Claremont School Board, April 5, 2017

Regular board meeting held in the Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center building: the board accepted $44,750 in grants, renewed its Primex contribution cap, heard the tech center director's plan for three new programs, set up the food service RFP review, adopted three policies and the lead-screening policy, and went into nonpublic session. The page is built from the CCTV recording's dialogue transcript; no agenda, packet or minutes survive in the district's online shares. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (Claremont School District, SAU 6)
Date
Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Start time
Not stated in available records. The chair calls the meeting to order at 0:00:30, after a few seconds of stray voice-assistant audio. The board enters nonpublic session by roll call at 2:15:38; the recording ends there and the dialogue transcript runs 2:16:59.
Location
Not stated in an agenda. The tech center director speaks of offerings "over here at the tech center" (1:00:00), and a member refers to "this very room we're sitting in", built "to do on site trainings for businesses" (1:40:36), which places the meeting in the Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center building.
Recording
Cablecast: SCHOOL BOARD MEETING 4-5-17 (transcript length 2:16:59; public session complete from call to order to the nonpublic roll call)
Minutes
None located. MAP.md records no Drive material for this meeting: neither district share holds a year folder older than 2022, and the Meeting Minutes share starts at 2023 (checked 9/26/26). No nonpublic minutes either.
Board composition
The opening roll call is inaudible apart from single answers. The chair reports "Mr. Irish has another meeting that he's at. He's going to try to make it later." (0:01:21); he is not heard afterward. Members heard by name or recognition: Brian Rapp (chair), Michelle Pierce, Frank Sprague, Patrick Adrian and Rebecca Zullo. A seventh voice is labeled Michael Petrin in the dialogue file by elimination only.

Participants

Everyone heard or addressed on the recording. There are no minutes to check spellings against; names follow how speakers are addressed on tape and the project roster, and the participation cell says which. Students named in the student representative's report are not named on this page.
NameRoleParticipation
Brian RappChairCalls the meeting to order (0:00:30) and runs every item and vote; addressed as Brian by the superintendent (0:35:34). Says he is "very surprised we haven't begun already the teacher prep program" (1:55:48).
Michelle PierceMemberRecognized as Michelle (0:40:52); answers the nonpublic roll as transcribed "Michelle Pierce here." (2:15:57). Moves the agenda, the grants and the Primex resolution; asks for per-school costs given falling enrollment, about LNA seats at Newport and about adult training at the tech center.
Frank SpragueMemberAddressed as Frank by the superintendent (0:20:00) and recognized by the chair (1:36:43). Moves the minutes and the three policies, seconds the Primex resolution, adds staffing, busing, maintenance and administration to the budget topics, and urges interest inventories and staff-sharing with the community college.
Patrick AdrianMemberRecognized as Patrick (0:33:06, 1:50:37). Asks for a report on whether early childhood and in-district special education programs are working, and questions the teacher-prep curriculum's fit with pre-K. Says "I think I've only been here a year" (0:37:12).
Rebecca ZulloMemberIdentified in the dialogue file with medium-high confidence: the superintendent's "Rebecca's research" (2:07:42) follows this voice's remark on food-service regulations. Asks how working would be measured, what Primex is, and how the tech center chose its proposed programs.
Unidentified member (labeled Michael Petrin)MemberThe dialogue file labels this voice Michael Petrin by elimination only (attribution report: low confidence; it could be Chris Irish if he arrived). It asks whether eighth graders tour the tech center (1:46:36) and says "So moved." on the lead-screening policy (2:11:34).
Chris IrishMemberAbsent at the start: "Mr. Irish has another meeting that he's at." (0:01:21). Not heard later.
Middleton McGoodwinSuperintendent, SAU 6Superintendent's report: the River Valley Community College early-college cohort, his SB 193 testimony in Concord the day before, and a student's email on food service. Updates the Bluff principal search and the strategic plan, presents the budget-topic list, and requests the nonpublic session.
Cory LeClairAssistant Superintendent, SAU 6Addressed as Corey (0:52:14); identified in the dialogue file with medium confidence. Presents the grants for acceptance and the new licensed child care space for student parents, and says she sits on the economic development subcommittee of the city master plan (1:43:20).
Michael O'NeillBusiness administrator, SAU 6Introduced as "Mike O'Neill" (0:53:52); spelling follows the project roster and is unverified. Presents the Primex contribution assurance program and the food service RFP schedule.
Joel SnyderDirector, Sugar River Valley Regional Technical CenterIntroduced by the superintendent as "Joel Snyder, director of sugar River Valley Regional" (0:58:38); surname spelling unverified. Presents the tech center's strategic plan.
Student representativeStudent representativeReads the Stevens High School and Claremont Middle School reports (0:03:51). Not named on the recording.
UnidentifiedVarious25 of 648 dialogue rows (3.9%) are unidentified: stray audio before the call to order, roll-call answers and voice votes.

