Claremont School Board, January 11, 2017

Public hearing on the fiscal year 2017-18 budget, at which the administration presented about $850,000 in recommended reductions and residents spoke against cuts to the Owls alternative program and a high-school physical education position, followed by a short board meeting with a nonpublic session. The page is built from the CCTV recording's dialogue transcript; no agenda, packet or minutes survive in the district's online shares. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (Claremont School District, SAU 6): budget public hearing, then a regular board meeting
Date
Wednesday, January 11, 2017
Start time
Not stated in available records. The first words on the recording are the end of the pledge at 0:02:08. The superintendent says “as of right now, at 8:00 on January 11th” at 1:23:24; the hearing closes at 2:14:12; the board meeting is called to order at 2:16:16; after the nonpublic session someone says 945. at 2:19:13. Those two spoken clock times are about 56 minutes apart on the recording but about an hour and three-quarters apart on the clock, so roughly 50 minutes (the break and the nonpublic session) are not on the recording (flag 6). The dialogue transcript runs 2:28:23.
Location
Not stated in available records. Members refer to having been “sitting here on Saturday” (0:23:27), and the January 7 session was set for the technical center (January 4 page), which suggests the Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center building.
Recording
Cablecast: SCHOOL BOARD BUDGET SESSION 1-11-17 (transcript length 2:28:23; the break and the nonpublic session are omitted)
Minutes
None located. MAP.md records no Drive material for this meeting: neither district share holds a year folder older than 2022, and the Meeting Minutes share starts at 2023 (checked 9/26/26).
Board composition
Seven members; all present for the board meeting roll call (2:16:25) and the sealing roll call (2:19:22).

