Claremont School Board — October 21, 2026

A public forum on the HB 1300 school tax-cap ballot question, followed by the regular meeting at the tech center. Eleven residents and officials spoke at the forum, which ran about twice its scheduled half hour. In the regular session, the new business administrator presented the first quarter's budget-to-actual report, the treasurer said electronic payments are still reaching neither him nor the board, and the superintendent reported more special education reassignments. The board authorized a 24-month electricity contract at a rate 26 percent above the last one, awarded the Disnard parking work, adopted five purchasing policies and elected two certified educators. Built from the speaker-attributed CCTV transcript, the agenda and the packet. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (Claremont School District, SAU 6)
Date
Wednesday, October 21, 2026
Start time
Agenda: public forum 6:30 p.m., call to order 7:00 p.m. The recording opens on the forum (0:00:11). The chair closes the forum at 0:59:03 and calls the meeting to order at 0:59:37. The nonpublic session is announced at 2:28:56 and the roll call begins at 2:29:28; the recording ends at 2:30:06, during that roll call. The agenda scheduled the nonpublic session for 8:10 p.m. and adjournment for 8:35 p.m.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, Claremont, John Goodrich Community Room (agenda). Audio carried on CCTV Channel 8.
Recording
Cablecast: Claremont School Board - 10/21/26 (show 17666; event date October 21, 2026). Runs 2:30:06 and ends during the nonpublic roll call; the return from nonpublic session and the adjournment are not recorded.
Minutes
None located as of October 23, 2026, two days after the meeting. Draft minutes are due within five business days, by October 28 (RSA 91-A:2, II). The 2027 Meeting Minutes folder holds drafts and approved minutes through the October 7 meeting.
Board composition
Seven members on the agenda: Candace Crawford (chair), Michael Petrin, Heather Whitney, William Madden, Loren Howard, Donald Lavalette and Brian Rapp. Six are present: at the roll call (1:00:59) Here is heard for Lavalette (rendered John), Petrin, Rapp, Whitney and Crawford, Madden's answer is not audible though he speaks later, and Howard's name is read with no answer; and the chair says at 2:19:25 that he "was not able to come to the meeting tonight." Student representatives on the agenda: Byron DeCamp and Faith Norton; DeCamp gives the report.

