Claremont School Board, January 4, 2017

Regular board meeting at which the board placed five collective bargaining agreements on the March ballot after a nonpublic session, reviewed a corrected FY2018 budget draft, and scheduled a Saturday budget work session. The page is built from the CCTV recording's dialogue transcript; no agenda, packet or minutes survive in the district's online shares. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (Claremont School District, SAU 6)
Date
Wednesday, January 4, 2017
Start time
Not stated in available records. The recording opens with the pledge at 0:00:05; the board goes into nonpublic session at 0:09:45 and is back at 0:10:14, so the session itself is not on tape. Adjournment is moved at 1:25:05. The dialogue transcript runs 1:25:14.
Location
Not stated in available records. The superintendent schedules the Saturday session here in the Texan [tech center] (1:14:04), and the chair asks about getting more use “out of this building” (1:02:38), which points to the Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center building.
Recording
Cablecast: SCHOOL BOARD MEETING 1-4-17 (transcript length 1:25:14; the nonpublic session is omitted)
Minutes
None located. MAP.md records no Drive material for this meeting: neither district share holds a year folder older than 2022, and the Meeting Minutes share starts at 2023 (checked 9/26/26).
Board composition
Seven members; five present. The chair reports that Michelle Pierce is “home with a sick child” and that Brent Ferland (Brant in the transcript) “could not make it tonight” (0:00:51).

Participants

Everyone heard or addressed on the recording. Names follow the roll call and the project's 2015-2023 roster; there are no minutes to check spellings against. Where a person is identified by voice cluster rather than by name on tape, the participation cell says so.
NameRoleParticipation
Brian RappChairRuns the agenda and the bargaining votes. Says the board has entered the budget process “very late” and pushes for a Saturday session so members can question line items; asks about the Maple Avenue insulation work, the size-factor salary adjustment, Medicaid billing and wider use of the technical center building.
Chris IrishVice chair (project roster)Answers Yes. when called by name in the nonpublic roll call (0:09:26). Challenges how warrant-article changes are presented (the security article as a $141,000 or a $20,000 increase), proposes a members' spreadsheet review, wants a full cost picture of the technical center, and runs the vote on the six policies.
Patrick AdrianMemberAnswers the nonpublic roll call (0:09:29). Moves the December 21 minutes, abstains on the paraprofessionals' agreement (0:12:18), asks how health-insurance lines combine staff groups and why the roofing article has no tax effect.
Dr. Alex HerzogMemberCalled at both roll calls; answers Here. Yes. (0:09:35). The superintendent reads from an article quoting him as River Valley Community College's vice president for student and community affairs (0:07:04). No other rows are attributed to him; a member's question on salary breakouts that may be his is unidentified (0:50:50).
Frank SpragueMemberMoves all five bargaining agreements to the ballot and the six policies, seconds the agenda and minutes. Reports spending three to four hours on the December draft and walks through examples of budgets rising while actual spending falls.
Michelle PierceMemberAbsent (sick child), per the chair (0:00:51).
Brent FerlandMemberAbsent; the chair says he emailed that he could not attend (0:00:51).
Middleton McGoodwinSuperintendent, SAU 6Asks to add the bargaining nonpublic session; gives the superintendent's report; presents a PowerPoint on the FY2018 budget, the five-year history of increases, the default budget and the loss of stabilization aid; sets the Saturday session.
Cory LeClairSAU 6 administrator; assistant superintendent per the project roster (title not stated on this recording)Explains the administrators' size-factor pay, Medicaid billing through the Lumia software [spelling unverified], the account-number structure and duplicate salary entries, and asks how the board wants its questions answered before January 11.
Michael O'NeillBusiness administrator (title per project roster)Asked by the superintendent to “explain the three documents” (0:32:35). Presents the corrected detailed budget, the operating-budget comparison and the salary recap, the warrant-article and bargaining cost items, and their tax-rate effects.
UnidentifiedStudent representative, Stevens High SchoolGives the student report (0:03:55); not named on this recording.
UnidentifiedSAU 6 technology directorReferred to by O'Neill as the technology director (1:14:49); explains the computer replacement cycle behind the Maple Avenue increase. Name not stated.
UnidentifiedRoll caller and others36 of 581 dialogue rows (6.2%), including the person who reads the opening and nonpublic roll calls (possibly the district clerk; not named) and short fragments.