Order of business (reconstructed)

No agenda survives. Speakers refer to its numbering ("Under Roman numeral six A", 0:01:38) and to "this night's packet" (0:08:43); the items below are reconstructed from the chair's transitions. No vote tally is recorded on tape for any motion; each passed on a voice vote with no audible opposition.
Taken upItemWhat was said and done
0:00:30Call to order; Pledge; roll call"The Claremont School Board meeting to order". Roll call inaudible; Irish expected later.
0:01:31Agenda, amendedThe superintendent asks to move grants from updates to action items, because they need board approval, and to add a nonpublic session: "That's a 91 a colon, three Roman numeral two C." (0:02:11). Pierce: "I'll make that motion to accept the agenda." Seconded; carried by voice vote (0:02:45).
0:02:58Minutes of the last meetingSprague: "I move the accept the minutes as written." Seconded; carried by voice vote (0:03:15). The meeting date is not stated.
0:03:32Citizens' comments"Okay. Seeing none." (0:03:44)
0:03:47Student representative's reportStevens and Claremont Middle School news. No action.
0:08:43Superintendent's reportEarly college, SB 193 testimony, a student's food-service email, a draft agreement with the Sugar River Education Association. No action.
0:22:06Discussion: Bluff Elementary School principal searchRecommendation coming after a site visit. No action.
0:23:18Discussion: school district strategic planPlanning meeting the next Friday at 3:00. No action.
0:25:19Discussion: budget schedule for fiscal year 2019Topic list and dates; members add topics. No action.
0:44:30Action: Claremont School District grantsLeClair: "So I'm looking for approval of 44,750 tonight." (0:50:44). Pierce: "I'd like to make a motion that we accept." Second by an unidentified member; carried by voice vote (0:50:54).
0:53:47Action: Primex contribution assurance programO'Neill reads the resolution (0:55:23). Pierce: "And make a motion to accept the resolution." Sprague: "I'll second it." Carried by voice vote (0:57:47).
0:58:28Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center strategic planPresentation by Joel Snyder and questions. The chair: "I think this is something we're going to need to probably bring back" (1:57:24). No action.
1:57:57Food service RFPVendor presentations scheduled for the next three meetings; evaluation committee discussed. No vote.
2:09:21Policies ACE, EBBC and IHBAA, third readRead by the chair as ACE "practical safeguards, nondiscrimination on the basis of handicapped or disability", EBBC "emergency care and first aid" and IHBAA "evaluation requirements for children with specific learning disabilities" (2:09:21). Sprague moves them "to third and final read"; Pierce seconds; carried by voice vote (2:11:03). The superintendent confirms this "means it's approved" (2:10:55).
2:11:05Lead screening policy, second readPre-kindergarten added to the testing requirement. "So moved." (voice labeled Petrin by elimination, 2:11:34); Pierce: Second. Carried by voice vote (2:15:05).
2:15:24Nonpublic sessionChair: "Need a 91, a two, three, two." The superintendent adds C (2:15:28). A voice labeled Adrian moves; Pierce: "I'll second." Roll call: five answers are audible, three of them Here (2:15:55 to 2:16:03). The recording ends. See flag 3.

Discussion timeline

Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/9020 SchoolBoard040517.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording. Quotations are as transcribed; bracketed words are corrections, with the transcript's wording kept where the correction changes sense.

