Claremont School Board, Public Hearing & Meeting — January 7, 2026

A public hearing on a $49,775 music grant, followed by the regular January meeting at which the board chose which FY2026–27 budget models go to the January 20 budget hearing. Built from the CCTV recording, the dialogue transcript, the posted agenda, the approved minutes and the unsealed nonpublic minutes. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (SAU 6). Chair: Heather Whitney; vice chair: Michael Petrin.
Date
Wednesday, January 7, 2026
Start time
Hearing scheduled 6:30 p.m., board meeting 6:45 p.m. (agenda). The chair calls the hearing to order at 0:00:00 and closes it at 0:13:52; the regular meeting follows at 0:14:04 with no second call to order. Nonpublic session 7:02 to 7:32 p.m. (approved minutes); on the recording the entry roll call is at 0:28:34 and the return motion at 0:29:43. The minutes record “Consent adjournment 10:11pm”. Arithmetic check: 7:02 p.m. less the 0:28:44 of tape before the entry roll call puts the start near 6:33 p.m.; that start, plus 3:09:21 of tape and about 29 minutes of nonpublic session not on tape, lands at about 10:11 p.m., matching the minutes. The minutes state no actual start time.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, per the agenda
Recording
Cablecast: Claremont School Board - 1/7/25 (3:09:21; the nonpublic session is not recorded). The gallery title’s year is CCTV’s error; the show’s event date, the packet folder and the minutes all give January 7, 2026.
Minutes
1.7.26 Approved CSB Public Hearing & Meeting Minutes; 1.7.26 DRAFT CSB Public Hearing & Meeting Minutes.pdf (earlier draft, not re-read for this page); 1.7.26 CSB Nonpublic minutes unsealed