The chair opens citizens' comments at 0:08:56 and closes them at 0:09:03: “Seeing none, we'll close citizens comments.” No member of the public speaks.

Order of business (reconstructed)

No agenda survives. The items below are reconstructed from the chair's transitions. The superintendent refers to agenda items by Roman numeral (Roman numeral six a at 0:01:53, Roman numeral seven C at 1:12:13), so a printed agenda existed.
Taken upItemWhat was said and done
0:00:05Pledge and roll callFive members answer; Pierce and Ferland absent (0:00:51).
0:01:20Changes to the agendaAdded: a nonpublic session on collective bargaining. Removed: the principals' budget presentations, moved to January 11. Moved by an unidentified member, seconded by Sprague; voice vote (0:03:21).
0:03:21Minutes of December 21, 2016Adrian: “Motion to accept the minutes.” Sprague seconds; voice vote, no opposition heard.
0:03:53Student representative's reportTheater performances January 12 to 15; an alumni panel for juniors and seniors.
0:04:58Superintendent's reportA regional school-leadership forum; an article on River Valley Community College. No questions.
0:08:56Citizens' commentsNone.
0:09:03Nonpublic session, negotiationsThe chair: “we're going to take a break for nonpublic for negotiations”. Moved and seconded by unidentified members; roll call, five yes (0:09:25 to 0:09:42). Not recorded. Return to public session on Sprague's motion, voice vote (0:10:17). See flag 2.
0:10:34Collective bargaining agreementsFive motions by Sprague, each voted by voice, no opposition heard: maintenance and transportation (0:11:36); Claremont Association of Paraprofessionals, Adrian abstaining (0:11:57); Sugar River Education Association (0:12:21); Claremont Association of Secretaries (0:12:37); Claremont Administrators Association (0:12:50). The operative words are “Approved for the ballot?” (chair, 0:11:35). Each motion row also carries I'll second; the seconders are not separately identifiable. See flag 3.
0:13:13Expectations for the FY2018 budgetSuperintendent's PowerPoint, board discussion of the corrected draft, the three budget documents, warrant articles, Medicaid revenue and line-item examples. No vote. A Saturday budget work session is set for January 7 at 8:00 (1:14:04).
1:17:35Policies postponed from December 21Third readings of six policies (public solicitations, advertising, employee gifts and solicitations, flier distribution, access to programs by nonpublic, charter and home-educated pupils, procedural safeguards for children with disabilities). Sprague moves them together (1:21:18); seconded; voice vote run by Irish, no opposition heard.
1:21:50AnnouncementsHerzog's and Sprague's terms end in March; the candidate filing period and the March 14 election.
1:25:05AdjournmentSprague moves; the same row carries second; voice vote.

Discussion timeline

Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/8845 SchoolBoard010417.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording. Quotations are as transcribed; bracketed words are corrections, with the transcript's wording kept where the correction changes sense.

