Claremont School Board, January 21, 2015

Board meeting at which the board set the fiscal year 2015-16 budget for the February 4 deliberative session and recommended the warrant articles. The page is built from the CCTV recording's dialogue transcript; no agenda, packet or minutes survive in the district's online shares. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (Claremont School District, SAU 6)
Date
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Start time
Not stated in available records. The recording opens partway through the Stevens High School program-of-studies presentation; the chair calls for adjournment at 2:36:34. The dialogue transcript runs 2:37:05.
Location
Not stated in available records. The early-childhood director is introduced as running the program "here at sugar River Valley" (0:50:02), and the program is described as "housed in this building" (0:54:31), which points to the Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center building.
Recording
Cablecast: CLAREMONT SCHOOL BOARD 1/21 (transcript length 2:37:05; begins mid-item, so the call to order, any roll call and any public comment are not on the recording)
Minutes
None located. MAP.md records no Drive material for this meeting: neither district share holds a year folder older than 2022, and the Meeting Minutes share starts at 2023 (checked 9/26/26).
Board composition
Six members are heard. No roll call is captured, so attendance and any absence cannot be established. The chair says three board seats are on the March 10, 2015 ballot (2:35:36).

Participants

Everyone heard or addressed on the recording. Names follow the project roster where the recording gives only a first name; where a surname rests on the roster or another recording rather than this one, the participation cell says so. There are no minutes to check spellings against.
NameRoleParticipation
Richard SeamanChairRuns the agenda and every vote. Addressed as Richard by the superintendent (0:42:09, 2:04:06); the surname rests on the project roster, which records Seaman as chair through February 2016, and on the February 3, 2016 deliberative recording ("Mr. Seeman"). Presses for clear grading and transcript explanations, a confirmed cost for night-game lights, and a quick decision on the bus drop-off policy.
Rebecca (Becky) FerlandMemberAddressed as Becky (0:38:05, 1:03:28); surname from the project roster. Corrects the diploma credit tables, defends the library paraprofessional and the early-childhood program, explains her no vote on the first budget motion, moves that the board not recommend the petitioned tax-cap article, and asks to be excused from the February 4 deliberative session.
Brian RappMemberAddressed as Brian (0:18:25, 1:50:28); surname from the project roster. Moves the first budget motion and the bus-purchase article, seconds several others, and asks whether the pending hearing request bars action on the transportation policy. His seat is on the March 2015 ballot.
Richard (surname not established)MemberLabeled "Richard Madigan" in the dialogue file; that surname is heard only once, as transcribed speech on the March 4, 2015 recording, and is unverified. Recognized as Richard when the chair asks the no voters to explain (1:53:57). Moves the second, successful budget motion at 2:10:29 and says he misunderstood the first figure. His seat is on the March 2015 ballot.
Bob (surname not established)MemberAddressed as Bob (0:59:01, 2:30:44). Says he served on the city council around 2008-09 (1:26:38). Questions the early-childhood program's finances and the fund-balance figures, votes no on the first budget motion, opposes the bus purchase, and moves most of the warrant articles and both transportation policies.
John (surname not established)MemberAddressed as John (0:14:56, 1:48:40). Seconds the first budget motion, asks for a legal opinion on putting the paraprofessional contract on a separate article, and questions the 27-credit diploma and the high-school share of reductions.
Middleton McGoodwinSuperintendent, SAU 6Presents the "draft eight" reduction list and the level-funded budget, explains the full-day kindergarten investment, and reports a resident's request for a hearing under the state board's dispute rule (transcribed "EDI 204.01").
Cory LeClairSAU 6 administrator (title not stated on this recording)Introduced by the superintendent (0:50:02; transcribed "Corey LeClaire"). Reports on the grading and reporting steering committee, presents the early-childhood program finances, explains the athletic reductions and the costing of new positions.
Michael O'NeillBusiness administratorNamed by the superintendent as "Mike O'Neill" (1:18:27); spelling follows the project roster and is unverified. Presents the updated budget, revenue offsets and tax-rate impact, and explains the general-fund and warrant totals and the draft MS-26 form.
Patricia (Pat) BarryPrincipal, Stevens High SchoolPresents the 2015-16 program of studies (the recording opens mid-presentation). Thanked as Pat by the chair (0:49:49); surname from the project roster.
Michelle JohnsonDirector, Early Childhood Education program, Sugar River Valley Regional Technical CenterNamed by the superintendent (0:50:02). Gives enrollment figures for the child-care center and the high-school courses and describes the waiting list.
Mary WoodmanClerk (recording secretary)Addressed as Mary for roll calls (1:38:00, 1:50:28) and on procedure (2:25:47); name from the project roster. Advises that the restraint policy returns for a third reading.
UnidentifiedVarious130 of 915 dialogue rows (14.2%) are short fragments, aye votes and crosstalk that cannot be tied to a person.

