Claremont School Board, January 17, 2024

Regular meeting of the Claremont School Board, the first attended by Interim Superintendent Chris Pratt, at which the board approved the FY25 operating budget of $36,117,406.87 and voted to buy a modular classroom for The Academy with ESSER funds. Built from the dialogue transcript, the posted agenda, the packet and the approved minutes. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (Claremont School District, SAU 6)
Date
Wednesday, January 17, 2024
Start time
6:30 p.m. scheduled (agenda). Called to order at 0:00:01 of the recording. The approved minutes record adjournment at 8:59 p.m.; the recording runs 2:29:49, which fits a 6:30 start. No nonpublic session.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center (agenda and minutes)
Recording
Cablecast: Claremont School Board 1/17/24 (runs 2:29:49 by the last transcript row; the Cablecast API refused this environment, so the observed extent is taken from the transcript)
Minutes
2. approved minutes CSB meeting 1.17.24.pdf; draft: draft minutes CSB meeting 1.17.24 (1).pdf (filed in the 2/21/24 packet; see flag 1)
Board composition
Seven members; six present (Frank Sprague absent, ill). Jennifer Gallagher arrived at 6:39 p.m. per the minutes.

Participants

Everyone in the record. Names and attendance follow the approved minutes; where the dialogue file's label differs, both are given. Rows in the dialogue file are attributed by voice clustering and can be wrong.
NameRoleParticipation
Heather WhitneyChairPresides throughout; welcomes the interim superintendent; seconds Candace Crawford's ESSER modular motion herself (1:31:29); introduces the finance subcommittee's report; proposes the extra pre-deliberative session (2:25:34).
Frank SpragueVice chair; finance subcommittee chairAbsent (minutes). The chair says he “was unable to attend due to illness this evening” (1:51:20).
Candace CrawfordMember; finance subcommitteeMoves the ESSER modular motion (1:30:34) and the FY25 budget motion (2:23:10); thanks CCTV for televising the finance meetings (1:53:14).
Jennifer GallagherMember; curriculum committee chairArrived 6:39 p.m. (minutes). Argues for locating The Academy at River Valley Community College (1:32:34). The dialogue file also labels her the voice that moves the amendment at 1:39:58; the minutes record Whitney Skillen as mover and Gallagher as seconder (see flag 6).
Arlene HawkinsMember (also SAU 6 board chair)Named in the roll call (0:00:47). The dialogue file gives her the “retired educator” remark (0:30:55) and the grade-two score question (1:02:44); the minutes credit that question to Bonnie Miles.
Bonnie MilesMemberPresent (minutes). No row of the dialogue file carries her name. The minutes credit her with asking about score differences between schools.
Whitney SkillenMember; policy subcommittee chairPresent (minutes). No row carries her name. The minutes record her as mover of the amendment to the modular motion.
Unidentified board memberSeated member (Miles or Skillen; not determinable from the recording)Recalls attorney Matt Upton's square-footage advice (1:41:46); asks whether the $420,000 should offset the revaluation (2:06:50); recalls the board retreat's goals (2:24:02).
Noelle KronbergSchool board clerkCalls the roll (0:00:37); reads back the amended motion (1:49:20, 1:50:28). Signs the minutes.
Nicole Bouchard; Kylee PlummerStudent board membersAbsent (minutes: “Not present”).
Chris PrattInterim Superintendent, SAU 6 (appointed 1/11/24), still Stevens High School principalSuperintendent's report on middle-school teaching loads and the seven-period schedule (0:06:40); speaks “as being the principal at the high school” on The Academy (1:09:43); warns of hidden costs in rented space and favors an ESSER-funded modular (1:19:24).
Mike KoskiAssistant SuperintendentCurriculum cycle and fall benchmark data (0:44:35).
Kat McLaughlinCurriculum Director (minutes spell it Cat)Instructional coaching and 2023-24 initiatives (0:50:06).
Mary HenryBusiness AdministratorPresents the FY25 budget, default-budget gap and tax-rate effects (1:58:58).
Ben NesterDirector of Special EducationAcademy location options and recommendations (1:13:28, 1:23:50).
Alex HerzogDirector, Sugar River Valley Regional Technical CenterSpace at the tech center and the risk to renovation funding of a non-CTE program in the building (1:41:05, 1:42:32); recounts the former superintendent refusing a memorandum of understanding (1:45:01).
Lee MulloyLead teacher, The Academy (dialogue file: Lee Malloy)Program data review (1:04:38). The minutes and Exhibit A spell the name Mulloy.
Courtney PorterSchool social worker; McKinney-Vento liaisonPresentation on school social work (0:12:22).
Rick ElliottInstructional coach, Stevens High SchoolPresentation on coaching (0:32:26).
Shawn McCarthyCitizens' comments, Ward 1 (dialogue file: Sean McCarthy)Urges an internal-only superintendent search (0:03:00). The minutes spell the first name Shawn.

