Claremont School District, Deliberative Session, February 9, 2022

First (deliberative) session of the 2022 annual school district meeting under RSA 40:13, the official-ballot (SB 2) procedure. The body is the district's voters; the school board presents the warrant. Voters amended the $37,243,825 operating budget twice by secret ballot, adding $61,973 for a full-time tech-center director (53 to 6) and $87,290 for a full-time tech-center guidance counselor (48 to 9 per the minutes), and sent all six articles to the March 8 ballot. Built from the CCTV recording's dialogue transcript, the posted warrant and two copies of the district's minutes. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School District annual meeting, first session (the voters); Claremont School Board presenting
Date
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 (warrant; snow date Thursday, February 10). Inside the RSA 40:13, III window: the last Monday in January 2022 was January 31, so the first session had to fall between Saturday, February 5 and Saturday, February 12.
Start time
6:30 p.m. per the warrant; the minutes record the call to order at 6:30 p.m. with the pledge. The recording begins at 0:01:23, after the call to order and the pledge, with the board chair's introductions. The moderator closes the meeting at 2:27:19; the transcript runs 2:27:56. Two stretches of the recording are taken up by secret-ballot voting with almost no speech (1:32:28 to 1:47:28; 2:02:42 to 2:15:28).
Location
Stevens High School auditorium, 175 Broad Street, Claremont (warrant and minutes)
Recording
Cablecast: School Board Deliberative Session of 2/9/22 (transcript 2:27:56; opening minute and the call to order not on the recording)
Minutes
CSB Deliberative Minutes 2.9.22 (1).pdf (in the July 20, 2022 board packet) and 2.9.22 District Meeting Minutes (in the November 3, 2022 special district meeting packet). The two copies carry the same entries with small wording differences; both are "submitted by Melissa Small".
Presiding
Charlene Lovett, introduced by the board chair as "our acting tonight, moderator Charlene Lovett" (0:01:56); the minutes call her "(moderator)". See flag 1.