Participants

Everyone heard or recorded as present. Names follow the agenda and approved minutes; where the dialogue file or the speaker’s own words give a different name, both are shown.
NameRoleParticipation
Heather WhitneyBoard chair; Finance SubcommitteePresided; moved the nonpublic session after the interim superintendent read the grounds; voted against advancing the current-configuration model; moved the amended three-school model, which failed 3–4.
Michael PetrinVice chair; Capital Improvement chairSeconded the nonpublic motions and the CAA ratification; favored alignment and a three-school model over a four-school model that might later have to shrink; said all three options could be pared further.
Arlene HawkinsBoard member; Policy and CurriculumMoved the music grant; seconded the current-configuration and aligned-model motions and the comment extension; moved ratification of the CAA tentative agreement, which she negotiated for the board; asked for a two-track leadership search.
Candace CrawfordBoard member; Finance Subcommittee chairSeconded the music grant; explained the insurance cost (about $33,000 two-person, $45,000 family, district share averaging 95%); said the hearing had to be held by January 20; voted for both four-school models and against the three-school model.
William “Bill” MaddenBoard member; Ad Hoc Leadership Search chairSeconded the three-school motion, calling it the only configuration taxpayers would accept; asked for an executive-director presentation at the next meeting.
Frank SpragueBoard memberAsked whether the music grant would supplant rather than supplement (labeled “Unidentified board member” in the dialogue file; the minutes name him); moved the four-school aligned model; moved the music-teacher nomination; voted against the three-school model despite his 6–12 experience.
Loren HowardBoard memberMoved the four-school current-configuration model, putting its cost at about $50 a month on a $250,000 home; moved the nine-minute extension of public comment.
Noelle KronbergSchool Board ClerkTook both nonpublic roll calls (per the minutes); kept time on public comment and said she paused the clock while the business administrator spoke; signed the minutes.
Kerry KennedyInterim Superintendent, SAU 6Presented the music grant, the models’ instructional objectives and attrition figures; read the nonpublic grounds into the record; gave the PD update, the music-teacher nomination and the technical advisory on filming permissions.
Matt AngellSenior Comptroller / Interim Business AdministratorFinance update (deficit path, cash, revenue anticipation loan); presented the three budget models, tax rates and warrant-article plans; answered on stipends and declined to say why the forensic-audit firms withdrew.
Chelsea Weatherford; Paige Jarvis; Jason BonnevilleInterim HR Manager; Interim Student Services Director; Interim Technology DirectorListed on the agenda masthead. Jarvis attended the nonpublic session (nonpublic minutes). No attributed remarks.
Luke WebsterAttorneyPresent virtually in the nonpublic session, per the nonpublic minutes. Not heard on the recording.
Dr. Eric LinkeWest Claremont Center for Music and the ArtsIntroduced himself as slated to take over the CMS band program; thanked Melissa Richmond and others. Labeled “Eric Link” in the dialogue file.
Michael Demars (minutes) / “Michael Myers” (tape)Citizens’ comments — Ward 3Three turns: asked whether the grant covers future years; asked for a stipend policy and public transparency; said a 7% increase is “dead on arrival” and questioned the 95% insurance share. He introduces himself on tape as “Michael Myers, Ward three”; the approved minutes print “Michael Demars, ward 3” each time. Not settled here.
Noel BeauchaineCitizens’ comments — Ward 3, Stevens seniorSpoke on what music programs give students and on chronic underfunding of the arts; asked whether the grant covers more than a salary. Labeled “Noah Bosch” in the dialogue file; the minutes give Noel Beauchaine.
Sherry WilliamsCitizens’ comments — Chestnut StreetSupported the music teacher and asked the difference between a grant and a donation; later spoke for summer school and credit recovery. The minutes spell her first name “Sherri”.
Erica AbbeyCitizens’ commentsAsked about the Code Monkey curriculum; later asked what model a default budget would carry and about construction. Named in the minutes; labeled “Unidentified public commenter” in the dialogue file.
Derek Ellerkamp (minutes) / “Derek Alexander” (dialogue file)Citizens’ comments — Ward 2Asked why the forensic-audit firms declined.
Cameron Lowney (minutes)Citizens’ comments — Ward 2, teacherNoted small-group interventions already happen; cited research on consolidation; asked why the aligned model costs so much less. Labeled “Camron Lownie” in the dialogue file.
“Sandra Edwards” (tape) / “Sandra Evans” (minutes)Citizens’ comments — Ward 3, parent and teacherAsked why models with more interventionists cost less; spoke on transitions for children moved from Bluff. The tape and the minutes disagree on the surname; not settled here.
Lisa HoltzCitizens’ comments — Ward 2, elementary educatorRead a letter, entered into the minutes, on repeated transitions and trauma among elementary students.
Alicia Simino (minutes) / “Alicia Simoneau” (dialogue file)Citizens’ comments — teacher, Maple AvenueSaid 25 teachers had asked her for references since the budget was posted; urged the board to visit classrooms. The tape renders the name “Alicia Seminole”.
Jenna GageCitizens’ comments — Ward 3, second-grade teacherRead a letter, entered into the minutes, on workload after the mid-year cuts and staff considering leaving.
Jim Zullo (tape)Citizens’ comments — Ward 3Urged further cuts and no tax increase. Self-identified on tape; the minutes record “A citizen from ward 3”.
Brian RappCitizens’ comments — Ward 2Asked for “a couple of years of stability”; called a three-school move “Ridiculous” and the process “too rushed.”
Clinton Laurie (minutes) / “Clinton Lowry” (tape)Citizens’ comments — Ward 2Spoke on the tax burden and superintendent payouts.

Named on the record but not present: Melissa Richmond (WCCMA executive director), Taylor Trudeau (Stevens music teacher), Ian Gallub (music teacher nominated; “Ian Globe” and “Ian Gallup” on tape). Eighty-one rows of the dialogue file are labeled Unidentified and thirty Unidentified public commenter.