Agenda

The posted agenda (Drive, uploaded the afternoon of the meeting) lists the items below. At the start the chair moved item IV.3 to the front of the action items without objection, and the order on tape then ran IV.3, IV.2, IV.1, IV.4.

Official agenda items, the time each was taken up, and its disposition per the recording and the approved minutes.
Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:01I. Call to orderAgenda: “6:30 PM Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance”.
0:00:34II. Roll callOnly two names survive the transcript (Whitney, Hawkins). Minutes: present Whitney, Miles, Skillen, Hawkins, Crawford, Gallagher (6:39); absent Sprague.
0:00:51Consent agenda: agenda amendments; minutes of January 3, 2024Agenda marks it “vote required”. The chair asks for objection to moving item three to item one, then: “Is there any request to alter or amend the minutes from January 3rd, 2024? Seeing none” and declares them accepted (0:01:16). No vote was called. Minutes: “No amendments, minutes accepted”.
0:01:50Citizens' commentsThree minutes per speaker, clerk keeping time. One speaker (Shawn McCarthy, Ward 1). The chair asks “Anyone else?” (0:05:57) and closes the period about four minutes after opening it.
0:06:04Student board member reportNot given: “I do not see that we have any student board member representatives present tonight”.
0:06:40III. Superintendent reportPratt on Claremont Middle School teaching loads (averaging “a little past 100” students a year) and a request to hold off on a seven-period schedule. Chair: “So we do not need to vote on this” (0:11:02).
0:11:30IV.3 Impact of teaching coaches and social workers (moved to first)Discussion only. Courtney Porter (0:11:30) and Rick Elliott (0:31:43) explain the two positions the FY25 budget adds.
0:43:38IV.2 Update on student achievement data (Exhibit C)Discussion only. Koski and McLaughlin on the curriculum cycle and fall benchmarks.
1:04:08IV.1 Update on alternative program; vote on 2024-25 location (Exhibits A and B)Crawford moves to “use Esser funds to, to purchase a modular unit for the use of the for the academy” (1:30:34); the chair seconds (1:31:29). Amendment (fallback to the tech center for one year if the modular is not ready) moved at 1:39:58; voice vote on the amendment at 1:49:57, no count. Amended motion: “Motion passes unanimously” (1:50:53). Minutes: amendment moved by Whitney Skillen, seconded by Jennifer Gallagher; both votes “unanimously approved”.
1:51:20IV.4 Budget approval (Exhibits D and E)Agenda named Frank Sprague as presenter; he was absent and Whitney, Crawford and Henry presented. Crawford moves “The school board approve a budget for fiscal year 25 of $36,117,406.87” (2:23:10); no second is audible on the transcript (minutes: seconded by Whitney). Voice vote: “Budget passes. Budget is approved” (2:25:07); minutes: “unanimously approved”.
Not taken upIV.5 School board sub-committeesNo subcommittee reports on the recording; the minutes repeat the agenda headings with no entries.
2:25:25V. Other businessChair seeks consensus for an extra session before the deliberative session; settled on January 24 at 6:00 at the Dow (see flag 2). Minutes record Other Business as none, but they record the working session under the budget item.
2:29:06VI. Future datesCandidacy filing January 24 to February 2; warrants and budget posted by January 29; deliberative session February 3, 9 a.m., Stevens High School, snow date February 10.
2:29:40IX. AdjournmentBy consent (“Seeing. No objection. Meeting is adjourned.”). Minutes: 8:59 p.m.

Discussion timeline

Times are taken from the dialogue transcript (Dialogue/15531 SchoolBoard011724.mp4.CSV) and link into the recording. Quotations are the transcript as it stands, including its errors.

