Participants
Everyone heard, named or listed for this meeting. Spellings follow the agenda and draft minutes; where the dialogue file's label differs, the difference is noted. Unidentified voices stay unidentified unless the minutes name them.
| Name | Role | Participation |
| Arlene Hawkins | Chair, SAU 6 Board (Claremont) | Presides; amends the agenda to take other business before the nonpublic session (0:00:55); questions the transfer practice and purchase-order coding (0:06:03, 0:11:30); reports the auditor's schedule and the check-signing problem (0:14:22, 0:14:43, 0:15:16). |
| Rocco Ruggeri | Vice chair (Unity) | Named by the draft minutes as the mover of the agenda amendment, the April 10 minutes, the nonpublic motion and adjournment; the dialogue file leaves those rows unidentified (0:01:16, 0:01:39, 0:22:54, 0:24:16). Gives the Unity update: "we put a RFP out" (0:21:25). Approved, with Madden, to review manifests and vouchers (0:16:52). |
| Shannon Popescu | Member (Unity) | Present (minutes); seconds the motion to leave nonpublic session (minutes), which is not on the recording. |
| Candace Crawford | Member (Claremont); SAU treasurer | Says the policy need not change (0:08:03); reports the former board member still on the account (0:15:53); proposes fewer meetings since there is no budget process (0:19:33). |
| Heather Whitney | Member (Claremont) | Seconds the nonpublic motion (0:23:06, 0:23:08); the minutes name her as mover of the seal motion. The dialogue file also gives her the checking-account analogy (0:12:34) and the Superintendent Evaluation report (0:17:29), both marked uncertain; the minutes credit the evaluation report to Frank Sprague and the questions about the policy to Whitney. |
| Frank Sprague | Member (Claremont); Superintendent Evaluation subcommittee | Present (minutes). The minutes credit him with the evaluation report: the process "Our process is complete." and a call for a Unity volunteer (0:17:29); the dialogue file labels that voice Whitney (uncertain). |
| William Madden | Member (Claremont) | Present (minutes); approved to review manifests and vouchers (0:16:52); on the evaluation subcommittee (0:17:29). No row attributed to him. |
| Michael Petrin | Member (Claremont) | Present (minutes). No row attributed to him. |
| Marjorie Erickson, Atonya Hart | Members (Unity) | Absent (minutes). |
| Loren Howard | Member (Claremont) | Absent (minutes). |
| Noelle Kronberg | SAU 6 board clerk | The minutes record her taking the roll-call votes. The roll is called by an unidentified voice (0:00:36). |
| Christopher Pratt | Superintendent, SAU 6 | Presents the FY25 report and the no-transfer practice (0:02:21, 0:07:52); explains overspending approvals and past miscoding (0:10:18, 0:13:04); says "our FY 23 audit is almost complete." (0:14:09). |
| Mary Henry | Business Administrator, SAU 6 | Not present; Crawford refers to "when Mary comes back" (0:08:29). |
| Unidentified | Roll-call and vote responses | Twenty-five rows carry an unidentified label: the roll-caller, the Unity member the minutes identify as Ruggeri, and one-word vote responses. |
Agenda
Items in the order taken, after the opening amendment moved items V and VI ahead of IV (SAU#6 School Board Agenda 6.12.25 .docx.pdf). Agenda wording in quotation marks is from the agenda; dispositions from the recording and the draft minutes.
| Taken up | Item | Agenda text and disposition |
| 0:00:00 | I. Call to order and Pledge | Agenda "6:30PM Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance" (agenda text). Roll at 0:00:36; minutes: present Crawford, Madden, Petrin, Popescu, Ruggeri, Sprague, Whitney, Hawkins; absent Erickson, Hart, Howard. |
| 0:00:55 | II. Agenda amendment; April 10 minutes | Items V and VI moved ahead of the nonpublic session; voice vote (0:01:16, 0:01:28). April 10 minutes approved by voice vote (0:01:39, 0:01:49). Minutes: Ruggeri moved and Whitney seconded both. |
| 0:01:54 | II. Citizens' comments | "I don't see citizens in the audience present to comment" (0:01:54). |
| 0:02:05 | III.1 Financial report: transfers and encumbrances, policy DBJ | Discussion only. See OBSERVATION. |
| 0:14:09 | III.2 Update on financial audits, policy DIE | FY23 audit nearly complete; the auditor wants everything current by 2026 (0:14:09, 0:14:22, 0:14:43); treasurer and signature questions (0:15:16 to 0:17:10). See OBSERVATION. |
| 0:17:17 | III.3 Subcommittee reports | Policy: no report. Superintendent Evaluation: process complete, a Unity volunteer sought (0:17:29, 0:18:18). |
| 0:18:46 | VI. Other business (moved up) | 2025-26 meetings set for November, January and May, second Thursday (0:21:06); Unity separation update (0:21:25). See OBSERVATION. |
| 0:22:12 | V. Future dates (moved up) | Claremont: no July meetings; Unity: July 15 (0:22:12, 0:22:19). |
| 0:22:34 | IV. Nonpublic session, RSA 91-A:3, II(a) and (c) | Motion and roll call (0:22:54, 0:23:08); into nonpublic at 6:54 p.m., out at 7:33 p.m. (minutes). On return, a motion to seal the minutes for one year, roll call (0:23:58 to 0:24:11). See POSITIVE MEDIUM. |
| 0:24:14 | VII. Adjournment | "I'd like a motion to adjourn." (0:24:14); minutes: adjourned at 7:34 p.m. |
Discussion timeline
Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/16596 SAU6-061225.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording.