Agenda

Items as posted in “1.7.26 CSB Public Hearing & Meeting Agenda”, with floor additions, the time each was taken up and its disposition from the recording and the approved minutes.
Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:00Hearing: call to order, roll callPledge and roll at 0:00:44; the minutes record all seven present.
0:01:24Hearing: CMS Band DonationAgenda: “NH Charitable Foundation Donation to Claremont Middle School Music Program in the amount of $49,775.00.” Kennedy described a grant application with the WCCMA, “not to exceed the $49,775.” Hawkins moved, Crawford seconded (minutes). Carried by voice vote with no opposition heard at 0:13:22; hearing closed at 0:13:52.
0:14:04II.a Consent agendaThree items added without objection: discussion of the CAA contract, ratification of a CMS music teacher, and a nonpublic session (“Non-public RSA (e&a)” in the minutes). The 12/17/25 minutes approved with two corrections; manifest accepted by consent.
0:19:26II.b Citizens’ commentsAbbey (Code Monkey), Demars/Myers (stipends), Williams (summer school), Ellerkamp (forensic audit). Closed at 0:27:33.
0:28:09Nonpublic session (added)On tape the grounds are read as RSA 91-A:3, II “as related to litigation” and RSA 91-A:2, I(a) for CAA negotiations. The minutes record Whitney’s motion under “RSA 91-A:3, II (a&e)”, Petrin’s second, a roll call by the clerk, all in favor; in at 7:02, out at 7:32 p.m. See flag 1.
0:30:16II.c Finance updateAngell: a path to wiping out the deficit; no deficit warrant article to be recommended; cash just over $5 million with the loan at zero. Report; no action.
0:34:11II.d Follow-up: PD updateJanuary 16 PD day by building and role. Hawkins asked for an update on 15 pre-K students who may not be receiving services (0:38:13).
0:39:10III.1 4-School Unaligned, 4-School Aligned, 3-School Aligned SummaryPresentation from 0:42:28; public comment from 1:25:45; extension of nine minutes at 1:51:44. Three motions: current configuration ($46,211,951) advanced 4–3 at 2:23:31; four-school aligned ($44,844,373) advanced “4 to 3” at 2:37:02; amended three-school model failed 3–4 at 2:55:22.
2:55:53III.2 Subcommittee reportsNone from Capital Improvement, Finance (“already covered”), Policy or Curriculum. Leadership search: executive-director presentation requested for the next meeting.
2:58:40Ratification of the CAA contract (added)Hawkins moved, Petrin seconded; “it’s unanimous” at 3:01:25. The administrators asked for no raise next year.
3:01:53CMS music teacher ratification (added)Ian Gallub, 0.6 FTE, MA+15, prorated January to June. Sprague moved at 3:03:41; the minutes name Whitney as seconder. Carried.
3:04:10IV. Other businessTechnical advisory on filming and photo permissions; WIDA speaking-test consent.
8:25 p.m. (scheduled)V. Future datesAgenda and minutes: hearing “1/20/26 Tuesday @ 7pm Stevens High School Auditorium”, “NO SNOW DATE”; board meeting 1/21/2026; deliberative session 2/7/2026 at 9:00 (snow date 2/9). Not read aloud on the recording.
10:11 p.m. (minutes)AdjournmentAdjourned by consent; the recording ends at 3:09:21.