Chronological topics with the most concrete material first.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:01:26Bargaining added to the agendaThe superintendent: “we need to discuss some financials with you. And these agreements, with the exception of the paraprofessionals, have not been ratified by the by the parties.” He corrects himself: “The, the SRA, the teachers did ratify, so.”OBS
0:02:30The January scheduleIrish asks whether the budget will still be live at the public hearing. The superintendent: “The public hearing on the 11th does not imply that we're done.” and “So I think meeting on the seventh would be premature.”
0:05:27Superintendent's reportA forum the district was invited to, “navigating school leadership in rough Seas”, with the New Hampshire School Administrators Association and the Nellie Mae foundation, on superintendent turnover, recruitment and “difficult public meeting climate”. He reads from a magazine article quoting “Alex Herzog, vice president for student and community affairs.” at River Valley Community College and ties it to the district's partnership with the college.
0:09:03Nonpublic sessionThe chair: “we're going to take a break for nonpublic for negotiations. Get a motion to go on and on public.” Roll call: Irish, Adrian, Herzog, Sprague and Rapp answer yes. The chair: “We'll be back momentarily.”OBS
0:10:34Five agreements to the ballotSprague asks whether to act on the nonpublic discussion now; the superintendent: “We could. We could do it publicly now.” He lists the January 3 memo's “five units”. Sprague: “We ratify or approve? What's the operative.” The chair: “Approved for the ballot?” Five motions follow; Adrian abstains on the paraprofessionals (“I stink stain.” [I abstain]). No terms or costs are stated during the votes.OBS
0:14:03The board's legal dutyThe superintendent: “School boards have a legal responsibility. In fact, it's even a constitutional duty to ensure that students within the district received their entitlement to an adequate education.” He describes the board as “stewards of the taxpayers dollars” who are “also responsible to provide an adequate education for children legally”.OBS
0:15:17Five years of budgetsFY2013 up less than 1%, FY2014 1%, FY2015 5.8% because of the Stevens renovation bond, FY2016 below FY2015 though taxes still rose; “over a period of fiscal year 13, the fiscal year 17, the budget has increased 1.57%”. Because the budget has been held down, the result is “the default budget being larger than the budget”.
0:18:35Stabilization aidThe superintendent: “there will be a reduction in Claremont's adequacy aid, a 4% incremental reductions”, each year for the next four years unless the law changes; either programs change or “we're going to expect the taxpayer to make up the difference”. He notes Adrian's contact with state legislators.OBS
0:20:45Corrected draftThe December first draft, about $1 million over the current year, “is now 552 $553,000 larger than the current year”; “this $552,000 increase represents a 1.7% percent, 1.76% increase”, and “it does not include the collective bargaining increases”. “The worst thing you can do with a budget is just to reduce it as if it was a math problem, because every reduction has an impact.” He asks the board to say now whether it wants a smaller increase.
0:24:27Inconsistencies in the draftSprague found “a fair number of inconsistencies” between budgeted and actual figures and has no year-to-date spending: “Flying blind.” The superintendent: “The document you have in front of you is is outdated.” and the new draft reflects “more than $450,000 corrections”.
0:27:08A Saturday work sessionThe chair: “I feel like we've gotten into the budget process very late”, and later cites “the lack of experience with the budget process that that this board has”. Irish first prefers one-on-one questions to O'Neill; the board settles on meeting together to build a single list.OBS
0:32:43Three budget documentsO'Neill: the proposed 2017-18 column “currently has $31,000,987, $987,890 in it”; against the 2016-17 operating budget with the three contracts and background checks added, “I come up with a variance of 552. 645”. With no bargaining costs, “you're looking at, you know, an 80 $0.80 tax increase on a $552,000 increase in the budget”. Adequacy aid now looks to fall only about $50,000 rather than $250,000, because rising enrollment offsets the stabilization cut.
