SAU 6 Board, September 5, 2019

Regular meeting of the School Administrative Unit 6 board (Claremont and Unity), built from the attributed dialogue transcript of the Claremont Community Television (CCTV) / Claremont Community Media Center (CCMC) recording; no agenda, packet or minutes for it are in the district's public shares. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
SAU 6 Board (members of the Claremont and Unity school boards)
Date
Thursday, September 5, 2019
Start time
Scheduled time not stated in available records. The recording opens on the call to order; the motion to adjourn comes at 0:31:39. No nonpublic session.
Location
Not stated in available records.
Recording
Cablecast: SAU #6 SCHOOL BOARD meeting 9-5-19 (observed extent about 0:31:53, taken from the last dialogue row; the Cablecast API refused this environment, so the run time was not read from it)
Minutes
None located in the district's public shares as of October 2, 2026. Neither Drive share reaches back before 2022, and the Meeting Minutes share starts at 2023 (MAP.md, checked September 26, 2026). The board approved these minutes, with corrections, at its October 10, 2019 meeting.
Superintendent
Michael Tempesta (from July 1, 2019)

Participants

Everyone named or heard in the record. Names follow the project roster for 2015 to 2023 where the transcript garbles them; no minutes are available to check spellings. Attendance is shown only as far as the roll call is audible.
NameRoleParticipation
Michael PetrinSAU 6 Board chair (Claremont member)Presides throughout (roll entry transcribed as “And Mike pitching here”). Amends the agenda, thanks central-office staff for a year of turnover, runs the position vote and sets the next meeting date.
Frank SpragueClaremont School Board chair; SAU 6 memberAnswers the roll. Questions the business administrator salary difference and where human resources will sit; speaks for the position merger as the restructuring he had promised the press after the IRS letter; asks for SAU budget planning at the next meeting.
Carolyn TowleSAU 6 member (Claremont)Answers the roll (transcribed “Carolyn Toll”). Asks whether auditors recommend control improvements; raises low Unity attendance; asks that minutes be sent before meetings; announces the Sullivan County education-funding listening session in Newport.
Heather WhitneySAU 6 member (Claremont)Answers the roll. No other speech attributed to her.
Rebecca ZulloSAU 6 member (Claremont)Called as Rebecca; an answer Here. follows. No other speech attributed to her.
Jason BenwareSAU 6 member (Claremont)Called (transcribed “Jason. Benwell”); no answer captured in the transcript. Presence not established by the recording.
Rob Lovett Jr.SAU 6 member (Claremont)Called (“Rob Lovett. Junior”); no answer captured. Presence not established by the recording.
Shannon PopescuSAU 6 member (Unity)Called; the reply transcribed is Seriously? Yeah.
Gary BaderSAU 6 member (Unity)Called (“Gary bader”; spelling unverified); no answer captured.
UnidentifiedSAU 6 member (Unity)First name on the roll is inaudible; a Here. answers it. A Unity member later asks whether the position change came up at the Unity meeting (“I know I wasn't there”) and says no one from Unity can attend the Newport hearing because Unity meets that night. Whether these are the same person is not established.
UnidentifiedBoard members (several)Move and second the amended agenda, the position merger and adjournment; one suggests a monthly superintendent's newsletter modeled on Lebanon's. The recording does not identify the movers or seconders.
Michael TempestaSuperintendent, SAU 6Superintendent's report (school opening, daily administrative school visits, Richard Seaman starting full time October 2); explains the IRS closing letter and the audit schedule; presents and recommends merging the grants manager and assistant business manager functions into one accountant/grants manager.
Mary WoodmanClerk (called Mary)Takes the roll.
Ben NesterSAU 6 administratorMentioned at the table (“Ben was here last year”; “Mr. Nestor is a good example” of departments taking over their own grant work). No attributed speech.
Richard SeamanIncoming business administratorNot present. Named as starting full time October 2, 2019 (once transcribed “Richard Simmons”).
John AubinPart-time business officialNot present. Named as the part-time person Seaman is transitioning with, and as having rebuilt the position cost sheet with the superintendent.
Mike O'NeillFormer part-time business administratorMentioned by Sprague. Spelling unverified.
Jamie YoungCentral-office assistantCredited by the superintendent for the summer turnaround work. Spelling as transcribed.
Marjorie (surname not spoken)Unity memberCredited by the chair with proposing standing Claremont and Unity updates. Probably Marjorie Erickson (SAU 6 vice chair from March 2019 per the roster), but the recording does not say so or show her present.

Order of business (reconstructed)

No agenda for this meeting is in any public share. The chair refers to “an agenda in front of us”; the items below are reconstructed from his transitions and labeled as such.