Participants

Everyone heard or addressed on the recording. Board and staff names follow the roll calls and the project's 2015-2023 roster; public speakers' names are as they introduced themselves, and spellings are unverified because there are no minutes. Where a person is identified by voice cluster rather than by name on tape, the participation cell says so.
NameRoleParticipation
Brian RappChairOpens the hearing, sets the comment rules, asks about Owls enrollment and the PE teacher's other courses, closes the hearing, calls the board meeting to order, asks for the nonpublic motion and calls the sealing roll call (“Self. Yes.”, 2:19:43).
Chris IrishVice chair (project roster)Questions the laptop figures, describes the members' January 7 line-by-line review, says he does not want to touch the Owls program or the middle-school athletic director unless there is no other choice, puts the administration's and board's reduction totals on the record, and states his goal of no tax-rate increase.
Patrick AdrianMemberAsks about the Maple Avenue library position, the alternative-education director costed at $74,000, and whether the Owls change has a plan behind it; invites former students to say how adult education would compare.
Brent FerlandMemberIdentified by voice cluster and by three garbled forms of his name (medium confidence; see footer). Asks about the technology replacement plan, whether adult education and the Owls program could work together, and how many athletic teams the district funds; answers Yep. in the sealing roll call as Brant (2:19:36).
Dr. Alex HerzogMemberCalled as Doctor. Alan. Rosa. Alex at roll (2:16:32). Asks Barry to explain a $46,000 athletics increase against the Owls reduction, and asks for data on student participation in sports.
Michelle PierceMemberAsks for a plain explanation of the Owls change, says she applauds the administration for looking at ways to make programs better on a limited budget, and links budget restraint to winning voter support for teacher raises.
Frank SpragueMemberSays he created the high-school discipline-monitor position and wrote the original grant for the alternative program; tells the board “I cannot support that as a board member.” of any change that mixes Owls students with behavioral programs; questions the PE reduction, the $50,000 equipment line and the school board's own budget line.
Middleton McGoodwinSuperintendent, SAU 6Presents the budget PowerPoint and recommended reductions, defends data-based changes, says word of the Owls change got out before the hearing, and gives the tax-rate effects of the warrant articles.
Cory LeClairSAU 6 administrator; assistant superintendent per the project rosterExplains the Maple Avenue library position, the technology replacement schedule, behavior paraprofessionals, the teen-parent child-care plan and the library-media staffing required by the state's school approval standards.
Michael O'NeillBusiness administrator (title per project roster)Explains that the athletic trainer was not budgeted in the right place last year and has been moved to athletics (1:39:13 to 1:39:57). The superintendent credits him with improving expense control (2:23:59).
Patricia (Pat) BarryPrincipal, Stevens High SchoolExplains the high-school reductions: the PE position, one Owls teaching position, supplies and equipment, an alternative-program director stipend and a program-assistant title for the discipline monitor; answers on PE credit through athletics and extended learning, Owls enrollment and adult-education pathways.
Dan SherryPrincipal, Maple Avenue School (spelling per the attribution report)Named by the superintendent (0:16:04). Explains the teacher-laptop refresh in the Maple Avenue technology line.
Middle-school principal (called Paula Fitzgerald by the superintendent; labeled Paulette in the dialogue file)Principal, Claremont Middle SchoolThe superintendent says “Any questions for Paula Fitzgerald?” (0:23:50) and “Thank you. Paula.”; name and spelling unverified. Explains the library media specialist's role and confirms the cut is an assistant athletic director.
Brian DillonTeacher, Owls program (spelling per the attribution report)Named by the superintendent (1:12:04). Describes how students enter the program, session sizes, early graduations, and warns: “careful which which limbs you cut off”.
Shauna BairdTeacher, Owls program (non-resident)Self-identified (1:51:02). Reports a dissertation calling the program a model and that the program and its predecessor have “serviced 300 students”.
Mike (surname not given)Citizens' comments, Ward 1; retired teacherIntroduces himself as “Mike Ward, one recent retiree” (1:25:33). Opposes the PE cut, leaving one teacher for more than 500 students.
Lisa DraperCitizens' comments, Ward 3; social-service agency workerSays adult education is not a substitute for the Owls program's supports: “a 17 year old is not an adult”.
Michelle SpringerCitizens' comments, Ward 2A graduate of the program's predecessor; says cutting it will send more students to the behavior program.
Brianne LawrenceCitizens' comments, Ward 2; former Owls studentGraduated through the program last year; asks whether the superintendent and principal have spent a day in the Owls classrooms.
Amanda MassCitizens' comments; former Owls student, lives out of town (spelling unverified)A 2010 graduate; asks whether the savings come from cutting teachers and says the program's teacher support is what worked.
John (surname not given)Citizens' comments, Ward 1; former board member by his own accountAsks who will cover the middle-school athletic director's duties, about a $44,000 athletic-training line, and whether library-media staffing meets legal requirements.
UnidentifiedCitizens' comments; former Owls studentGraduated two years ago; asks how the program will work with one fewer teacher (1:43:54).
Judy (surname from a later recording)Citizens' comments; retired Stevens PE teacherIntroduces herself as “Judy, lifelong resident of Claremont” and a 39-year physical education teacher; labeled Judy Couture in the dialogue file, a surname the attribution report takes from the January 18 recording. Calls the PE cut “Pennywise and pound foolish” and asks for time to present facts.
Veronica BellairCitizens' comments, Ward 2 (spelling unverified)Asks who would teach adaptive physical education and coach the unified team.
Bruce WilkinsCitizens' comments; parent of an Owls graduateSays his son graduated through the program this year.
UnidentifiedBoard members, staff and others117 of 701 dialogue rows (16.7%), mostly short acknowledgements, roll-call answers and fragments, including the roll caller (not named) and a board member who asks the Owls completion rate (1:52:15).

Also named but not heard: Mike Lansing and Melissa Lewis (elementary principals offered for questions, 0:15:37, 0:15:50); Doug Beaupre, athletic director (transcribed Doug Beaufoy); Joel, for the technical center items; and Nathan, the departing technology director, who was absent.