No public comment is heard on the recording. Because the recording begins mid-item, it cannot show whether a comment period was held earlier.

Order of business (reconstructed)

No agenda survives. The items below are reconstructed from the chair's transitions; the chair refers to "action items", "discussion items" and a second agenda page, so a printed agenda existed.
Taken upItemWhat was said and done
0:00:00Stevens High School program of studies, 2015-16In progress when the recording starts. The chair notes it is listed "as an action item" (0:48:42). Barry asks for time to fix the diploma tables: "Clearly, I wouldn't want you voting on something that isn't fixed". Final approval deferred to the next meeting on February 4 (0:49:35). No vote.
0:49:56Early childhood education program updateChair: "We're back on discussion items. Early childhood education program update." Discussion only; no vote.
1:14:042015-16 strategic restructuring recommendationsTranscribed "20 1516 Strategic restructuring recommendations". The superintendent presents "draft eight" of the reduction and addition list. Discussion only.
1:27:21Revenue offsets and tax-rate impactO'Neill's handout on estimated revenues and the tax-rate effect of the budget and proposed warrant articles. Discussion only.
1:37:41Budget to take to the deliberative sessionFirst motion (Brian, second John) to approve $33,959,382, roll call at 1:50:28; the board proceeds as if it failed and explains no votes. Second motion by Richard at 2:10:29, "Second by Brian" (2:10:36), roll call; the chair then says the board has "put together a budget that will go in front of our voters." Neither tally is audible.
2:11:49Warrant articles 3 to 8Each article read aloud and voted for placement and recommendation: Article 3, paraprofessionals' agreement, $92,370 (motion Bob, second Brian, one abstention); Article 4, security upgrades, $101,000 (motion from Bob, garbled in the transcript); Article 5, bus, $95,000 (motion Brian, second Richard, Bob opposed); Article 6, Disnard roof, $100,000 (motion Bob, second Brian); Article 7, building repairs and maintenance expendable trust (motion Bob); Article 8, petitioned tax cap, voted not recommended (motion Becky).
2:22:42Acceptance of a giftChildren's winter jackets valued at $560 from Mill Travel for the SAU's families-in-transition program. "Moved by Richard. Second by Brian." Voice vote, no opposition heard.
2:24:07PoliciesJKAA, use of restraints and seclusion, approved on second reading (motion Bob, second Brian), returning for a third reading; transportation drop-off policy approved on second reading (motion Bob, second John) after the superintendent asked the board to wait for a resident's hearing; bus-accident procedures (transcribed EAR) approved on second reading (motion Bob).
2:35:17Dates and announcementsFebruary 4 deliberative session; Ferland asks to be excused; candidate filing period January 21 to 30 for three board seats; election March 10.
2:36:34Adjournment"Would anyone like to make a motion?" then "All in favor? Thank you." No mover or seconder is audible.

Discussion timeline

Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/7313 SchoolBoard012115.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording. Quotations are as transcribed; bracketed words are corrections, with the transcript's wording kept where the correction changes sense.