Discussion timeline

Chronological topics. Quotations are from the dialogue transcript as transcribed; bracketed text is an insertion or correction.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:01:24Music grant hearingKennedy: CMS students “have not had band or chorus or music music instruction since October 31st.” The motion would authorize applying and, “if granted, to accept the needed funds … this amount is not to exceed the $49,775.” “this is totally no cost to anybody in Claremont.”POSITIVE
0:04:16Public questions on the grantDemars/Myers asks about future years; Kennedy at 0:05:19: “So we have a plan.” Beauchaine on what music gave her; Williams on grant versus donation. Linke at 0:10:13 introduces himself as the WCCMA teacher taking over band.
0:12:10Supplement or supplant?A board member (Sprague, per the minutes): grants he knew required that they “supplement but not supplant.” Reply: that “only applies really” “To federal funds.”
0:15:02Agenda additionsHawkins adds “a discussion on the see a negotiating contract”. Kennedy at 0:15:32: a nonpublic session “to address an emergent situation”, RSA 91-A:3, II “as related to litigation, something that just recently came up today.” A music-teacher ratification added at 0:17:18.MEDIUM
0:20:33Stipend transparencyDemars/Myers: “there needs to be more public transparency about who’s getting stipends for what, who approved the stipend?” Angell at 0:22:12: stipends follow the collective bargaining agreement. Kennedy at 0:23:48: some were “Not contractually obligated.”
0:26:32Forensic audit: firms declinedEllerkamp: “Are they declined? Who declined? The two. The two from auditors.” Angell at 0:27:09: “I don’t really think it’s appropriate for me to go into it at this point in time.”OBSERVATION
0:28:09Motion to enter nonpublic sessionKennedy reads the grounds: “RSA 91 A on three Roman numeral two as related to litigation, and then RSA 91 a colon to the numeral. I mean one excuse me, letter A as related to contact [contract] negotiations and see a these administrators.” Whitney: “I would like to move that motion.” Petrin seconds; roll call at 0:28:34. Return motion and roll call at 0:29:43.MEDIUM POSITIVE
0:30:16Finance update“I do see a path forward with wiping out the deficit.” “I’m going to make a recommendation to the board not to have a deficit warrant article.” Cash “just over $5 billion [million]” after paying the loan “down to zero.” At 0:31:36: “March is going to be tough.” At 0:33:02: a state lending law has conditions that “make it unpalatable.”POSITIVE
0:39:10How the models will moveWhitney: the board will not vote on a budget at the January 20 hearing; tonight’s votes only choose what is presented there, with the decision at the January 21 meeting.
0:45:01Enrollment and objectivesKennedy: “we are currently at 1500 students. 1509, I believe, today”, possibly “down to 1000 students” within several years.
0:46:04Three models pricedThree-school aligned $44,022,085 (1.95%); four-school aligned $44,844,373 (3.86%); at 0:46:45 four-school current configuration “$46,211,951, or $3,032,387, or 7.02%.” Angell: “I did make a recommendation to the to the school board of almost $1 million, but the current config model can’t, reach the same level of savings.” Reopening Bluff at 0:47:51: “$46,831,034 or, a $3.6 million increase or 8.4% increase.”
0:48:24Tax rates$0.08 per $100,000 of budget. At 0:48:55: current “$17.45”; three-school “$18.14”; four-school aligned “$18.80”; current configuration “$19.91.” At 0:49:23: the hold-harmless grant “is going to kick in”; Crawford confirms the adequacy drop hits FY28, not FY27.
0:52:10Interventionists and attrition“the three school nine [aligned] model has ten interventionists above what we already have for title one”; four-school aligned six; current configuration zero. Attrition at 0:54:31: 27 staff left in 2024, 35 this year.
0:55:28Warrant articles plannedAn administrators’ collective bargaining article; special-education and building reserves funded from surplus; permission to sell or lease Bluff and the Masonic Temple; “at this time, we’re not recommending an appropriation. I mean, a deficit appropriation.”
1:00:06Why the hearing is January 20Crawford: “The hearing has to be accomplished by January 20th. That’s why we’re not waiting until the 21st”; “the general courts, calendar of when stuff has to be done.” January 20, 2026 was the third Tuesday in January, the SB 2 deadline for budget hearings.
1:09:25Health insuranceCrawford: “An average of 95% is paid by the district.” Angell at 1:10:26: 23 vacant positions budgeted at $1 for health insurance, “because a normal school district would have, at any given moment, 23 vacancies.” Crawford at 1:12:39 on ending the year in the black: “it’s still a crapshoot.”
1:15:48Class-size standardHawkins: under the new Ed 306 language “it is the average class size per educator that includes a teacher and a para.” (Not verified for this page.)
