Participants
Everyone heard or addressed on the recording. Names follow the agenda masthead. No minutes of this meeting were found, so attendance and attributions rest on the recording and the dialogue file; where the file's attribution is weak it is said so. Unidentified voices stay unidentified.
| Name | Role | Participation |
|---|
| Arlene Hawkins | Chair, SAU 6 Board (Claremont member) | Presides. Moves the superintendent's 3% raise (0:03:57) and the assistant superintendent's salary adjustment, first as a "$7,000 salary bonus" and then, withdrawn and restated, as a readjustment "to achieve parity" (0:04:47, 0:05:07). Opens and closes the hearing (0:05:47, 1:01:22). Asks for the percentage change and is told it is not known (0:39:34). Says "the budget increase is actually a decrease" (0:39:04). Asks whether the superintendent has plans for the fund balance (0:56:38). |
| Candace Crawford | Member (Claremont) | Adds the two-year term to the superintendent motion (0:04:23). Says "I would be uncomfortable giving up that point six director today." (0:22:05). Proposes raising the budget to keep the position (0:34:39, 0:34:58). Moves the FY26 budget, first in words (1:02:03) and then at "$2,755,723" (1:03:48). Seconds adjournment (1:08:49). |
| Heather Whitney | Member (Claremont; chair of the Claremont School Board) | Seconds the nonpublic motion (0:03:09) and the superintendent motion (0:04:12). Opposes cutting the curriculum director: "my assessment of the failures of the district have been the failures of leadership almost exclusively" (0:12:59); "we also had a massive failure in our district of not even having a curriculum in place" (0:13:29). Asks the administration to seek Title I funding for the position (0:33:33). Seconds the fund-balance motion (1:04:52, 1:05:18). |
| Frank Sprague | Member (Claremont) | Supports the administration's proposal (0:11:20) and calls it "a means to the end of what you would like to see" (0:16:54). Questions a FY25 wage figure for the assistant superintendent's administrative assistant: "It was actually 47,000 was the actual wage that we approved last year on that, not 65." (0:39:53). Asks the business administrator to explain the health-plan contributions "for the sake of the public hearing" (0:53:11). Seconds adjournment (1:08:49). |
| Whitney Skillen | Member (Claremont) | Agrees with keeping the curriculum director (0:22:11); asks about a "67000 increase in the HR salaries" (0:23:02). Moves the $160,000 fund-balance motion (1:04:17) and the adoption of Policy KE (1:06:33). The dialogue file names her by elimination and role, with medium-high confidence. |
| Michael Petrin | Member (Claremont) | Notes the packet says $50,000 of Title I money will cover part of the curriculum position (0:31:51); raises using the SAU fund balance (0:48:54); proposes "160 of the fund balance to offset" (0:55:50). The dialogue file also gives him the Unity withdrawal update (1:07:16), which Ruggeri delivered at earlier meetings; that attribution is not settled. |
| Rocco Ruggeri | Vice chair (Unity member) | Answers the roll (0:00:41). No other speech is attributed to him. The voice asking which meeting the auditors will attend (1:08:40) is unidentified; he is a candidate, as is he for the Unity update. |
| Marjorie Erickson, Shannon Popescu, Kelly Simpson, Atonya Hart, Bonnie Miles | Members | Absent on the transcribed roll (no answer follows their names, 0:00:41). No minutes confirm it. |
| Noelle Kronberg | SAU 6 School Board clerk | Reads the roll (0:00:41) and the nonpublic roll-call vote (0:03:15, 0:03:24); asked to record the fund-balance motion, says "Yes, but I couldn't. It was 100." (1:04:57). |
| Chris Pratt | Superintendent of Schools, SAU 6 | Explains dropping the curriculum director: "myself and Assistant Superintendent Kosky [Koski] will divide and conquer" and "we do want to keep the cuts as far away from we can from the from the classrooms" (0:09:40, 0:10:42). Explains the HR coordinator funding (0:23:27) and the administrative assistant's salary (0:40:38). "I don't have any proposals in regards to the. Fund balance." (0:56:52). |
| Mike Koski | Assistant Superintendent (Michael Koski on the agenda) | The curriculum director is "point four as a coach and point six as a curriculum director" with the coaching share from "the title grant" (0:20:15, 0:20:28); outlines the role (0:26:00). Asks the clerk to change the fund-balance motion's "title one funds" to "title funds" (1:05:10). The dialogue file identifies him by role, with no direct name anchor. |
| Mary Henry | Business Administrator, SAU 6 | Presents version 3: the administration will "take out of our budget, roughly $197,000", cutting the finance director to part time and "not having a curriculum coordinator" (0:08:35, 0:09:05). Prices restoring the position at "anywhere from 145,000 to 150,000" (0:36:00). On the percentage: "I would have to figure that out because I don't know." (0:39:43). Gives the fund balance as "a little over probably 350,000" (0:49:34). Produces the adopted figure: "Are you ready. 2,755,000. Make it even $723." (1:03:14). |
| Unidentified | Board members and voices away from the microphone | 17 of 489 rows: an agenda and minutes mover recognized only as Whitney with two Whitneys seated (0:01:47 to 0:02:16), a seconder (0:02:21), a roll-call answer (0:03:21), crosstalk while the budget figure was read back (1:03:19 to 1:03:40), and the auditor-meeting question (1:08:40). |
Agenda
Items from SAU6 Budget Public Hearing agenda 12.12.24.docx.pdf, which has two parts (a budget public hearing, then a regular meeting); agenda wording is quoted from that document. Dispositions from the recording; no minutes of this meeting were found.