Participants

Everyone heard or addressed on the recording, plus the absent member and agenda-listed staff who were not heard. Names follow the agenda, the packet, and speakers' own introductions; attributions come from the speaker-attributed dialogue file and are named only where the record supports them.
NameRoleParticipation
Candace CrawfordChair; Finance Subcommittee chairOpens and runs the HB 1300 forum (0:00:11), adds her own figures on SAU staffing, health care and energy (0:11:09 to 0:17:46), and closes it (0:59:03). Calls the meeting to order, runs every agenda item and vote, and gives her view in the HB 1300 discussion: "I don't think this vote is necessary." (2:07:05).
Michael PetrinMember; SRVRTC Committee chair (agenda)Answers the roll call (1:00:59; rendered Michael) and the nonpublic roll call (2:29:31). His voice is not otherwise identified in the transcript; he is one of the two members who could be the unidentified board member below.
Heather WhitneyMember; Ad Hoc Reconfiguration Subcommittee chairPraises the business administrator's report (1:18:49), moves the NHIAA letter (1:44:49) and three purchasing policies, raises the auditor-payment history and asks the Policy Subcommittee to revisit the audit policy (1:53:26 to 1:58:12), and speaks in favor of the HB 1300 cap (1:58:54 to 2:04:56). Recognized by name at 1:52:50 and 2:05:12.
William "Bill" MaddenMember; Capital Improvement & Facilities Subcommittee chairAsks for manifests electronically and in advance (1:04:44), asks the business administrator for a record of changes between reports (1:27:10 to 1:28:09), asks to visit schools "without a dog and pony show" (1:51:56), supports the cap (2:12:06), and gives the capital improvement report (2:25:48).
Loren HowardMember; Policy Subcommittee chairAbsent. Named at roll call with no answer (1:00:59; rendered "Lauren. Howard."); the chair says he contacted her that day and could not attend (2:19:25).
Donald LavaletteMemberCorrects the September 16 and October 7 draft minutes (1:01:21 to 1:03:03), reports on SAU web pages and the athletics site (1:39:30 to 1:45:49), proposes notifying parents when a classroom is evacuated (1:49:30), states his view on the cap (2:05:15), and moves the electricity contract (2:15:35) and the parking award (2:18:28). Addressed as "Mr. Level" (ASR for Lavalette) at 1:43:14.
Brian RappMemberAnswers the roll call (1:00:59; rendered "Ryan. Rap.") and the nonpublic roll call (2:29:32; rendered Ryan). See the unidentified board member below.
Unidentified board member (Brian Rapp or Michael Petrin)MemberOne board voice the speaker attribution could not settle between the two members whose voices are otherwise unidentified. Asks to hear the NHIAA motion again (1:45:54), argues against the cap (2:08:34 to 2:11:40), and moves the DJG policy (2:22:11) and the teacher nominations (2:24:33). The October 21 draft minutes should name the movers.
Noelle KronbergSchool board clerkCalls both roll calls (1:00:59, 2:29:28) and answers Lavalette's minutes corrections (1:02:53).
Byron DeCampStudent representative (Stevens High School)Gives the student report (1:10:51); introduced as "Brian DeCamp" (ASR) at 1:10:33 and thanked as Byron (1:14:13, 1:14:27). Faith Norton, also on the agenda, is named in the report as homecoming queen and is not heard.
Dr. Timothy BroadrickSuperintendent, SAU 6Presents the forum explainer (0:01:20 to 0:11:00), the curriculum update (1:29:43), the superintendent's report (1:32:51 to 1:39:07), the electricity rate (2:13:32), the parking procurement (2:17:02) and the nominations (2:22:34). Spelled as he signs his own memos; the transcript and some district documents render it "Broderick".
Teresa TaylorBusiness AdministratorIntroduced by the chair as about two weeks on the job (1:15:22); presents the first-quarter budget-to-actual report (1:16:24 to 1:26:16) and the DOE-25 status (1:28:36).
Luke DiamondDistrict TreasurerGives a verbal treasurer's report (1:14:46 to 1:15:14).
Kerry KennedyDirector of Curriculum, Instruction & AssessmentListed on the agenda for the curriculum report; not heard. The superintendent gives it (1:29:43).
Chris CogswellForum speaker; Ward 3; city councilor; candidate for NH HouseSpeaks twice (0:19:12, 0:54:50); self-identified as running "for New Hampshire House in district six".
Kevin TysonForum speaker; Ward 2Speaks twice (0:22:48, 0:50:47). Maintainer of this project; see the method note.
John CloutierForum speaker; Ward 1; NH state representativeSelf-identified (0:26:04); asks how special education would be funded under a cap.
Mark ChamberlainForum speaker; Ward 1Self-identified (0:28:21); walks through cap arithmetic.
Sam DeeringForum speaker; candidate for state representativeGives only "My name is Sam." (0:30:52); the surname is taken from his October 7 citizens' comment, where he gave his full name and the same candidacy.
Benjamin NelsonForum speaker; Ward 2; candidate for Sullivan County commissionerSelf-identified (0:32:02, 0:32:03).
Wayne HemingwayForum speaker; Ward 1; NH state representativeSelf-identified (0:34:01); says he voted for HB 1300.
Gary MerchantForum speaker; Ward 2Speaks twice (0:37:18, 0:52:41).
Emily SandbladeForum speaker; Ward 3Self-identified (0:40:51; the transcript splits the surname, "Emily San. Blade").
Tom LutherForum speaker and citizens' comment; Ward 1; Riverview charter school boardSpeaks at the forum (0:44:03) and at citizens' comment (1:09:40).
Hope DamonForum speaker; NH state representative (House Education Funding Committee)Speaks twice (0:46:33, 0:57:08).
Rachel NaglerCitizens' comments; Ward 2Self-identified as Rachel and gives her last name when the chair asks (1:06:08, 1:09:22); the spelling she gives is cut off in the transcript.