1:25:52Public comment on the modelsLowney: interventions “are like definitely currently happening”; research on consolidation paints “a very different direction.” Angell at 1:28:30: “there’s $1 million that I could recommend to take off in any of the other models.” Edwards/Evans at 1:29:17: “this one has fewer positions and it costs less. That doesn’t make sense to me.”
1:32:30Teachers’ letters and testimonyHoltz reads her letter. Simino/Simoneau at 1:36:00: “I have been approached by 25 teachers since your budget came out on the website.” Gage at 1:39:40: “Kids who are in need of additional academic support are not in compliance for those services in any school.”
1:40:59Taxpayers on the increaseMyers/Demars: “a 7% increase, for the current configuration is dead on arrival with the taxpayers.” Zullo at 1:43:08: “somebody needs to sharpen their pencil and start making some more cuts.” Angell at 1:45:30: “I’m sorry for letting go those 39 people. That was my responsibility.”
1:46:00Default budget questionAbbey (per the minutes): if the budget fails, what model applies? Angell: “the default budget hasn’t been calculated yet because, I don’t know which model to pick”; it will follow the chosen model. At 1:50:21: “can I make payroll? … Right now, I’m pretty comfortable that I can meet payroll.”
1:51:15Comment clock and extensionKronberg: “I paused it when Mr. Angel [Angell] … Was speaking.” Whitney: “we’re at the 30 minute mark.” Howard at 1:51:44: “I’ll make a motion to extend the time. 10 minutes or 9 minutes.” The chair counts “One. Two. Three. Four. Motion passes.”MEDIUM
1:52:24Rapp and LaurieRapp: “We need a couple of years of stability. It’s called triage.” Laurie/Lowry at 1:55:09: “My taxes went up 26%.”
1:58:34Motion 1: current configurationHoward moves model three to the January 20 hearing; Hawkins seconds “for discussion” (1:59:12). Howard at 2:01:42: “$50 a month doesn’t sound that bad.” Whitney at 2:07:20: “taxes are levied on people, on families, on households, and those taxes have consequences.” Madden at 2:11:43: he did not know of the budget problems “until it started blowing up in April and then in July.” Hawkins at 2:16:21: “My biggest question is the number of ifs.”
2:23:31Vote 1 by show of hands“the motion to move the number three, school configuration with a budget of 46,211 951. I guess we can do it by hand. Vote. Raise your hand.” The chair counts four; no count of the other side is heard. “That’s going forward.” Minutes: for Howard, Sprague, Crawford, Hawkins; against Petrin, Madden, Whitney.OBSERVATION
2:24:17Motion 2: four-school alignedSprague: “We have an instructional issue.” Crawford at 2:28:23: “I do not support, a three school model at all.” Petrin at 2:29:34: reaching a two-school model would need “more money from the taxpayers to remodel the middle school.” Whitney at 2:35:26: she objects to the idea “that we would deliberately, willingly and knowingly, waste money.”
2:36:49Vote 2Restated at “$44,844,373.” Voice vote; the chair: “For 4 to 3.” An unidentified voice at 2:37:25: “Who were the four?” The approved minutes list only “In favor: Loren, Frank, Candace, Arlene”.MEDIUM OBSERVATION
2:37:32Motion 3: three-school, amendedWhitney: remove four vacant interventionist posts (leaving six) and two vacant instructional-coach posts, add two guidance FTE (1.75 at a new middle/high school, 0.25 at the upper elementary), “resulting in a net reduction of 622,521.” At 2:38:38: “So the new operating budget would be 43,179,564. That is a .51 percent increase.” Madden seconds at 2:39:21. Sprague at 2:51:02: “I’m a no” without a real plan for Stevens.OBSERVATION
2:55:22Vote 3 fails“All in favor of moving the three school aligned model with a modified budget that would have a zero tax increase and a 0.051% increase in the budget”; “Three all opposed model does not move forward to the public hearing.” Minutes: for Whitney, Madden, Petrin; against Howard, Sprague, Hawkins, Crawford.OBSERVATION OBSERVATION
2:57:16Leadership searchHawkins: “Could it be a two pronged search?” for an executive director or a superintendent, since “all of our policies say, superintendent.”
2:58:40CAA agreement ratifiedHawkins moves to ratify the tentative agreement with the “Claremont Administrative Association”; “that group came to negotiations without a request for a pay raise for next year.” At 3:01:19: “We’re ratifying the Claremont Administrator’s Association. Tentative agreement.” Unanimous.MEDIUM
3:01:53Music teacherA part-time applicant for the post vacant since October. At 3:02:41: “step 17, a master’s plus 15, which is the annual rate of 71,831”; the 3/5 amount is given on tape as “$33,099” [the minutes: $43,099], prorated January to June.
3:04:10Filming permissionsA Department of Education technical advisory restricts filming; the district’s release “covered filming, whereas most other districts did not.” Families may redo permissions; a family that declines filming may limit a student’s participation in filmed activities.

