Claremont School Board — October 4, 2017

Regular meeting of the Claremont School Board, summarized from the Claremont Community Television recording and its speaker-attributed transcript; no agenda, packet or minutes are posted in the district's online shares, and the recording begins partway through the superintendent's report. The board reviewed its September 30 Saturday budget study session, at which members present set a target of cutting about $1.2 million from the administration's FY2018-19 proposal; agreed to route members' budget questions through the superintendent, citing the open meeting law; approved a German exchange trip; asked for a lead-screening policy with a parental opt-out; formed a diversity-plan subcommittee after the events of late August; heard the Stevens principal ask community members not to demonstrate outside the schools the next day, which led to a sharp exchange between members; and moved several policies to final approval. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board
Date
Wednesday, October 4, 2017 (date from the Cablecast title and file name; the superintendent's report covers "September 21st to October 4th", 0:00:02)
Start time
Not captured: the recording opens mid-way through the superintendent's report (0:00:02), so the call to order, roll call and any earlier items are not on the record. Motion to adjourn at 2:40:59; the recording ends at 2:41:04.
Location
Not stated on the recording, and no notice or agenda is available.
Recording
Cablecast: SCHOOL BOARD MEETING 10-4 (2:41:04, starting partway through the superintendent's report and ending at adjournment)
Minutes
None located in the district's public shares: neither Drive share holds a year folder older than 2022 (MAP.md section 42, checked 9/26/26).
Board composition
No roll call is on the recording. All seven members speak: Brian Rapp (chair), Chris Irish (vice chair), Patrick Adrian, Michael Petrin, Michelle Pierce, Frank Sprague and Rebecca Zullo.

Participants

Everyone the recording shows taking part. Names follow the project's dialogue file and the 2015 to 2023 roster; no minutes exist online to check spellings against. Where the dialogue file says Unidentified, this page does too.
NameRoleParticipation
Brian RappChairPresided. Was absent from the September 30 session and pressed members to share their reduction ideas in public: "This is an open board meeting" (1:07:05). Volunteered for the diversity subcommittee; said the demonstration planners had been given the chance to speak at citizens' comments (2:20:04).
Chris IrishVice ChairExplained the September 30 directive and its "deliberate" no-cuts-without-data wording; proposed routing budget questions through the superintendent; blamed state representatives for the funding crisis (1:31:03); clashed with Adrian over the planned demonstration.
Patrick AdrianBoard memberAsked that the community be brought into the response to the late-August events; questioned the preschool expansion as revenue shrinks; said he had told the demonstration organizers they could come to the meeting (2:20:21).
Michael PetrinBoard memberNoted the student report had been left off the agenda (0:10:17); reported the September 30 session and the $1.2 million target (0:42:25); asked for staffing ratios and in-district special education placements.
Michelle PierceBoard memberMoved the German exchange trip; asked about the high-school schedule timeline, special education costs and grants; supported the lead-screening policy; said demonstrations belong at Broad Street Park rather than in front of a school (2:11:34); volunteered for the diversity subcommittee. Absent from the September 30 session.
Frank SpragueBoard memberCalled the district's finances a crisis and said members were "unanimous on Saturday" (0:50:40); requested actuals and an employee list; cautioned on class rank; moved the policy approvals and adjournment. Also SAU 6 vice chair (2:37:36).
Rebecca ZulloBoard memberSeconded the exchange trip; asked for per-pupil cost; favored a lead-screening waiver (1:54:14); volunteered for the diversity subcommittee; rebuked the chair and vice chair for how they responded to a colleague (2:22:20).
Middleton McGoodwinSuperintendent, SAU 6Gave the superintendent's report on the late-August events; said recent tax increases came from falling state aid, not the budget (0:52:39); advised on the open meeting law; presented class rank, the lead-screening policy, the diversity plan and the conduct-policy review; asked demonstrators to join a working group instead (2:07:05).
Cory LeClairAssistant Superintendent, SAU 6Spoke on the high-school schedule plan, fundraising policy, grants and supplement-not-supplant, and the search for in-district special education space.
Michael O'NeillDirector of Business and Finance, SAU 6Handed out FY2016-17 actuals and FY2017-18 year-to-date spending (0:44:37) and an employee list (1:27:26).
Chris (surname not on the record)Special Education Director, SAU 6Described talks with the Brattleboro Retreat about a satellite day program to cut out-of-district tuition and transportation (1:25:28). Medium-confidence identification.
Patricia (Pat) BarryPrincipal, Stevens High SchoolPublicly asked adults planning to gather outside the middle and high schools on October 5 to reconsider (2:02:17); explained the school's handling of an ongoing investigation.
Lexi Grenier (spelling unverified)Student representative, Stevens High SchoolGave the student report (0:25:46); spoke on class rank and on how students felt about the planned demonstration (2:07:34).
UnidentifiedStevens High School teacher, German exchange programPresented the exchange with the partner school in Germany and asked permission to run it (0:33:28). Name not stated.
UnidentifiedProcedural voice at the tableAdvised during the policy votes that the items "are separate, items on the agenda" (2:31:06). Possibly the recording secretary; not named.
Citizens' commentsNone recordedThe chair invited comment at 0:32:55 and closed the period; no one spoke. Members later said community members connected with the planned demonstration had been in the room and left.