Chronological topics with the most concrete material first.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:01:38Agenda changes"Under Roman numeral six A, we have Claremont School District grants. That's going to require to have the board approve. So we need to put that under action items instead of updates." The nonpublic item is added under RSA 91-A:3, II(c), after a false start: "It's two C. I'm sorry. That's wrong. Three C. No it is two c." (0:02:23)MED
0:03:51Student reportsAll Stevens juniors took the state assessment; honor society inductions; a Key Club project of "approximately 60 Easter baskets to the elderly of Sullivan County" (0:05:21). Middle school students took part in national assessment testing and were completing the Smarter Balanced tests "by April 13th" (0:06:15).
0:08:43Early college creditsThe superintendent describes a River Valley Community College pathway for current eighth graders entering Stevens, with a planning meeting the next week, aimed at a high-need profession in Sullivan County.
0:10:51SB 193 testimony"yesterday I drove the Concord with several other superintendents" to testify on SB 193. His example: ten students leaving would not reduce staffing "but it would draw $36,000 from the Claremont School District" (0:12:00). "the fiscal year 17 budget caused an increase of $0.11 per $1,000 on the Claremont tax rate. But because of a reduction of stabilization funding for this year, that 11 set increase changed to $1.25 increase." (0:12:27) Testimony ran "from about quarter of 11 to about 215" (0:13:49).
0:14:17Committee vote expected"I'm quoting from State Representative Linda Tanner. There are many Republicans on the committee who are due to die voucher people." [as transcribed] "It will be a close vote." (0:14:45)
0:15:37A student's food-service emailA Claremont Middle School student, a member of the Fuel Up to Play 60 club, wrote to the board about the food service action item. The superintendent invited him to the April 19 meeting: "Actually, I've already invited him, so it's too late to give me a permission, I guess." (0:18:02)
0:19:28Tax rate and zip codeAsked by Sprague whether wealthier towns' legislators follow the party line, the superintendent: "I think it's a combination of both." "And the tax rate was about $43 per 1000." (0:20:00)
0:22:15Bluff principal search"There were ten of them. I was a facilitator, but there were ten members. They were unanimous about this individual being the next leader of bluff." (0:22:44)
0:23:20Strategic planBegun in early July with a Thanksgiving target, the plan is late: "State championship football games and snowstorms got in the way of our schedule." (0:23:52) The next session is "next Friday at 4:00, 3:00, 4:00", settled as three o'clock in the SAU conference room (0:24:45).
0:25:27FY2019 budget topicsThe superintendent lists topics for board briefings, including technology, athletics, capital improvement, security, early childhood growth, pupil-teacher ratios and K-5 health education, where "we are sorely lacking" (0:27:56). Sprague adds "a lucky 13": staffing patterns in "bussing, maintenance and administration" (0:30:20).
0:31:15Is early childhood working?Adrian asks for evidence on the preschool and in-district special education programs. The superintendent: "It has to work. It's a requirement." (0:32:21) Zullo asks whether he means referral rates or kindergarten readiness (0:36:19). LeClair: "every dollar we invest on a child 0 to 5, it's a 7 to $17 return on investment" (0:38:18).
0:40:53Per-school costsPierce asks for each school's cost, given "a decline with our enrollment" (0:40:58). The superintendent: "Where are we in 2022, 2023? And we shouldn't be deciding that 12 months before the decision" (0:42:28).
0:45:02GrantsThe system of care grant, "approximately $2 million over the course of four years", likely five. New: Title I reallocation, "we have $20,250 to send a team of folks to the New Hampshire Department of Ed summer summit" (0:46:12); McKinney-Vento, "an additional $16,500" (0:47:35), for a licensed child care space for high school students with babies, "We officially opened last week" (0:48:00); and "two grants from Broome, one for $3,000, one for $5,000 to support early learning" (0:49:32). Total for approval $44,750 (0:50:44).MED
0:51:04More grants on the horizonBooks for preschoolers, a Home Depot application for an outdoor play space the building trades students would build, and "about $502,000 in additional competitive grants just for this year" (0:51:55).