Agenda

The posted agenda (CSB Agenda - October 21 2026) with where each item is taken up. Linked times are from the recording; clock times are the agenda's.
Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:11Public Forum on the HB1300 November ballot question (agenda 6:30 p.m.)Agenda links an "Explanation of HB1300 Ballot Question" slide deck. The superintendent presents (0:01:20), the chair adds figures (0:11:09), board members defer their comments to the later discussion item (0:18:20), and eleven speakers take one or two three-minute turns. The chair closes the forum at 0:59:03: "We're twice the amount of time that we were going to devote to this."
0:59:37Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance (agenda 7:00 p.m.)"call the Claremont School Board to order for October 21st, 2026"; Pledge at 0:59:56.
1:00:45Consent Agenda: agenda approval; minutes of September 16 and October 7 (drafts); review of manifests (vouchers #1073 and #1074)A member prompts the roll call, which the clerk reads at 1:00:59. Lavalette gives corrections to both sets of minutes (1:01:21 to 1:03:03). No motion or vote follows; the chair says "So seeing no one dissent will assume those are approved with the changes." (1:03:11). On manifests, members agree they need not be printed in the binders; the chair concludes "we're not going to have them in the packet in the future" (1:05:38).
1:05:38Citizens Comments (Policy BEDH)Rachel Nagler (1:06:08) and Tom Luther (1:09:40).
1:10:33Student Representatives' ReportByron DeCamp (1:10:51 to 1:14:05).
1:14:27Treasurer's Report (Luke Diamond)Verbal only: "No written reports tonight." (1:14:48).
1:15:22Finance Report (Teresa Taylor): FY26 EOY & DOE-25; FY27 progress toward Budget/Actual Expenditure reportFirst-quarter budget-to-actual by function, handed out at the meeting (1:16:24); DOE-25 status at 1:28:27. No action.
1:29:39Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment Report (Kerry Kennedy)Given by the superintendent: "No real report tonight." October 1 enrollment data is being certified (1:29:43 to 1:30:59).
1:32:45Superintendent's ReportSpecial education staffing, the Parent Information Center workshop, the HB 1099 committee report, the Plodzik & Sanderson payment history, the Unity IT separation, holiday cards for the military, and the Right-to-Know log (1:32:51 to 1:39:07). Board questions follow; a motion to have the superintendent write to the NHIAA carries "unanimously" at 1:46:35.
1:58:38Discussion of HB1300 November Ballot QuestionFive board voices give their views (1:58:54 to 2:13:15). No motion.
2:13:21Electricity bid for Nov 2026-2028Lavalette moves to let the superintendent "execute a contract to lock this rate in tomorrow morning" (2:15:35); seconded (2:15:41). Voice vote at 2:16:36; the chair calls for opposition (2:16:48) and does not announce the result.
2:16:55Disnard Parking Expansion Procurement (JT Landscaping proposal recommended)Lavalette moves to "engage JT landscaping to get this work done in accordance with the RFP" (2:18:28); Whitney seconds (2:18:36). "Motion carries unanimously." (2:19:06)
2:19:25Policies: second reading and adoption of DJB, DJB-R, DJC & DJC-R, DJD, DJF, DJGTaken one at a time by voice vote with Howard, the Policy Subcommittee chair, absent: DJB with DJB-R (moved at 2:20:38, voice not identified), DJC with DJC-R (Whitney, 2:21:08), DJD (Whitney, 2:21:29), DJF (Whitney, 2:21:52), DJG (the unidentified board member, 2:22:11). No dissent is heard on any of them.
2:22:32Personnel Report: nominations; retirement notificationsThe superintendent corrects the lane, step and salary figures on the nomination sheet before the vote (2:22:34 to 2:24:04). Moved by the unidentified board member (2:24:33), seconded, and approved by voice vote (2:24:37). The agenda lists two retirement notifications.
2:24:42Emergency Operations Plans (nonpublic, RSA 91-A:3, II(i))Deferred by the chair to the closing nonpublic session (2:24:42).
2:24:42Subcommittee ReportsMeeting dates confirmed; Madden reports for Capital Improvement (2:25:48) and the superintendent corrects the facilities-inventory status (2:26:43).
2:28:41Other BusinessLavalette has future agenda items but holds them (2:28:45).
2:28:56Nonpublic session (agenda: RSA 91-A:3, II(a, d, & i))The chair announces "RSA 91 a three Roman numeral two II for emergency operation plans and A, D and I for other business"; the roll call begins at 2:29:28. The recording ends during it.
8:30 p.m.Future Dates/Future Agenda Items; Adjournment (agenda 8:35 p.m.)Not on the recording.