| Taken up | Item | Agenda text / disposition |
|---|
| 0:00:03 | I. Call to order / Pledge; II.a Roll call | Called to order At 630 (0:00:03); pledge (0:00:15); roll (0:00:41). Seven answers. |
| 0:01:04 | II.b Agenda amendments and approval | The chair adds under other business a Unity update and confirmation of the auditors' February meeting (0:01:13). An unidentified member moves "to accept the agenda, as amended" (0:01:55); the chair's row carries the second (0:01:59). No vote is heard; the chair moves to the minutes. |
| 0:01:59 | Minutes of November 14 and November 21 (agenda part 2, II) | The agenda's hearing section instead carries a leftover item, "Minutes of the 9.12.24 meeting?", with a scripted amendment about the "Global review of actual to budgeted 24-25 budget". The board approved the November 14 minutes (motion 0:02:16, second 0:02:21, voice vote 0:02:23) and the November 21 minutes "as presented" (motion by Whitney 0:02:37, second 0:02:42, ayes 0:02:47). See the November 21 page. |
| 0:02:48 | III. Non-public meeting session RSA 91-A:3 | Agenda: "I’d like to move to enter into a non-public meeting session under RSA91-A:3.II (a)", followed by the text of II(a) and scripted lines for a roll call to return and "Motion to seal the minutes? Duration?". As spoken, the motion cites "RSA 91. Dash a colon three a." (0:02:48); Whitney seconds (0:03:09); roll-call vote, each answer Yes. (0:03:15 to 0:03:24). No return motion, roll call or seal vote is on the recording. See flag 2. |
| 0:03:57 | Not on the agenda: superintendent and assistant superintendent compensation | Motion by the chair "to approve the 3% salary increase for the superintendent" (0:03:57), Whitney second (0:04:12), Crawford adds "that it's a two year" (0:04:23); restated "for a two year contract? So for this year, it's 3% increase. And to renew your contract for two years." (0:04:26); voice vote, no count (0:04:40). Then a motion for "a $7,000 salary bonus for Assistant superintendent" (0:04:47), corrected by members to parity, withdrawn and restated without a dollar figure (0:05:07); voice vote, "Motion passes." (0:05:40, 0:05:47). See flag 3. |
| 0:06:40 | IV. Presentation of Fiscal Year 2026 Budget (Exhibit A) | Agenda: "Ms Henry will present the proposed SAU6 budget for FY2025-26." Henry presents version 3 inside the hearing (0:07:17 to 1:00:33). |
| 0:05:47 | V. Public Hearing on the Proposed FY 2025-26 SAU6 Budget; Closing of Public Hearing | Opened at 0:05:47; closed at 1:01:22 ("So the public hearing is now closed. Thank you for the members of the public for for watching"). No member of the public spoke or was present to speak (1:01:42). All discussion was among board members and staff. See flag 4. |
| Not done | Part 2, I. Call to order; II. Roll call | The agenda schedules a second call to order and roll for the regular meeting; the chair moved straight on ("Now we'll move back into the continuation of our school board meeting", 1:01:22). |
| 1:01:42 | Part 2, III. Citizens Comments | "Seeing no citizens in our audience, we'll move on to our next order of business". |
| 1:01:42 | Part 2, IV.A Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Approval (Action) | Crawford moves version 3 with the compensation changes and the curriculum position restored, "offset by retained funds" (1:02:03, 1:02:44); Henry gives "2,755,000. Make it even $723." (1:03:14); restated motion "to approve the budget. For fiscal year 26 of $2,755,723." (1:03:48); "Second discussion. All those in favor?" (1:04:00); "Aye, aye." (1:04:05); "Opposed? One. And any abstentions. Okay." (1:04:06). Then Skillen's motion "to use $160,000 of the fund balance" for the curriculum director if Title funds cannot cover it (1:04:17), Whitney second (1:04:52), voice vote (1:06:06). |
| 1:06:16 | Part 2, IV.B Policy KE, second read (Exhibit B) | Skillen moves adoption "as presented with a tiny revision", deleting a stray period (1:06:33); second and voice vote in the chair's row (1:06:54). |