0:38:44Salary recap; no new positionsThe third document lists everyone the district pays. Asked about new positions, O'Neill: “There is no new positions in this budget version.” except those at the high school, which the principal will present.
0:39:46Warrant articles and how to count themSecurity upgrades proposed at 141,000 against 121,000 last year; a building capital reserve (with $200,000 already in it, O'Neill would skip a year); roofing at $100,000. Irish: “Its $141,000 increase to the budget we already have in front of us.” O'Neill: “we need to compare appropriation to appropriation”, so the tax effect is the $20,000 change, about three cents.
0:44:27Maple Avenue insulation; size factorFoam insulation was sprayed on the boiler-room ceiling because the classroom above reached 85 degrees. LeClair explains the administrators' contract pays a building-size factor.
0:48:01Medicaid billingStaff log service hours in the Lumia system [spelling unverified] for Medicaid reimbursement. O'Neill: “It's significant. It's I think this year was $600,000.” With an outside provider, “we went from 200,000 to 600,000. You pay 9%.”
0:53:23Budgets rising while spending fallsSprague's example, Maple Avenue administrative supplies: “budget in 1415 is 3000. They use 1221.”, then budgets of 2,500 and 2,000, now 4,500 proposed. O'Neill: “we had a bad policy of freezing budgets, unfreezing budgets”; the extra $2,000 per principal is a placeholder for field trips moved out of transportation wages.
0:57:27Placeholders and year-end spendingIrish: “I want to make sure we don't have money as placeholders” and “there should be a mechanism in place that doesn't allow for the month or two month before the fiscal year is over. People are allowed to just spend what's left of their budget.” O'Neill on returned fund balance: “Unfortunately, three years ago we gave back more than we should have, and we're still struggling to get caught up on that.”
1:02:23Questions welcomedThe superintendent: “I came up with $1.5 million worth of questions. It's a good process.”POS
1:02:38Using the technical center buildingThe chair asks about more high-school electives in the building. LeClair: “As long as you're not displacing a current program or preventing a another CTE program from coming in.” Irish wants the center's full cost: “my hunch is, I think it's going to be pretty pricey for what we're paying on a per student charge here”; “Right now with four programs, it's not doing that.”
1:06:26Bargaining cost items disclosedO'Neill's 2016-17 to 2017-18 comparison: teachers' first-year “cost items for the first year at 268,000 for 68” and administrators' 29,723 go in the operating budget; the paraprofessional, maintenance and custodial and secretarial agreements are separate articles. “So overall, you look at $1.39 increase or 965,000 or 77 increase in the overall appropriation.” Why not earlier: “I couldn't really go public with what those numbers look like.” (1:11:17).OBS POS
1:11:33Technology replacementSprague: the Maple Avenue technology line shows “an increase of $41,350” with no explanation. The technology director: Maple Avenue staff computers are due on the replacement cycle, as are Bluff and the high school. O'Neill: the board could choose to stretch the cycle.
1:14:04Saturday session setThe superintendent: “we are meeting then Saturday the seventh, eight, 8:00 here in the Texan.” [tech center] The chair: “And Penny post as well, only to warn the meeting.” [post as well, to warn the meeting]. Later: “I'll also send out an agenda that's going to be worn to all the members.” [warned] (1:24:56).OBS POS
1:17:52Turnaround before January 11LeClair: “Are you expecting the answers at the January 11th board meeting?” Irish: the 11th “is going to be a lot of discussion”; answers can come as they are ready.
1:20:47Six policies adoptedIrish lists them, saying “I think we just postponed do the lateness of the hour at the last meeting.” Sprague's motion names the codes as transcribed: “KHK hb GBEBCKDCA and j j j.” and IHPBA-R. Approved by voice vote.
1:21:50Seats on the ballotThe superintendent: “Alex Herzog and Frank Sprague term ends in March.” Letters of intent go to the superintendent; the district will advertise the filing period.