Items in the order the chair took them up. Dispositions are from the recording; no minutes are available to confirm tallies or the names of movers and seconders.
Taken upItemWhat happened
0:00:00Call to order, pledge, roll callChair: “I'd like to call the September 5th. That's a six school board meeting to order.” The clerk calls the roll at 0:00:47: seven Claremont names and two Unity names are audible, plus an inaudible first name.
0:01:19AgendaFloor amendment by the chair: the superintendent's report is added “after citizens comments”. Motion from an unidentified member (“The agenda as amended.”), second from another; voice vote, no opposition heard.
0:01:44Citizens' commentsNone: “Seeing none under close citizens comments.”
0:02:01Superintendent's reportSchool opening, administrative team visits, Richard Seaman full time from October 2. Sprague notes at 0:05:39: “Approval of minutes is not on the agenda either.”
0:05:49Discussion: staff appreciation; IRS closing letter; auditsChair thanks central-office staff. IRS letter reported as closing the matter. Claremont FY17 audit closing, FY18 to start, Unity FY17 closed; auditors to be invited to the next meeting. Information only.
0:11:27Discussion: accountant/grants manager positionSuperintendent proposes merging the grants manager and assistant business manager functions into one full-time position. Motion at 0:21:25: “I make a motion that we approve this, grant slash accounting position.” Second at 0:21:31; voice vote at 0:21:33, Aye., no opposition heard. Mover and seconder unidentified on the recording.
0:21:44Update on business administratorSeaman starting October 2; no action.
0:22:49Future agenda items; next meeting dateSAU budget planning proposed for the next meeting; standing Claremont and Unity updates to be added; October 10 floated as the next date, the superintendent to poll members for consensus.
0:29:24Other business: minutes of July 25Deferred to the next meeting because members had not received them in advance (Towle). No vote.
0:30:13Other business: education-funding listening sessionTowle announces the Sullivan County hearing in Newport; information only.
0:31:39AdjournmentMotion and second from unidentified members; voice vote.

Discussion timeline

Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/10522 SAU6090519.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording.