Participants

Everyone heard or named on the recording. Names and wards follow the district's minutes, which list floor speakers in speaking order; where the dialogue file's label differs, the label is given in parentheses and the method footer explains the match. Identifications made by matching the minutes' order to the recording are marked "per minutes order".
NameRoleParticipation
Charlene LovettPresiding officer (acting moderator)Reviews the rules: "Debate will then be limited to two minutes per speaker." (0:03:37); takes the two minutes motions (0:05:34, 0:06:22), recognizes speakers, runs both secret ballots and announces "So six no, 53 yeses. So the amendment passes." (1:47:28); closes the meeting (2:27:19). One question about the tech center's growth that the dialogue file gives her (0:57:49) is a voter's (see Pam Ruest).
Frank SpragueSchool board chairIntroduces the board (0:01:56); presents Articles 4, 5 and 6, giving tax impacts of "$0.21 on the thousand" (2:20:09), "$0.04 on 1000" (2:23:25) and "$0.07 on the thousand" (2:25:54). The minutes credit him with moving the question to the second secret ballot. Transcribed "Chairman. French fries", "Mr. Greg", "Chair Greg" and "Sheriff Greg".
Heather WhitneySchool board vice chairRecognized on Article 1 (0:06:46); her remarks are not audible. The Second. on the February 4, 2021 minutes is credited on tape to "Vice chairwoman" (0:06:22).
Rob Lovett Jr.School board memberMoves to restrict reconsideration of Article 2 (2:16:18). Transcribed "Mr. Levitt".
Steven HorskySchool board memberIntroduced (0:01:56, "Steve Gorski"). Per the minutes he presented Article 3; the presenter at 2:17:03 is unlabeled in the dialogue file. The minutes also name him as seconder of the Article 2 motion.
Nicholas StoneSchool board memberRecognized by the moderator to begin the Article 2 presentation (0:07:43); the reading of the article at 0:08:15 is unlabeled in the dialogue file and is probably his.
Michael PetrinSchool board memberPer minutes order, the speaker at 0:42:22 (unlabeled in the dialogue file): "This is a one year budget right now for next year." with a half-time director, to be revisited as programs grow (0:42:57). Transcribed "Mike, Petra" at the introductions.
Joshua LambertSchool board memberIntroduced (0:01:56); no other speech.
Richard SeamanAssistant Superintendent for Finance, Operations and Human ResourcesPresents the budget worksheets (0:09:22 to 0:23:17): a total of $37,243,825, "reduction $541,581 1.43%" (0:16:32), and a projected total tax rate of $22.85 (0:21:29). Explains the default budget (0:21:57, 0:34:44, 0:48:32) and the guidance amendment's effect (1:58:06).
Michael TempestaSuperintendent, SAU 6Answers Crawford on the tech center (0:28:15) and the default budget (0:34:01); per minutes order, says he is speaking of positions, not people (1:10:28). Attribution of these rows is low to medium confidence.
Matt UptonDistrict counsel (Drummond Woodsum)On what the amendments bind (1:59:57): transfers within the budget, and "I'd have to do the research" on earmarking (2:00:25). Per the minutes he also explained the five-signature secret-ballot request and answered the earmarking and full-board questions; those answers (1:02:17, 1:04:10, 1:04:25) are unlabeled in the dialogue file.
Mary WoodmanSchool district clerkIntroduced (0:01:56, "Mary Goodman"); no speech attributed.
Candace CrawfordVoter, Ward 2Cites graduation and proficiency figures and asks "why is the Claremont School Board recommending a 2023 budget that is the same amount as the default budget" (0:26:28); asks how taxpayers will know how one-time money is spent (0:33:08). The minutes name her as seconder of the second amendment.
Jason BenwareVoter, Ward 1 (former board member)Moves both sets of 2021 minutes (0:05:43, 0:06:22); urges people to vote because of the bargaining articles (0:38:26); asks whether added money will be spent as voters intend: "If it's not, then it's pointless to put it back in." (1:06:53). Transcribed "Jason. Ben" and "Jason van Rooyen".
Gary MerchantVoter, Ward 2Per minutes order, likely the speaker at 0:39:49 on the board's priorities (unlabeled). Questions how reductions carry into the default budget (0:49:23); asks whether the administration must spend added funds as intended: "Even though we put the money back, it doesn't mean you have to spend it." (1:59:04). Transcribed "Gary Martin", "Mr. Martin".
Andy LafreniereVoter, Ward 3; vice chair, Claremont Development Authority (dialogue label: Andy)For the CDA, asks the board to "recognize the need for a full time director dedicated to programing and to growth at that facility" (0:46:28). Surname from the minutes.
Allen DamrenVoter, Ward 1Moves both amendments: $61,973 to the director line (0:52:07) and $87,290 for a full-time guidance counselor (1:52:07); "Counterproductive by cutting off the head" of the center (0:53:16). Transcribed "Helen Damron", "Mr. Darmon", "Mr. Dammann", "Mr. Danley". Whether he is the former assistant mayor of the same name is not established.
Matt BeanVoter, Ward 1; president of the paraprofessional association (dialogue label: McKean)"I'm awake until after midnight, going line by line through this budget." and lists line reductions (0:55:31); later argues the "unjust property tax system" cannot be fixed by cutting the schools (1:25:26, per minutes order); thanks the board as "the president of the paraprofessional association here in Claremont" (2:21:05). Name from the minutes; the dialogue label is an ASR rendering.
Pam RuestVoter (ward not recorded)Per minutes order, asks "what the growth at the Texan has been" over the director's tenure (0:57:49); the dialogue file labels this passage Charlene Lovett.
Scott PopeVoter, Ward 2; tech-center teacherPer minutes order (unlabeled in the dialogue file): "we've had a full time director for CTE as long as I can remember" (0:59:41); later, "I have an engineering class that may not be part of those numbers" and introductory classes are not reported as program enrollment (1:21:52).
Mimi RhinesVoter, Ward 1Per minutes order (unlabeled): asks whether the whole board or only the budget committee decides, and whether that vote would be public (1:03:42, 1:04:21); concern for four district-wide positions being cut (1:04:29).
Derek FerlandVoter, Ward 3 (dialogue label: Derek Bergman)"jeez, you know, I cut this board twice and it's still too short." (1:11:52); "I think this current budget is short sighted." (1:13:17); supports the guidance amendment, citing graduation rates (1:55:39). The minutes spell the first name both Derrick and Derek; the recording's self-introduction is transcribed "Derek Bergman".
Bonnie MilesVoter, Ward 2"This is really embarrassing" (1:14:43); reads from a Department of Education letter on the center's Perkins application dated May 2020 (1:15:38). She won a board seat in March 2022 (roster).
Kyle MessierVoter, Ward 1Per minutes order (unlabeled): on Claremont's image, "We're throwing the baby out with the backwater." (1:17:49).
Tom GallagherVoter, Ward 1New resident: "the will of the people is what's important, not the decisions that you made outside those doors." (1:20:04).
David MessierVoter, Ward 1 (dialogue label: David)Objects to "asking somebody who's a professional to work part time" without benefits (1:23:34). Surname from the minutes.
Tom ConnairVoter, Ward 2 (dialogue label: Tom Kinnear)Supports the amendment and recalls the constitutional duty: "education isn't just a nice thing to have" (1:49:52). Name from the minutes, which quote the same phrase.
UnidentifiedVotersThe seconder of the first minutes motion (Ward 2, 0:05:48, 0:06:20); the voter who moves the question before the first ballot (1:26:48); a Ward 1 voter confirming the combined amendments come to about $148,000 (1:57:41); the voter asking whether the amendments change the default budget (1:54:05). The "will of the people" remarks at 2:01:19 may be Gary Merchant's (the minutes summarize them under his name).
Melissa SmallSAU administrative assistantThanked for organizing the meeting (0:02:48); author of the minutes.