Chronological topics with what was said. Hover or focus a cell to expand it.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:03:00Public comment: superintendent searchShawn McCarthy, Ward 1, calls the departed superintendent “a trunk slammer that he packed his picnic basket, and he came to our community a few hours each week” and asks the board, “instead of paying a big chunk of money” for a search, to limit applicants to people who “have worked in the school district for a whole year in the last, say, seven years”. He names “Pratt here, just got appointed” and Herzog as examples.
0:06:04Welcome to the interim superintendentThe chair welcomes “Mr. Pratt to his first school board meeting as interim superintendent”, describing him as an administrator “who has been a superintendent for eight years” who can lead “through this tumultuous time”. Pratt says it is “my second full day” (0:08:06).
0:06:40Middle-school teaching loads and schedulePratt revisits figures Superintendent Tempesta had presented: individual content teachers carry 94 to 114 students a year, averaging “a little past 100”; unified-arts numbers look higher because students rotate quarterly (“Music can technically see 295 students in a year”). He asks to put “the seventh period schedule on the back burner”. The chair: “We can give Mr. Pratt the executive authority to operate and make those schedule as he sees fit” (0:11:02); an unidentified voice asks whether it has budget implications (0:11:14).
0:11:38Why the coaches and social worker are presentingThe chair: “We're trying to add an additional social worker and an instructional coach”, so the board can hear “how they are able to improve academic achievement”.
0:12:22School social work (Courtney Porter)Porter, the district's school social worker since 2013 and McKinney-Vento liaison, reports homeless-student counts “from 51 to 78 this year. We're at 50” (0:19:20), mostly doubled-up families; describes the building suicide-prevention liaison process created under “Senate Bill 282” (0:17:32) using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale; and says social work written into IEPs and 504 plans “can actually be a moneymaker for us as a district because we can build Medicaid” (0:25:26). Crawford and Hawkins thank her (0:30:06, 0:30:55).
0:32:26Instructional coaching (Rick Elliott)Elliott, Stevens class of 1992, says “I'm named in the Claremont lawsuit against the funding of education” (0:32:56); after 26 years at Fall Mountain he coaches at Stevens: “We have 41 instructors at Stevens High School. I meet with 38 of them every week for at least 30 minutes” (0:34:59). He then runs a live questioning demonstration using Mary Henry, Lee Mulloy and Crawford as students.
0:44:35Curriculum cycle and benchmarks (Koski)A curriculum renewal schedule that “we may or may not be able to keep”; fall reading and math benchmarks show strong early grades with a decline “as we go through those grades” (0:59:29). Asked why grade-two results differ by school, Koski says each school has about two classrooms, “pretty small numbers” (1:03:00).
0:50:06Curriculum director's initiativesMcLaughlin describes job-embedded coaching, Teach United, outside consultants in math practices and classroom management, accountable talk, ELA program implementation and a teacher newsletter. The chair links the second coach to covering the elementary schools (0:57:18).
1:04:38The Academy: program data (Lee Mulloy)Twelve students (data on ten): course failure from “a 65% of fail and rate” to 3% (1:05:32); suspensions “last year there was 59 suspensions. And this year there has been three” (1:07:19); behavior log entries 137 last year, 18 this year (1:07:45). Two seniors are on track to graduate (1:09:02).
1:09:43The Academy: high-school viewPratt, speaking “as being the principal at the high school”: “I've never seen so much progress in a program in such a short time” (1:11:03).
1:13:28Location options and recommendations (Nester)River Valley Community College is open to a partnership; Riverview Charter School has no space; off-campus rentals from “$56,000 annually” (1:14:49) to single offices. Recommendations: maintain funding, keep The Academy at the tech center one more year, partner with the Visioning Committee, a proposal to the board by December (1:24:12). Exhibit A puts the deadline at Dec. 1, 2024 and says the tech-center option has “no impact on renovation funding” (quoted from Exhibit A).OBS
1:19:24Hidden costs of rentals; modularPratt, from Bellows Falls experience: rented buildings bring “astronomical hidden costs”, code, asbestos, lead paint and ADA work, plus security problems; a modular bought “if you use the the Esser funds” avoids future lease costs (1:21:10). Herzog: per “what Mr. Upton talk to us about, being outside the building would not be in conflict” (1:23:35).OBS
1:27:00Space for health science and pre-KHerzog: room for the health-science program depends on pre-K leaving the building and on shrinking adult education's two upstairs classrooms (1:27:28). The chair confirms the budget moves pre-K into the elementary schools (1:28:14).