Order of business (reconstructed)

No agenda survives. The items below are reconstructed from the chair's transitions. The chair refers to “our agenda for tonight” and the superintendent to a PowerPoint and handouts.
Taken upItemWhat was said and done
0:02:15Budget public hearing openedThe chair: “we'll have an overview of the budget and the Warren articles. After which we'll open the floor to citizens comments.”
0:02:41Superintendent's budget presentationEnrollment, five-year budget history, state aid, class sizes, recommended reductions by school with principals answering questions, and the tax-rate effect of the budget and warrant articles. No default budget figure is given (flag 1).
1:24:33Citizens' comments on the budgetRules: “only questions directly relating to the budget will be heard”, name and ward, “Three minutes only”, with a second turn after everyone has spoken. Eleven public speakers (one of them twice), mostly on the Owls program and the PE position.
2:08:50Board remarks and close of hearingIrish states the reduction totals; members ask for athletics data. The chair closes the hearing at 2:14:12.
2:16:16Board meeting: call to order, roll call, agendaThe chair: “We have no real need for our action items.” Agenda accepted by voice vote (2:17:19).
2:17:29Nonpublic sessionThe chair: “I'd like a motion for nonpublic 91 a for personnel.” Roll call (2:17:47); not recorded. On return, motion to come out of nonpublic, voice vote (2:19:00). See flag 4.
2:19:15Sealing of nonpublic minutesThe chair: “Motion to seal. Minutes.” Roll call taken by the chair; the answers heard are yes. No reason for sealing is stated. See flag 4.
2:19:47Questions for the administrationThe school board's own budget line, the members' spreadsheet, and goals for the budget. No vote.
2:28:08AdjournmentMoved and seconded; voice vote.

Discussion timeline

Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/8873 SchoolBoard011117.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording. Quotations are as transcribed; bracketed words are corrections, with the transcript's wording kept where the correction changes sense.

