Claremont School Board, Superintendent Candidate Interview (Broderick) — April 6, 2026

A public forum with Dr. Timothy Broadrick, the one superintendent candidate the board brought to the district for a full-day visit. It was announced from the chair at the noticed meeting of April 1 and filmed by a board member as a volunteer. There is no agenda, packet or minutes for this evening, so this page is built from the recording’s dialogue transcript and from the district’s approved minutes for the meetings on either side of it. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Convened and moderated by the chair of the Claremont School Board, Candace Crawford. No roll call was taken and no attendance was recorded. Two board members are identifiable on the recording: the chair, and William Madden, whom she recognises by name at 1:09:03. A third, Loren Howard, told the April 1 meeting that he would bring his camera and film the forum. Whether a quorum of the seven-member board was present cannot be determined from the record (see flag 1).
Date
Monday, April 6, 2026 (the chair: “Tonight is Monday, April 6th”)
Start time
Announced for 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. in the approved minutes of April 1 (“April 6th 5-7 candidate forum (filmed but not live)”). The chair opens at 0:00:15 and closes at 1:19:02 with “We have reached the time”. The dialogue file runs to 1:20:15; no clock time is spoken.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, Teal Room. The chair at 0:00:15: “we're at the Tech center teal room”; the April 1 announcement gave the same room.
Format
The chair alternated questions submitted online, which she read aloud, with questions from the floor, and put three questions of her own. She put the online questions at “about 12 or 15”; this page counts seven read out and fourteen questions from the floor in thirteen turns.
Recording
Cablecast: Claremont School Board - Dr. Tim Broderick Interview 4/6/26 (1:20:15 in the dialogue file; filmed on a volunteer’s camera and not broadcast live)
Minutes and packet
None located. The FY 2025-2026 meeting-documents archive has special-meeting folders for March 26, March 30, April 9, April 13 and April 17, 2026 and none for April 6; the 2026 minutes folder also skips the date (MAP.md section 119, verified 2026-08-28; no minutes found by title search 2026-09-25).
Outcome
The board later chose him. The approved minutes of April 15 record the search subcommittee’s announcement: “The Board as a whole interviewed candidates”; “The vote was not unanimous, Mr. Howard and Ms. Crawford voted against, but they support the Board and Dr. Broderick”; and “A contract has not been signed”. Those minutes do not say at which meeting the vote was taken, and no minutes recording it were located.

Participants

Only the chair and the candidate are named in any district document for this evening. The chair recognised floor questioners by first name only, and there are no minutes to supply surnames, so this page prints a role where it cannot print a name.
NameRoleParticipation
Candace CrawfordChair, Claremont School BoardConvened, moderated and closed; self-identified at 0:01:46 (“my name is Candy Crawford, and I'm the chairman of the Clements School board”). Read the online submissions, alternated them with floor questions, and asked three of her own: on the zero-tuition warrant article, on where the candidate would live, and on trust. 53 of 274 dialogue rows.
Dr. Timothy BroadrickSuperintendent candidateAnswered for about eighty minutes; 160 of 274 rows. Everything this page reports about his career is his own first-person account. Spelled as he signs his own later memos (“Timothy Broadrick, EdD”) and as the dialogue file labels him; the Cablecast title, MAP.md and the approved April 1 and April 15 minutes spell it Broderick
William “Bill” MaddenBoard member; chair, Ad Hoc Leadership Search SubcommitteeRecognised by the chair at 1:09:03 (“Bill, you had.”) and declined to ask a question. One row.
KimFloor questioner; parent in the district for eleven yearsQuoted the candidate’s letter of application back to him and asked how he builds accountability; followed up on grades not entered on time. Five rows. First name from the chair’s recognition at 0:09:51.
DavidFloor questioner; describes long-range planning work in the community and calls himself a former teacherThree turns: both sides of the fence in planning (0:20:04), sustainability and family engagement (1:09:09), and whether the superintendent will be in classrooms (1:15:44). Fourteen rows.
MarkFloor questionerAsked how admirers and critics would describe his leadership (0:18:50); later put the turnaround pitch (1:08:39). Two rows.
MichelleFloor questionerCorrected the candidate on self-contained classrooms, gave the Maple Avenue fourth-grade example, and asked about staffing shortages (0:37:20). Five rows.
JasonFloor questionerAsked whether the cheapest sealed bid must win (1:01:58). Twelve rows, most of them fragments.
Unidentified questioner addressed as “Doctor”Floor questionerAsked about test scores as a measure of a school system (0:43:56), the dissertation (0:54:12), and public engagement (1:13:52). Ten rows.
Unidentified questionerFloor questioner; spoke of the central office as “not even a skeleton crew”Asked what qualify means for preschool (1:04:02) and how he recruits staff (1:05:20). Six rows.
Unidentified questionerFloor questioner at the back of the roomAsked which lever of change he already had in mind (0:48:50). Two rows.
Submitters of online questionsMembers of the public, read aloud by the chairThe dialogue file records every word they wrote as the chair’s speech. One submission was anonymous (the chair at 0:23:21: “It was anonymous. Yeah.”); one was read with the submitter’s name, which the transcription renders Matt being (0:30:36). See flag 2.