Agenda

The posted warrant, signed by the board on January 31, 2022, is the agenda for the first session. Article wording below is quoted from the warrant. The first session explains, debates and may amend articles; under RSA 40:13, VI every article goes to the March 8 ballot whether or not the session votes on it.

Warrant articles and their disposition, with the preliminary business
Taken upItemWarrant text and disposition
0:03:14Rules of procedureProponents five minutes, other speakers two; amendments in writing, signed by mover and seconder (0:04:27).
0:05:08Minutes of the 2021 district meetingsTwo votes on tape: minutes of the February 1, 2021 session (Benware; seconded by an unidentified Ward 2 voter; aye vote, 0:05:48) and of the February 4, 2021 session (Benware; "Second. Vice chairwoman."; aye vote, 0:06:22). The minutes record a single motion, on the 2/4/2021 minutes, seconded by Frank Sprague. See flag 2.
0:06:46Article 1: Election of school district officialsWarrant: "To elect a Moderator, District Clerk, and District Treasurer, each for a one (1) year term, and 2 School Board members, each for a three (3) year term." Whitney recognized; voice vote (0:07:42).
0:07:43Article 2: Operating budgetWarrant: operating budget "totaling THIRTY SEVEN MILLION TWO HUNDRED FORTY THREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE DOLLARS" ($37,243,825); default budget the same figure. Amendment 1 (Damren): add $61,973 to account 100.35.2410.110 for the tech-center director; secret ballot, 53 yes, 6 no (1:47:28). Amendment 2 (Damren, seconded by Crawford per the minutes): add $87,290 for a full-time tech-center guidance counselor; secret ballot, 48 yes, 9 no per the minutes (the transcript renders the announcement "48 to none", 2:15:28). Amended total $37,393,088 per the mover (1:52:07). Reconsideration restricted on Lovett Jr.'s motion, voice vote with "a couple of oppositions" (2:16:18, 2:16:39).
2:16:45Article 3: Secretaries association agreementCost items $22,723 (FY2023) and $16,936 (FY2024); raise and appropriate $22,723. Presented (per minutes) by Horsky; no speakers; voice vote (2:18:25).
2:18:38Article 4: Paraprofessional association agreementCost items $157,564, $137,709 and $109,379 (FY2023 to FY2025); raise and appropriate $157,564. Sprague: tax impact "$0.21 on the thousand", members accepted insurance concessions (2:20:09). Bean speaks in favor (2:21:05). Voice vote (2:21:57).
2:21:57Article 5: Maintenance workers agreementCost items $30,791 and $23,112; raise and appropriate $30,791. Sprague: "$0.04 on 1000" (2:23:25). Voice vote (2:24:27).
2:24:31Article 6: Administrators association agreementCost items $53,592, $55,055 and $51,736; raise and appropriate $53,592. Sprague: "$0.07 on the thousand"; the agreement lets the district add "I believe it's $5,000" to attract three new principals (2:26:00). Voice vote; meeting closed (2:27:19).

Discussion timeline

Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/12204 SchoolBoardDeliberative020922.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording.