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each one names the rule it rests on, as that rule read on January 4, 2017, or is labeled an observation where no verified rule applies.

MEDIUM No agenda, packet or minutes for this meeting survive in any district share

MAP.md records no Drive material: the district's shares hold no year folder older than 2022, and the Meeting Minutes share starts at 2023. The recording is the only public account of a meeting that placed five bargaining agreements on the ballot and adopted six policies. RSA 91-A:2, II, in the text in force for 2017, required minutes including "names of members, persons appearing before the public bodies, and a brief description of the subject matter discussed and final decisions", "open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting". This page applies the MEDIUM limb of the project's severity rule because the record mitigates the gap: the board approves the December 21 minutes on tape (0:03:40), two weeks after that meeting, so minutes were being produced. The 2017 statute required inspection, not online posting, so their absence from today's shares does not show they never existed. What is missing is any public copy now.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2016 codification; source note ends 2016, 29:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2017, the text in force for calendar 2017)

OBSERVATION The nonpublic session for negotiations was entered without a stated exemption

The chair called for “nonpublic for negotiations” (0:09:03) and the motion was moved and seconded with no statutory ground named; the roll call was taken (0:09:25 to 0:09:42). RSA 91-A:3, I(b) required that "Any motion to enter nonpublic session shall state on its face the specific exemption under paragraph II." Collective bargaining is not among the paragraph II exemptions. It is handled differently: RSA 91-A:2, I(a) excludes "Strategy or negotiations with respect to collective bargaining" from the definition of a meeting, so a closed bargaining-strategy session needed no nonpublic motion at all. Treating it as a nonpublic session, with a roll call, gave the public more notice than the law required. The point for a reviewer is that the superintendent described the purpose as discussing “some financials” of agreements already reached (0:01:26); whether that fell within strategy or negotiations cannot be told from the recording. The board then took its votes in public.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, I(a) (2016 codification); RSA 91-A:3, I(b) (2016 codification; source note ends 2016, 30:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2017)

OBSERVATION Five agreements went to the ballot before their terms or costs were stated in public

The five motions (0:11:28 to 0:13:01) named only the bargaining unit; no term, raise or cost was read before any vote. The cost items came an hour later in O'Neill's comparison: teachers' first-year cost items of 268,000 for 68 as transcribed and an overall increase in appropriation he put at $1.39 on the tax rate (1:06:40, 1:08:12). He explained that he could not “go public” with the numbers before ratification (1:10:51, 1:11:17). The superintendent had also said that only the paraprofessionals and teachers had ratified (0:01:26, 0:01:47). Placing cost items before the voters is what the statute contemplates: RSA 273-A:3, II(b) provides "Only cost items shall be submitted to the legislative body of the public employer for approval at the next annual meeting". No rule required the board to read terms aloud before voting. The observation is that a viewer of the votes learned the cost only later in the meeting, and that the votes for three units preceded those units' ratification as described on tape.

Sources: RSA 273-A:3, II(b) (source note ends 2013, 244:1, eff. Sept. 22, 2013)

OBSERVATION The superintendent placed the constitutional duty on the school board; the aid figure he gave matches the statute

The superintendent told the board that ensuring an adequate education is “even a constitutional duty” of school boards (0:14:03). The New Hampshire Supreme Court's 1997 decision in this district's own case placed that duty on the State: "it is the State's duty to provide a constitutionally adequate public education and to guarantee adequate funding". Local boards have statutory duties to operate schools, but the constitutional obligation he described is the State's, which bears on his later point that a shortfall in state aid falls on local taxpayers. His figure for the aid reduction is accurate: RSA 198:41, IV(d), as it read in 2016-17, set the stabilization percentage at "96 percent for fiscal year 2017", reduced by 4 percent of the 2012 grant each fiscal year after that (0:18:35).

Sources: Claremont School District v. Governor (N.H. Supreme Court, Dec. 17, 1997); RSA 198:41, IV(d) (2016 codification; source note ends 2016, 85:9, eff. July 18, 2016)

OBSERVATION A Saturday work session of a quorum was set for January 7; no record of it is in the corpus

The board scheduled a Saturday session for January 7 at 8:00 in the technical center (1:14:04), and the chair and superintendent said it would be posted and an agenda sent (1:16:51, 1:24:56). A gathering of a quorum to discuss the budget is a meeting: RSA 91-A:2, I defines one as "the convening of a quorum of the membership of a public body", and ¶II requires 24 hours' notice and minutes. Later recordings show the session was held, with five members, and produced a list of cuts (January 11 and January 18 pages). MAP.md holds no section, recording, agenda or minutes for January 7. Arranging notice was the right step; the open question is where the minutes went. That gap is flagged on the January 11 page, where the session's results were presented.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, I and II (2016 codification)

POSITIVE Corrections, tax effects and bargaining costs were laid out on camera, and the members' review was noticed

The administration told the board and viewers that the December draft carried “more than $450,000 corrections” (0:26:55) and showed duplicate salary entries in parentheses rather than silently deleting them (0:51:51). O'Neill gave the tax-rate effect of each warrant article and bargaining unit the same night the agreements went to the ballot (1:08:12). The superintendent welcomed line-item challenges (“It's a good process.”, 1:02:23). When Irish suggested members could meet on Saturday without staff, the chair and superintendent kept it a posted, agenda-driven session rather than an informal gathering (1:16:51, 1:24:56). None of this is required beyond RSA 91-A's minimums.

Sources: Cablecast: SCHOOL BOARD MEETING 1-4-17

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page