Order of business (reconstructed)

No agenda was posted. The item list is reconstructed from the chair’s transitions, with the source of each question.
Taken upItemSource and disposition
0:00:15OpeningThe chair names the candidate and describes his day at 0:00:46: the Dow building, the tech center, the middle school, the high school, and a meeting with the Sugar River Education Association leadership.
0:01:16Format“There are about 12 or 15 questions that were submitted online. And I will try and read those and Doctor Broderick will answer them.”
0:02:21Curriculum, professional development, self-contained classroomsOnline submission, read by the chair.
0:10:00Building a culture of accountabilityFloor: Kim.
0:17:00School reconfigurationOnline submission, read by the chair.
0:18:50Leadership style, as fans and critics would describe itFloor: Mark; follow-up from David at 0:20:04.
0:22:35School choice and competitionOnline submission, anonymous, read by the chair.
0:28:22The zero-tuition warrant article and open enrollmentThe chair’s own question.
0:30:36Education freedom accounts; holding the State to its funding obligationsOnline submission from a named Claremont taxpayer, read by the chair.
0:37:20Class sizes and staffing shortagesFloor: Michelle.
0:43:56Test scores as a measureFloor: the questioner addressed as Doctor.
0:48:50Where he would push firstFloor: back of the room.
0:50:23Results after staffing changes in his current postOnline submission, read by the chair.
0:54:12His dissertationFloor: the questioner addressed as Doctor.
0:55:36A board that oversteps into operationsOnline submission, read by the chair (“You're going to love this next question.”).
0:57:24Human resources and cash flowOnline submission; the chair: “That's someone's opinion.”
1:01:57Sealed bidsFloor: Jason.
1:02:37Residence and daily presenceThe chair’s own question.
1:04:02Preschool eligibility; recruiting into a depleted central officeFloor: one speaker, two questions (second at 1:05:20).
1:08:39A turnaround pitchFloor: Mark.
1:09:09Sustainability and family engagementFloor: David.
1:13:52Public engagement and trustFloor: the questioner addressed as Doctor; the chair merged her own final question on trust at 1:14:14.
1:16:03Availability to teachers; classroom visitsFloor: David.
1:19:02CloseThe chair closes, points the public to the candidate’s resume online, and gives her district address for further questions. No adjournment is taken or needed on the recording.