1:30:34Motion: ESSER-funded modular for The AcademyCrawford moves; the chair: “we still need to get everything approved through SR and things of that nature” (1:30:56) and “I'll second the motion” (1:31:29). Crawford: “The SR funds are only available until September 24th” (1:31:37); buying the unit lets the district keep it “in perpetuity” (1:32:08).OBS
1:32:34River Valley alternativeGallagher (by the dialogue file's label): River Valley rents classrooms at a nonprofit rate and wants a low-cost partnership, so locating The Academy there may be “the best option on the table”. Mulloy on the program's earlier time at the college: students liked it, but proximity to services matters (1:34:58).
1:39:58Amendment: one-year fallback at the tech centerThe voice the dialogue file labels Gallagher: “I'd like to amend.” “Candy's motion to put in the, the caveat that if the modular unit for the Academy cannot be made ready in time” for 2024-25, the program stays one more year at the tech center. An unidentified member: “Second that amended motion” (1:40:28). The minutes name Whitney Skillen as mover and Gallagher as seconder.OBS
1:41:05Renovation-funding riskHerzog: attorney Upton “couldn't say either way” whether the program affects funding; “The state could say, no, you're not using this section in this section for CTE purposes”. “I'm just a letter of the law kind of guy. And the and the statement for the RSA specifically it should be exclusively for CTE” (1:42:32).OBS
1:45:01The memorandum that was refusedHerzog: the state (“Jeff Beard”, a name the corpus also spells Baird) told him to seek a one-year memorandum of understanding for an earlier life-skills program, “But Mr. Tempesta said, this is my building. We're not doing that. I'm not doing a memo.” (1:45:25). The board agrees an MOU will be drawn up (minutes: “Will draw up an MOU”).OBS
1:49:20Amended motion read back; votesThe clerk reads the amendment (1:49:20); voice vote on the amendment (1:49:57); clerk reads the full motion: “utilize the Esser funds to purchase a modular classroom for the academy, with the caveat that if the modular unit is not ready for the start of the 2425 school year” (1:50:28). “Motion passes unanimously” (1:50:53). No count was announced; six members were present.
1:51:20Finance subcommittee overviewThe chair: “Our finance subcommittee meetings were videotaped and televised live” (1:51:47). Additions: one district-wide instructional coach, one district-wide elementary social worker (three were requested), and the health-science program (1:52:46). Crawford thanks “the CCTV and Josh Nelson”: “I think we had 5 or 6 meetings. 2 to 3 hours each” (1:53:14), and notes FY25 is “the first year, after three years, that we will not have Esser funding” (1:54:14).POS
1:58:58Default budget and increaseHenry: “our budget is 210,633 over default”; up “3.55% over last year's, or that is roughly 1.2 million”, but higher revenues mean “852,000 of that would be added on to the tax rate” (2:00:34). Exhibit E: FY24 appropriated $34,880,311.72, FY25 proposed $36,117,406.87, increase $1,237,095.15.
2:00:34The $420,000 held from fund balanceHenry: “In 23 we had 1.7 million in fund balance. Last year we had 736. Now, out of that 1.7, the board chose to hold 426,000. This year they've chosen to hold 420,000.” It was held because “we're still in the process of being audited” (2:01:30). She recommends releasing it to cut the tax impact: “even if we don't do it, it's going to go back to them in November because you can't hold it for more than that year” (2:07:29). Minutes: “will have to hold a public hearing”.OBS OBS
2:04:02Revaluation and the tax rateHenry: residential values rose about 42% against 23% for commercial, shifting the tax burden; estimated increase of 69 cents per thousand, or about $35.21 per $100,000 if the $420,000 is used (2:09:32). Adequacy aid up about 3.8%; state sources up about $519,000 (2:10:31).
2:11:55Cost drivers and staffing changesTeacher contract year two 573,000, administrators' year three 51,000, paraprofessionals' year three 109,000. Every paraprofessional “is here because there's an IEP” (2:12:29). Middle school goes from 25 to 24 teaching FTE through attrition (2:13:25). The ESL teacher moved to account 1260 (“The state requires it be in 1260”, 2:16:19); substitutes cut by 125,000 (2:16:47).
2:21:39ESSER cliffHenry: salaries cannot be funded from ESSER “because they end in September of 24” (2:21:54). The chair: ESSER-funded staff “knew that they were coming out” (2:22:24).OBS
2:23:10FY25 budget motion and voteCrawford moves $36,117,406.87. Asked when the $420,000 would show, Henry: “That'll be in your revenues? It won't be part of the budget” (2:23:47). Voice vote: “Budget passes. Budget is approved” (2:25:07).
2:25:34Extra session before the deliberative sessionThe chair proposes the finance committee and administrators meet “to kind of put our heads together” and assign the deliberative presentation (2:25:47). Gallagher will be away: “Or I can call in if that's all right” (2:27:37). The chair: “We could do that would be a work session. We wouldn't need to do it in this formal setting.” and “There be no votes taken or anything like that” (2:27:51). Settled on the 24th at 6:00 at the Dow.MED
2:29:14Election calendarFiling period January 24 to February 2; “January 29th is the last day for us to post warrant and budget”; deliberative session February 3, 9 a.m., Stevens High School.