Chronological topics. Quotations are as transcribed; bracketed words are corrections.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:01:56IntroductionsThe chair introduces the board, the clerk "and our acting tonight, moderator Charlene Lovett". How she came to preside is not on the recording, which begins after the call to order.MED
0:05:082021 minutes"the motion to approve the minutes of February 1st has been moved and seconded" (0:05:48); then "We have a motion to approve the last of the 2021 deliberative Session meeting held February 4th, 2021." (0:06:22).MED
0:09:22Budget presentationSeaman: debt service down $10,994; Bluff down $134,554 (a teaching position); the tech center down $181,000 in four parts: the vacant nurse position, the 0.5 guidance counselor, the vacant accounting position and the director reduced by 50% (0:12:48 to 0:13:45); district-wide down about $300,000 (0:14:18). Total "reduction $541,581 1.43%" (0:16:32).
0:17:03Revenue and tax rateAdequacy grants up about $1 million; the district assessment of $16,305,917 is "down by $732,000" (0:20:13); local rate $21.62 plus state $1.23 "gives us the total tax rate of $22.85" against $24.53 adopted last year: "We're seeing a reduction of $1.68." (0:21:52). Rates are estimates on the current assessed valuation.
0:21:57Default budgetSeaman: last year's budget less one-time expenditures; "We include any reductions that are included in this year's budget." (0:22:17); with no growth and no one-time items, "the default budget calculates that it can be the same as what the proposed budget is." (0:22:47).OBS
0:25:01Crawford's questionsGraduation rate "79%, compared to a rate of 91.8% for all of New Hampshire" (her figures, attributed to U.S. News); "why is the Claremont School Board recommending a 2023 budget that is the same amount as the default budget" (0:26:28). Seaman: the budget "doesn't need more money, that needs a different use of the money that we currently have" (0:30:28), with CARES money funding teachers and tutoring. Tempesta: "Now they've changed the rules in the default budget sort of moves with the regular budget." (0:34:23). Seaman: a yes vote "It's an affirmative vote for a continuation of the initiative." (0:37:04).OBS
0:38:26Why voteBenware: the bargaining articles mean "there are things that are affected by showing up to vote" (0:38:50).
0:40:50Tech center prioritiesA voter (probably Gary Merchant, per the minutes) says the budget shows the center "gets cut". Petrin (per the minutes): a 0.5 director fits next year; "This is a one year budget right now for next year." (0:42:57). Andy Lafreniere for the CDA asks for a full-time director (0:44:37).
0:48:32Reductions and the defaultSeaman: "if you are making any reductions in the proposed budget, those reductions have to carry into the default budget." Merchant: "that logic doesn't make sense to me" (0:49:23). Seaman: "There's confusion across the state on calculation of the default budget." (0:50:01).OBS
0:50:40Amendment 1: directorDamren moves "$61,973 to account" 100.35.2410.110 (0:52:07): cutting the director is "Counterproductive by cutting off the head" (0:53:16). Bean supports it and lists line reductions he found (0:55:31); "I'll sign a check right now." (0:57:07). No one speaks against when asked (0:57:49).
0:57:49Director historyPam Ruest (per the minutes) asks about growth under a full-time director; Scott Pope (per the minutes): "we've had a full time director for CTE as long as I can remember" (0:59:41) and enrollment followed the number of programs (1:00:32).
1:01:53Can an amendment earmark?Answer (counsel, per the minutes): the money "Gets added to the budget. And then the school board will decide whether it wants to put the money back in to restore a full time director" and "ultimately, that's a decision for the school board." (1:02:17). To Rhines: "It would actually be the end. The full school board." (1:04:10); "Any decision of the full school board would have to happen in public reaction." (1:04:25) [session].OBS
1:05:28Will it be spent?Benware: "However, there's nothing that makes them spend the money." (1:05:38); "If it's not, then it's pointless to put it back in." (1:06:53). Merchant asks for the position to be restored full time (1:08:51); the administration says it is speaking of positions, not people (1:10:28).OBS
1:11:52Voters for the amendmentFerland: "I think this current budget is short sighted." (1:13:17). Miles: "This is really embarrassing" (1:14:43), reading the state's Perkins approval letter (1:15:38). Kyle Messier on the city's image (1:17:27). Gallagher: "If we vote and pass it and you don't execute that desire, everyone here will lose faith in all of you." (1:20:32). Pope on unreported introductory classes (1:21:52). David Messier on part-time work without benefits (1:23:34). Bean: "we have to operate under an unjust property tax system" (1:25:26).
1:26:48First secret ballotThe question is moved and seconded; "You're going to need five voters to sign." (1:27:08); signatures gathered; the moderator explains the ballot procedure (1:29:23). Result: "So six no, 53 yeses. So the amendment passes." (1:47:28).POS
1:48:11ConnairNew Hampshire spends "the least amount on education by the state"; the constitutional language means "education isn't just a nice thing to have" (1:49:52).
1:52:07Amendment 2: guidanceDamren: "To add $87,290 to account" for a full-time guidance counselor at the center, bringing the total to $37,393,088. A voter asks whether the amendments change the default budget (1:54:05); the answer is not audible (the minutes record Sprague clarifying that they do not). Seaman: the position was shared with Unity, so the amendment is "increasing from the current 0.5 to a 1.0 guidance counselor for next year." (1:58:35).
1:59:04TransfersMerchant: "Even though we put the money back, it doesn't mean you have to spend it." and asks whether the administration can move it to another line (1:59:31). Counsel: "It's a process for the school board to." transfer within the budget; "They hold a public hearing and" discuss the movement (2:00:19); on earmarking, "I'd have to do the research" (2:00:25). A voter: "please listen to the local people." (2:01:48).OBS
2:02:13Second secret ballotQuestion moved (Sprague per the minutes); five signatures (2:02:39); result announced "So the amendment passed 48 to none." (2:15:28), which the minutes record as 48 yes, 9 no.POS
2:16:14Restrict reconsiderationLovett Jr.: "I'd like to make a motion that we restrict reconsideration of war." [of Article 2]; voice vote, "There's a couple of oppositions" (2:16:39). The minutes instead record a motion "to approve Article 2, as amended".MED
2:16:45Bargaining articlesArticles 3 to 6 presented and passed on voice votes. Sprague presents three of them: "that's one of the benefits of of being retired" (2:22:18).OBS