Discussion timeline

Chronological topics. Quotations are from the dialogue transcript as transcribed; bracketed text is an insertion or correction. Where a speaker is reading someone else’s words, the snippet says so.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:03:52Job number one is the central office“There's some really important work that needs to be done in the central office and with administrators around keeping track of the money and making sure that we're meeting our obligations to taxpayers. And that's probably job number one for your next system leader.” He returned to it at 0:26:06: “It was a lack of systems in the central office that did that.”
0:06:01The title of the post“You can call me anything you want, and many of you will.” At 0:05:35 he had said a curriculum leader must be “somebody who is not the superintendent or executive director or whatever”.OBSERVATION
0:06:30Revisit the strategic plan“I understand you have a strategic plan document that exists. I just wonder if, in light of the last 9 or 12 months, it's worth taking a collective moment to look at that together and see if maybe something needs to be added or changed before we just forge ahead as fast as possible.”
0:10:00A questioner reads his letter of application back to himKim: “the letter that you wrote, emphasized your strong command of central office and school level operations and the importance of relating every decision to the community's vision of student success.” Those words are from his letter, quoted by a member of the public. Her own point: “we have a lack of clear expectations and holding people accountable.” No copy of the letter is in the district’s shares.MEDIUM
0:15:39Weekly gradebooks, and the union“I believe that every professional educator should reasonably be expected to update things like grade books. Or if you're a special ed educator, student service logs on a weekly basis.” And: “my experience shows that labor leaders can agree with me on that, generally speaking.”
0:17:15The reconfiguration question, in the submitter’s wordsRead by the chair from an online submission: “Some on the board keep talking about changing to three schools, and now there's a committee of the board to do research to to more reconfiguration.” A member of the public’s characterisation, not the chair’s.MEDIUM
0:18:12The answer: no change for twelve months“One school has closed, and there's going to be a grade level reconfiguration that results in some other movement going into next year. Don't make another change for the next 12 months. Study. Think. Plan.” At 0:18:36: “Give everybody 12 months to catch their breath, please.”
0:18:57My way or the highway“my answer to that question was, yes, things can be my way or the highway. And I'm always willing to listen.” At 0:21:17: “the areas in which I might be perceived as inflexible are areas in which regulation or law dictates part of what we have to do.”
0:22:35School choice, in an anonymous submitter’s wordsRead by the chair; not her view. “You've been very clear in your support of school choice, stating that this is necessary in quotes for a functional system, and that schools should compete in quotes for students. Many would argue that this approach shifts public education away from its core mission, and instead introduces winners and losers among districts.”MEDIUM
0:25:06The answer, and an enrollment figure“I work in the here and now. I work in a public school system today under the current regulatory and legal scheme.” Then: “roughly 10% of the students enrolled in Claremont schools left.” He attributed it at 0:25:39 to “headlines about a financial crisis, which I would guess scared people out of the system”, and said at 0:26:57 that enrollment has since risen.
0:26:32Where he is from“I grew up in Warner. I graduated from Kearsarge. We used to play sports against Stevens.”
0:28:22The chair states the March warrant article“this district, passed a, Warren article in March, that, said that we would pay for zero students to go out of district”. She asked at 0:29:02: “How do you reconcile open enrollment with the fiscal responsibility for a district that, people might not understand the value of the current education?”
0:29:13He has run an open-enrollment program“the open enrollment law is has not been well understood in New Hampshire since it was passed in 2009, which might be one of the reasons no school system actually operated an open enrollment program until three years ago”. At 0:30:09: “there's no place accepting students under an open enrollment program around here.” The chair: “We'll take 10%. We'd be happy to have students.” He, at 0:30:32: “Well, I do know how to run that program.”OBSERVATION
0:30:36A named taxpayer’s question on public money for private optionsRead by the chair: “do you support these types of policy proposals that divert public tax dollars to private entities and hurt communities like Claremont Tech?” The candidate at 0:31:28: “I work for a school district. Whatever system it is under the existing legal and regulatory scheme. Those are the conditions under which I work.”MEDIUM
0:34:13Per-pupil spending and state aid“Claremont last year spent roughly $26,000 per student, not including out of district special ed costs or transportation.” At 0:34:46: “The funding problem here isn't not enough money. It's too much money having to come from a place that it's just not realistic to expect people to be able to pay.” At 0:35:42: “Claremont actually receives the sixth highest per pupil rate of state aid. That could go down potentially.” The figures are his; no document supporting them was before the room.
0:36:57The chair on her role“I have to tell you, it's so hard to sit here and not say anything.”MEDIUM
0:37:55Class sizes and missing staff, from the floorMichelle: “there was an example of Maple Avenue, fourth grade classrooms that had 14 students that suddenly went to 28.” At 0:38:42: “That we have buildings without nurses. We have buildings that are under staffed with counseling.”