Discussion timeline

Quotations are from the transcript as heard, including its errors; bracketed words are corrections. Speakers are named from the attributed dialogue file. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:11Forum opensThe chair says the board "thought it would be helpful to have a forum. An information forum about HB 1300." and that she has "received questions from the public about trying to understand what the vote means". She has asked the superintendent for slides; board comments come first, then the public (0:00:46).
0:01:20Superintendent's explainerCalls his task "challenging but strictly factual". The question would cap growth of the school tax levy "for the next two years" and limit central-office spending; it needs a 3/5 vote (0:02:37). On the wording: "It is dictated by the RSA. So this language, the language of the ballot question, is not up to somebody either associated with the school department or in the city to decide how to phrase". Formula: last year's levy plus Northeast CPI plus net new construction (0:03:44); the capital lease and bond are excluded (0:06:45); central office capped at 6 percent, where Claremont is at "roughly 5.5% is my estimate". Health care is "$7.2 million. I think it is against a $42 million budget"; electricity is "up a modest 26%". A budget above the cap would need a 3/5 vote (0:10:23).MEDIUM OBSERVATION
0:11:09Chair's added informationIt is "two questions in one statement": a yes vote is yes to both (0:12:10). Payroll totals 377 people (0:13:08); she lists the SAU office's staffing, including one HR person who "hired 75 people this summer". Of about $750,000 for energy, "about 330,000 is electricity", which is going up; the transcript renders the percentage 2,020% (0:15:55). The education share of her own tax bill is 53% (0:17:09; transcript: "and you can see it's 50, 53%").OBSERVATION
0:18:16Board members deferAsked for board comments, a member replies "It's on the meeting agenda." and another says "I'm more interested in hearing." The chair opens the floor with three-minute turns (0:18:35).
0:19:12Chris Cogswell (Ward 3)Proposes raising taxes on "the very wealthy and corporations who right now only pay 16% of the total taxes raised in New Hampshire". Removing the whole SAU administrative budget "would be about $1.72 million", while health insurance increases added "$1.22 million in spending" last cycle.
0:22:48Kevin Tyson (Ward 2)Says he reviewed "314 of your recorded meetings" and the packets against state and federal rules: "The good news is you're not bad, you're inept". "We need HB 1300 because you guys need guardrails." Says the organization "is basically operating as an oligarchy".OBSERVATION
0:26:04Rep. John Cloutier (Ward 1)Asks "how would the district meet its legally mandated special education obligations if these costs increased substantially. But revenues are constrained by the cap." Federal special education funding was promised at 40 percent (0:27:04).
0:28:21Mark Chamberlain (Ward 1)"$40 million times 3.6% is $1.4 million"; about $8 million of costs at 15 percent growth is "1.2 million of basically uncontrollable costs", so a 3 percent teacher raise of about $400,000 puts the budget over the cap (0:29:56, 0:30:22).
0:30:52Sam DeeringFrom his Navy diesel maintenance work: "the longer you put off maintenance, the more expensive it gets"; "I think this puts a lot of that at risk".
0:32:02Benjamin Nelson (Ward 2)"We show up, we check your work, and we approve it or we disapprove it." He opposes bundling: "I believe in a system where it had one question, one vote."
0:33:43Rep. Wayne Hemingway (Ward 1)Says the chair called to ask whether he voted for HB 1300: "I told her, yes, I did." He speaks "in support of the local control and the right of citizens of Claremont to make this decision for themselves", and of the district's information: "which I think you did a fair job about".
0:36:55Gary Merchant (Ward 2)Gives reasons to vote no. Claremont voters rejected a cap last March "1345 to 560, 70 to 30"; "The formula is confusing. The ballot language is difficult to understand." County taxes rose "about 48%" over five years. Asks how much of the budget comes from state and federal funding (0:39:58).
0:40:51Emily Sandblade (Ward 3)October census fell "from 1923 students to just 1338 students"; "That comes out to 32,063 per student." Fifteen years ago it was "$15,111 per student". Of past administrations: "most of them were fired for incompetence or dishonesty". The cap is a way "to prevent the spectacular crash and burn that we saw last year".
0:44:03Tom Luther (Ward 1)"we might not be the dumpster fire that we've been witnessing" had a cap existed 10 to 15 years ago; "we need guardrails on this so that we don't make this mistake again".
0:46:33Rep. Hope DamonSits on the House Education Funding Committee, where the bill was heard (0:47:00). It is "perplexing, to say the least, to have two questions with only an opportunity to give one answer". "There is also a sentence in the mandatory language to go on the Warren article that was not included in the slide here, which says that there will not be classroom effects from this." In her view, "There are almost certainly going to be classroom effects." The November vote comes before next year's budget exists (0:49:30).MEDIUM
0:50:32Second round: TysonSays the March warrant article was posted "as an image PDF" and its item four "was gibberish": "So you guys signed a legally binding document that you didn't read." The chair answers that the article "was submitted by a member of the public. It was not put forth by the school board."
0:52:35Second round: MerchantAsks about the revenue side if state or federal funding falls (0:53:07); worries that sports, band and electives are what is left to cut (0:53:57, 0:54:21).
0:54:50Second round: CogswellOf New Hampshire GDP, "It's gone way up 25%"; of Sullivan County real income, "it's gone down $17,000 a household". Asks the board for "our list of items to cut from the school budget" before the vote.
0:57:08Second round: DamonNew Hampshire is "the only state in the country that funds our public education system, 70% from local property taxes"; "This measure doesn't lower property taxes."
0:59:37Call to order and roll callPledge at 0:59:56. Roll call at 1:00:59: six members answer; Howard's name gets no answer.
1:01:09Minutes of September 16 and October 7Lavalette asks the clerk to replace "Navy with Army", to add that Mrs. Morris manages Frontline (1:01:52), and to fix the attribution of a Howard question (1:02:14); he says the September 2 minutes still lack earlier changes (1:02:49). Approved "with the changes" without a motion or vote.OBSERVATION
1:03:11Manifests out of the bindersThe chair asks whether manifests belong in the printed packet, since "People see them in the packet and then they go into the saw office and to sign". Madden wants them "distributed electronically", the signed cover sheet afterward, and "a reasonable amount of time before we need to write checks so that we can ask meaningful questions". Electronic signatures are in development with no target date (1:05:12 to 1:05:34).OBSERVATION
1:06:08Citizens' comment: Rachel Nagler (Ward 2)A mental health clinician and parent, she asks the board not to place "children with neurological processing disabilities" in the same category as behaviorally non-compliant students, and objects to a member's remark at the last meeting (1:07:34): "behavior is communication to them. You cannot lump them together." She asks to submit a written letter (1:09:25).