Chronological topics. Quotations are as transcribed; bracketed words are corrections.
| Time | Topic | What was said | Flags |
| 0:00:00 | Opening and roll | The roll is garbled: "Marjorie Erickson, what's on your heart, Laura?", then a chorus of answers (0:00:44). | |
| 0:00:55 | Agenda reordered | The chair asks to move other business and future dates "to occur before moving into nonpublic." | |
| 0:02:21 | No line-item transfers | "we don't have any transfers from line item to line item." The bottom line is positive (0:04:11; transcribed "1288 70.", i.e. [$128,870.56] on the report). Crawford: "it shows a positive balance at the end of the year". | OBSERVATION |
| 0:04:48 | Using the report to budget | Crawford: school board contracted services "you had $10,000 budgeted and we haven't spent any." Pratt: average the past two or three years (0:05:15). | |
| 0:06:03 | Is policy DBJ needed? | The chair asks whether the policy is "extraneous"; Pratt: it guards against a future business manager who does transfer (0:06:54). Crawford: "I don't think you should change the policy at this point." | OBSERVATION |
| 0:09:47 | Negative lines and purchase orders | Pratt: "You need to you need to get approval before you overspend anything." Only the business administrator can approve an overrun (0:11:08). Past miscoding: items "put under equipment" that belonged elsewhere; the chair: "That's inappropriate." | OBSERVATION |
| 0:14:09 | Audits | Pratt: "our FY 23 audit is almost complete." The chair, relaying the auditor: "unity 2023 should now be complete, and Claremont 2022 should have just gone out", and "he wants everybody to be current by 2026." | |
| 0:15:16 | Check signing | "So we don't have anybody currently signing the check." Crawford: a former board member "was the signer on the account still". Madden and Ruggeri approved to review manifests and vouchers; they need direction (0:16:52, 0:17:01). | OBSERVATION |
| 0:17:29 | Superintendent evaluation | "Our process is complete." The next cycle starts in the fall; a Unity volunteer is sought, and none comes forward that night (0:18:18, 0:18:22). | |
| 0:18:46 | Meeting schedule for 2025-26 | "because the saw is being dissolved as of July 1st of 26." Crawford: "Since there's no budget process to go through." Settled on November, January and May (0:21:06). | OBSERVATION |
| 0:21:25 | Unity separation | "we put a RFP out"; "It's for all the services that we would need." | OBSERVATION |
| 0:22:34 | Into nonpublic session | "I'll make a motion to move into a non public session per RSA 91-A colon three section two sub A and C." Second from Whitney; roll call (0:23:08). | POSITIVE |
| 0:23:58 | Seal vote and adjournment | The recording resumes on "For one year."; second; roll call (0:24:04 to 0:24:11). Adjourned (0:24:14). | MEDIUM |
Items flagged for review
These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each one names the rule it rests on, as that rule read on June 12, 2025, or is labeled an observation where no verified rule applies.
MEDIUM The earliest copy of these minutes found in any public share was created November 12, 2025, five months after the meeting
RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to be "open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting" (statute text). Five business days after Thursday, June 12, 2025 ran to June 19, or June 20 if Juneteenth is counted as a national holiday. Following the project's two-stage search for SAU 6 minutes: this meeting's own folder 6. SAU6 6.12.25 holds three documents (the agenda, the June financial report and the April 10 draft minutes) and no June 12 minutes. Two later SAU 6 folders hold copies: the Google Doc 8. DRAFT SAU6 School Board Minutes 6.12 (2).25 in 10. SAU6 9.11.25 (a folder created September 11, 2025) and the PDF DRAFT SAU6 Meeting Minutes 6.12 .25.pdf in 12. SAU6 11.13.25. Drive gives both a createdTime of November 12, 2025 (19:59 and 20:00 UTC), the day before the November 13 meeting and 153 days after this one. The intervening SAU 6 folders for August 21, August 26 and September 4, 2025, as inventoried in the project's meeting map, contain no June 12 minutes. Both copies are drafts; no approved version was found.