0:39:28What a day in the schools told him“I was a little surprised at some of the class sizes in your elementary schools.” At 0:39:47: “not having an actual four day a week, half day preschool program for every student who qualifies for that. To me, that's a serious, probably high priority concern”. At 0:40:16: “I can't second guess the decisions that have been made.”
0:40:41A core belief about staffing“in Claremont, roughly ten years ago, there were over 1700 students enrolled in the school system.” At 0:41:10: “Right now, there are well under 1500 students”. At 0:42:18: “Instead of paying more people less, you can pay fewer people a little bit better.”
0:44:07Test scores and socioeconomic statusQuestioner: scores “they're used as sort of a very strong argument for how bad things are.” Answer at 0:45:44: “there's a researcher at Stanford named Sean Reardon who has done a lot of work around socioeconomic status and expected achievement.” At 0:46:52: “ZIP code really is a proxy for socioeconomic status.” The questioner at 0:48:36: “I'll think I'll give you an A minus.”
0:49:57Priority: a curriculum leader“you do not currently have a system level curriculum leader has to be a priority, just has to be.”
0:50:48His current post, in his own wordsA two-town system that “had had three superintendents when they hired me”; hired “originally on a two year agreement with the school board to help them with some strategic planning and run one of their three schools as a part time superintendent” (0:51:14); “I have 1300 kids” (0:51:58); the boards signed “the Shared Services Memorandum of Agreement, which they signed in 2021 or 22” (0:52:21); “There is less money being spent on central office salaries” (0:52:48); growth “higher than the state average among elementary schools” (0:53:16). All first person. The transcription renders the towns seven different ways (Alderman Bart's, Alton, and Barnes did, Alton and Barnes said, farmsteads, Barnes stead, Barnes dad, Bardstown) and this page does not settle the name.MEDIUM
0:54:23The dissertation“So principals perceptions of the role of relationships in their practice.” At 0:54:48: principals help staff with “what's called the emotional labor of being an educator”.
0:55:36The board-overreach question, asked in front of the boardRead by the chair from a submission: “many have reported instances of the school board overstepping its operational matters”. A member of the public’s words. The candidate at 0:56:09: “I'm saying this in front of most members of your school board, I think are in the room right now.” At 0:56:59: “there have been times in the last year when the school board has been more involved in operations, when they should than they should be, because you haven't had much choice.” The chair at 0:57:19: “No comment.”MEDIUM POSITIVE
0:57:53An embezzlement where he works, and financial controls“they discovered that a business office employee had actually been stealing from the district, which is not the situation that you're in here.” At 0:58:49: “One of the first things we did was work with the school board to have them adopt 9 or 10 new financial control policies.”
0:59:09Purchase orders and three procurement tiers“Being an employee of a school district does not give you permission to enter into financial obligations for the school district. A purchase order gives you permission to enter into a specific financial obligation”. Best business practice at “$1,500 or less” (1:00:04); written quotes from three vendors above that; an RFP above “$20,000” (1:00:39). At 1:01:14: “you will never wonder where $5 million one it just won't be possible.”
1:01:40Prior contact with the district’s business office“I just described it in a written document that I actually think maybe some folks in Claremont have already seen, because I shared it with Mr. Angel a few months ago. I've known Matt Angel for a little while and we've exchanged some information. So prior to me even sending you all a letter.”OBSERVATION
1:02:37Where he would liveThe chair: “I understand that you live in Maine, about two hours away from Claremont. We have a policy that employees must be physically present at work for all their contracted days.” He at 1:03:13: “if the school board wants to keep talking to me after today, this is one of the things we're going to have to talk about.” At 1:03:32: “we don't intend to relocate permanently to Claremont, but I would certainly need to be sleeping here at least. The majority of the time”.MEDIUM
1:04:17Preschool eligibility, answered within his knowledge“I need to be really careful when I don't know the detail about what I'm talking about”. At 1:04:36: “I said qualified because I understand that preschool programs are fundamentally special education programs that include non-disabled peers.” The questioner at 1:05:20: “You've done exactly what I was asking you to do.”
1:05:50Recruiting“Making it easier is not the answer.” At 1:08:17: “Settling for less is the wrong answer, because in the end, you've experienced the worst case scenario.”
1:12:35The tech center building in the evenings“in a building like this, there could be other things going on, potentially in the evening.”
1:14:14Trust and office hoursThe chair: “how do you build trust in the communities that you lead”. He at 1:14:30: “I think it's actually a different answer here than it's been anywhere I've ever worked.” At 1:14:48: “Stop by and have tea with Tim. But I think that might be a good idea here.”POSITIVE
1:16:35Classrooms“I'd rather go to a class and read to a third grade classroom from a book”. At 1:17:23: “because of what Claremont has just been through, I think it's important to be out in the public just kind of talking to people generally.”
1:19:02The chair closes and points to a resume“I was remiss in not summarizing, Doctor Broderick's, CV before the before we began the questioning.” At 1:19:35: “his, resume is online, and if anybody would like to take a look at that, they're certainly welcome to look at that.” No resume is in the district’s shares.MEDIUM