| 1:06:54 | Other business (added): Unity update; auditors | Unity's withdrawal report: "The state board reviewed it last month and approved it." (1:07:16). Auditors to present at the February 13 meeting at 6:45 (1:08:10 to 1:08:47). |
| 1:08:49 | Part 2, V. Adjournment | Moved and seconded by Crawford and Sprague as named by the chair; ayes (1:09:02). |
Discussion timeline
Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/16213 SAU6121224.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording.
| Time | Topic | What was said | Flags |
|---|
| 0:00:03 | Opening, agenda, minutes | Roll (0:00:41); the chair adds "a unity update" and confirmation of the auditors for February (0:01:13, 0:01:36); minutes of November 14 and 21 approved (0:01:59 to 0:02:48). | |
| 0:02:48 | Nonpublic session | "I would like to present a motion that we move into a nonpublic meeting session under RSA 91. Dash a colon three a." Roll-call vote (0:03:15, 0:03:24). The chair: "For those watching, the regular meeting will continue after the nonpublic session." (0:03:34). The recording resumes 23 seconds later with a motion already in hand. | MEDIUM |
| 0:03:57 | Superintendent raise and contract; assistant superintendent parity | The chair: "I would like to propose the motion that we increase the superintendent's salary to approve the 3% salary increase for the superintendent." Crawford: "You want to add that it's a two year." (0:04:23). Voice vote (0:04:40). Assistant superintendent: "a $7,000 salary bonus" (0:04:47); Whitney: "Oh, not a bonus." (0:04:58); Crawford: "It's a parody [parity]." (0:05:04); restated as "Readjust the assistant superintendents salary to achieve parity with other districts" (0:05:07); voice vote (0:05:40). | OBSERVATION |
| 0:05:47 | Hearing opened; version 3 | The chair: members "have been sending their questions about the post budget to the superintendent and the business administrator" (0:06:40). Henry: with the adjustments "The bottom line changes to still under budget of $8,201.55." (0:07:17); "we had version two and unfortunately we couldn't have a meeting for version two" (0:08:08). | OBSERVATION |
| 0:08:35 | The $197,000 cut | Henry: "Superintendent Pratt was very adamant about that, that we are going to take out of our budget, roughly $197,000"; the finance director to part time "which cuts out a little around $50,000" and "not having a curriculum coordinator" (0:09:05). Pratt: he and the assistant superintendent would divide curriculum oversight (0:09:40, 0:10:07); "is it a perfect solution? No" (0:10:42). | |
| 0:11:20 | Debate on the curriculum director | Sprague supports the cut (0:11:20, 0:12:52). Whitney opposes it (0:12:59 to 0:14:55): "So I'm opposed to reduction." Crawford: "I would be uncomfortable giving up that point six director today." (0:22:05). Skillen: "I don't think it's worth it." (0:22:11). Koski on the current split and the coaching vacancy (0:20:15, 0:26:00). Whitney: "We're short a full FTE for a curriculum coach." (0:30:16). | POSITIVE |
| 0:23:02 | HR coordinator salary | Skillen asks about "a 67000 increase in the HR salaries" (0:23:02). Pratt: moving part of the curriculum director into Title I "freed up the money for us to hire the HR assistant without additional costs to the district" (0:23:27). | |
| 0:31:51 | Title I funding of the position | Petrin reads from the packet summary that "an additional 50,000 will come from title one" (0:31:51). Koski: "When I started our curriculum director was Esser funded." (0:32:07). Whitney asks the administration to look at "every avenue, to have the curriculum coordinator position funded by title one grant money" (0:33:33). | |
| 0:35:23 | Pricing the restored position | The chair: "the majority of the board is in the position of liking the movement" (0:35:23). Henry: "anywhere from 145,000 to 150,000, because that would include benefits" (0:36:00). Finance director: "It's one now. It would go to point eight next year" (0:37:03). | |