Chronological topics with the most concrete material first.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:00Program of studies: courses and structureBarry describes condensed career pathways, a planned A/B schedule of year-long courses, and a change to "require that students take a year of English four years in a row". Remedial courses go: "the absence throughout here of our structured language and structured math, our remedial courses". Pre-algebra and earth science are removed as middle-school courses. New courses: forensic science, and digital art and design co-taught by the computer and art teachers. A dance choreography class replaces sending students to an outside studio, presented as a cost saving.OBS
0:08:43Diploma credit tables and library paraFerland finds that the merit-diploma columns do not add up to four credits in math and science. Barry: "You're you're absolutely right in the diploma with merit." Ferland objects that the library media paraprofessional is cut while the program text still describes duties needing one: "I believe that there needs to be a para in that library media center." Barry says the text was written before the budget and would be revisited.
0:14:09Community service and creditsBarry explains the switch from 12 credits a year to "48 credits by the time you graduate" for promotion. John asks the district to "stop counting at 48 hours". Rapp suggests a sophomore-year checkpoint; the chair recalls the board's earlier choice to require hours each year.
0:21:41Credit load and costJohn asks whether the 27-credit diploma, "which is actually five more than state requires", could be lowered to save teaching positions. Barry defends the breadth of offerings: "I think it would be ill advised."
0:25:21Grading, GPA and transcriptsThe chair asks how GPA, class rank and valedictorian work under the descriptor grading system. LeClair reports that a steering committee is reviewing a draft reporting document: "Right now, we're targeting March for that final approval." The chair: "there are 50 inquiries coming into our guidance counselors on what do your transcripts mean?"
0:36:22Public perception of the schoolsThe chair says the schools are perceived as weak despite their offerings. Ferland reports that Zillow rates the schools "around 2 or 3 out of ten". Rapp: "they list the average teacher salary at $70,000 a year." The superintendent suggests a stipended staff member to write regular articles, citing Newport's practice.
0:49:00Program of studies deferredBarry asks for time to correct the diploma requirements. The chair asks whether approval can wait until February 4; Barry: "It can. I'd rather get it right."
0:51:14Early-childhood program financesLeClair reports changes since last year's proposed cut: parents now pay for 50 weeks, rates were raised and collections tightened, and "the early childhood program is running approximately cost to neutral." FY2015 projected expenditures excluding the high-school teacher are about $180,352 against projected revenue of about $186,000 (revenue to date $93,000 as of January 14). She recommends keeping the paraprofessional, because "cutting that position actually would not be a cost savings to the district" under state licensing ratios, and adding two preschool slots for "approximately $17,000 worth of revenue". Of the families served, 12 live in Claremont.POS
0:59:01Running a businessBob: "There's no mistake about it. We're running the business." and "we're running a business and taxpayers are subsidizing that in the Claremont School District". Ferland replies that other technical-center programs are not held to the same test: "I feel like she's being singled out because she has a successful program working with the community." Rapp: "It's it's showing that it's not losing money." Johnson reports 24 children enrolled and a waiting list "2 to 3 years long."
1:11:29Budget line versus actualsBob reads the program's budget line as $344,487 against revenue of $186,000. LeClair: year-to-date plus encumbrances is $269,332, or $180,352 without the high-school teacher, and "the budget figure is not an accurate figure to start with"; she says FY2016 lines were cleaned up.
1:14:15Draft eight of the reduction listThe early-childhood para returns to the budget. Added cuts: "athletic reductions, which include benefits, are $33,295.56", and phone and internet bids came in lower: "we have reduced this line item by $43,380." Result: "the recommended budget for fiscal year 1516 at this day is $14,516 less than the current fiscal year." The superintendent ties the cuts to funding full-day kindergarten and warns: "please do not expect this to be an annual effort."
1:19:56Athletics and night-game lightsLeClair: about $23,000 of the athletic reduction is coaching stipends and related costs, plus "$10,000 for lights for night games" that the city had asked the district to pay. The cost per hour is disputed: the superintendent recalls "a little over $100", Bob recalls a 2008-09 city study at "only $50 an hour." The chair asks for a confirmed figure.
1:27:22Revenue offsets and tax rateO'Neill: an estimated $250,000 fund-balance return; "tax rate impact is proposed to be $0.55 on the operating budget, including the war nautical [warrant article] for the Paris [paras]." Each proposed capital article adds roughly 14 to 15 cents. "It's the increase in the total proposed appropriation to the school is $377,000." Bob challenges the shifting fund-balance figures ($1.3 million, $700,000, $250,000); LeClair clarifies that the larger figure is the FY2014 return and $250,000 the projected FY2015 return. The superintendent cites a $444,000 increase in FY2016 adequacy aid.