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer's aid, not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each names the rule it rests on, as that rule read on January 17, 2024. Verify against the recording and the primary sources before relying on any of them.

MEDIUM Draft minutes reached the public share four weeks after the meeting

RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to be “open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting” (statute text); for a Wednesday, January 17 meeting that is Wednesday, January 24, 2024. The draft minutes appear in the district's Drive share only inside the next meeting's packet folder (4. CSB 2.21.24): Drive records the file as created 2024-02-14 at 21:09 UTC and last modified the same afternoon (20:45 UTC), so the modification date does not show an earlier version. That is about twenty business days. Severity follows the project's rule for missing records: the minutes exist, the meeting was noticed and packeted, and the share date shows when the public could see them online, not whether a paper copy was available at the SAU office, so this is MEDIUM rather than HIGH. The same pattern (minutes posted only when the next packet is assembled) affects the January 3 minutes approved at this meeting.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2023 codification, in force from Oct. 3, 2023; minutes within 5 business days); draft minutes CSB meeting 1.17.24 (1).pdf (Drive metadata read 2026-10-03)

MEDIUM A board session was planned as an informal “work session” with phone participation

At 2:27:39 the chair described the extra session as one that “would be a work session. We wouldn't need to do it in this formal setting”, with “no votes taken”, and agreed Gallagher could call in. Under RSA 91-A:2, I a meeting is the convening of a quorum to discuss or act on a matter within the body's jurisdiction; the statute's four exclusions do not include a work session, and the purpose stated here (assigning the board's deliberative presentation and preparing answers to public questions) is board business. Remote participation is allowed under RSA 91-A:2, III(a) only when attendance “is not reasonably practical” (statute text), with the reason stated in the minutes. The approved minutes record the plan as “January 24th at 6:00 at Dow (working session)”. The only surviving record of that session is a set of minutes dated January 29, 2024, filed in the 2/21/24 packet, which assigns slides to members and directs a motion to restrict reconsideration but gives no attendance, times or location; no notice, agenda or recording has been located. That session is outside this page; the flag is the plan as stated on the record here.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, I, II and III(a) (2023 codification; meeting defined; 24-hour notice; remote participation); Minutes from CSB working session 1.29.24 (1).pdf

OBSERVATION The business administrator says prior years' audits were still open

Explaining why the board held back fund balance, Mary Henry said at 2:01:30 “we're still in the process of being audited”, that she had done the DOE-25 and straightened out FY23, and “I still think that 22 and 21st May fall” (transcript as it stands; the sense appears to be that FY2022 and FY2021 figures may still change). Federal rules require a single audit for any year in which a district spends $750,000 or more in federal awards (the FY2021 to FY2023 threshold), submitted within the earlier of 30 days after the auditor's report or “nine months after the end of the audit period” (regulation text); for a July to June year ending June 30, 2022 that was March 31, 2023. The district was spending ESSER money in those years, so the threshold was very likely met, but this recording does not say which years' audits were unissued or whether reporting packages were filed. The Federal Audit Clearinghouse record for the district would settle it. RSA 21-J:19 governs state-side audits and is permissive as to timing.

Sources: 2 CFR 200.512(a)(1), 2023 edition (due nine months after period end); 2 CFR 200.501 (single audit at $750,000 for fiscal years before Oct. 1, 2024); RSA 21-J:19 (audits; permissive)

OBSERVATION ESSER money voted for a modular classroom before any approval

The board voted at 1:50:53 to “utilize the Esser funds to purchase a modular classroom for the academy” (clerk's reading). The chair said at 1:30:56 that “we still need to get everything approved through SR” and that “they're really scrutinizing construction projects”. Under the 2023 Uniform Guidance, capital expenditures for buildings are unallowable as direct charges “except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity” (regulation text), here the NH Department of Education. Crawford gave the deadline as “September 24th” (1:31:37); the U.S. Department of Education's date is that ARP ESSER funds “must be obligated by September 30, 2024” (ED memo). The vote is lawful as an expression of intent; whether approval was sought and obtained, and whether the unit was obligated in time, is not in this record. The amendment's fallback (one more year at the tech center) covers the case where it was not.