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer’s aid. They are not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; an Observation rests on no confirmed rule.

MEDIUM The nonpublic motion as read on tape and the grounds in the minutes do not match

At 0:28:09 the grounds were read as RSA 91-A:3, II “as related to litigation” and RSA 91-A:2, I(a) “as related to contact [contract] negotiations” with the administrators. The approved minutes and the unsealed nonpublic minutes record the motion as “RSA 91-A:3, II (a&e)”, and the nonpublic minutes list “Discussion of CAA negotiations” as a matter taken up. Paragraph II(a) (dismissal, promotion or compensation of a public employee, or discipline) was not read on the recording, and no letter for the litigation ground was stated aloud. RSA 91-A:2, I(a) is not a nonpublic ground at all: it removes collective-bargaining strategy from the definition of a meeting. RSA 91-A:3, I(b) requires the motion to “state on its face the specific exemption,” and I(c) confines the session to “the matters set out in the motion.” The written record therefore cites an exemption the tape does not carry, and files the bargaining discussion under it. Mitigation: the tape shows both subjects were announced before the vote, the procedure was otherwise complete (flag 6), and the minutes were not sealed. The motion was read by the interim superintendent and adopted by the chair (“I would like to move that motion”), which the minutes record as Whitney’s motion.

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b), I(c), II(a), II(e) (2023, 189:1, eff. Oct. 3, 2023; text read 2026-09-25); RSA 91-A:2, I(a) (collective-bargaining strategy excluded from “meeting”); approved minutes; unsealed nonpublic minutes.

MEDIUM The approved minutes record one budget vote with only its ayes and differ from the tape on several points

RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to include “a brief description of the subject matter discussed and final decisions, the start time and end time of the meeting, and name of the person who produced the minutes,” and the names of each mover and seconder. Against the recording: (1) the vote that advanced the $44,844,373 aligned model is minuted as “In favor: Loren, Frank, Candace, Arlene” with no opposed line, though the chair announced “4 to 3” (2:37:15); the other two model votes are minuted with both sides; (2) the minutes give only the agenda’s scheduled times, not the actual start time (the end time, 10:11 p.m., and the clerk’s name are recorded); (3) the ratified agreement is minuted as the “Claremont Administrative Assistant’s tentative agreement”, while the motion on tape and the January 20 warrant article name the Claremont Administrators’ Association (3:01:19); (4) the comment-time extension is minuted as “all present voting in favor” and “unanimously”, while on tape the chair counts “One. Two. Three. Four.” (1:52:01), which may be a count of hands rather than of the whole board. These were approved minutes, so the board adopted them in this form.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2025, 112:1, eff. Aug. 22, 2025; mover/seconder sentence from 2018, 244:1; text read 2026-09-25); approved minutes.