Chronological topics with the most concrete material first.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:02:41Hearing, not meetingThe superintendent: “It's a public hearing. And there is a difference.” The current figure is “a increase of over $850,000 to next year's budget compared to this year's budget”; the recommendations are “clearly is not a done deal”.POS
0:05:42Default budget mentioned, not statedWith an $850,000 increase, “there would be a default budget lower then the budget being proposed”, and the bargaining agreements “would be for not” [naught] if voters chose it. No default figure is given.HIGH
0:06:22Enrollment and state aidClaremont enrollment “It's decreased by over 300 students” in ten years. The budget rose less than 2% over five years, “but that still represents $2.4 million”. This year the board's $60,000 for professional development raised the rate 11 cents, while “a reduction in adequacy aid, and that was over $430,000” raised it 63 cents.
0:10:10Class sizesIn core academic classes, Stevens has about 18 classes under ten students and 32 over twenty; the middle school has none under fifteen. “Research has shown that class size is not the major factor on student achievement” [the speaker's characterization]. Changes “can't be based on emotions or friendships. They have to be based on data.”
0:14:40January 7 work sessionThe superintendent will show “some of the work that the school board accomplished on January 7th, the Sadie [Saturday] budget work session”. Sprague later: “when we were sitting here on Saturday, we're looking at budget lines with with big numbers and not a clue” (0:23:27).MED
0:16:04Elementary reductionsThe Maple Avenue request to replace the library paraprofessional with a teacher is withdrawn; LeClair: “from paraprofessional to teacher” was the proposal, and the library class continues as now. Teacher-laptop refreshes are deferred a year; the replacement plan “will be deferred a bit”.
0:22:27Technology purchasingSprague: “$50,000 for new equipment, we haven't been involved at all in knowing how how that money is spent.” and “Does it go out to bid?” The superintendent proposes a review with the new director of instructional technology.
0:23:50Middle-school reductionsThe middle school's assistant athletic director position is cut, with duties falling to the district athletic director; an assistant principal position is reduced by 0.2. The principal confirms the library media specialist supports classroom teachers.
0:26:19Explaining in public firstThe superintendent says he received letters and press calls about the high-school changes and told a reporter “I'd like to wait until the board meeting. So the community and the board can hear it versus have pieces of it being published.”POS
0:26:55PE positionBarry: of the two PE positions, one is not fully PE; the plan is to grant more of “the 1.0 credit that the state requires for graduation” through extended learning and sports. She reads that a student “may earn a maximum of 0.25 credits per year” for each varsity or junior-varsity season (1:18:38). Enrollment is about 545 to 550.
0:28:26Owls and the alternative programBarry: one of the Owls teaching positions is cut while the district expands individual plans with adult education; the program runs two 2.5-hour sessions “with a capacity of 30”. An alternative-program director stipend and a program-assistant title for the discipline monitor are added. Adrian recalls the alternative position was presented as a director at about $74,000.
0:37:49Sprague on OwlsSprague: he created the discipline-monitor position and “I wrote the grant for ombudsman.”; most Owls students “are not behavioral problems. They are school phobic.”; mixing them with behavioral programs: “I cannot support that as a board member.” Barry: “the mixing of those populations is not part of how we would move forward”.
0:45:13Owls enrollment and entryBarry: a high of about 44 two years ago, back to a cap of 30, about 23 now. Dillon: guidance counselors use a dropout-risk rubric; three students have already graduated this year; “careful which which limbs you cut off, you know, because it may not be able to walk anymore”. Sprague recalls the state's change to compulsory attendance to age 18 as the program's origin.
1:00:12What is being cutPierce asks whether the program is being consolidated rather than cut. Dillon: “that is not exactly the case”. Barry: “the way it's currently structured works well” and the proposal answers the task of finding cuts.
1:06:43Athletics versus OwlsHerzog raises “the sacred cow in this community about athletics with an increase in $46,000”. Barry: athletics are “another form of an alternative program”; uniforms and helmets are overdue after lean years.
1:09:51The members' line-by-line reviewIrish: on Saturday “we literally went through 67 pages front and back, 1300 plus lines of budget one by one as a group”. On Owls: “my personal opinion, I don't want to mess with it unless we have absolutely no other choice”. The superintendent: “the word got out from whatever source and suddenly the Owls program is going to be cut. That was never the intent”.MED
1:13:06PE dataSprague calls it “kind of a non sequitur” to cut PE while core classes run small, with no PE enrollment data presented. Barry describes absorbing co-taught and health sections.
1:21:19Bottom line and tax effectsWith the administration's recommendations and some of the board's January 7 work, “if this was March 14th, the main budget is less than this year's budget”; “the fall budget to be announced” [default budget]. Warrant articles: maintenance and custodians 7 cents, paraprofessionals 17, secretaries 4, roofing no change, capital reserve a 15-cent reduction; overall “represents 16 cent increase on the thousand”. Staff pay lags other districts by “anywhere from six to over $20,000”.HIGH
1:24:33Comment rulesRaise a hand, use the podium, name and ward, three minutes, a second turn after all have spoken; the board will respond where asked.POS
1:25:45Mike, Ward 1“32 years of experience has told me any time you cut any personnel in any position, the kids suffer somehow.” One teacher would serve “the 500 plus students”.
1:28:08Lisa Draper, Ward 3“I am very concerned that adult Ed is not a substitute for the supports that our students receive in the Owls program.”
1:30:51Michelle Springer, Ward 2A graduate of the original program 18 years ago: “I would have dropped out”; cutting it would send more students to the behavior program.
1:32:12Brianne Lawrence, Ward 2Asks the superintendent and principal whether they have “really sat inside the owls classrooms during either of the sessions”; says adult education and Owls students have “totally two different needs”.
1:33:48Amanda MassA 2010 graduate, now finishing a nursing degree: “Is it is it by eliminating the teacher positions?” Barry: “Part of it is from the teacher salaries.” and the rest is furniture and equipment.
1:37:19John, Ward 1Asks who will cover middle-school athletics and about “a $44,000 increase for athletic training services”. O'Neill and the superintendent: the trainer “was by error not budgeted in fiscal year 16” and has been moved to athletics; “It's been the same person for for several years.” Irish praises the trainer's concussion work.
1:42:26Middle-school athletic directorIrish: “I don't want to touch people. I want to touch things.” and credits the position for higher sports participation.
1:43:54Former Owls studentAsks how the program will still work with one teacher fewer. Irish: the proposal “it's not written in stone”. Adrian: “I would I would never move forward without being able to answer that kind of question.”
1:47:44Judy, retired PE teacherCalls the PE recommendation “ill conceived and perhaps Pennywise and pound foolish” and asks for time to gather facts before the February 8 deliberative session; four years ago there were two and two-thirds PE teachers.
1:49:24Veronica Bellair, Ward 2“who's going to teach the adaptive physical that's being taught now?” and how one teacher can serve 540 students.
1:51:02Shauna Baird, Owls teacherA dissertation found “our program is a model program”; staffing fell from three to two; “since we've been here, Ombudsman and Owls, we've serviced 300 students”.
1:54:37Bruce WilkinsHis son graduated through the program this year.
1:56:04Adult-education pathwaysBarry explains working with the adult-education coordinator on individual plans; an $8,000 adult high-school tuition line would fund evening credit-recovery classes at “about $1,500” a teacher. “none of us got into the business to dismantle anything”.
2:02:13Library-media staffingJohn asks whether legal requirements are met. LeClair: “at the elementary level, we have to have the services of a library media specialist” under the state's school approval standards, provided by one specialist and two paraprofessionals; “we do meet school approval standards”.
2:09:02Reduction totalsIrish: the administration's proposal and the board's Saturday list come to about $850,000 and $897,000 (he first reverses them, then corrects: “we had 897. They had 850.”), with overlap; “We're looking at $900,000 worth of cut before we even get started.”MED
2:11:08Athletics dataFerland asks how many teams the district funds and suggests athletics “might be a place for some cutting”; Herzog and Sprague ask for participation data; the superintendent will report with the athletic director in a week.
2:13:36Hearing closedThe chair: “This is just the start of our process.” and “I'm going to close the budget hearing.” (2:14:12).
2:17:29Nonpublic session and seal“I'd like a motion for nonpublic 91 a for personnel.” The chair asks whether the room “next door” is free. After the return, 945. is spoken and the chair moves “Motion to seal. Minutes.” with a roll call.MED OBS
2:19:56The school board's own lineSprague: the school board line “it's 150,000.” and no one can explain it; the superintendent mentions elections and the School Boards Association dues and offers an accounting.
2:22:17Patterns in the figuresSprague: “So five of us five of us were here Saturday.” and saw budgets rising without growth in actual spending. The superintendent: “The problem was the prior BA didn't have a handle on expenses”, which led to fall spending freezes; of O'Neill, “He's made such a difference.”MED
2:25:18Board goalsHerzog: the board still owes the superintendent “written expectations”. Irish: cuts aimed at equipment and supplies, not people, and “My goal is that the tax rate doesn't go up at all, and that's after adding in Warren articles”. The superintendent: cutting a line without knowing its effect “it's more than just a math activity”; Irish: zeroed lines will be refilled “with what's justified”.