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. A deliberative session is the first session of the annual school district meeting: the voters are the body, so school-board rules (public comment periods, nonpublic sessions, board quorum) do not apply. The governing law is RSA 40:13 and the provisions it incorporates, the statutes on district officers, and RSA 91-A as it reaches "any legislative body" of a school district. Each flag names the rule as it read on February 9, 2022, or is labeled an observation.

MEDIUM An acting moderator presided, and no record shows how she was chosen

The board chair introduces "our acting tonight, moderator Charlene Lovett" (0:01:56), and she presides throughout. The minutes call her "(moderator)" without saying how she came to preside. The district elects its moderator on the official ballot (Article 1 of this warrant). When the moderator is absent, RSA 197:20 has the district clerk "act as moderator of any meeting until a moderator pro tempore shall be chosen"; where the office is vacant, RSA 671:33, III has the clerk serve as moderator or appoint a moderator pro tempore. RSA 197:26 bars the school board from filling a moderator vacancy. The clerk, Mary Woodman, was present (0:01:56), but neither route appears in the minutes, and the recording begins after the call to order, so a choice made in the first minute would not be on tape. This page applies MEDIUM rather than the HIGH grade the project gave the same pattern at the 2024 session, because there the whole opening was on record and here it is not: the documents leave a gap rather than proving an irregularity. The district's Rules of Procedure sheet for this session, which might explain the arrangement, was not located.

Sources: RSA 197:20 (clerk acts as moderator until a moderator pro tempore is chosen; 1963, 120:5); RSA 671:33, III (moderator vacancy; source note ends 2021, 91:318, eff. July 1, 2021); RSA 197:26 (board fills vacancies "except that of moderator"); RSA 197:19 (district moderator has a town moderator's powers)

MEDIUM The minutes differ from the recording on three votes

(1) The recording shows two approvals of 2021 minutes, the February 1 session (seconded by a Ward 2 voter, 0:05:48) and the February 4 session (seconded by "Vice chairwoman", 0:06:22); both copies of the minutes record one motion, on the "2/4/2021" minutes, "seconded by Frank Sprague". (2) The minutes record a "Motion by Rob Lovett seconded by Steven Horsky to approve Article 2, as amended"; on the recording Lovett Jr. moves to "restrict reconsideration" of Article 2 (2:16:18), a different motion with a different effect under RSA 40:10, and it carried with audible opposition (2:16:39). The restriction itself is nowhere in the minutes. (3) The second ballot: the transcript renders the announcement "48 to none" (2:15:28) and the minutes give 48 yes, 9 no; the minutes are probably right (the announcement opens with a garbled reference to nine), but the record should not leave a reader to reconcile them. RSA 197:20 requires the clerk to "keep a true record of all the doings of each meeting", and RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to show the names of persons making and seconding motions. Both copies are "submitted by Melissa Small", the SAU administrative assistant, not the clerk.