1:09:40Citizens' comment: Tom LutherAs a Riverview charter school board member, thanks the superintendent: special education support "has made a difference in their operation of running the school".
1:10:51Student reportHomecoming and pep rally; the SATs "got moved due to lack of proctors"; class fundraisers, theater, band, fall sports records and clubs (1:11:53 to 1:13:25). Lavalette suggests a board representative on the student side (1:14:13).
1:14:46Treasurer's reportDiamond met with the business administrator about "these electronic payments that are going through that are not being seen by the board. They're not being seen by me." "And so she's going to address that."MEDIUM
1:15:22First-quarter budget-to-actual reportTaylor's one-page summary by function carries comments on variances; a line-by-line detail follows (1:17:09, 1:17:59). Whitney: "I can't count how many years we have been begging for something as simple as this." The superintendent cautions that early-year figures understate spending: "we are not going to end the year $7.9 million under budget." He says the board "has received really good advice to not trust things that are produced in Excel" and will get reports run from the iVisions accounting system (1:23:43). Madden asks to see what changes from one report to the next, and why (1:27:34 to 1:28:01).POSITIVE
1:28:27FY26 year-end and DOE-25Taylor met the Department of Education that morning, and "the auditors have provided enough of a starting trial balance for me to go ahead and go ahead and start building that". An update is hoped for at the next meeting (1:29:23).MEDIUM
1:29:43Curriculum and enrollmentOctober 1 enrollment data will be certified, "I'm supposed to certify it by Friday", with a ten-year enrollment history to follow (1:30:10). Lavalette asks whether enrollment is down six from 1,338 (1:31:07).
1:32:51Special education staffingFive or six staff reassignments; a second life skills classroom at Maple Avenue for over-enrolled programs (1:32:51, 1:33:29); categorical licensing to be aligned so programs can be approved by June under the state's due diligence review (1:34:18, 1:34:43). A December 2 Parent Information Center workshop on progress monitoring, "because we are aware that we're struggling to meet all of our kids" service requirements (1:35:06, 1:35:43).HIGH
1:36:22HB 1099, auditor payments, Unity ITAttaches the HB 1099 committee's final report (1:36:22); a "20 or 21 year history of every payment that's been made" to the auditors, rendered "Plaza and Sanderson"; and an update from Jason Bonneville on "the status of the IT services separation from unity".OBSERVATION
1:37:16Holiday cards; Right-to-Know follow-upCards for the Department of Education's military holiday challenge, due by November 15 (1:37:35); the Right-to-Know questions "I think I've answered those with my report tonight".POSITIVE
1:39:30Web pages and the athletics siteLavalette finds the Unity site's McKinney-Vento link "takes me to a page with Courtney Porter", a Claremont employee; a Disnard handbook link shows "file removed"; the athletics link goes to a site "not part of the saw six organization" that sells spirit gear (1:41:49). The superintendent says the NHIAA requires the platform (1:43:40). Whitney's motion for a letter to the NHIAA carries unanimously (1:46:35).
1:46:40Lavalette's requestsA census of paraprofessionals, exit-interview questions, bus driver counts and starting pay (1:46:40, 1:47:14); the superintendent describes a "makeshift, backwards engineered" transportation wage scale and promises board-approved scales (1:48:19, 1:48:56). Proposes notifying parents each time a classroom is evacuated and reporting "loss learning time each month" to the board (1:49:30, 1:50:55).
1:51:32Board visits to schoolsMadden asks to visit without being "run through the school"; the superintendent: "Call the principal, make an appointment. Have at it."
1:52:51Audit history and audit policyWhitney, on the auditor-payment spreadsheet: "there were lots of invoices for years where audits were not done", "for instance, we didn't have audits done from 16 to 15, 16, 17, 18." She asks the Policy Subcommittee to consider a public vote on the engagement letter, a nine-month target for the audit, rotating auditors "every 3 to 5 years", and draft audits to the board (1:54:50 to 1:56:38). The superintendent: "I actually think that the submitted to the Department of Education within nine months is is actually in a law." Taylor: "we have to have it by June of the next year".OBSERVATION
1:58:54HB 1300 discussion: WhitneySees the cap as "a mechanism by which we can create guardrails"; "we've gone through four Bas in four superintendents". Recounts the FY23 budget, where the board cut $1 million and "$1 million was put back in the budget" at the deliberative session. Says the district "did not submit for reimbursement for millions of dollars in revenue".OBSERVATION
2:05:15LavaletteFaults the federal delegation over IDEA funding (2:05:36, 2:06:07); "I'm not afraid of this tax cap." "So I trust the voters."OBSERVATION
2:07:05Crawford"I don't think this vote is necessary." Voters already review the budget each year; "I think that's misleading."OBSERVATION
2:08:34Unidentified board member"It's very dangerous to just put a blanket cap in"; "Concord needs to start funding education like the Supreme Court rulings have said that they need to".OBSERVATION
2:12:06Madden"I didn't hear anybody speaking for the taxpayers." "And we had corrupt administrators." "So I think we need these guardrails."OBSERVATION
2:13:21Electricity contract"a school district should not be purchasing electricity a month before its rate expires. This this is supposed to have happened about one year ago right now." The recommended price is "12.4 $0.02 per kilowatt hour" [12.42 cents] for 24 months, "26.23% more than the previous rate". A 12-month rate of 12.24 was offered (2:16:07). Moved by Lavalette (2:15:35).OBSERVATION OBSERVATION
2:16:55Disnard parking expansion"Our threshold now is $20,000." Specs went to three contractors; the Disnard repair budget for the year is $40,000 (2:17:02). After a first estimate of about ten thousand and a price of 40, "The low quote we have here is $23,400." Awarded unanimously (2:19:06). The superintendent: "So what you just experienced is what should happen in school board meetings when we're procuring things like that."OBSERVATION
2:19:25Purchasing policies adoptedHoward absent; the chair asks whether all six could be taken together, and they are taken individually (2:20:08). Adopted: DJB with DJB-R, DJC with DJC-R, DJD, DJF and DJG (2:20:43 to 2:22:17).OBSERVATION
2:22:32Teacher nominations"So the law and district policy both require that the superintendent nominate certified educators, and then the board elects or appoints." The sheet's lane, step and salary figures are "wrong in this case inadvertently"; corrected salaries "$69,477" and "66062". Approved (2:24:37).POSITIVE
2:24:42Emergency plans; subcommitteesEmergency operations plans go to nonpublic. Madden: the district "is way behind" on facilities; the superintendent corrects that only one inventory is done (2:26:43). Whitney asks about an end-of-life facilities plan and "a capital reserve fund" (2:26:58, 2:28:11).
2:28:56Nonpublic sessionRoll call: Donna [Don], a garbled madam that may be Madden, then Michael, Ryan [Brian] and Heather Whitney, each answered Yes (2:29:28 to 2:29:35). The recording ends at 2:30:06.OBSERVATION