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each one names the rule it rests on, as that rule read on January 11, 2017, or is labeled an observation where no verified rule applies.

HIGH No default budget figure was disclosed at the budget hearing

Claremont votes by official ballot under RSA 40:13. In the text in force in January 2017, RSA 40:13, XI(a) read in full: "The default budget shall be disclosed at the first budget hearing held pursuant to RSA 32:5 or RSA 197:6." This was the budget hearing the superintendent had scheduled for January 11 as the required public hearing (December 21 page). On the recording the default budget is discussed only in the abstract: it “would be” lower than a budget with an $850,000 increase (0:05:42), and after the reductions the superintendent says “the fall budget to be announced” (1:21:19), which in context reads as default budget. No figure is stated by anyone at any point in the hearing. If the default amount appeared on a slide or handout that the recording does not capture, the statute may have been met; the slides do not survive (flag 3). Graded HIGH because the requirement is mandatory, the hearing is the one the statute names, and the only statement on the record says the figure was still to come.

Sources: RSA 40:13, XI(a) (2017 codification; source note ends 2014, 190:1-3, 8-10, eff. Sept. 9, 2014; re-read 2026-10-02)

MEDIUM The January 7 Saturday work session of five members has no recording or minutes

Five members met on Saturday, January 7 (“So five of us five of us were here Saturday.”, 2:22:17), went through the budget line by line (1:09:51) and produced a list of reductions that Irish put at about $897,000 (2:09:28) and that the superintendent folded into the budget presented tonight (1:21:19). Five of seven is a quorum, and RSA 91-A:2, I made that a meeting: "the convening of a quorum of the membership of a public body" to discuss matters within its jurisdiction. ¶II required minutes "open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting". MAP.md has no section for January 7, and no recording, agenda or minutes for it are in any district share. This page applies the MEDIUM limb of the project's severity rule because the record mitigates the gap: the session was publicly scheduled and its posting was arranged on the January 4 recording, and its results were described in public at this hearing. The work that shaped the reductions is visible only through members' summaries.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, I and II (2016 codification; the text in force for calendar 2017)