| 0:39:04 | "Actually a decrease"; the percentage nobody had | The chair: "So right now the budget increase is actually a decrease." Then: "how would that change the bottom line? I know what you said by numbers, but what about percent?" (0:39:34). Henry: "I would have to figure that out because I don't know." (0:39:43). | OBSERVATION |
| 0:39:49 | Administrative assistant's wage base | Sprague: "The FY 25 wages is 65,000. It was actually 47,000 was the actual wage that we approved last year". Pratt: the employee moved positions and the difference is offset "to use grant money" (0:40:38, 0:41:13). Crawford and the chair link it to indirect-cost revenue (0:44:09, 0:44:25). | |
| 0:45:56 | Indirect costs | Henry: the rate is 3.1% for fiscal 2025 and 2.7% for fiscal 2024 grants (0:45:56); "we have not been getting indirect costs into the SA. You we have claimed them, but they either staying in Claremont or we don't claim them all the time. It's been inconsistent" (0:47:37). | |
| 0:48:54 | SAU fund balance | Petrin asks about using it. Henry: "there's no use of the fund balance here in your fund balance is a little over probably 350,000. Oh good. Again that's give or take because we haven't been audited on some of the years. But the last audit we had 210." (0:49:34). A board vote restricting it binds it to that purpose (0:50:40). | OBSERVATION |
| 0:51:17 | Health insurance and retirement | Health insurance up "roughly $60,000"; plan increases 7.7%, 3.02% and 2.42%; dental 10% (0:51:17, 0:52:01, 0:52:21). "It went from 3.53 [13.53] to 12.75, which gave us a decrease of $15,841" (the packet summary reads 13.53% to 12.75%) (0:52:45). Employee contributions 15% on the high plan, 5% on the others (0:53:22). | |
| 0:55:50 | Fund balance to offset | Petrin: "I would support using 160 of the fund balance to offset." Pratt: "I don't have any proposals in regards to the. Fund balance." (0:56:52). Whitney: "So by retaining we would have a neutral tax act." (0:58:42). | |
| 0:59:52 | Hearing closed | Crawford: "Do you have a public hearing that you have to open or." (0:59:55). The chair finds the clerk's $3,600 line (1:00:43, 1:01:08) and closes the hearing (1:01:22). "Seeing no citizens in our audience" (1:01:42). | OBSERVATION |
| 1:02:03 | FY26 SAU budget adopted | Crawford's motion names no figure (1:02:03); Sprague: "We have to make a motion on a number." (1:03:10); Henry: "Are you ready. 2,755,000. Make it even $723." (1:03:14); the figure is read back in fragments (1:03:25 to 1:03:35). Restated motion at $2,755,723 (1:03:48); "Opposed? One." (1:04:06). | MEDIUM OBSERVATION |
| 1:04:17 | $160,000 of fund balance | Skillen moves it, first naming the "financial director position" and correcting to curriculum director (1:04:17); the clerk could not catch the figure (1:04:57); "160. Right. We wanted a little cushion." (1:05:02). Koski: "Noel, can you just make that title funds instead of title one funds? Okay. Just gives more flexibility." (1:05:10). Henry: "The board's fund balance stays within the board." (1:05:46). Voice vote (1:06:06). | OBSERVATION |
| 1:06:16 | Policy KE adopted | Second read; adopted with a punctuation correction (1:06:33, 1:06:54). | |
| 1:07:16 | Unity withdrawal | "So unity submitted its planning committee. Withdrawal document to the state for review. The state board reviewed it last month and approved it." It is "really just a formality where they just make sure all the boxes are checked as my understanding"; the next step is Unity's March meeting (1:07:31). | OBSERVATION |
| 1:08:10 | Auditors in February; adjournment | Auditors to present at the February 13 meeting (1:08:47); adjournment (1:08:49, 1:09:02). | |
Items flagged for review
These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each one names the rule it rests on, as that rule read on December 12, 2024, or is labeled an observation where no verified rule applies.