Order of business (reconstructed)

No agenda for this meeting is posted in the district's online shares, so this order of business is reconstructed from the chair's transitions on the recording, which begins during the superintendent's report. The superintendent refers to agenda item "Roman numeral seven B fiscal year 19 budget" (2:32:52).

Items in the order the recording takes them up.
Taken upItemWhat was done
0:00:02Superintendent's report (in progress)On the "events of late August", community dialogue and the district's response. Questions from members follow (0:10:38).
0:25:46Student representative's reportAdded from the floor after Petrin noted "we forgot to add the student rep report to our agenda" (0:10:17).
0:32:49Citizens' commentsNone.
0:32:59Action item: German exchange programPierce: "I'd like to make a motion to accept the trip for Germany and the fundraising for it." (0:40:02); Zullo seconded (0:40:08); voice vote, no audible opposition (0:41:31).
0:41:51Review of the September 30 budget study sessionDiscussion of the $1.2 million directive and of how members' questions will be handled. No vote.
1:31:03Class rankConsensus to have the administration study it and report back (1:46:40).
1:47:08Revisiting the lead screening policySuperintendent to return with a revised draft that "a waiver would be an option" (1:55:33). No vote.
1:59:23Diversity planSuperintendent to form a subcommittee; Zullo, Rapp and Pierce named (2:01:28, 2:01:31). Followed by the principal's statement on the planned demonstration (2:02:07).
2:24:41Policies involving conduct and behaviorSixteen policies presented for review; superintendent to return with recommendations. No vote.
2:29:09Action items: policy second and third readsSprague moved to waive the third read of two policies and give final approval to a list of others (2:30:30); after advice that the items were separate, the chair took a vote (2:31:46) and then a second motion by Pierce for the third-read group (2:32:22), seconded (2:32:33), voice vote (2:32:39). Policy codes as spoken are garbled in the transcript; see flag 4.
2:32:45Future agenda itemsBudget information requests for the October 18 agenda (2:32:52); process for moving items off the future list (2:37:48); a junior-high bullying discussion (2:38:58).
2:40:59AdjournmentSprague: "I'd like to make a motion to adjourn." Voice vote.

Discussion timeline

Chronological topics from the dialogue file. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording. Quotations are the transcript as recorded, ASR errors included. This page does not repeat details about any student beyond what speakers said in general terms.