Chronological topics. Quotations are verbatim from the transcript, including its errors; bracketed words are editorial.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:47Roll callClerk: “Shannon Popescu.” / “Gary bader.” / “Frank Sprague here. Rebecca.” / “Jason. Benwell. Rob Lovett. Junior. Heather Whitney here. Carolyn Toll here. And Mike pitching here.” The first name called is inaudible and is answered Here. No answer is captured for Bader, Benware or Lovett, so the recording does not establish whether a quorum of the SAU board was present.OBS
0:01:19Agenda amendedChair: “I'm going to make one change that we need to kind of get back on the regular schedule. The superintendent report. I'm going to add that in after citizens comments”. Moved, seconded, passed by voice.
0:02:01Superintendent's reportTempesta: school “has opened both in unity and at in Claremont and things are going well”; the administrative team is “committed to spending at least four hours scheduled every day of the year in schools.” At 0:02:55: “Richard Seaman is going to be joining us October 2nd full time”, “transitioning well with John Aubin, who's our part time person.” Plans to have Unity and Claremont students perform and report to the board.
0:05:39Minutes not on the agendaSprague: “Approval of minutes is not on the agenda either.” The chair later takes up the July 25 minutes under other business (0:29:25).OBS
0:05:49Thanks to central-office staffPetrin: the office “has gone through quite a turnover”; “All most of the faces here at the table are new. You know, Ben was here last year.” People “stepped up into new roles” over “a tough, probably at least a year.”
0:07:07IRS closing letterPetrin: “We got good news from the IRS.” Tempesta: the letter was “a very, direct form letter that, you know, this matter is, is resolved”; “it is closed in.” He says the letter was included in the members' materials; it is not in any public share, and the recording does not say what the IRS matter was.MED
0:08:06Audit statusTempesta: “the auditors are closing the Claremont 17 audit now, they, they expect to start the the 18 next week.” At 0:08:32: “the unity 17 is closed and we're going to be presenting that, the to the board for signature at the unity meeting next Tuesday.” A suggestion from “Mr. Robin” (identity unresolved; the attribution report guesses John Aubin) is to have the auditors attend the next SAU meeting.MED POS
0:09:36Auditors to presentTempesta: “To have the auditors here themselves so they, they can talk about. Exactly. And particularly for the audience as well.” Next meeting “probably mid mid-October”; “it would be great to hear from the third party folks who do that.”POS
0:10:20Auditor recommendationsTowle asks whether auditors give “Recommendations on how to improve systems or controls within.” Tempesta: “You usually get a you know a recommendation letter in indoor findings”; a “new crew” comes in afterward, and Seaman has proposed “some pretty innovative ways to get a handle on everything.”MED
0:11:33Accountant/grants manager: the cost sheetTempesta says the handout did not print properly (“I had a legal size one, and I blew it up, but we couldn't get it on there”) and was rebuilt with John. Two vacant positions (assistant business manager/HR and director of technology) had been left unfilled to fund two middle-school teaching positions, budgeted at “$60,000 in salary and then approximately $30,000 in fringe benefits.” Actuals “came in actually a lot lower”: the transcript reads “with the actual salaries, with 36,030 7000. And the benefits estimated were 20,000”, and “we estimated that would be approximately 180,000. It was only 112,000.”OBS
0:13:36Accountant/grants manager: the proposalThe long-time grants manager resigned; “we paid that person approximately $70,000 a year”, out of “a consultant line.” Proposal: “we emerge the two aspects of the position” so there is “a full time employee” to “manage and control the grants” who is also “a skilled, experienced accountant”. Tempesta calls it “a very fiscally responsible way to go.”OBS
0:16:27Assessment reduction“the total reduction of the Saw assessment is 170,000.” The net change is garbled in the transcript: “we still will have a 60. What is that, 56,000, $57,000, 40,000 in Claremont to be returned and 17,008 as part a portion.” At 0:17:04: Claremont carries “89.5% of the overall assessment” and Unity “a little over 10%, ten, 10.5%.” The split cannot be reconstructed from the transcript without the handout.OBS
0:17:50Member questionsAn unidentified member restates that the previous grants manager “was only a part time position at 70 K” and asks whether combining the roles is still “a huge savings”; Tempesta says it is “more effective” and keeps someone “in the building all the time.” Sprague (0:18:42) asks the salary difference between “Mike O'Neill” (part time) and Seaman (full time): “not much”, “A few thousand dollars”. Human resources will be supervised by Seaman and the superintendent (0:19:12).
0:20:13Sprague on the IRS letter and restructuringSprague: “I've been asked by the press and various people as the Claremont board chair, about the IRS letter”; he has said the board and administration are “taking every step to make sure that these errors don't happen again”, and the plan has “very fine mesh for things to. So nothing big will slip through”.
0:21:21Vote: accountant/grants managerChair: “Looking for a motion to approve this.” Sprague: “Make that motion.” An unidentified voice (0:21:25): “I make a motion that we approve this, grant slash accounting position.” “I'll second that.” Voice vote, Aye.; “Opposed? All right. Thank you.” No dissent heard; the tally is not stated.OBS
0:21:44Business administrator updateSeaman starts October 2, “Coming to us with lots of experience.” Sprague: “I asked the question last year when when we were having some issues is why isn't this why isn't that position full time.” A Unity member asks whether this came up at the Unity meeting; Tempesta: “We we spoke about all.”
0:23:01SAU budget calendarSprague: “Our budget for the saw is to December ish”, earlier than the district budgets, “So that really is something we need to start soon”; he suggests planning, “maybe a subcommittee”. Petrin: in past years the whole board did it “over a couple of meetings”, with no subcommittee.OBS
0:23:50Unity attendanceTowle: “We barely have unity members at the meetings.” “I'm quite concerned about the lack of membership from the unity side.” Asked whether SAU meetings are optional, a member says there is “No policy on on this. You know, the city council has that.” Sprague: “My response to that is then don't complain about the decisions that get made.” / “If you're not here to contribute.”OBS
0:25:18Standing district updatesPetrin: “Something that Marjorie had brought up is maybe putting on the agenda on a regular basis is just a report from unity, a report from Claremont.” Added as an ongoing item.POS
0:26:14Next meeting datePetrin hopes audit reports will be ready; Towle: the usual “Second Thursday”, “Which would be the 10th.” Petrin: “October 10th.” The superintendent is asked to circulate the date for consensus.
0:27:15Getting the news outTowle: people online think “the administration is essentially still the same” and do not know there has been “almost a complete clean out of the staff at the administration”. A member suggests a monthly superintendent's report like Lebanon's; Tempesta: “I'll do press release.”
0:29:25Minutes of July 25 deferredPetrin: “We have the minutes from July 25th.” Towle: “I didn't get this prior to the meeting. Was it sent out?” She asks that minutes come in advance “so that we can read it before we get here”. The item goes “on the agenda for the next one”.OBS
0:30:15Education-funding listening sessionTowle: a “public hearing and listening session regarding education funding” at the Sullivan County administration building, “third floor at the probate courtroom in Newport”, at 6 p.m. (the handout has “the date wrong” in one spot). Sprague: “A bipartisan group”, a chance to meet those who “May need” “Further convincing that schools need to be funded adequately.” A Unity member: Unity meets that night.
0:31:39Adjournment“I made a motion to adjourn.” Voice vote. Towle: “That was the shortest meeting ever.”

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each cites the rule it rests on, read as it stood on September 5, 2019, or is labeled an observation where no verified rule applies.

