significantly cost estimated. So an estimated construction budget of 14.2 million", about $20 million with soft costs, "a $15 million state portion and a $5 million local" share if the old formula holds. Estimators use "a 5% inflation rate a year".OBS
0:56:06Options or one plan?Whitney asks for "a cafeteria plan with associated budgets" and calls this "the fairy godmother plan". Crawford: "I don't think we did not see this as the Cadillac version." (as transcribed; the minutes record that the committee "did not see this as the dream plan"). Pratt: a fire safety program was cut. Herrington: "this is like our one time chance from the state for the next 30 years."
1:02:08Skepticism on numbersMadden: "I see you have a range of 200 to $450 per square foot." Spence: "it's not vetted. You're absolutely right. We have not done any phasing." Crawford: the committee declined to pay for a firm estimate yet.OBS
1:07:50CCTV in the planWhitney: "Just just making sure CCTV was included. And it was." (see the maintainer disclosure in the footer).
1:08:46Public comment on the renovationBonnie Miles, former member and visioning-committee member, supports it. John Lambert of Charlestown: "please go out to the public and start giving the awareness and reasoning and just don't blindside them month before."
1:12:47Instructional coachesKoski: "Basically 70% of their days are spent with teachers" (72% high school, 70% middle school). The middle school coach is building a fifth-grade advanced math bridge.
1:19:59Middle school math benchmarksGrade 6 math: 85% below grade level at the start of the year, 96% at mid-year. Hawkins: "96% of our students in the sixth grade are performing below the expected level at the midyear point." Koski: Yes. It is the first year of a standards-aligned math program: "the first year of implementation is is always rough." ELA, in its second year, shows better results.
1:24:48Elementary interimsAbout half of elementary students are below grade level each grade; Koski: "statewide it's about 38% below grade level or I'm sorry, 38% proficient." No elementary ELA interim was given because "we're losing too many to many teaching days testing."
1:28:52Are coaches spread thin?Hawkins asks about meetings and covering classes. Koski: "I've heard nothing and about coaches subbing", then that when a teacher attends an IEP meeting "the coach can go in and and and teach a lesson", and "we're pulling teachers out of their preps to cover classes and paying them extra." Whitney: "my biggest fear is, is mission creep." Koski: "I would say year two is much better than year one."
1:39:44Special education trust withdrawalHenry: the Maple Avenue building "cost us with the closing 258,000, which we have drawn out of the special ed trust, bringing us down to 479,000". She asks for up to $50,000 for sprinklers, water lines and technology infrastructure: "I would ask for it with the bills." Whitney: "Frank made the motion. Mr. Peterson second." Carried.OBS
1:42:46Strategic plan, phase twoWhitney: "We haven't had a strategic plan and probably over 20 years of functioning strategic plan." DMG kept on for implementation. Pratt lists five subcommittees and measures, including "Decrease the number of bullying harassment investigations." Survey counts as of April 16: "we already have 523 participants" (students); staff "only at 28 responses still all from Claremont Middle School"; "family surveys 89 responses".
1:56:26Teacher Appreciation during a freezeCrawford: last year's cost "was about thousand $500." Henry: "the bottom line budget right now is in a deficit situation", but this is important. Hawkins: "If we're saying we have a spending freeze on and we are in such a deficit", are we modeling it? Madden: "I don't think we should be spending too much time talking about a cup of coffee." Petrin offers a second; the chair: "I'm going to give that to Lauren."OBS
2:05:31Finance subcommittee reportMet April 4: last year's budget process, a timeline with DRA deadlines, health-insurance options including HSAs, auditors' findings, the deficit, most of it in special education costs; "we went into the process approximately $1 million short". Schedule read aloud includes "May 5th non meeting to a numbers of findings prior to meeting with you folks."OBS
2:08:45Audit liaison reportCrawford met the auditors by Zoom on March 20 with the business administrator: "it wasn't technically a meeting" and "I wanted to file it with today's meeting." Monthly meetings are scheduled. Henry: "I have reviewed the fiscal year 20 ones and I've approved it"; FY22 is under way; "I think we're going to be done by fall with these". Madden: "Well, can we publish them so that we hold ourselves?"OBS POS
2:11:34PoliciesHawkins: the committee is working through statutorily required "priority policies". Second reads ACAC, AC and ACA adopted; AC-R presented without vote. GBCD, listed as a first read: "The committee met today", the offender-against-children language moves to the student policy, and "It's not it's not a new policy"; the revision is accepted the same night. Hawkins asks that adopted policies reach staff handbooks, onboarding and the website.OBS
2:19:43Policy work referred outSection D (fiscal) to the finance committee and business administrator; support services to Madden; personnel to HR; sections I and J to administration; Howard to update the tracker. The committee meets every other Wednesday before the board.
2:22:17Meeting signsStudents will build two solar-lit sandwich-board signs at about $50 each to direct the public to the unlocked side door. Whitney: "I'll donate the money so we don't have to make a motion for that."
2:24:58Adjournment by consent"Is there any opposition to adjournment? Seeing no opposition. Meetings adjourned."