Topics by start time.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:02Superintendent's report on the late-August events"Racism, bullying, however you wish to describe it. They're all connected, interconnected." He notes "a great deal of community dialog and online dialog regarding the events of late August" and media "from New York and other parts of our country" (0:00:02). "Because if people don't watch or attend the school board meeting, there's an information gap." (0:14:05).OBSERVATION
0:11:01Recycled Percussion concertMcGoodwin: "It was approximately a $30,000 concert. If we had contracted" (0:11:01). Petrin: "We didn't pay that." ... "it was provided for free." (0:11:23).
0:11:41Community involvementAdrian asks that parents and community members be brought in (0:11:41). Irish: "please don't work to provoke or engage the larger audience until you have worked with those closest to the issue first." (0:15:40).
0:16:24High-school schedule timelinePierce asks whether the board will see the Stevens schedule plan before it takes effect (0:16:24). McGoodwin: "The Memorandum of Understanding or Agreement was signed in January 2007 [2017]. Ten months later. We're in a very different place" (0:20:20).
0:25:46Student reportCommunity service day planned for April 19, 2018 (0:27:20); a new Communication Club that will "partner with Claremont Community Television CCTV" (0:29:46).
0:33:28German exchange approvedThe teacher asks "Just your permission to conduct the exchange." (0:39:52). LeClair: approval is needed because it is "a overnight out of country trip" with unusually large fundraising (0:40:28). Approved (0:41:31).
0:41:57September 30 study session and the $1.2 million targetMcGoodwin thanks members "for putting these minutes together" (0:41:57). Petrin: "Brian and Michelle were not able to make it, as noted" (0:42:25); "The 1.2 million, which would affect the tax rate about $1.70." (0:42:57). Rapp: "one of the directives is no reductions in instructional staff" (0:47:39); Irish: "That language was very deliberate." (0:48:07). Sprague: "we were unanimous on Saturday" (0:50:40).OBSERVATION
0:52:39State aid and the tax rateMcGoodwin: the tax-rate increases have "not been due to the budget. It's been due to the reduction in state aid." (0:52:39). "a $1.2 million reduction will be much more than that, because there are some uncontrollable fixed cost increases" (0:53:28).
0:54:54Preschool and staffing questionsAdrian questions reinvesting kindergarten aid in a preschool expansion as revenue shrinks (0:55:22). Petrin asks for a staffing snapshot by school (0:58:19); Zullo for a per-pupil cost breakdown (0:59:49).
1:00:02How members' questions will be handledIrish: "don't send them to all of us" (1:00:19). McGoodwin: "Problematic with the open meeting law? Yeah. What we communicate to you outside of the board packet needs to be done publicly, right?" (1:01:05). Rapp: answers "can also be tabulated and put in the packet for our next board meeting." (1:02:12). McGoodwin: "what we receive in your packet, the community receives online as well." (1:03:23).POSITIVE
1:05:06Should the ideas be discussed in public now?Rapp: "But you already gave a $1.2 million figure. So if you have some ideas ... it would be good for the public to know" (1:05:06). Irish: the figure came from "a lot of conversations that led to the 1.2" (1:05:52). Rapp: "This is an open board meeting. I think a lot of this stuff, if we can do it in public meetings, should be done in public meeting." (1:07:05). Irish: "It all be done in public. We're just not there yet." (1:07:14).OBSERVATION
1:21:22Special education placementsPetrin asks what in-district placements would cost (1:21:22). LeClair: talks with the Brattleboro Retreat about a satellite program and a look at space at the One for All center (1:22:26). Chris: transportation "is almost equal to the tuition" (1:25:28).
1:31:03The funding crisisIrish: "Make no mistake, this crisis lays at the feet of our state reps past, present and future." (1:31:03).
1:31:16Class rank and valedictorianMcGoodwin describes a strong student who was not valedictorian because of course choices (1:31:16). Grenier asks whether she must choose between music "or the AP and honors classes that are weighted at five" (1:42:16). Irish: "It's about the scholarships." (1:44:57). Consensus to study it (1:46:40).
1:47:08Lead screening policyMcGoodwin cites "RSA 141 C semicolon 20-A" [RSA 141-C:20-a] on immunizations and says "the law does not require lead screening, however, and so it cannot be. It's not enforceable." (1:48:16, his characterization; not verified for this page). Zullo: "there should be a waiver" (1:54:14). He will return with a draft (1:55:33).
1:59:23Diversity plan and subcommitteeMcGoodwin: "I very much like to develop a subcommittee, of of the school board and, and administration" (1:59:25); refers to "the event of August 28th" (2:01:05). Rapp: "Sign me up." (2:01:28). "I'm going to establish a subcommittee" (2:01:31).OBSERVATION
2:02:07Principal's statement on the planned demonstrationBarry: "My concern is that that the schools have never been contacted about this." (2:02:42); "For many students, that will not be a positive experience." (2:03:22). McGoodwin asks those planning to demonstrate to join a working group instead (2:07:05). Grenier: "no one has come and talk to us" (2:08:28).
2:11:20Board members disagreePierce: "Public assembly shouldn't be held in front of the school." (2:11:34). Rapp: the plan is "to demonstrate off school property on public property" (2:15:26). Adrian says an organizer had been in the room (2:15:47). Irish: "I'm not going to let you do her presentation here tonight. Not going to happen." (2:17:03); "You are creating the anxiety by continuing to give them a forum." (2:18:58). Rapp: "they had an opportunity to speak at citizens." (2:20:04). Zullo: disappointed to see "Our chair and vice chair immediately jump on somebody" (2:22:20); Rapp: "I don't recall jumping on anybody." (2:23:58).
2:24:55Conduct and behavior policiesMcGoodwin: "Student conduct is eight years old. Bullying and cyber bullying is eight years old" and "there's been new RSA that need to be blended into those." (2:26:15).
2:29:09Policy approvalsSecond reads for wellness and administering medication, adding insulin (2:29:34). Sprague's motion "that we take JLC FJLCD wave third read and take gb ECI ge IHAMJLCKJLDJLIF and JLF2. Final implementation approval." (2:30:30). "Do you want me to rephrase it or would you like to just fix it in the minutes?" (2:31:27). Two voice votes follow (2:31:46, 2:32:39).OBSERVATION
2:36:34Closing remarks and future itemsPierce asks the community to hear students first (2:36:34). Irish raises how items move off the future-agenda list (2:37:48). Sprague reminds members of the SAU 6 meeting "next" Thursday (2:37:28).