Sources: 2 CFR 200.439(b)(1), 2023 edition (capital expenditures need prior written approval); U.S. Department of Education, ARP ESSER and EANS obligation deadlines (obligate by Sept. 30, 2024)

OBSERVATION A non-CTE program in a state-aided CTE building, without the memorandum the state asked for

RSA 188-E:3, II, as it read in January 2024, makes a state-aided regional center facility district property “for use by the career and technical education center exclusively” (statute text). The tech center's director raised exactly this at 1:42:32 and said attorney Upton “couldn't say either way” whether housing The Academy there affects renovation funding (1:41:05); Exhibit A states the opposite conclusion (“no impact on renovation funding”, quoted from Exhibit A) without giving a source. Herzog also said the state had advised a one-year memorandum of understanding two years earlier and the former superintendent refused it (1:45:25). The board's amended motion keeps the tech center as the fallback location for 2024-25, and the minutes record that an MOU will be drawn up. No state ruling is in the record either way, so this is an observation: the open legal question is the state's view of temporary non-CTE use, which an Education Department letter or the MOU would settle.

Sources: RSA 188-E:3, II (2023 codification; source note ends 2021, 210:2; exclusive CTE use); Exhibit A-The Academy @ SHS (1).pdf

OBSERVATION Minutes and recording disagree on who moved and seconded the amendment

RSA 91-A:2, II requires that “The names of the members who made or seconded each motion shall be recorded in the minutes” (statute text). The approved minutes do name them: the amendment was moved by Whitney Skillen and seconded by Jennifer Gallagher. On the recording, the voice that says “Can I make the amendment?” at 1:39:58 is the one the dialogue file labels Gallagher, and the second comes from an unidentified member (1:40:28). The dialogue file's labels come from voice clustering, which merges voices on this recording, so the minutes may be right; but if the transcript label is right, the minutes reverse mover and seconder. A similar mismatch: the minutes credit Bonnie Miles with the question about score differences between schools, which the dialogue file labels Arlene Hawkins (1:02:44). Neither Miles nor Skillen is named anywhere on the recording. The budget motion's second (Whitney, per the minutes) is not audible in the transcript. The minutes are treated as authoritative on this page; the disagreement is reported so a reader can check the video.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (mover and seconder recorded in minutes; in force since Jan. 1, 2019); approved minutes 1.17.24

OBSERVATION The legal basis for holding $420,000 is not stated

Henry said at 2:00:34 that the board “chose to hold 426,000” of FY23 fund balance and “This year they've chosen to hold 420,000”, and at 2:07:29 that “you can't hold it for more than that year”. The statute that lets a New Hampshire district keep year-end unassigned funds, RSA 198:4-b, II, requires that the legislative body first authorize retention, caps the total at 5 percent of net assessment, and says “Prior to expending retained general funds, the school board shall hold a prior public hearing” with 7 days' newspaper notice (statute text). It sets no one-year limit. The minutes record that using the money “will have to hold a public hearing”, which matches the statute; but the recording does not say whether the $420,000 is RSA 198:4-b, II money or simply surplus the board chose not to apply to the tax rate. The audited fund-balance note (GASB 54 classification) or the district's retention warrant article would settle it.

Sources: RSA 198:4-b, II and II(a) (2023 codification; source note ends 2020, 38:25; 5% cap; hearing before expending); GASB Statement 54, paragraphs 6 to 17 (fund-balance classes)

POSITIVE Finance subcommittee budget sessions were televised live

The chair said at 1:51:47 that the finance subcommittee's budget meetings “were videotaped and televised live”, and Crawford counted “5 or 6 meetings. 2 to 3 hours each” (1:53:14). RSA 91-A requires notice and minutes for a subcommittee, not video. Broadcasting and archiving every working session exceeds that minimum and is what lets this project reconstruct the FY25 budget's development. Disclosure: the broadcaster thanked here is Claremont Community Television (CCTV) / Claremont Community Media Center (CCMC), which publishes these pages; see the footer.

Sources: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) (subcommittees are public bodies); RSA 91-A:2, II (notice and minutes are the statutory minimum)

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws, rules and standards cited on this page