1:33:50Outsourcing RFPsBid openings for maintenance and custodial, food service and transportation were delayed "until the 30th of, of January"; one maintenance-custodial response is in and sealed. The chair: if the process succeeds, "it will result in a surplus next year." O'Neill explains that savings can only lower the tax rate through the revenue estimate when the rate is set in the fall.
1:38:00General fund versus warrant totalThe chair first states the motion as "the budget for 1516 at $31,094,382." O'Neill explains that the warrant adds $2,215,000 in grants and $650,000 for food service, both revenue-neutral, for a warrant total of $33,959,382. The draft MS-26 form shows doubled prior-year figures: "The budget on page 305 says 65 million." The posting deadline is discussed: "26th is when the last date of postal warrant."OBS
1:49:15Paraprofessional contract on a separate articleJohn: "I would like a legal opinion" on whether one union's cost items may sit on a separate article when others are in the budget, adding "All employees should be treated equally if they're going to work for the school district." The superintendent: "That has been the past practice."
1:50:04First budget voteMotion stated as $33,959,382, transcribed in fragments (1:50:14); "Motion made by Brian, seconded by John and Mary. Can we do a roll call on that, please?" Only Bob's No, no. is audible (1:50:51). The chair then asks those voting no to explain. Bob cites "a tax rate out there at $41 and something a thousand" and "240 homes in the city of Claremont on the market, 30 of them under foreclosure."OBS
1:53:23No voters explainThe superintendent: "You asked me to come in with a level funded budget. I've come in with a level funded budget 14,000 to the good." Richard: "Had I truly understood that, I probably would have voted the other way." Ferland: "So that's why I voted. No, because I feel that that money needs to come from somewhere else, not from a para and a teacher." She proposes restoring the library para and half a physical-education position (about $50,000).OBS
1:58:19Priorities and the bottom lineJohn: "As a community, we can't offer the pie in the sky and then complain about paying for it." The chair describes the budget as a bottom line within which the superintendent may change positions. LeClair explains that new positions are costed high and reductions low; full-day kindergarten adds "three new full, full time teaching positions for kindergarten, one to be at each of the three elementary schools".
2:10:29Second budget voteRichard: "That we accept the proposed budget as presented." The chair: "Second by Brian. Further discussion. Hearing. None. Mary, please." Only scattered Yes. answers are audible. The chair: "And let's understand what we've done here is put together a budget that will go in front of our voters."OBS
2:12:37Warrant articles 3 to 7The chair reads each article aloud. Paraprofessionals: "Year 2015 2016 estimated increase $92,370." with one Abstain. Security upgrades $101,000. Bus $95,000, Bob opposed, saying high-mileage buses reflect "a lack of maintenance". Roof: "Bob opposes that passes roofing repairs at Disney [Disnard] elementary School"; O'Neill says the earlier figure was "$137,000 for the first two phases" and the work can be done for $100,000. Expendable trust under "RSA 19820-C" [RSA 198:20-c], with the board named agents to expend.POS
2:19:55Article 8, petitioned tax capThe chair reads: "shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 325 B [RSA 32:5-b] and implement the tax cap" at 0%. He argues the cap penalizes returning one-time revenue. Ferland: "Then move that we don't." Chair: "We do not recommend this article." Passes by voice vote.
2:22:00Default budgetBob asks for the default budget figure; O'Neill's answer is garbled in the transcript ("30 ... 411 ... 41138 50") and he says it is higher than the proposed budget. No reliable figure can be read from the recording.
2:22:59Gift of winter jacketsThe chair reads the thank-you letter for "children's winter jackets valued at $560" from Mill Travel for the families-in-transition program; accepted on motion and second.
2:24:49Policy JKAA, restraint and seclusionThe superintendent: "This is a, a new RSA, of September 2014." The board approves it "for second reading"; the clerk indicates a third reading follows: "For third place." [read]OBS
2:26:56Transportation drop-off policy and a hearing requestThe superintendent reports a resident's request to meet the board "per EDI 204.01. Proceedings at school board level to resolve disputes between individuals and the school system." and asks the board to defer. The chair says he has invited the resident twice and does not want to delay a rule that kindergarten through second-grade children are not dropped off without an adult: "we can take it from a change to a final reading in the same night." Rapp: "My only concern is that it says a local school board shall adhere to the following due process procedures." Approved on second reading.OBS
2:34:05Bus-accident proceduresThe superintendent says the procedure comes from the New Hampshire School Boards Association and was checked with the ambulance company. Approved on second reading.
2:35:24DatesFerland: "I would like to be excused from that meeting." The chair: filing for three open seats "begins January 21st today and ends on January 30th"; vote March 10.