Items flagged for review

Flags are a reviewer's aid generated by comparing the meeting against the law in force on October 4, 2017, cited as it then read. They are not findings of violation, and nothing here is legal advice. Where no verified rule applies, the flag says so and is recorded as an observation. 5 flags follow, ordered by severity.

OBSERVATION The recording starts mid-meeting, and no agenda, packet or minutes is online

The recording opens partway through the superintendent's report (0:00:02), so the call to order, roll call, agenda approval and minutes approval (if taken) are not on the public recording. MAP.md section 42 records that neither district Drive share holds anything older than 2022 (checked 9/26/26). That is a limit of what the district posts online, not evidence that records were never made: members refer to a packet (0:33:15) and a numbered agenda (2:32:52), and the superintendent says the packet goes online (1:03:23). RSA 91-A:2, II as it read in 2017 required minutes naming members and "persons appearing before the public bodies", with a brief description of the subject matter and final decisions, open to inspection "not more than 5 business days after the meeting"; the mover-and-seconder requirement did not exist until January 1, 2019. The project's missing-records rule is applied on its online-availability limb.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2016 codification; source note ends 2016, 29:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2017, so in force for all of 2017).

OBSERVATION A $1.2 million reduction directive was set at a Saturday study session whose notice and minutes are not online

Members report that on Saturday, September 30, the board met without Rapp and Pierce (0:42:25), "decided as a board" to seek a cut of about $1.2 million, roughly $1.70 on the tax rate (0:42:57), with a directive of no reductions in instructional staff without supporting data (0:47:39, 0:48:07), and were "unanimous" (0:50:40). Five of seven members is a quorum, and RSA 91-A:2, I (2016 codification) defines a meeting as "the convening of a quorum of the membership of a public body" to discuss or act on matters within its jurisdiction, so the session carried notice and minutes duties. The record mitigates the concern: the superintendent thanked members "for putting these minutes together" (0:41:57), and the directive was reviewed in this public meeting. Neither the September 30 notice nor its minutes is in the district's online shares, and the corpus holds no recording of that session. At this meeting the chair, who was absent on September 30, asked that the reasoning behind the figure be aired publicly (1:05:06, 1:07:05); the members who attended said no specific cuts had yet been discussed (1:05:37, 1:07:14).

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, I and II (2016 codification, in force for all of 2017).

OBSERVATION The new diversity-plan subcommittee includes three board members and carries Right-to-Know duties

The superintendent proposed a subcommittee "of the school board and, and administration" (1:59:25), and Zullo, Rapp and Pierce joined it (2:01:28, 2:01:31). RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d), unchanged since 2008, makes a public body of "any committee, subcommittee, or subordinate body thereof, or advisory committee thereto", so the subcommittee's meetings would require notice and minutes like the board's. Whether it met, and whether its meetings were noticed and minuted, cannot be checked from the district's online shares for 2017. Recorded as a pointer for later pages, not a finding.

Sources: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) (source note ends 2008, 354:1, so the same text in 2017).

OBSERVATION Which policies received final approval cannot be recovered from the recording

Sprague moved to waive a third read and give "Final implementation approval" to a run of policy codes that the transcript renders as "JLC FJLCD" and "gb ECI ge IHAMJLCKJLDJLIF and JLF2" (2:30:30). A voice at the table advised that "they are separate, items on the agenda, so you should be doing them separately" (2:31:06); Sprague asked "would you like to just fix it in the minutes?" (2:31:27). The chair then took one vote (2:31:46) and a second on Pierce's motion for the third-read group (2:32:22 to 2:32:39). RSA 91-A:2, II (2016 codification) requires minutes to record "final decisions"; with no agenda or minutes online, the public cannot tell which policies were adopted that night or in what form. The ambiguity is in the recording and the online record, not necessarily in the minutes the district kept.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2016 codification, in force for all of 2017).

POSITIVE The board chose a question process designed to keep budget deliberation out of email

Asked how members should pose budget questions, the superintendent flagged the "open meeting law" and said communications "outside of the board packet needs to be done publicly" (1:01:05); the board settled on sending questions to him alone, with answers "tabulated and put in the packet for our next board meeting" (1:02:12), a packet he said the community also receives online (1:03:23). RSA 91-A:2-a, unchanged since 2008, provides that public bodies "shall deliberate on matters only in meetings" and that communications outside a meeting "shall not be used to circumvent the spirit and purpose" of the chapter. Routing questions through staff and publishing the answers is a practice that keeps a quorum's exchanges out of private channels.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2-a, I and II (source 2008, 303:4, unamended, so the same text in 2017).

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page