0:54:02Primex contribution capO'Neill: the cap program "limits your increase to a 7%. We actually saw 16% increase year over year" (0:54:27); later he gives last year's uncapped increase as 19 (0:56:33). He recommends continuing "to a 7% increase through 2021" (0:54:48). Zullo asks what Primex is: "a risk pool insurance company that all public entities participate in" (0:57:21).
1:00:24Tech center historyOpened in 1992 for region ten; "the center cost $5.2 million to build" (1:00:43). The 20-year agreement "expired in 2012" and a ten-year agreement followed (1:01:19). Claremont enrollment "was 155. This year we have 129", and programs fell from eight to 4.5 (1:02:25).
1:08:52Student survey and labor dataA weighted survey put culinary arts first "with a weighted score of 202" (1:09:38); about 200 students were surveyed through advisories (1:34:06). State sector data point to manufacturing, hospitality, health care and information technology (1:12:49).
1:14:16Three proposed programs"I'm proposing that we we we introduce three programs pre-engineering, teacher prep, and computer repair and networking." Schedule: pre-engineering July 2018, teacher prep September 2019, computer repair and networking July 2020 (1:20:33). Each teaching position would cost "$67,431 to $104,045" (1:21:23); computer repair equipment about $56,000 from Perkins funds (1:23:06), of which the center receives about 76,000 a year (1:23:31).
1:27:25No duplication with NewportThe 2012 agreement "says we cannot duplicate programs. Newport can duplicate our programs." Claremont may duplicate only if it is oversubscribed (1:27:47).
1:31:12LNA seatsPierce asks about licensed nursing assistant training at Newport, capped at eight students. Snyder: Claremont's share "might only be three" seats (1:33:17). Sprague: the question is whether anyone from Claremont who wanted it was turned away.
1:36:45Interest inventories and shared staffSprague suggests aptitude inventories through the high school's college and career software (transcribed Navy) rather than a survey, and asks why the district is not "sharing staff" with the community college (1:38:14). "our schools are the are what's going to transform Claremont" (1:38:51).
1:40:09WeldingSprague says Newport's welding course is full. Snyder asked Newport's director: "I'll give you the last five years. None." "It's not one of insufficient capacity for Stevens students, it seems." (1:41:29) LeClair: Claremont students have "first option of refusal" on their share of seats (1:42:44).
1:44:39Schedule accessThe superintendent: a Stevens scheduling committee will work toward a fall 2018 schedule, which he hopes "will provide greater access to tech center programs" because access now "only occurs if it's a fit for their schedule" (1:45:51).
1:48:06Adult trainingPierce describes her own welfare-to-work welding course and asks whether the tech center could train adults. Snyder: possible for machining or plumbing, but "We don't have a welding lab in this building." (1:49:45)
1:50:49Teacher prep and pre-KAdrian doubts the curriculum suits pre-K classrooms. The superintendent: "The Department of Education, Patrick for two years has been telling us the program should be discontinued." (1:54:35) Rapp: "I'm very surprised we haven't begun already the teacher prep program." (1:55:48)
1:58:43Food service RFPO'Neill: proposals "will be evaluated by a committee against the following criteria with assigned wages [weights] indicated" (1:58:43), and he has scheduled vendor presentations at the next three board meetings (1:59:46). The contract runs "on a one year basis, generally it's for five years with with it's a one year contract with full one year renewals" (2:01:42). The RFP closes "April 19th, which is the day of the first vendor meeting" (2:03:46); finance "it's only 20 points". On the weights: "We can't change the weight. Okay, that's that's statutorily" (2:06:21).POS
2:06:51Evaluation committeeZullo, who has been reading the regulations: "it is so extensive that my brain turned to mush." The superintendent will form a committee "representative of the district, both in house as well as community" (2:07:09). Board volunteers are not clearly settled on tape. Members suggest student members from the high school and middle school (2:08:36).POS
2:09:46Lead screening policy"I have added pre-kindergarten. It was kindergarten." Sprague: lead screening information is valuable to student support teams (2:11:39). Rapp: "No one else has won and I'm proud of it." (2:14:43)