MEDIUM No minutes of the meeting that adopted the SAU budget and the superintendent's contract terms have been published; they were approved four months later
RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes "open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting", which made December 19, 2024 the deadline. No minutes of this meeting were found in the SAU 6 packet folders or the Claremont Meeting Minutes share. The next SAU 6 packet folder that exists, 6. SAU6 6.12.25, holds the April 10, 2025 draft minutes, which record: "Heather Whitney made a motion to approve the minutes from 12.12.24 as presented, Michael Petrin seconded the motion". So minutes were written and approved 119 days after the meeting, but the text was not published with them. Because of that gap the public record of this meeting is the recording alone: it does not show who seconded the budget motion (the chair's own row carries "Second discussion", 1:04:00), who cast the one recorded No (1:04:06), or who attended. RSA 91-A:2, II also requires the minutes to record "the names of the members who made or seconded each motion". Graded MEDIUM under the project's severity rule, not HIGH, because the meeting was noticed and packeted and the minutes demonstrably exist; the defect is that they were never made available.
Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2024 codification; minutes within five business days; movers and seconders); 4.10.25 DRAFT SAU6 Board Meeting Minutes (approval of the 12.12.24 minutes)
MEDIUM The nonpublic motion as spoken named no exemption paragraph, and no return, seal vote or nonpublic minutes are in the record
The posted agenda scripts a motion under "RSA91-A:3.II (a)" and quotes II(a), the compensation and discipline exemption. As spoken, the chair moved "under RSA 91. Dash a colon three a." (0:02:48), which names section 3 but not paragraph II; RSA 91-A:3, I(b) requires the motion to "state on its face the specific exemption under paragraph II", and the roll-call vote was taken (0:03:15 to 0:03:24). The recording then jumps: the chair announces the session at 0:03:34 and the next motion, a raise for the superintendent, comes at 0:03:57, 23 recording-seconds later. The agenda's scripted return motion, roll call and "Motion to seal the minutes? Duration?" do not occur on tape. RSA 91-A:3, III requires minutes of a nonpublic session to be publicly disclosed within 72 hours unless a two-thirds recorded vote taken in public session seals them. No nonpublic minutes and no record of a seal vote were found, and the meeting's own minutes are unpublished (flag 1). The recording cannot show what happened during the gap; the agenda's script and the 23-second splice are consistent with a return vote that was not recorded. Graded MEDIUM: the exemption claimed on the agenda fits the compensation decisions that followed, and the gap is in documentation, not shown misuse.
Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b), II(a), III (motion, exemption, disclosure of nonpublic minutes); SAU6 Budget Public Hearing agenda 12.12.24, item III
OBSERVATION The superintendent's raise and two-year contract renewal, and the assistant superintendent's salary adjustment, were voted with no agenda item, no dollar amounts and no count
The agenda's only compensation item is the nonpublic session. Immediately after it the chair moved "the 3% salary increase for the superintendent" (0:03:57); Crawford added the term and the chair restated it as "to renew your contract for two years" (0:04:26). The assistant superintendent motion began as "a $7,000 salary bonus" and was withdrawn and restated as a readjustment "to achieve parity with other districts" with no figure (0:04:47, 0:05:07); the $7,000 reappears only inside the later budget motion (1:02:03). Neither salary, nor the base the 3% applies to, nor the contract's other terms were stated in public, both votes were voice votes with no count, and no executed contract was found in any SAU 6 folder. The SAU board does hold this power: RSA 194-C:5, III says the board "shall fix the salaries of all school administrative unit personnel". Voting in public session after the nonpublic discussion is the right sequence. The concern is what a member of the public could learn from the notice and the record, which is very little; no statute located for this date requires an agenda item before a regular meeting acts.
Sources: RSA 194-C:5, III (SAU board fixes salaries); SAU6 Budget Public Hearing agenda 12.12.24
OBSERVATION The adopted budget total appears in no packet document, and no total or percentage increase was stated at the hearing
The packet folder was created at 3:59 p.m. Eastern on the day of the meeting, with the agenda at 4:01 and version 3 at 4:03, some two and a half hours before the hearing. Version 3 totals $2,597,521.45 gross against the FY2025 budget of $2,489,151.00, an increase of $108,370.45 (4.35%), but its printed headline is "Total Budget Increase ($16,629.55) Total Budget % Increase -0.67%", a figure net of $125,000 of grant revenue compared with an FY2025 total carrying no revenue offset. The chair repeated the sheet's message ("the budget increase is actually a decrease", 0:39:04) and then asked for the percentage, which the business administrator could not give (0:39:34, 0:39:43). The amount adopted, $2,755,723, was produced orally (1:03:14); it is $266,572 (10.71%) above the FY2025 budget and is in none of the packet's documents. No member of the public attended (1:01:42). No statute located requires an SAU budget hearing or prescribes its form (RSA 32:5's hearing rules govern districts, and RSA 194-C:9 governs SAU apportionment), so this is an observation; the hearing was the board's own commitment on its agenda, and the record shows the public could not have known what the board was about to adopt.