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid. They are not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each names the rule it rests on, checked as it read on April 16, 2025, or is labelled an observation where no verified rule applies.

MEDIUM Draft minutes first reached the public share on the 14th business day

RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes, drafts included, to be open to public inspection within five business days, here by Wednesday, April 23, 2025. The draft is filed in the next meeting's packet folder, 21. CSB 5.7.25, which Drive shows was created on May 6, with the draft uploaded a minute later and last modified seconds after that. That is the 14th business day. Nothing in the file's metadata shows it existed earlier. Graded MEDIUM under the project's severity rule: the meeting was noticed and recorded and minutes exist; only their timeliness fails. The pattern matches the corpus finding that Claremont minutes reach the public share when the next packet folder is built.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (minutes within 5 business days); Drive metadata for file 1auQc-DfdK5h4urvgQmelT0W-01D2sugr and folder 1PD0um5t_P-QcPTPRJciZgY6ZhK-160Q1, read 2026-10-03.

OBSERVATION Two actions taken by objection where the agenda says a vote is required, a misstated motion, and a reassigned second

The agenda labels the consent agenda "(vote required)"; on tape it was approved by asking for objections (0:00:41), and adjournment was handled the same way (2:24:58). Unanimous consent is a recognised way to take an uncontested action, and the minutes record "Consent approval" and "Consent adjournment" honestly, so no rule is cited as broken; the gap is between the board's own agenda and its practice. When calling the grant vote the chair restated the amount as "$444,300" (0:13:51); the motion and the minutes say $44,300, and nobody corrected the restatement. On Teacher Appreciation, Petrin said "I'll second that." and the chair answered "I'm going to give that to Lauren." (1:58:31); the minutes record Howard as seconder, which matches the chair's ruling rather than who spoke first.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (movers and seconders recorded); CSB Agenda 4.16.25; approved minutes 4.16.25.

OBSERVATION Policy GBCD was listed as a first read and its revision adopted the same night

The agenda lists GBCD under "First Read Policies"; the board accepted the revision at 2:18:30 after the chair of the policy committee said "It's not it's not a new policy." The May 7 agenda then listed GBCD for a second read, and it was struck there as already "revised at last meeting" (May 7 minutes). The revision removed the offender-against-children language the SAU 6 board had discussed on April 10, to be handled in student policy JLIF instead. Whether district policy on policy adoption permits a revision in one reading was not checked for this page; the record shows only that the board's own agenda labelled it a first read.

Sources: CSB Agenda 4.16.25 and 5.7.25; approved minutes 4.16.25 and 5.7.25; SAU 6 Board, April 10, 2025, flag 8. No statute is cited.

OBSERVATION The special education trust bought and is now fitting out a building; the trust's authorized purpose is not in the record

The business administrator says the Maple Avenue building cost $258,000 with closing, drawn from the special education trust, leaving about $479,000 (1:39:55), and the board authorized up to $50,000 more for sprinklers, water lines and technology infrastructure (1:42:34). Whether an expendable trust created for special education may pay for real estate and building work depends on the warrant article that created it, which is in neither packet. The project has not located the trust's authorizing statute or article; this page therefore states no conclusion. Mitigation: the withdrawal is "up to" actual bills, with a promised accounting to the board.