Graded MEDIUM under the project's severity rule because the meeting was noticed and packeted and minutes now exist, so the gap is one of timing. The limit of the evidence: a Google Doc's createdTime resets when a document is copied, so an earlier original may have existed outside these folders; none was found. The same board's April 10, 2025 draft minutes were posted with this meeting's packet on June 9, 2025, so the delay is not new.
Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II, 2024 codification (minutes within 5 business days); 8. DRAFT SAU6 School Board Minutes 6.12 (2).25 (Drive metadata); DRAFT SAU6 Meeting Minutes 6.12 .25.pdf (Drive metadata)
MEDIUM The nonpublic minutes were sealed for one year with no recorded determination of the statutory ground for withholding them
After the nonpublic session the recording resumes on a fragment, "For one year.", followed by a second and a roll call answered Yes by each voice (0:23:58 to 0:24:11). The draft minutes record the motion as "Heather Whitney made a motion to seal the minutes for 1 year, Rocco Ruggeri seconded the motion" with "all present voting in favor" (minutes text). RSA 91-A:3, III requires nonpublic minutes to be "publicly disclosed within 72 hours" unless, "by recorded vote of 2/3 of the members present taken in public session, it is determined that divulgence of the information likely would affect adversely the reputation of any person" other than a board member, or one of the section's other listed grounds applies (statute text). The vote margin satisfies the two-thirds requirement: all eight members present voted yes. What neither the minutes nor the surviving recording shows is the determination itself, the finding that names which statutory ground supports withholding. The motion's full wording is not on the recording, which joins the moment of entering nonpublic session to the end of the sealing motion.
The nonpublic session was entered under RSA 91-A:3, II(a) and (c), and (c) is the reputation ground, so a determination of the same kind may have been intended. The flag is a documentation gap, not a finding that the minutes were wrongly sealed. A sealing for one year would expire about June 12, 2026; this page did not locate unsealed minutes. The April 10, 2025 draft minutes record the same form of motion ("made a motion to seal the minutes for 1 year") with no determination either (April 10 minutes text).
Sources: RSA 91-A:3, III (72-hour disclosure; 2/3 recorded vote with a determination to withhold; source note ends 2023, 189:1); Draft minutes 6.12.25 (seal motion)
OBSERVATION A former board member was still the signer on the SAU account two years after leaving the board, and no one was signing checks
Reporting on the auditor's April advice, the chair said "we were told that it cannot be a member of the board who signs the checks. So we don't have anybody currently signing the check." (0:15:16). Candace Crawford, elected SAU treasurer on April 10, 2025, then reported that a former board member "was the signer on the account still", that "he was signing on the checks, and I was told as a board member I can't sign the check." and that "he hasn't been on the board for two years, and he's still his signature is what's on the checks and on the account, and that needs to be straightened out." (0:15:53). She added "But I haven't gotten any update." The chair asked for an update by September (0:16:29). The surname is transcribed by the ASR and is not confirmed by any document reviewed, so it is not printed here. The draft minutes reduce this to "Candace Crawford noted that the previous treasurer and the electronic signature is a former Board member" (minutes text).
RSA 194-C:5, I requires each SAU board to organize "by choosing a chairperson, a secretary, and a treasurer" (statute text). No verified statute or rule tells an SAU who may hold signature authority on its accounts, so this is an observation. What the record supports is narrower: on June 12, 2025 the signature on the SAU's checks and account belonged, by the treasurer's account, to a person who had left the board about two years earlier, and the board itself said no current signer existed. The same item records that Madden and Ruggeri had been approved to review manifests and vouchers and were still waiting for direction on how (0:16:52, 0:17:01).
The April 10, 2025 draft minutes, posted in this meeting's packet, set out what was intended: the auditor said "the treasurer should review the check register"; the business administrator said "whoever is on the account should be the electronic signature and the one to review the check register and it will be the treasurer"; and the board elected Crawford treasurer and named Ruggeri and Madden "to review and sign vouchers" (April 10 minutes text). Two months later the account had not been changed to match.