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer’s aid. They are not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; an Observation rests on no confirmed rule. Statutes are applied as in force on April 6, 2026.

MEDIUM No record says whether a quorum of the board attended, and the answer decides whether notice and minutes were owed

RSA 91-A:2, I defines a meeting as the convening of a quorum of a public body, able to communicate contemporaneously, to discuss or act on a matter within its jurisdiction, and excludes only collective-bargaining strategy, consultation with counsel, a party caucus, and the circulation of draft documents. A candidate forum is not excluded, and the caucus exclusion is unavailable to a school board elected on a non-partisan ballot (RSA 671:30). Choosing a superintendent is within the board’s jurisdiction, so the question is the quorum. The recording establishes two members (the chair, and Madden at 1:09:03); Howard said on April 1 he would film it. The only evidence of more is the candidate’s own hedged impression at 0:56:09, “I think are in the room right now.” If four or more members were present, 24 hours’ posted notice and minutes within five business days naming members and persons appearing were required (RSA 91-A:2, II); none exist. If fewer were present, neither was owed.

Points on each side. The chair behaved as a moderator: “it's so hard to sit here and not say anything” (0:36:57) and “No comment.” (0:57:19). But one employment term was discussed in the room, at 1:02:37, and the approved April 15 minutes say “The Board as a whole interviewed candidates”, which places the board’s own characterisation of its interviews in the record. Graded MEDIUM on the mitigated limb: the forum was announced with date, hours and room at the noticed April 1 meeting and listed in its approved minutes, and it was recorded and published. A roll call at the start would have settled the question.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, I and II (meeting defined; notice; minutes; start/end-time and producer clauses from 2025, 112:1, eff. Aug. 22, 2025); RSA 671:30 (non-partisan ballot; 1979, 321:1); 4.1.26 Approved CSB Public Hearing & Meeting Minutes; 4.15.26 Approved CSB Meeting Minutes.

MEDIUM Every document in play was read aloud, none is on file, and the transcript records each as the reader’s own words

The chair read the online submissions; a questioner read the candidate’s letter of application; the chair referred the public to a resume. An automatic transcription attributes speech to the reader, so the dialogue file makes submitters’ characterisations (that he has been “very clear in your support of school choice”, that staff “have reported instances of the school board overstepping”) the chair’s statements, and the letter the questioner’s. They are neither reader’s views. The chair flagged it twice: “It was anonymous. Yeah.” (0:23:21) and “That's someone's opinion.” (0:57:24).

The documents themselves cannot be checked. The chair said at 1:19:35 the resume “is online”; no resume, letter or set of submitted questions for this candidate was located in the district’s shares, and there is no folder for April 6. RSA 91-A:4, I gives every citizen the right to inspect governmental records, and RSA 91-A:5, IV permits, but does not require, withholding personnel files whose disclosure would invade privacy. The candidate’s account of his record at 0:50:48 is therefore unverifiable from the public record. Graded MEDIUM: the trap is a property of the source, and the fix (one folder for April 6 with the letter, resume and submissions) is simple.