Sources: SAU6 FY26 Proposed Budget V3 (Drive createdTime 2024-12-12, 21:03 UTC); SAU FY26 Proposed Budget V2; RSA 194-C:9, I (SAU budget apportionment)
OBSERVATION Up to $160,000 of an unaudited fund balance was committed, and staff altered the motion's wording after the second
The business administrator described the SAU fund balance as "a little over probably 350,000", adding "that's give or take because we haven't been audited on some of the years. But the last audit we had 210." (0:49:34). The board then voted to use "$160,000 of the fund balance" for the curriculum director if "that position cannot be covered with title one funds" (1:04:17). After the second, the assistant superintendent asked the clerk to "make that title funds instead of title one funds" (1:05:10); the clerk agreed and the vote followed without the mover restating the motion. The change widens the condition. SAU 6's audits were years behind at this date (fiscal 2021 was presented in April 2025), so the balance being drawn on was an estimate. No rule is cited: no statute was located for this date governing an SAU's use of its own surplus, and the motion's own condition, Title funding first, is prudent.
Sources: the recording at the times shown; 4.10.25 DRAFT SAU6 Board Meeting Minutes (fiscal 2021 audit presented)
OBSERVATION The board adopted an SAU budget, apportioned to both districts, with one of Unity's five members present, as Unity's withdrawal advanced
Only Rocco Ruggeri answered the roll for Unity (0:00:41). The board was told Unity's withdrawal plan had been reviewed and approved by the state board and awaited Unity's March vote (1:07:16, 1:07:31). RSA 194-C:9, I apportions SAU costs half on average membership and half on equalized valuation, and RSA 194-C:8 provides weighted voting by pupils, used only "upon the demand of a majority of the members of any board present and voting"; no demand was made. Seven of twelve members made a quorum, so the vote was valid. The observation is that the budget Unity will pay a share of was adopted with Unity almost absent, and the single recorded No cannot be attributed to anyone (flag 1).
Sources: RSA 194-C:9, I (apportionment); RSA 194-C:8 (weighted votes on demand); RSA 194-C:2, IV (withdrawal from an SAU)
POSITIVE A proposed cut was debated on its merits in public, with the administration's reasons and the members' objections both on the record
The administration explained its proposal to drop the curriculum director's SAU-funded share and why ("we do want to keep the cuts as far away from we can from the from the classrooms", 0:10:42). Members disagreed openly with the superintendent and with each other (0:11:20 to 0:22:11), questioned how the position is funded between the SAU budget and Title grants (0:20:15 to 0:34:02), priced the alternative (0:36:00), and tied the decision to a stated offset. Sprague also pressed a specific wage discrepancy in public (0:39:53). Deliberation of this kind on the budget itself, rather than consensus reached off the record, exceeds what any statute requires.
Sources: the recording at the times shown
Appendix: source files
Official and public sources
Project files
Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.
Dialogue/16213 SAU6121224.mp4.CSV (489 attributed rows; the basis of this page)Input/Videos/16213 SAU6121224.mp4Input/Transcripts/16213 SAU6121224.mp4.jsonInput/SupportingDocuments/MAP.md, section 247
Laws and rules cited on this page
- RSA 91-A:2, II, 2024 codification (source note ends 2023, 188:1): minutes within five business days; movers and seconders
- RSA 91-A:3, I(b), II(a), III (2023, 189:1, eff. Oct. 3, 2023): nonpublic motion, compensation exemption, disclosure or sealing of nonpublic minutes
- RSA 194-C:5, III (1996, 298:3): SAU board fixes salaries of SAU personnel
- RSA 194-C:8 (1996, 298:3): weighted votes on demand of a majority
- RSA 194-C:9, I (2003, 279:1): SAU budget apportionment
- RSA 194-C:2, IV (2010, 5:1): withdrawal from an SAU