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each cites the rule it rests on, or says that none applies. RSA 32:5-i, RSA 659:44-a, RSA 652:16-h and RSA 273-A:1 were read at gc.nh.gov on October 23, 2026; the other provisions come from the project's verified anchor files. Quotations from documents are marked as such; everything else in quotation marks is from the transcript.

HIGH Special education services are still not being delivered as IEPs require

Two weeks after the superintendent told the board that the district could not meet its special education obligations, his written report says staff will help "provide more of the services we have been struggling to fit into student and teacher schedules" and that parents will hear about "completed, missed, and compensatory services" (superintendent's report text, items 1 and 2). On the recording: "we are aware that we're struggling to meet all of our kids" service requirements (1:35:06, 1:35:43). Federal rules require that services be made available in accordance with each child's IEP. Mitigation stated on the record and in the report: five or six staff reassignments, a second life skills classroom at Maple Avenue to bring programs within enrollment limits (1:32:51 to 1:33:53), licensing alignment for state program approval by June (1:34:43), evening and weekend educators, and a parent workshop on progress monitoring. The report does not say how many students or service hours are affected.

Sources: 34 CFR 300.323(c)(2) (special education and related services made available "in accordance with the child's IEP"); 34 CFR 300.17(d) (FAPE is provided in conformity with an IEP); Claremont SB report - Oct 21 2026.docx.pdf

MEDIUM The district's HB 1300 explainer misquotes the ballot question it says the law dictates

The slide deck in the packet, HB1300 Tax Cap Guide - Oct 21 2026.pptx.pdf, prints a "Ballot Question Language (wording is dictated by the law)" that begins "Shall the [name of municipality] adopt the provisions of RSA 32:5-i to establish a local tax cap" (deck text). The question the statute actually prescribes, RSA 32:5-i, V, begins "Shall the [name of municipality] limit property tax growth for [name(s) of school district(s)] under RSA 32:5-i?" (statute text) and includes a sentence the deck omits: "These caps apply only to administrative operations of the SAU central office and do not affect classroom instruction, school-based services, or other municipal expenditures." (statute text). The superintendent told the audience the language "is provided here" and "is dictated by the RSA" (0:02:37, 0:02:57). Rep. Damon pointed out the missing sentence (0:48:00); no one from the district responds to that point on the recording. Under RSA 32:5-i, II the question goes on the November ballot by operation of law, so voters will see the statutory wording; the deck, which the agenda links and the superintendent said was in hard-copy packets, does not match it. Several slides in the posted PDF carry the label "Gemini Notebook" (deck text). The page does not judge which side the omission helps.