Sources: RSA 194-C:5, I (SAU board chooses a chairperson, secretary and treasurer); Draft minutes 6.12.25 (item 2); Draft minutes 4.10.25 (treasurer and voucher signers elected)
OBSERVATION The administration does not make the line-item transfers that policy DBJ contemplates, and the FY25 report shows large line overruns inside a positive bottom line
The agenda item was "Transfers/Encumbrances FY25 budget per policy DBJ" (agenda text). The superintendent: "we don't have any transfers from line item to line item." (0:02:21); "as of right now, Mary said, you haven't been transferred between line items." (0:02:46). Crawford advised against changing the policy and said a departure can be addressed in public, adding "we're not following this policy" (0:08:03, 0:08:20). Asked how purchase orders were coded in the past, Pratt said items had been coded to lines with money left; the chair: "That's inappropriate." (0:13:04, 0:13:49).
The packet's SAU6 Financials June 2025_0001.pdf shows estimated FY25 totals of $2,489,151.00 budgeted, $2,212,190.26 spent, $148,090.18 encumbered and $128,870.56 remaining (document text; the remainder checks). Several lines are well over budget, among them Superintendent's Office health insurance ($60,746.00 budgeted, $110,223.98 spent), Human Resources salaries ($140,369.60 against $157,585.74) and Business Office health insurance ($105,144.48 against $118,457.19). Policy DBJ itself was not in the packet and was not read for this page, so the page does not say what it requires; the observation is that the board heard its own policy described as not followed and left it in place.
Sources: SAU6 Financials June 2025_0001.pdf; SAU#6 School Board Agenda 6.12.25 (item III.1, policy DBJ)
OBSERVATION The chair described the SAU as "being dissolved" on July 1, 2026; the mechanism the record identifies is Unity's withdrawal
Setting the 2025-26 calendar, the chair said "We have a budget so we don't have to do any budget work because the saw is being dissolved as of July 1st of 26." (0:18:46), and the draft minutes repeat "since the SAU is dissolving" (minutes text). The withdrawal process for a member district is RSA 194-C:2, IV, and Unity is the district withdrawing: the April 10, 2025 draft minutes record that Unity's town vote to withdraw passed and give "Last day will be June 30, 2026 and first day of separation will be July 1, 2026" (April 10 minutes text). The Unity member's update describes an RFP for the services Unity will need (0:21:25, 0:21:53). Later district records state both readings, and this page does not decide whether the unit itself ends; it records what was said. The board agreed to meet in November, January and May on the second Thursday (0:21:06). A May meeting falls within the April 1 to June 1 window in which RSA 194-C:5, I requires an SAU board to meet and organize (statute text: "shall meet between April 1 and June 1 in each year").
Sources: RSA 194-C:2, IV (withdrawal from an SAU); Draft minutes 4.10.25 (Unity town vote and timeline); RSA 194-C:5, I (annual meeting between April 1 and June 1); Draft minutes 6.12.25 (Other Business)
POSITIVE The nonpublic session was entered on a motion naming its exemptions, by roll call, and the minutes give the times in and out
The chair asked for a motion "Under Rs 91-A column, three comma, two A and C." (0:22:34), the motion was made "per RSA 91-A colon three section two sub A and C." (0:22:54), and the vote was taken by roll call (0:23:08 to 0:23:24). RSA 91-A:3, I(b) requires that the motion "shall state on its face the specific exemption" and that the vote "shall be by roll call" (statute text). The draft minutes record the motion and second, the roll call, and the clock times (into nonpublic "at 6:54pm", out "at 7:33pm", adjourned "at 7:34pm"). Those times also fit the recording: entering nonpublic at 0:23:40 of tape at 6:54 p.m. puts the call to order at about 6:30 p.m., as noticed, and 18 seconds of tape cover the 39-minute session, so the camera was stopped rather than the session cut from a continuous feed. This board's paperwork had cited a nonexistent RSA chapter for nonpublic sessions in 2023 and early 2024; on this date the citation is correct.
Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b) (motion states the exemption; roll-call vote); Draft minutes 6.12.25 (item IV)
Appendix: source files
Official and public sources
Project files
Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.
Dialogue/16596 SAU6-061225.mp4.CSV (193 attributed rows; the basis of this page)
Input/Videos/16596 SAU6-061225.mp4
Input/Transcripts/16596 SAU6-061225.mp4.json
Input/SupportingDocuments/MAP.md, section 267
Laws and rules cited on this page
- RSA 91-A:2, II, 2024 codification (source note ends 2023, 188:1): minutes within five business days. The 2025 additions (2025, 112:1, eff. Aug. 22, 2025) are not applied here.
- RSA 91-A:3, I(b) and III (source note ends 2023, 189:1): nonpublic motion and roll call; 72-hour disclosure and the sealing vote
- RSA 194-C:5, I (1996, 298:3): annual SAU board meeting between April 1 and June 1; chairperson, secretary, treasurer
- RSA 194-C:2, IV: withdrawal of a district from an SAU