OBSERVATION Three 4–3 budget votes were taken by hands and voices, with the losing side never counted aloud

The first model vote was taken as “I guess we can do it by hand. Vote. Raise your hand” (2:23:31); the chair counted four and declared it going forward. The second was announced “For 4 to 3” and a voice asked “Who were the four?” (2:37:25). The third was declared failed after the chair counted “Three” (2:55:41). The minutes supply names for two of the three. No statute requires a roll call on an ordinary motion; RSA 91-A:3, I(b) requires one only to enter nonpublic session, and the board took that one. On closely divided votes that set which budgets reach the public hearing, a roll call is what lets a listener check the minutes against the recording.

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b); RSA 91-A:2, II. No rule requires a roll call on ordinary motions.

OBSERVATION The failed three-school motion stated a budget total equal to the current year’s budget

The chair’s motion took the $44,022,085 three-school model, applied “a net reduction of 622,521” (2:37:32), and gave the result as “43,179,564. That is a .51 percent increase” (2:38:38). $43,179,564 is the current-year budget as the business administrator presented it; $44,022,085 less $622,521 is $43,399,564, which is the 0.51% increase over the current year that the motion described. At the vote it was restated as “a 0.051% increase” (2:55:22). The approved minutes carry the $43,179,564 figure and the .51% together. The motion failed, so nothing turns on it, but the minutes record a motion whose dollar figure and percentage cannot both be right.

Sources: the recording at the timestamps above; approved minutes; FY 26-27 Operating Budget w current pos.pdf (not re-read for this page).

OBSERVATION Two firms declined the forensic audit, and the reason was withheld

Asked at 0:26:32 what had become of the forensic audit, the business administrator confirmed on tape and in the minutes that the auditors had declined and that he was seeking another firm, and said “I don’t really think it’s appropriate for me to go into it at this point in time” (0:27:09). The forensic audit is the district’s response to the deficit that produced the mid-year cuts, so the reason firms declined is a matter of public interest. RSA 91-A governs access to records and meetings, not the completeness of an oral answer, so no rule is engaged; correspondence with the firms would be reachable by a records request.

Sources: RSA 91-A:4 (right to inspect governmental records); approved minutes.

POSITIVE The nonpublic session’s decision and each member’s vote are on the public record

Entry and return were each by motion, second and roll call (0:28:34, 0:29:43), with times recorded to the minute. The nonpublic minutes, posted unsealed (“Motion made to seal these minutes? No.”), record who else attended, the decision made (a 6–1 roll-call vote authorizing the interim superintendent to direct the district’s attorney to pursue litigation over court-ordered out-of-state special-education costs), and the name of the one member voting against. RSA 91-A:3, III requires nonpublic minutes to “record all actions in such a manner that the vote of each member is ascertained and recorded,” and these do.

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b) and III; 1.7.26 CSB Nonpublic minutes unsealed.

POSITIVE The $49,775 music grant was taken up at a noticed public hearing

For a gift or grant of $20,000 or more, RSA 198:20-b, III(a) requires a public hearing with newspaper notice at least seven days ahead. The agenda posted the hearing as its own item with the amount and purpose, public comment was taken (0:04:16–0:11:07), a board member raised the supplement-versus-supplant question in public (0:12:10), and the vote was taken before the regular meeting began. This page did not check whether newspaper notice was published.

Sources: RSA 198:20-b, III(a) (2023, 38:1, eff. July 18, 2023); agenda.

POSITIVE The administration put its year-end outlook and cash position on the record before the budget hearing

At 0:30:16–0:31:36 the business administrator reported an initial year-end calculation showing a path to eliminating the deficit, said he would recommend against a deficit warrant article, and gave the cash balance, the loan at zero, and the February and March pressure points. Board members pressed the uncertainty in public (“it’s still a crapshoot,” 1:12:39). Stating this before the hearing and the deliberative session lets voters weigh the models with the deficit question in view.

Sources: the recording at the timestamps above; approved minutes.

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page