Sources: RSA 32:5-i (2026, 324:1, eff. Sept. 1, 2026), ¶¶ II and V; HB1300 Tax Cap Guide - Oct 21 2026.pptx.pdf

MEDIUM The FY26 DOE-25, due September 1, has not been built yet

Asked for the FY26 year-end and DOE-25 status (1:28:27), the business administrator says the auditors have provided "enough of a starting trial balance for me to go ahead and go ahead and start building that" (1:28:57). The statute sets the annual financial report for "on or before September 1 of each year" (statute text), and the reenacted section gives no extension for it. MEDIUM rather than HIGH because the record explains the delay: on October 7 the district said the DOE-25 "is already late but we have permission to be late" (October 7 recording, as quoted on that page), and the prior-year audits it depends on are still being finished. The November 4 agenda item "DOE-25 End-of-Year reporting update" is listed for follow-up.

Sources: RSA 198:4-d, III (DOE-25 financial report "on or before September 1 of each year"); 2026 N.H. Laws ch. 272 (SB 586), approved July 2, 2026, eff. July 1, 2026, reenacting RSA 198:4-d; RSA 189:28 (reports to NHDOE; aid withheld until complete); October 7, 2026 page, flag 3

MEDIUM Electronic payments still reach neither the treasurer nor the board

Following up his October 7 report, the treasurer says he met the business administrator about "these electronic payments that are going through that are not being seen by the board. They're not being seen by me." (1:14:54). By statute the treasurer pays out district money only upon orders of the school board or of members it empowers. The record shows a meeting and an assignment ("she's going to address that") but no fix, no count of payments and no dollar amount.

Sources: RSA 197:23-a (treasurer pays out district money only upon orders of the school board or of two or more members it empowers); October 7, 2026 page, flag 4

OBSERVATION Electricity: a year's delay on the consultant's advice, and pricing that arrived the day of the vote

The superintendent's memo says the consultant advised the central office "About a year ago" to extend rates, "but the district did not take action to secure a rate. Since that time, rates are up about $0.02 per kilowatt hour." (Electricity Rate Memo 10.21.26.pdf). The consultant's quote memo is stamped as received "October 21, 2026 @ 1:14 p.m.", the afternoon of the meeting (A Lafreniere rate memo - Oct 21 2026.pdf). The board authorized a 24-month contract at $0.12420/kWh against a prior average of $0.09839/kWh (2:14:01, 2:14:31). On the consultant's stated load of 800,000 to 1,000,000 kWh a year, the 2.581-cent difference is roughly $20,600 to $25,800 a year in supply cost (this page's arithmetic). No rule sets when a district must buy electricity; the superintendent himself says it "is supposed to have happened about one year ago" (2:13:32). The consultant attributes the delay to "last year's budget turmoil" (memo).

Sources: Electricity Rate Memo 10.21.26.pdf; A Lafreniere rate memo - Oct 21 2026.pdf. No statute or regulation is cited for this observation.

OBSERVATION The three parking quotes cover different areas, and the new policy calls for a public RFP above $20,000

The packet's Disnard Parking Procurement - Oct 2026.pdf holds the October 9 request for quotes (about 120 by 90 feet behind the school plus three front spaces) and three responses: JT Landscaping, $23,400 for "approximately extra 6,895 Square feet"; Young's Excavating & Paving, $32,750 for "Aptecomataly 11950 square foot" [approximately 11,950]; and Pine Hill Construction, $48,200 for "approx. 11,000 s.f." (proposal texts, typos theirs). Per square foot that is about $3.39, $2.74 and $4.38 (this page's arithmetic), so the lowest total is not the lowest unit price, and the record does not show whether the 6,895-square-foot quote covers the whole requested area. The Pine Hill proposal is dated 9-1-26, five weeks before the request it answers. The superintendent says the specs went to three qualified contractors (2:17:02). Later that evening the board adopted DJB-R, which for non-educational services above $20,000 has the business administrator conduct a "Request for Proposals (RFP)" with "publicly-advertised terms" and award to "the lowest-priced responsive vendor" by board vote (policy text). That procedure was not yet in force when the parking vote was taken, and a district policy is not a statute.

Sources: DJB-R Procurement & Purchasing Guide.pdf (district policy, adopted at this meeting); Disnard Parking Procurement - Oct 2026.pdf

OBSERVATION The forum is expressly allowed; the electioneering limits apply to employees, not to board members

On October 7, board members disagreed over whether the board could take part in the ballot question. The statute that created the question says nothing in it prohibits "a municipality, school board, or school administrative unit board from holding a public hearing on the question" (RSA 32:5-i, III, statute text). Separately, a public employee may not electioneer on duty or with government property, and "electioneering" means information a reasonable person would believe "explicitly advocates for or against" a measure (RSA 652:16-h, statute text). The superintendent framed his talk as "strictly factual", and his slides list what "Proponents say" and what "Opponents point out" (deck text). Board members who gave their own views at the forum and in the discussion item (0:11:09, 1:58:54 to 2:13:15) are elected officials, and the statute's definition of "public employee" excludes "Persons elected by popular vote" (RSA 273-A:1, IX(a), statute text). Whether any statement crossed into advocacy is a judgment this page does not make.