Sources: Dialogue/16477 SchoolBoard041625.mp4.CSV; approved minutes 4.16.25, item VI.3. No statute is cited because the authorizing provision was not verified.

OBSERVATION Subcommittee and auditor-meeting records referred to on tape are not in the packet

Three records come up that the public share does not hold with this meeting: minutes of the April 4 Finance subcommittee meeting, which the chair read from (2:05:37); the policy subcommittee meeting held that afternoon (2:16:48); and Crawford's notes of the March 20 Zoom meeting with the auditors, which she asked to "file it with today's meeting" and which the minutes say were "to be included with the Board minutes". The approved minutes carry no attachment, and none of the 13 packet files is any of them. Subcommittees are public bodies under RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) with the same minutes duty. One member meeting the auditors is not a quorum, so Crawford's session was not a meeting. The schedule read aloud also places a "May 5th non meeting" next to audit findings; the agenda calls it a "Non-Meeting for Legal Advice", which RSA 91-A:2, I(b) excludes from the definition of a meeting only for consultation with legal counsel. These are not found in this packet, which is different from not existing: the subcommittee folders the by-laws point to were not inspected for this page.

Sources: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) (committees and subcommittees are public bodies); RSA 91-A:2, I(b) (consultation with legal counsel is not a meeting) and II (minutes).

OBSERVATION Store revenue will go to a school activities account described as "not our account"

The business administrator described each school's activities account as one that "operates under us, but it's not our account" and "has nothing to do with our general fund" (0:09:04). The second half can be right: activity money need not run through the general fund. The first half is the loose part. Under GASB 84, activity is fiduciary only where the government does not control the assets; money a district employee approves and spends for a district program (here, a credit-bearing class's store, with expenses approved by the SRVRTC assistant director) is generally the district's own governmental activity. A board member had just asked whether such money is tracked, so the classification matters. Loose wording is not a GASB departure; the district's audited financial statements, which show how student activity funds are reported, would settle it.

Sources: GASB Statement 84 (fiduciary activities; control test), effective FY2021; N.H. Admin. Rules, Rev 1102.03 (NH districts follow GASB GAAP).

OBSERVATION A $20 million renovation figure produced in 24 hours, against a state funding line that "has $1 in it"

The architects told the board the state asked for a project number within 24 hours (0:47:57) and that the $14.2 million construction and roughly $20 million total figures are per-square-foot assumptions, "not really significantly cost estimated" (0:48:40); no phasing has been done (1:03:14). The $15 million state share assumes the former 75% split, while the state line "has $1 in it" (0:47:16). The presenters were candid about all of this. The point for readers is that the figure is a placeholder sent to the state, not an estimate the board adopted; any future bond article would need a real estimate and, for a local share, a warrant article voted by the district.

Sources: Dialogue/16477 SchoolBoard041625.mp4.CSV; approved minutes 4.16.25, item VI.1 ("it is a very loose estimate"). No rule is cited.

POSITIVE The grant was accepted after a held public hearing with public comment and questions on sustaining costs

For unanticipated money of $20,000 or more, RSA 198:20-b, III(a) requires a prior public hearing with newspaper notice of its time, place and subject at least seven days ahead. The board held the hearing as a separate agenda item, heard the applicant, questioned future costs and the handling of store revenue, opened the floor to the public (0:12:45) and heard one speaker, and closed the hearing before voting. The newspaper notice and the district's enabling article under ¶I could not be inspected for this page.

Sources: RSA 198:20-b, I and III(a) (enabling article; hearing and 7-day newspaper notice at $20,000; threshold as amended 2023, 38:1, eff. July 18, 2023).

POSITIVE A board audit liaison with monthly auditor meetings, reported in public

Crawford reported a standing monthly meeting with the audit firm and the business administrator, gave the public the state of the FY21 and FY22 audits, and Madden asked that completion targets be published (2:11:19). No statute required this. With several years of audits outstanding, a named member reporting progress at each meeting is more than the law asks.

Sources: Dialogue/16477 SchoolBoard041625.mp4.CSV, 2:08:45–2:11:24; approved minutes 4.16.25, item VI.6b.

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and standards cited on this page