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each one names the rule it rests on, as that rule read on April 5, 2017, or is labeled an observation where no verified rule applies.

MEDIUM No agenda, packet or minutes for this meeting survive in any district share

MAP.md records no Drive material: the district's shares hold no year folder older than 2022, and the Meeting Minutes share starts at 2023. The recording is the only public account of four votes, the tech center's program and cost proposals and the grant amounts. RSA 91-A:2, II, in the text in force for 2017, required minutes that "shall include the names of members, persons appearing before the public bodies, and a brief description" of the subject matter, "open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting". This page applies the MEDIUM limb of the project's severity rule because the record mitigates the gap: the meeting had a numbered agenda and a packet (0:01:38, 0:08:43), and the board approved its previous minutes on tape (0:03:13), so minutes were being produced. The 2017 statute required minutes to be open to inspection, not posted online. What is missing is any public copy now.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2016 codification, in force for 2017; source note ends 2016, 29:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2017)

MEDIUM Three grants of $5,000 or more were accepted with no prior public hearing on the record

The board accepted $44,750 in one vote (0:50:44, 0:50:54): $20,250 in Title I reallocation money, $16,500 in McKinney-Vento funds and $8,000 in two early-learning grants of $3,000 and $5,000. The item was moved from updates to action items at the start of the meeting because "That's going to require to have the board approve" (0:01:38). If the district accepted these funds under RSA 198:20-b, the statute in force in 2017 provided that "For unanticipated funds in the amount of $5,000 or more, the school board shall hold a prior public hearing", with notice of its "time, place, and subject" published in a newspaper, and for smaller amounts that the board "shall post notice of the funds in the agenda and shall include notice in the minutes". No hearing is mentioned on this recording. The record leaves open three things that would settle it: whether Claremont voters had adopted the RSA 198:20-b article, whether the funds were within the budget the voters approved and so not "unanticipated", and whether a hearing was held at an earlier meeting. The system of care grant, "already approved" (0:50:32), is not part of this vote.

Sources: RSA 198:20-b, I and III (2016 codification; source note ends 2005, 188:1)

OBSERVATION The nonpublic session's exemption was stated, but the roll call reads as attendance and nothing after it is public

The superintendent named the exemption when the agenda was amended, "a 91 a colon, three Roman numeral two C", matters that would affect "the reputation of of a person" (0:01:38, 0:02:11), and the chair restated it when the motion was made (2:15:24). RSA 91-A:3, I(b), as in force in 2017, required that the motion "state on its face the specific exemption" and that "The vote on any such motion shall be by roll call". A roll call was taken, but of the five answers audible three are Here and two are Yes (2:15:55 to 2:16:03), so the recording does not show each member's vote on the motion, and Irish's absence and the seventh voice's identity are unsettled (see Board composition). The recording ends at the roll call. RSA 91-A:3, III required that minutes and decisions of the nonpublic session be "publicly disclosed within 72 hours" unless withheld by a recorded two-thirds vote taken in public session; no such vote is on tape and no nonpublic minutes survive. Whether a seal vote was taken after the session, off camera, cannot be known from this record.

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b), II(c) and III (2016 codification; source note ends 2016, 30:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2017; 280:1)

POSITIVE A food service contract to be chosen on published weighted criteria after vendor presentations in public

The business administrator scheduled each prospective food service vendor to present at a televised board meeting over the next three meetings (1:59:46, 2:01:25), proposed an evaluation committee of board members, staff and others, with site visits to districts using each vendor (2:00:31), and stressed that price is only 20 of the RFP's points (2:03:46). Members asked for student members (2:08:25). Federal school meal rules required only that a contract with a food service management company run no longer than one year with no more than four one-year renewals, which matches the term he described (2:01:42); public vendor presentations go beyond that. His statement that the weights are fixed "statutorily" (2:06:21) is not verified here; the RFP he worked from is described as "required by the state" (1:58:43).

Sources: 7 CFR 210.16(d) (2017 annual edition: contract of no longer than 1 year; renewals not to exceed 4 additional years)

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page