MEDIUM No minutes, agenda or packet for this meeting are in the district's public shares

The board worked from an agenda (“We have an agenda in front of us”, 0:01:19), a printed cost sheet for the position vote (0:11:33) and an IRS letter the superintendent says was “included” in the members' materials (0:07:17). None of these, and no minutes, is in any district share: the Drive shares begin in 2022 and the Meeting Minutes share in 2023. RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to be open to public inspection within five business days and makes them “permanent records”; from January 1, 2019 it also requires the minutes to name who made and seconded each motion, which matters here because the recording does not identify the mover or seconder of any motion. Graded MEDIUM under the project's severity rule because the record mitigates the absence: at the October 10, 2019 SAU 6 meeting a motion was made “that we accept the minutes of September 5th, 2019”, corrections to the date and to the chair's name were read, and the minutes were approved (Dialogue/10567 SAU6101019.mp4.CSV, about three minutes in). So minutes were written; they are simply not in any public location this project can reach. A records request to SAU 6 would settle whether they survive.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II, 2019 codification (minutes within 5 business days; permanent records; mover and seconder named); RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d), 2019 codification (a school administrative unit's board is a public body)

MEDIUM District audits more than two years behind: Claremont's FY2017 audit still closing and FY2018 not yet begun

At 0:08:06 the superintendent reports the auditors “closing the Claremont 17 audit now” and expecting to start “the 18 next week”; Unity's FY2017 audit is closed and goes to the Unity board for signature (0:08:32). Fiscal 2017 ended June 30, 2017 and fiscal 2018 on June 30, 2018. Where a district spends $750,000 or more of federal awards in a year, the Uniform Guidance requires the single-audit reporting package within nine months of year end, which would have been March 31, 2018 for FY2017 and March 31, 2019 for FY2018. This recording does not state either district's federal expenditures, so the page cannot confirm that the threshold applies; that is why this is graded MEDIUM rather than HIGH. If Claremont's federal spending met the threshold, both deadlines had passed by this meeting. In mitigation, the board asked to hear from the auditors in public (0:09:36) and Towle asked about their control recommendations (0:10:20).

Sources: 2 CFR 200.512(a)(1), 2019 edition (report due the earlier of 30 days after the auditor's report or nine months after period end); 2 CFR 200.501(a), 2019 edition ($750,000 threshold)

OBSERVATION Position merger and a $170,000 assessment reduction approved from a handout the public cannot see

The board approved replacing a part-time grants manager (about $70,000 a year from a consultant line) and an unfilled assistant business manager position with one full-time accountant/grants manager (0:13:36 to 0:21:33). The superintendent's figures depend on a cost sheet that is not in the public record, and the transcript garbles the key numbers: the actual salaries read “36,030 7000”, and the amount “to be returned” reads “56,000, $57,000, 40,000 in Claremont to be returned and 17,008” (0:16:27). A reader cannot reconstruct the net effect on either district's assessment from the recording. No statute is engaged by the decision itself; the SAU board sets its own staffing. The gap is one of documentation, and the missing minutes (flag 1) would have recorded the motion and its sponsors.

Sources: the recording; RSA 91-A:2, II, 2019 codification (minutes record final decisions and movers)

OBSERVATION July 25 minutes still not in members' hands six weeks after that meeting

Towle said she had not received the July 25 minutes before the meeting (0:29:38), and their approval was deferred to the next meeting; Sprague had already noted that “Approval of minutes is not on the agenda” (0:05:39). RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to be open to public inspection within five business days; it does not require that they be sent to members before approval, and a draft may satisfy it. The recording shows only that members had not seen the July 25 draft; it does not show whether the public could. The October 10 recording shows the July 25 minutes approved that night, eleven weeks after the meeting.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II, 2019 codification; Dialogue/10567 SAU6101019.mp4.CSV

OBSERVATION SAU budget planning begins against the January 1 deadline, with Unity attendance raised as a concern

Sprague placed the SAU budget “to December ish” (0:23:14), which matches the statute: the SAU board must adopt its budget at a meeting held before January 1. Towle then said “We barely have unity members at the meetings” (0:23:50), and the roll call itself captures answers for only one or two Unity members (0:00:47). The recording does not establish whether a quorum was present; no minutes exist to settle it. This is noted because the budget the board adopts by January 1 is apportioned to both districts.

Sources: RSA 194-C:9, I, 2019 codification (SAU budget adopted at a meeting held before January 1; apportionment)

POSITIVE Auditors invited to report in public, and standing reports from each district added

Acting on a suggestion relayed by the superintendent, the board planned to have the independent auditors attend the next SAU meeting “particularly for the audience as well” (0:09:36), and added a standing Claremont and Unity update to every agenda (0:25:18). No statute requires either. Both give the public a direct view of the audit backlog in flag 2 and of each district's business.

Sources: the recording; no rule requires these practices.

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page