Sources: RSA 32:5-i (2026, 324:1, eff. Sept. 1, 2026), ¶ III; RSA 659:44-a, I and II (no electioneering by a public employee on duty or with government property); RSA 652:16-h ("electioneering" means information a reasonable person would believe "explicitly advocates for or against" a measure); RSA 273-A:1, IX(a) ("public employee" excludes persons elected by popular vote)

OBSERVATION Three actions the minutes will need to record carefully

First, the September 16 and October 7 minutes were approved without a motion or vote: "seeing no one dissent will assume those are approved with the changes" (1:03:11), so there is no mover or seconder to record. Second, on the electricity contract the chair calls for ayes and opposition (2:16:36, 2:16:48) but does not announce the result. Third, entering nonpublic session the chair says "I do a motion." and a voice says "Someone second." (2:28:56, 2:29:22), so the mover and seconder are not audible; the exemptions are stated aloud and a roll call is held (2:29:28), as RSA 91-A:3, I(b) requires. For II(d), the statute requires that discussing the property matter in public "would likely benefit a party or parties" (statute text). The minutes are not yet posted; they will show how each item was recorded.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (minutes record all actions taken and the names of the members who made or seconded each motion; five business days); RSA 91-A:3, I(b) and II(a), (d), (i) (nonpublic session by recorded roll call on a stated exemption)

OBSERVATION Manifests leave the printed packet

The board agrees manifests need not be printed in the meeting binders (1:03:11 to 1:05:38). Tonight's vouchers #1073 and #1074 are still posted in the online packet folder. Madden asks for manifests electronically, with the signed cover sheet afterward and enough lead time "so that we can ask meaningful questions" (1:04:44). The chair's summary, "we're not going to have them in the packet in the future", leaves open whether the public will still see them online. Manifests are the record of the board's orders to the treasurer.

Sources: RSA 197:23-a (treasurer pays out district money only upon orders of the school board or of two or more members it empowers)

OBSERVATION Auditor payments for years without audits, and a request to rewrite the audit policy

The superintendent's report attaches every payment to Plodzik & Sanderson since December 2004, $526,262.56 in all, and says "there were years when the district did not provide data so annual audits could not be completed" and that "purchase orders do not appear to have been in use by the district prior to about 2019" (report and payment list). Whitney says the list shows invoices for years with no audit and asks what the district was charged for without an engagement letter (1:53:52 to 1:54:24); that is her characterization, and the payment list does not say what each invoice covered. She asks the Policy Subcommittee to consider public votes on engagement letters, a nine-month target, auditor rotation and draft audits to the board (1:54:50 to 1:56:38). The superintendent recommends keeping the same firm through the FY28 audit and bidding after that (report). His statement that a nine-month deadline is now law (1:57:10) matches the reenacted statute: the audit report for the last completed fiscal year is due "within 9 months of the end of the fiscal year" (statute text), which for FY26 is March 31, 2027. The business administrator's "June of the next year" for the Department of Revenue (1:57:50) was not verified.

Sources: RSA 198:4-d, VIII (audit report for the last completed fiscal year due within 9 months of year end); 2026 N.H. Laws ch. 272 (SB 586), approved July 2, 2026, eff. July 1, 2026, reenacting RSA 198:4-d; Plodzik and Sanderson payments 2005-2026 .xlsx - Sheet1.pdf; Claremont SB report - Oct 21 2026.docx.pdf

POSITIVE A first-quarter budget-to-actual report by function, with variance notes, posted in the packet

The new business administrator gives the board a one-page summary by function with comments on each variance and a line-by-line detail, both posted in the packet (10.21.26 - FY27 Claremont SD YTD Budget vs Actual Summary as of 10.16.26.pdf; 10.21.26 - FY27 Claremont SD YTD Budget vs Actual Details as of 10.16.26.pdf). A member who has asked for this for years calls it beautiful (1:18:49). The superintendent commits that the detail "will always be printed or produced to a PDF directly from the accounting software" (1:23:43), and warns against reading first-quarter numbers as a surplus (1:20:51). No rule requires interim reports in this form.

Sources: No statute is cited; this is practice beyond the legal minimum.

POSITIVE Nomination errors corrected on the record before the board voted

The superintendent tells the board the nomination sheet's lane, step and salary entries are "wrong in this case inadvertently" and gives the correct salaries, $69,477 and $66,062 (2:22:34 to 2:24:04). The posted nomination report now shows those figures, with a note explaining the lane titles (10.21.2026 Nomination reports.pdf). The nomination-then-election sequence follows the statute.

Sources: RSA 189:39 (superintendents nominate and school boards elect teachers)

POSITIVE A Right-to-Know request log published in the board packet

The superintendent's report lists every Right-to-Know request since November 6, 2025: 131 requests, 127 closed and 4 open, from 22 requesters, with one requester accounting for 88 (report, item 7). This page does not repeat the requesters' names. No statute requires a public log of requests.

Sources: RSA ch. 91-A (Right-to-Know Law); Claremont SB report - Oct 21 2026.docx.pdf

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page