Sources: RSA 197:20 (clerk keeps a true record); RSA 91-A:2, II (2019 codification; mover and seconder in minutes from 2018, 244:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2019); RSA 40:10 (restriction of reconsideration; 1996, 64:1); minutes, July 2022 copy; minutes, November 2022 copy

OBSERVATION What the voters' amendments bind: the board keeps transfer authority, and no hearing is required to use it

Voters were told, accurately, that money added to a line "Gets added to the budget" and that "ultimately, that's a decision for the school board" (1:02:17). Several voters said an amendment is pointless unless the money is spent as intended (1:05:38, 1:59:04). RSA 32:10 lets the governing body transfer an unexpended balance from one appropriation to another during the year, provided the total is not exceeded and records let any citizen trace the transfers; only special warrant articles and capital reserve appropriations are locked to their purpose. So the two amendments, which change the operating budget's line items, do not oblige the board to fill a full-time director or counselor position. Counsel also said that for a transfer the board would "hold a public hearing" (2:00:19); RSA 32:10 contains no hearing requirement, so any hearing would come from district practice or policy, not the statute. Whether the added money was in fact used for the two positions is a question for the FY2023 records.

Sources: RSA 32:10, I(a)-(d) and II (source note ends 2017, 127:4, eff. Aug. 15, 2017; read 2026-10-03)

OBSERVATION The default budget equals the proposed budget to the dollar; the explanation given is broader than the statute, and the default budget form was not located

The warrant sets both the operating budget and the default budget at $37,243,825. The business administrator explained that "We include any reductions that are included in this year's budget" (0:22:17) and that "if you are making any reductions in the proposed budget, those reductions have to carry into the default budget" (0:48:32). RSA 40:13, IX(b) defines the default budget as the prior year's operating-budget appropriations, adjusted for debt service, contracts and obligations previously incurred or mandated by law, and reduced by one-time expenditures "and by salaries and benefits of positions that have been eliminated in the proposed budget". Eliminated positions (such as the vacant nurse, guidance and accounting positions) therefore come out of the default; the statute does not say that every other reduction does. RSA 40:13, XI(a) requires a default budget form identifying each change by account code with reasons, which would show whether the two figures were built line by line. That form was not located. The warrant, which must be posted with the budgets "on or before the last Monday in January" (RSA 40:13, II-a), is signed January 31, 2022, the last Monday; its posting date is not in the record.

Sources: RSA 40:13, II-a, IX(b) and XI(a) (last amended 2019, 192:2, eff. July 10, 2019); 2022 CL Warrant.pdf

OBSERVATION Voice votes to move articles to the ballot have no legal effect, and the minutes present them as decisions

The moderator calls "All those in favor of the article as written" on Articles 1 and 3 to 6 (0:07:36, 2:18:25, 2:21:57, 2:24:27, 2:27:19), and the minutes record each as "Motion passed via voice vote". Under RSA 40:13, VI "All warrant articles shall be placed on the official ballot for a final vote, including warrant articles as amended by the first session", so these votes neither advance nor block anything. The practice is common and harmless, but a reader of the minutes could take an article that passed on February 9 to have been adopted; the binding votes were on the March 8 ballot.

Sources: RSA 40:13, IV and VI (first session explains, debates and may amend; all articles go to the ballot)

POSITIVE Both amendments were decided by secret ballot on written requests, counted at the meeting and announced with tallies

Before each vote the meeting was told "You're going to need five voters to sign." (1:27:08), signatures were collected, the moderator explained the procedure (1:29:23), ballots were cast at the front, counted, and the result announced with the numbers (1:47:28, 2:15:28); the minutes name the people who assisted with the count. RSA 40:4-a requires the moderator to conduct a vote by secret yes-no ballot when five voters present request it in writing before the vote, and RSA 40:13, IV makes that section govern the first session. The meeting followed the statute and gave voters exact tallies rather than a declared voice vote.

Sources: RSA 40:4-a (secret ballot on written request of 5 voters; 2006, 117:1); RSA 40:13, IV

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page