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each one names the rule it rests on, as that rule read on January 21, 2015, or is labeled an observation where no verified rule applies.

MEDIUM No agenda, packet or minutes for this meeting survive in any district share

MAP.md records no Drive material: the district's shares hold no year folder older than 2022, and the Meeting Minutes share starts at 2023. The recording is the only public account of a meeting that set a $33,959,382 warrant figure. RSA 91-A:2, II, in the text in force in 2015, required minutes including "names of members, persons appearing before the public bodies, and a brief description of the subject matter discussed and final decisions", "open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting". This page applies the MEDIUM limb of the project's severity rule because the record mitigates the gap: the clerk is present and taking roll calls, and the business administrator refers to "the minutes" of the previous meeting (1:31:21), so the board was producing minutes at the time. The 2015 statute also required minutes to be open to inspection, not posted online, so their absence from today's online shares does not show they were never available. What is missing is any public copy now.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2015 codification; source note ends 2008, 303:4)

OBSERVATION The recording begins mid-item

The first words are Barry's, partway through the program-of-studies presentation (0:00:00). The call to order, any roll call, the adoption of the agenda, any approval of minutes and any public comment are not on the recording. The chair's remark at 0:48:42 that the program of studies is "on here as an action item" shows a printed agenda existed, but no copy survives. No statute required a public-comment period in 2015 (RSA 189:74 dates from 2022), so this is a gap in the record, not a rule breach.

Sources: Cablecast: CLAREMONT SCHOOL BOARD 1/21

OBSERVATION Neither budget roll call can be read from the recording

The board took two roll-call votes on the budget. On the first (1:50:28) the only audible answer is Bob's No, no.; the result is never announced, but the chair at once asks the no voters to explain and a second motion follows, so the board treated it as failed. Ferland and Richard each say they voted no. On the second (2:11:01) only scattered Yes. answers are heard before the chair says the budget will go to the voters. How each member voted, and the tally on either motion, cannot be recovered without the minutes that flag 1 finds missing. RSA 91-A:2, II required minutes to record "final decisions".

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2015 codification)

OBSERVATION Members voted on a budget figure they said they did not understand

The chair stated the first motion as $31,094,382 (1:38:00), the general fund; the motion put to the vote was the warrant total of $33,959,382, which adds $2,215,000 in grants and $650,000 in food service (1:38:49, 1:43:11). The draft MS-26 that members were handed showed prior-year figures doubled to "65 million" (1:40:23), which O'Neill attributed to the state form. Ferland asked "If I say yes, I'm agreeing to all these cuts that we got on this sheet way here." (1:47:42). After the first vote Richard said "Had I truly understood that, I probably would have voted the other way." (1:54:45). The chair's own comment was "It's it's not the easiest of accounting concepts." (1:43:36). No rule is engaged; the point is that the decisive vote followed a misunderstanding of the figure.

Sources: Cablecast: CLAREMONT SCHOOL BOARD 1/21; Dialogue/7313 SchoolBoard012115.mp4.CSV (rows 463 to 596)

OBSERVATION Restraint-and-seclusion policy still at second reading after the statutory duty took effect

RSA 126-U:2, as amended effective September 30, 2014, required "Each facility and school" to "have a written policy and procedures for managing the behavior of children" that describes "how and under what circumstances seclusion or restraint is used". Before that amendment the section already required a written policy on restraint (2010, 375:2, eff. September 1, 2010). On January 21, 2015 the board approved policy JKAA only on second reading, with a third reading to follow (2:26:03, 2:26:37). The recording does not show whether an earlier restraint policy was in force, so this is an observation about timing, not a finding that the district lacked a policy.

Sources: RSA 126-U:2 (2015 codification; 2014, 324:4, eff. Sept. 30, 2014); RSA 126-U:2 (2014 codification; 2010 text)

OBSERVATION Transportation policy advanced while a resident's dispute hearing was pending

The superintendent told the board a resident had asked to be heard under the state board's rule for resolving disputes at the school-board level and recommended deferring further action on the transportation policies until then (2:27:31). The board approved the drop-off policy on second reading anyway (2:31:14, 2:33:54). Ed 204.01 requires "A local school board shall adhere to the following due process procedures prior to a party filing a dispute as a contested case". The rule governs how the board hears the dispute; it does not in terms bar the board from acting on a policy meanwhile, and the chair said the policy could be reopened after the hearing. Whether the hearing was held is not in the record.

Sources: N.H. Admin. Rules, Ed 204.01 (#8334-A, eff. 4-23-05; text in force in 2015)

POSITIVE Requested figures returned in a week, and every warrant article read aloud before its vote

Questions from the previous meeting about the early-childhood program came back with a revenue and expenditure sheet, family residency counts and a costed recommendation (0:51:14 to 0:58:42). Members who voted no on the first budget motion explained their reasons on camera (1:51:40 to 1:57:21). The chair read the full text of each warrant article before the board voted to place and recommend it (2:12:37 onward). None of this is required by statute, and it lets a viewer follow what was decided.

Sources: Cablecast: CLAREMONT SCHOOL BOARD 1/21

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page