MEDIUM No agenda, presentation, packet or minutes for the hearing or the meeting survive in any district share

MAP.md records no Drive material for this meeting. The superintendent's PowerPoint, the recommended-reduction slides and the warrant-article sheet are not available, so the figures on this page come only from what was said aloud. RSA 91-A:2, II required minutes including "names of members, persons appearing before the public bodies, and a brief description of the subject matter discussed and final decisions", open to inspection within five business days. This page applies the MEDIUM limb: the board voted to seal nonpublic minutes at 2:19:15, which shows minutes were being kept, and the 2017 statute required inspection rather than online posting. What is missing is any public copy now.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2016 codification)

MEDIUM Nonpublic session entered for personnel and its minutes sealed without a stated finding

The chair asked for “a motion for nonpublic 91 a for personnel” (2:17:29). RSA 91-A:3, I(b) required that "Any motion to enter nonpublic session shall state on its face the specific exemption under paragraph II." Personnel is not one of the paragraph II grounds; II(a) (dismissal, promotion, compensation or discipline of an employee), II(b) (hiring) and II(c) (reputation) are distinct, and the motion names none. After the session the board voted by roll call to seal the minutes (2:19:15 to 2:19:43). RSA 91-A:3, III allows nonpublic minutes to be withheld only "by recorded vote of 2/3 of the members present taken in public session" that determines that divulging them would likely affect a person's reputation, render the proposed action ineffective, or concern terrorism. The roll call was recorded, but no determination was stated. Both are documentation gaps; neither shows what was discussed.

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b), II(a)-(c), III (2016 codification; source note ends 2016, 30:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2017)

OBSERVATION Reductions affecting named programs reached the public before the hearing, without detail

The superintendent said he had received letters and press calls (0:26:19) and that “the word got out from whatever source and suddenly the Owls program is going to be cut. That was never the intent” (1:11:43); a retired PE teacher called it “this week's news” (1:47:44). Most of the hearing's public testimony answered a reduction (one of the Owls teachers) that the principal described as a partial change. No rule governs when a draft recommendation becomes public; the point is that the hearing spent much of its time correcting an account of the budget that the public had received before the presentation.

Sources: Cablecast: SCHOOL BOARD BUDGET SESSION 1-11-17

OBSERVATION About fifty minutes between the hearing and the sealing vote are not on the recording

Two clock times are spoken on tape: the superintendent's “as of right now, at 8:00 on January 11th” at 1:23:24 and an unidentified 945. at 2:19:13, just after the board returns from nonpublic session. Those points are 56 minutes apart on the recording and 105 minutes apart on the clock. The recording jumps across the break after the hearing (2:14:12 to 2:16:16) and across the nonpublic session (2:18:14 to 2:19:00), so the nonpublic session lasted most of the missing time. If 945 was not a clock time, this reading fails; the minutes that would settle it do not survive. Recording positions on this page after 2:14:12 are therefore not clock times.

Sources: Dialogue/8873 SchoolBoard011117.mp4.CSV (rows 343, 593 to 630)

POSITIVE The hearing met its statutory window and gave the public time, answers and a second turn

The hearing was held 28 days before the February 8 deliberative session, inside RSA 32:5, I's requirement that it be held "not later than 25 days before" the meeting, and before the third Tuesday in January (January 17) set by RSA 40:13, II-a(c). The superintendent held back details from the press so that “the community and the board can hear it” together (0:26:41); principals answered members' questions on each reduction; the chair's rules gave each speaker three minutes and a second turn (1:24:33, 1:24:59); and members and staff answered public questions on the spot, including the athletic-training line (1:39:13) and library-media staffing (2:03:19). The board did not finalize the budget at the hearing, which RSA 32:5, I contemplates: the body "after the conclusion of public testimony shall finalize the budget".

Sources: RSA 32:5, I (2017 codification; source note ends 2014, 190:7, eff. Sept. 9, 2014); RSA 40:13, II-a(c) (2017 codification)

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page