Sources: RSA 91-A:4, I (2024, 49:1, 2, eff. Aug. 13, 2024); RSA 91-A:5, IV (permissive); MAP.md section 119 (negative search, 2026-08-28).

OBSERVATION Which board hires, and why the post can carry another title

RSA 194-C:5, III gives the SAU board the power to fix the salaries of all SAU personnel and to remove superintendents; chapter 194-C does not say who appoints one. On April 6 the SAU 6 board was the joint Claremont and Unity board, whose April 9 agenda lists twelve members and contains no superintendent item. Unity leaves the unit on July 1, 2026, after which the SAU board is the Claremont board (the chair of the SAU board says so on the April 9 recording, and the April 15 minutes record that “it will only be Claremont in the SAU as of July 1, 2026”). The Claremont board hiring the person who will lead the unit it is about to constitute is neither authorised nor forbidden in terms by the statute. The two titles in use (the chair on April 1: “our next superintendent or executive director”, show 17291, not deep-linked here; the candidate at 0:06:01) are lawful: under RSA 194-C:5, II(a) “School districts shall not be required to have a superintendent”; the superintendent services of RSA 194-C:4 are what is compulsory.

Sources: RSA 194-C:5, II(a) and III (1996, 298:3; never amended); RSA 194-C:4; 4.9.26 SAU6 Board Agenda; SAU 6 Board, April 9, 2026.

OBSERVATION Two things the candidate volunteered that no document records

First, prior contact with the district’s interim business administrator: at 1:01:40 he said he had shared his procurement guide “with Mr. Angel a few months ago. I've known Matt Angel for a little while and we've exchanged some information. So prior to me even sending you all a letter.” No rule in RSA chapters 91-A or 194-C is engaged by a prior professional acquaintance; the point is that he disclosed it himself, in public, and nobody followed it up. Second, at 0:30:32 he said he knows how to run an open-enrollment program, having just heard the chair say that the district's voters passed a warrant article in March to pay for zero students out of district (0:28:22). Both facts bear on the appointment and exist only because the forum happened.

Sources: the recording at the times above; 4.15.26 Approved CSB Meeting Minutes (Matt Angell, “Senior Comptroller/Interim Business Administrator”, on the masthead). No March 2026 ballot results document was reviewed for this page; the warrant article is described from the chair’s statement.

OBSERVATION Public comment: the thirty minutes were exceeded in substance, but no speaker was asked for a name

RSA 189:74, I requires school boards to “provide the opportunity for the public to comment on school district matters at a meeting of the school board held under RSA 91-A:2” for “no less than 30 minutes”, with exceptions only for emergency and nonpublic-only meetings. If this was a board meeting (flag 1), most of the eighty minutes went to questions from the public, asked by at least eight people in the room or read from online submissions, which exceeds the thirty-minute floor. But no one was asked to give a name and ward, which is this board’s practice at its ordinary meetings, and so most questioners are known here by first name or not at all. If it was not a board meeting, the section did not apply.

Sources: RSA 189:74 (2022, 333:1, eff. Sept. 6, 2022; never amended).

POSITIVE The finalist for the top job answered the public directly, on camera, for eighty minutes

The chair announced the forum at a noticed meeting five days ahead, with date, hours and room, invited written questions to her district address, and named the candidate on the record. The earlier second-round interviews were, in her April 1 words, “done in private as a courtesy to the candidates”, as RSA 91-A:3, II(b) allows for “The hiring of any person as a public employee”. Nothing required the board to put the finalist before the town. On the night he answered a question about the board overstepping while, by his account, most of it sat in the room (0:56:09); answered where he would live (1:03:13); gave his view of class sizes and preschool after one day (0:39:28); and offered office hours (1:14:48). The reservation: the public got the candidate, not the paperwork. There is no notice, attendance list, minutes or resume on file (flag 1, flag 2).

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, II(b) (2023, 189:1, eff. Oct. 3, 2023); 4.1.26 Approved CSB Public Hearing & Meeting Minutes; Claremont School Board, April 1, 2026 (the chair’s search statement).

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page